Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WBN049
WBN049
systems
Tutorial – WG B1.61
2023
Table of contents
▪ Introduction
The work includes the revision (where applicable) to construction techniques and installation techniques
which mean, as previously defined into TB 194, are as follows:
• Construction technique: Technique used to create the cable route, mainly covering the civil works such as
trenching.
• Installation technique: The installation method used (basically air and buried installations) in relationship with
the cable design and the associated cable design issues.
The scope of work covers extruded and self-contained fluid filled cable systems. Submarine cables are not
included in the scope of this WG.
Chapter 1
Design data
Elements for the design of a successful link
• The life of a cable link can generally be divided into the following stages;
• Clear understanding by the asset owner and the installer of the performance requirements of the link including life
expectancy;
• Selection of a viable route between the terminal points that allows for the most efficient use of resources and the
least disruption to all other affected stakeholders such as the public;
• Identify all possible points along the route that may have an impact on circuit rating;
• Early engagement of third party stakeholders so that everyone, including other utilities come along for the ride;
• Once the preliminary route is selected, trial excavations to be performed for thermal resistivity tests and ground
temperature measurements (these are often performed at the same time as identifying other major service
locations);
• Design of special crossings (such as bridges, roads or rivers);
• Production of a robust cable/accessory/installation specifications;
• Selection of a competent supplier and involvement in the manufacturing and testing process;
• Adequate involvement/supervision during the installation and testing;
• Finally, maintain the link in accordance with the manufacturers recommendations.
• The design must also ensure the link is maintainable (e.g. link boxes in accessible locations).
Preliminary study
How to go from A to B?
A L1 R1
C1
L2 C2 R2
flooded
area
L3 C3
R3
river
C4
national
park
C5 bridges
R4
hill
C6
L4
L5 C7
B R5
Preliminary study
▪ Methodology
✓ Data collection:
Electrical
• Voltage, Ampacity, Load curve, Cable working temperature during operation
• Short circuit/Fault level and duration, Impulse level, Touch and step voltages
• Cost of kWh, cost of losses
• Estimated length of the link
Environmental
• Type of soil, Soil temperature, Maximum soil temperature at burial depth
• Soil resistivity, density, moisture content, Frost depth
• Environmental hazards (earthquake, flood, …)
✓ Process
• Selection of cables and accessories among available types
Preliminary study
▪ Design
• Cable cross section and material
• Earthing method
• Number of cables per phase and, for HVDC, number of cables per pole and earth return
method (cable, electrodes)
✓ Soil
• Stability, Hardness, Thermal and Electrical Resistivity, Seismicity, Drying out,
Temperature, Frost, Archaeology etc.
➔ In each section, review of possible different civil work techniques that may be required
Chapter 2
Construction Techniques
(percentage of usage taken by last survey)
Ducts (50%)
Ducts (50%)
Ducts (50%)
PROS CONS
The civil work is completely “De-coupled” from the cable pulling and Cable failures or jacket faults are more difficult to locate with
splicing work leading to less nuisance conventional tools because of a partial insulation from ground
Cables are well protected from dig-ins (especially with the use of The ducts must be well assembled, clean and as straight as possible
concrete) in order to prevent excessive pulling tensions.
Cheaper to install than a tunnel The cables can be replaced through The ducts must be evenly lubricated in order to prevent excessive
most conditions including temperatures below freezing point. pulling tensions
Application
This technique is a “main” installation technique as opposed to a special crossing technique which is
designed to avoid obstacles. This technique is best suited for the following situations:
• Urbanized areas (under streets, sidewalks, etc…)
• Under or in the vicinity of roads (as opposed to highway) crossings
• In all areas where an easy cable removal is requested
Direct burial (17%)
Direct burial (17%)
Direct burial (17%)
PROS CONS
Fastest installation technique The trench must remain open until all cables are pulled and is a
longer nuisance compared to other installation modes
Least expensive installation technique The cables must be readily available once the trench is ready (i.e.,
construction schedule coordination)
Cable failures or jacket faults are easier to locate with fault locating The backfilling and compacting around the cables must be carried
apparatus out with extreme caution
Higher permitted cable ampacity compared to air filled duct banks Cables could be more vulnerable to dig-ins depending on the
for the same cable design and axial distance between cables protective slab design and materials used
Cables are more vulnerable to earthquakes
It is difficult to remove the cables from the ground for replacement
or after the cable useful life
The ampacity needed for the link may lead to bigger cross sections
due possible limitations on the temperature at the contact cable-soil
to avoid any soil drying out
Application
This technique is a “main” installation technique as opposed to a special crossing technique which is
designed to avoid a special obstacle. This technique is best suited for the following areas:
• Agricultural areas • Rural areas
• Sparsely urbanized areas • Highway or Railroad right of ways (if owner approves)
Tunnels (21%)
Open cut technique
Tunnels (21%)
Shielded technique
Tunnels (21%)
LIMITS OF TECHNIQUE
Air temperature: ventilation may be needed
In some cases, air conditioning and/or water cooling
Water drainage: water collection and possibly treatment is needed
Seismicity: more resistant to earthquakes than other techniques
Work duration: very long
Easy for maintenance
Considered as flexible installation (festoon or snaking) or rigid installation (straight)
Troughs(12%)
Buried - Filled
Troughs(12%)
Surface - Filled
Troughs(12%)
Surface - Unfilled
Troughs(12%)
PROS CONS
Buried troughs
Cables are well protected from dig-ins The trench and trough must remain open until all cables are pulled
and is a longer nuisance compared to other installation modes
Cables are less vulnerable to earthquakes as their pathway is more The cables must be readily available once the trough is ready
rigid
Cable failures or jacket faults are easier to locate with fault locating The cables can be difficult to remove from the ground after their
apparatus when the trough is backfilled compared with duct / duct useful life.
banks installations.
Surface or above ground troughs
Cables are protected from manual aggression Cables remain vulnerable to vandalism (lockable lids could be used
to prevent these actions)
The cables can easily be removed from the trough after their useful Cables in metallic trays can overheat due to direct sunlight exposure
life
The troughs are susceptible to move upwards in areas with freezing
temperatures
Application
This technique is a “main” installation technique as opposed to a special crossing technique which is
designed to avoid obstacles. This technique is typically used within secure locations such as the perimeter
of substations or generating stations. Some electricity companies are also using troughs into sandy areas,
along railways or highways or into tunnels where the public access is normally restricted.
Bridges and Viaducts
Dedicated bridges and viaducts
• Cost
Risks
• Damage of other services, No warning
Pipe Jacking
Pipe jacking is generally referred to as “microtunnelling” below 1.2 metre diameter
In each section
• Identification of the sizing requirement
• Checking of the cable design and ampacity (phase spacing, installation depth, backfill materials)
• Calculate impact of other cables in close proximity on the installation and on the assets of others.
If necessary, modification of
• Cable cross section
• Earthing method
• Cable design
Installation design
• Choice of a Civil Technique
Considerations
• Site prejudice
• Site duration, site working time
• Site access (size and weight of drums and tools according to transportation facilities and regulations)
• Magnetic field
• Laying technique
• Maintenance and repair of system and associated costs
• Cable removal
• Construction cost
• Site prejudice cost
• Operation cost and link non availability cost
➔ Choice of a technique for each section needs to be considered with consideration given to the cost
and safety aspects.
Installation design
• Cable Installation
2. Flexible systems
• Free to move , requiring the installation of horizontal or vertical deflection known as snaking
3. Cable in ducts
• In ducts, the cable installation could be rigid or flexible depending on:
• The ratio duct inner diameter / cable outer diameter
• The filling
• The blocking at the duct extremities
Installation design
1. RIGID SYSTEMS
Cleat spacing
• The cable thrust < the critical load
• This depends on the sheath (thick or thin)
Installation design
2. FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS
This system allows for expansion longitudinally and
laterally
• Initially installed in a sinusoidal formation
• Movements should be controlled
• Thrusts are low
De2
l (m)
65 W
• Horizontal plane
De
l= (m)
20
Installation design
FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS (3/3) (Japanese approach)
• Vertical plane
Vertical snaking calculations
Unfilled ducts
1. Large diameter duct (1.5 to 2 times the cable diameter)
• Considered as flexible installation
• Natural snaking takes place inside the duct
• Low thrust forces at accessories
R
Pulling tension T2
R
• Cable weight
• Length of section T3
• Coefficient of friction
• Angle
• Bend radius
Installation Design - Cable Lay
1. Backfill
1. Nose pulling
• Using winch with pulling hawser connected at cable nose
2. Synchronised power drive rollers
• Multiple powered rollers at regular intervals. Difficult to synchronise
3. Caterpillar
• Pushing force directly onto cable outer sheath
4. Bond pulling
• Using a bond wire tied to the cable at regular intervals
External Aspects
THE FOLLOWING CONSIDERATIONS NEED TO BE MADE:
• The location: whether urban or rural
• Right of way or easement requirements for the width of the cable system and whether
additional construction widths are required
• The impact of magnetic fields and cable arrangements to mitigate effects
• The crossing of other of utilities assets including:
• Electrical cables
• District heating
• Telecommunications
• Steel gas and fuel mains
• Trees
• Railways
• Other utilities
• Protection of the environment from a system fault
• The cable system from a mechanical aggression
• Protection during works
• Protection during maintenance
Chapter 4
Hazards Caused by
Inappropriate Civil
Works or Installation
Design
Hazard caused by inappropriate civil works or installation design
Some Examples of Inappropriate Civil Work or Installation Design or installation mistakes
• Pipe ovalization/deformity
• Concrete or fluidized backfill intrusion into ducts
• Bad duct jointing
• Wrong cleating pitch
• Lifting by thrust of lids
• Inappropriate bending radius
• Buckling of cable
• Bad backfill compaction
• Fire hazard
• Excessive load bearing pressure
• Shallow installations
• Cable system installations which do not meet national legal requirements
• Accessory failures due to poor jointer training/selection
• Poor link box assembly causing internal flashover or wrong internal electrical connection
Hazard caused by inappropriate civil works or installation design
Some Examples of Inadeqaute Safety Considerations
• Scaffolding collapse
• Risk when working close to big machines
• Risk of being hit by falling materials
• Risk of falling into excavations
• Safety incidents (induced voltage)
• Interface failures or delays due to mismatch of components or designs
• Trench collapse
• Cable run-away during pulling on steep inclines
• Jointer loss of life due to SF6 suffocation
• Poor labelling hazard resulting in disconnection of live equipment earthing
• Poor link box assembly causing internal flashover
Copyright © 2023
Copyright &
Disclaimer notice Disclaimer notice