Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lesson 2 Modes of Assessment
Lesson 2 Modes of Assessment
Introduction
There are several good reasons to consider offering a variety of assessment methods. Students need
to understand concepts deeply, as opposed to memorize information and reproduce it on an exam, so they can
handle advanced course work and later work effectively in their chosen field. Students have diverse abilities,
backgrounds, interests, and learning styles, so assessment variety puts all students on a level playing field in
terms of demonstrating what they know and can do Students need to be able to apply knowledge in authentic
learning and assessment activities to develop the skills necessary for work in their chosen field. Thus, there is
no best single assessment method that will capsulize all competencies.
Course Outcome: explain the basic concepts and principles in educational assessment;
Strengths:
a) Can cover a lot of material,
b) Fair – they will answer same sets of questions,
c) Effective in assessing declarative knowledge of content,
d.) Easier to score/ administer than performance assessments
Weaknesses:
a) Time consuming to prepare,
b) Easy for students to cheat, guess or bluff,
c) Encourages rote memory than deep understanding,
d) Less effective in assessing procedural knowledge and creative thinking,
e) Construction of good higher level recognition items is difficult
2. ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENT (All Methods except Objective Paper and Pencil test)
It require to create/perform a response and this measures the skills or competence directly
Also known as performance test
Performance-Based Assessment
-It requires actual demonstration of skills or creation of products or both.
-Either Process/Performance base or Product base or both
-Used if specific behavioral outcome are to be observed
Strengths
a) - It can assess complex learning targets that CANNOT be measured by OBJECTIVE test,
b) - It elicits HOTS and other domains of learning,
c) - Effective for assessing application of knowledge, skill and procedural learning, creative learning,
d) - it can evaluate both the process and the product,
e) - Focuses also in doing, not only knowing and
f) May utilize group dynamics
Weaknesses
a) - Time consuming to administer and to score,
b) - Hard to score fairly, scoring may be bias,
c) - Availability of resources/facilities/materials,
d) - Additional Cost is inevitable,
d) - Learners may not create their own products/projects,
e) - Effectivity of Group dynamics is crucial and
f) - It is burdensome to create/prepare for students