Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evans 1990
Evans 1990
Evans 1990
ABSTRACT
A study has been made of the nucleation and growth of thin microcrystalline
films of Cu,Au,Pt,Ni prepared by ion-beam sputtering. In-situ measurements of
the film resistance during deposition have been analysed in terms of percolation
theory for the early, discontinuous, phase and thin film, grain boundary,
scattering for the quasi—continuous phase. This analysis yields values of the
percolation threshold, fractional coverage and lateral grain dimensions, for
different deposition rates, which are compared with the corresponding values
obtained from direct observations and soft X—ray multilayers reflection spectra.
The minimum thickness of the metallic nuclei is shown to be four atom layers.
1 . INTRODUCTION
In lBS a stream of inert gas ions/excited atoms from a self contained gag
discharge (ion-gun) is directed onto a target at an angle of incidence of 60
(to the normal) . Sputtered target atoms are deposited on a substrate which is
vertically above the target and out of line of sight of the ion-gun. The
deposition chamber is continuously pumped so that the dynamic inert gas pressure
within the chamber is maintained at 10 ' torr.
which is 100 x less than that
required to maintain the discharge within the ion-gun.
For a given target material the sputtering rate, hence deposition rate,
depends upon the ion—gun operating parameters such as the dc HT voltage and the
ion—current. Providing these parameters are closely controlled the deposition
rate can be maintained constant over a long period of time. In order to measure
the deposition rate for a given material it is necessary to measure the thickness
t of films of the material prepared for different deposition times T. The
thickness of films having t3nm can be measured from the Talystep trace across
the film 'edge' but for smaller values of t it is necessary to employ a soft
X—ray interferometric technique (see later). Once the deposition rate of a given
material has been established the film thickness t is known at any time T and this
2 . EXPERIMENTAL METHOD
The thin film deposition rate of metal M (M = Cu,Au,Pt,Ni) was found from
Talystep measurements on single films (t>3nm) and from the Bragg reflection
maxima observed in M/C multilayers at wavelength X = O.834nm. For such a
multilayer reflection maxima are observed at glancing angle of incidence where
where d = t1+ t2 is the multilayer periodicity and =Yi (1-y)c52, S being the
refractive index decrement, and y = t1/d. The metal M thickness t1 is determined
from equation (1) since the C layer thickness t2 is known from a previously
determined deposition rate. Figure 1 gives, as example, the reflection spectrum
of a 5 1 /50 Ni/C multilayer in which t1 = 1 Qnm , t2 1 .25nm . From measurements
on a series of multilayers 'of different t1 (M layer deposition times) the M layer
deposition rate was determined for different ion-gun HT voltages in the range
1.6 to 2.6 kV. The deposition rates for the extremes of HT voltages used are given
in Table I. In the measurements described here the ion—gun current was kept
constant at 220m amp.
The physical structure of the single M film was determined from transmission
electron microscope (TEM) measurements on single films of known t deposited on
carbon coated EM grids . The crystallographic structure of the films was determined
from the associated electron diffraction patterns.
The dc resistance R of the M films was measured during deposition using a
Keithley 617 programmable electrometer. Prior to deposition two conducting silver
electrodes, separation 3±0.2mm, were painted on the glass substrate surface.
The film was deposited through the rectangular aperture in a mask, held in close
proximity to the substrate surface, to form a strip 3mm wide which overcoated
both electrodes and the substrate region between. Resistance R measurements
were made at is intervals during the early stages of deposition and at 30s
intervals after the onset of continuous film foxmation. Since the deposition
rate appropriate to the particular ion-gun HT voltage had previously been
determined, Table I, the R versus T measurements could be translated into R
versus t traces where t is the equivalent continuous film thickness.
3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
4. DISCUSSION
where p is
the eiectronic specuiar reflection coefficient, k = t/X and X is the
electron mean free path in the bulk material. When the film is polycrysa1line
however, as in the case considered here, the average grain diameter D in the
film becomes comParable(th Xc that grain boundary scattering be
included. In this case
co 2pC2X
t (1+p) 3(a)
cx 0 (1 + +c1 C2)
3(b)
\) = D i+t 3(c)
2 (1-t1)
where the electron transmission coefficient t' at a grain boundary plays the same
role as the coefficient p at the film surface. Writing equation 3(a) as
PFt =pt+2pC2X
0 0(1—p) 4
(1+p)
it is evident that, if equation (4) applies, a graph of Rt2 (=pFt) versus t
should be a straight line of slope p.
Equations (5) and (6) are not directly applicable to the case under
investigation viz. that of discrete metal particles on a substrate having a
finite surface conductance, since it is not possible to define the conductivity
of such an assembly. For this reason a modified form of the equations was
employed ie.
where R(x) is the measured resistance of the assembly at a fractional metal coverage
x. Assuming x = t/t.
and taking p = 1.3 in equation (7) then
R(0) = B x 1.3 = R
c D
R(1) = A(1—x )1.3 R
c m
2
If R(x ) = (RDR the thickness t corresponding to x can be determined also
parameers A an B. Values of these parameters derives from the measured R versus
t (tt ) graphs for Au,Pt,Ni and Cu films; Figures 3,4,5 and 6, are listed in
Table fand Figures 11 and 12 show the resulting fit of the computed curves,
equation (7) , to the experimental R versus t traces for Au and Pt. In the case
of the Pt film a better fit was obtained using p = 2 instead of p = 1.3.
Figure 1 shows the soft X-ray reflection spectrum of a 51/50 Ni/C multilayer
from which the Ni layer thickness t1 can be determined. From a series of such
measurements on Ni/C multilayers a graph of Ni layer thickness t1 versus
deposition time T was obtained as shown in Figure 13. For values of ti > 2nrn
the graph of ti versus T is linear but the graph departs from this straight line
at smaller values of t1. This is because the Ni is now in the form of discrete
particles whose thickness is greater than that of the equivalent continuous film.
The graph of Figure 13 would appear to intercept the Ni film thickness axis at
O.8nm. This evidently represents the minimum particle thickness and corresponds
to a thickness of four atomic layers.
Over the range t1<2nm the first order multilayer reflection can also occur
as a doublet, as shown in Figure 14. In this case the particles have thicknesses
of 1.0 and 1.2nm, corresponding to five and six atomic layers respectively.
With a slight increase in Ni deposition time the reflection doublet reverts to a
singlet corresponding to a preponderence of Ni particles of thickness 1.2nm.
With further increase in T the sequence is repeated.
The deviation from the straight line graph in Figure 13 associated with the
discontinuous, particulate, Ni film can be translated into a graph of fractional
substrate coverage versus equivalent film thickness as shown in Figure 15. There
it is seen that complete substrate coverage (corresponding to x=1 at t=t
equation (7)) occurs at t=1.6nm and x evidently reduces to 0.25 at t=O.2n1
since the minimum particle thickness is O.8nm. In this respect the mathematical
analysis leading to Table IV and Figures 11,12 is unrealistic since it assumed
that x varied continuously from 0 to 1. The value of t . ('4nm) obtained from
the R measurements of Ni on glass, Table IV, is greater in the value of 1.6nm
obtained from Figure 15 for Ni on carbon. This may be due to the different
properties of glass and carbon substrates or the erroneous attribution of
t . tox=1.
mm
CONCLUSION
6 . ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
7. REFERENCES
Table I. The measured lBS deposition rates for different metals at ion-gun
voltage V and current I.
Table III. The parameters of equations (3) and (4) which describe (with
p = t'
= 0.5) the linear portions of the Rt2 versus t graphs shown in
Figures 7,8,9,10. (a) 1.6kV, (b) 2.2kv.
Au Pt Ni Cu
(a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b)
p (10 acm) 2.132 1.292 3.41 4.14 7.2 7.2 1.06 0.6
D 60 99 98 81 15 87.5 154
g
Sputtering
voltage (kV) 2.2 1.6 2.2 1.8 2.2 1.6 2.2 1.6
x
c 0.57 0.51 0.27 0.30 0.33 0.32 0.24 0.31
t mm
() 70 90 30 28 44 42 200 160
t =x t
c c mm () 40 46 8.1 8.4 15 14 48 50
09
08
0.7
0•5 .10'
cr
04 .10'
0)
0•3 E
*10'
02 ILl
1-) .10'
01
C'-)
uJ
5 10 15
(degrees)
.10'
1•Onm
l5nm
2•Onm
3
260
Ion the
450
240 with
The
220
The
R t. line), 400 Figure
the
200 shows
350 of for
110 detail.
t
glass.
300
160
(dotted
glass. Inset
(Angstroms) (Angstroms) on
140
resistance thickness
000 t.
120
on .
greater
Au versus
in of
00
Ni 1.6kV 200
film in
line)
50 lBS measurements
Rt2
I0.
(I) (0Li.J
xlO'
c
.io' .10'
Figure measured equivalent gun 2.2kV initial
.10' .10'
0 C-)
.io'
Co
0 20 40 60 00 100 120 140 160 10 2(0 220 0 20 00 60 % 00 120 140 160 leO 200 220 2O 260 210
THICKNESS (Angst roms) THICKNESS (Angstroms)
* (•...... exptt.
*
*10' (a)
0)
10.00 ( b) p =1.3
C
*
E
C 10000
** 1.) 100000
C
I- a
* 111 10000
1000
a:
100
0 50 100 150 200 200 300 350 400 450 5 550 0.0 1 .2 .3 4 S .6 7 .8 .9 10
THICKNESS (Angstroms) Fractional coverage
Figure 10. lBS Cu on glass. The Figure 11. lBS Au on glass. The fit
R versus t measurements of Figure 6
of the percolation equations (7),
plotted as Rt2 versus t for the p = 1.3, to the measured variation
larger values of t. of R with fractional coverage
x = t/t . for HT voltage 2.2kV.
mm
3 .4 5 .6
FrcictionciL coverage 1 10 100
deDositlon time (mm)
Figure 12. lBS Pt on glass. The
fit of the percolation equations (7) Figure 13. The measured thickness tj.
with p = 1 .3, p = 2, to the measured of the Ni layers in Ni/C multilayers
variation of R with fractional as a function of the Ni layer deposition
coverage x = t/tmm
for HT voltage time.
1.8kV.
O•6
I I 1 1 1 1 I I
05 a;
08
r
a;
>
0.L.
0
U
03 ta
I-
0.2
Ii- I I I I I I I I I
0•2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
EquivaLent film thickness (A)