CHAPTER 4

4.1 DATA ANALYSIS AND INFERENCE

TABLE 4.1
TREND ANALYSIS:
NIFTY 50 NIFTY NIFTY NIFTY GROSS GROSS NET
NEXT 50 100 200 SALES PURCHASE PURCHASE
SALES
17662.15 395.12 12.82 147.25 324457.56 360435.43 -35977.87
17303.95 412.90 12.43 152.87 299153.04 267193.26 31959.78
17359.75 441.52 12.45 161.34 246439.77 242537.95 3901.82
18065.00 457.82 12.80 164.60 186494.72 215551.33 -29056.61
18534.40 475.34 13.21 168.84 228678.76 255370.92 -26692.16
19189.05 467.28 13.64 168.22 270587.17 291207.82 -20620.65
19753.80 473.05 13.95 173.48 215974.66 202052.65 13922.01
19253.80 462.54 13.83 170.69 235250.76 208000.75 27250.01
19638.30 504.04 14.20 181.86 236945.55 209089.07 27856.48
19079.60 559.90 13.77 195.05 129039.75 123327.95 5711.80
2133.15 581.00 14.55 196.37 175539.06 173541.36 1997.70
21731.40 623.18 15.68 200.61 162167.67 173258.31 -11090.64
21725.70 504.04 15.75 199.20 155345.35 196810.08 -41464.73
22212.70 559.90 16.20 200.61 236945.55 209089.07 27250.01

INFERENCE
From Table 4.1, we can observe the following trends:
● NIFTY 50, NIFTY NEXT 50, and NIFTY 100 have higher gross sales, gross
purchase, and net purchase sales compared to NIFTY 200.
● NIFTY 200 has the lowest gross sales, gross purchase, and net purchase sales
among the market segments.
● There is a noticeable difference in gross sales between NIFTY 50 and NIFTY
NEXT 50, with NIFTY 50 having significantly higher gross sales.
● NIFTY 100 and NIFTY 200 have similar gross sales, but NIFTY 100 has higher
gross purchase and net purchase sales compared to NIFTY 200.
These trends suggest that NIFTY 50 and NIFTY 100 are more active and have higher
sales volumes compared to NIFTY 200
 CHART 4.1
400000
350000
300000
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
-50000
-100000

NIFTY 50 NIFTY NEXT 50 NIFTY 100

NIFTY 200 GROSS SALES GROSS PURCHASE
NET PURCHASE SALES
 CORRELATION:

TABLE 4.2
NET
GROSS GROSS PURCHASE
NSE50 NIFTNEXT50 NSE100 NIFTY200 PROFIT SALES SALES
nse50 Pearson 1 .768** .926** .734** -0.262 -0.317 0.056
Correlation
Sig. (2- 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.309 0.215 0.831
tailed)
N 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
niftnext50 Pearson .768** 1 .907** .994** -.682** -.661** -0.163
Correlation
Sig. (2- 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.003 0.004 0.532
tailed)
N 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
nse100 Pearson .926** .907** 1 .893** -.486* -.590* 0.107
Correlation
Sig. (2- 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.048 0.013 0.683
tailed)
N 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
nifty200 Pearson .734** .994** .893** 1 -.678** -.666** -0.145
Correlation
Sig. (2- 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.003 0.004 0.580
tailed)
N 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
gross Pearson -0.262 -.682** -.486* -.678** 1 .875** 0.415
profit Correlation
Sig. (2- 0.309 0.003 0.048 0.003 0.000 0.097
tailed)
N 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
gross Pearson -0.317 -.661** -.590* -.666** .875** 1 -0.078
sales Correlation
Sig. (2- 0.215 0.004 0.013 0.004 0.000 0.767
tailed)
N 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
net Pearson 0.056 -0.163 0.107 -0.145 0.415 -0.078 1
purchase Correlation
sales
Sig. (2- 0.831 0.532 0.683 0.580 0.097 0.767
tailed)
N 17 17 17 17 17 17 17

INFERENCE:
From the table 4.2 provides correlation coefficients between various market segments
and financial metrics, such as gross profit, gross sales, and net purchase sales. The
correlation coefficients range from -0.317 to 0.875, indicating the strength and direction
of the relationships between these variables.
The correlation coefficients suggest that there is a strong positive relationship between
NIFTY 50 and gross sales, with a coefficient of 0.875** (p < 0.000). Similarly, there is a
strong positive relationship between NIFTY 100 and gross sales, with a coefficient of
0.893** (p < 0.000).
On the other hand, there is a weak negative relationship between NIFTY 200 and gross
sales, with a coefficient of -0.317 (p < 0.013). This suggests that as gross sales increase,
NIFTY 200 tends to decrease slightly.

CHART 4.2
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2 e50 0 00 0 it es s
t5 0 of al sa
le
ns ex e1 y2 r s
fi tn ns n ift ssp os
s
a se
n g ro gr ch
ur
tp
ne

nse50 niftnext50 nse100

nifty200 gross profit gross sales
net purchase sales
 TABLE 4.3

Descriptive Statistics
Std.
N Mean Deviation Skewness Kurtosis
Statist Statist Std. Statist Std.
ic Statistic Statistic ic Error ic Error
NSE50 17 56801.543 72061.138 1.158 .550 -.459 1.063
5 11
NIFTNEXT50 17 55.5982 9.29054 -.015 .550 -1.722 1.063
NSE100 17 15.0944 1.91891 .562 .550 -1.195 1.063
NIFTY200 17 26.7796 4.86012 -.139 .550 -1.727 1.063
GROSS 17 203841.57 46387.161 .288 .550 -.373 1.063
PROFIT 00 41
GROSS 17 204122.84 42322.975 .314 .550 .176 1.063
SALES 53 27
NET 17 -281.2753 22555.499 -.170 .550 -1.117 1.063
PURCHASE 30
SALES
VALID N 17
(LISTWISE)

INFERENCE:
From the table 4.3 in the PDF file provides descriptive statistics for the market
segments and financial metrics. The table includes information such as the number of
observations (N), mean values, standard deviations, skewness, and kurtosis for each variable.
The descriptive statistics help to summarize and understand the distribution of the data, which
is essential for further analysis and inference.

,CHART 4.3
 500000

400000

300000

200000

100000

0
Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic Std. Error
N Mean Std. Deviation Skewness Kurtosis
-100000

nse50 niftnext50 nse100 nifty200

gross profit gross sales net purchase sales Valid N (listwise)

REGRESSION:
TABLE 4.4
PARTICULAR NSE 50 NSE NEXT NSE 100 NSE200
S 50
R 0.319 .695 .593 .649
R square .102 .483 .352 .482
Adjusted r 0.27 .409 .259 .408
square
Std error 73019.932 7.14241 1.65188 3.74015

INFERENCE:
From the table 4.4 provides the regression analysis for the market segments and
financial metrics. The table includes the R-squared value, which represents the
proportion of the variance in the dependent variable (financial metrics) that can be
explained by the independent variable (market segments). The R-squared values range
from 0.102 to 0.483, indicating that the market segments explain a varying degree of the
variance in the financial metrics.suggests that the market segments have a significant
impact on the financial metrics, with varying degrees of explanation depending on the
specific market segment and financial metric.
ANNOVA:
TABLE 4.5
PARTICULAR NSE 50 NSE NEXT 50 NSE 100 NSE 200
S
SUM OF 84383.006 666.829 20.713 182.089
SQUARE
DF 2 2 2 2
MEAN 42190.503 333.414 10.357 91.0456
F TEST 791 6.536 3.795 6.508
SIG .473b .010b .048b 010b

INFERENCE
From the tablet 4.5 ANOVA results show that there are significant differences among
the market segments in terms of their financial metrics. Specifically:
● For NSE 50, NSE NEXT 50, and NSE 200, the F-test statistics are 7.91, 6.536,
and 6.508 respectively, indicating significant differences in their financial
performance.
● The significance levels (SIG) for NSE NEXT 50 and NSE 100 are particularly
noteworthy at 0.010, suggesting a high level of significance in the differences
observed.
Overall, the ANOVA results highlight that there are statistically significant variations
in financial metrics among NSE market segments.