Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Donald Trump May Not Pay Bond - and Instead Let Letitia James Seize
Donald Trump May Not Pay Bond - and Instead Let Letitia James Seize
on NYPost.com
75,497
66,574
As Donald Trump faces a Monday deadline to post a $454 million bond in the civil fraud case against him
in New York, insiders said he may be weighing a little-discussed option: Doing nothing.
The ex-president reportedly has been struggling to raise the cash for the bond — either from banks or
'Vigilantes' try to evict squatters at
wealthy friends — with his lawyers claiming on Monday that it was a “practical impossibility.” $1M Queens house after homeowner
who confronted them is arrested in
While some reports have raised speculation that Trump may “go nuclear” with a Chapter 11 filing to tense standoff
protect his prize real estate assets across Manhattan, experts said bankruptcy would create unwelcome
complications as the 2024 election season comes to a head. 51,271
Now on
See All
Video
Biden wanders off stage after spotting
baby in crowd at Arizona campaign
event: ‘Couldn’t resist’
“He’s been there and done that,” one insider close to Trump said, dismissing the prospect of a Chapter 11
filing.
Explore More
JetBlue dropping service Goldman Sachs banker New Yorkers who moved
to these cities after deals once in line to be CEO to low-tax Texas, Florida
with Spirit, American becomes latest female aren't saving as much as
blocked executive to leave firm they used to: report
after 25-year career
A third possibility, however, is to let the deadline pass, leaving it to New York Attorney General Letitia
James to seize Trump’s bank accounts or buildings — including Trump Tower, from which he declared his
2016 presidential run, and which famously includes his personal penthouse.
an option Trump appears to have considered – partly because he believes the chances are good that
It’s
he could recover the assets on appeal, even if he is forced to take his case to the US Supreme Court,
according to friends.
“Even if there is a taking, it doesn’t mean he can’t take it back later,” a source close to Trump told The
Post.
A decision to do nothing poses risks of its own — among them that the New York AG’s Office has the right
to sell off any properties it confiscates in order to recover the cash penalties it is owed.
“They are going after the money and that’s all he has a right to get back, not the buildings — unless the
judgment is reversed before they are sold,” said Adam Leitman Bailey, a New York-based attorney who’s
focused on the commercial real estate sector.
One source close to Trump insisted that he could raise funds from
wealthy “friends and supporters,” but so far has not chosen this path.
“He’s not an ‘I’m passing the hat’ man — he doesn’t want pity or for anyone to feel sorry for him,” the
source claimed. “He will do what he has to do. He has plenty of wealthy friends who would help him if
asked, but he’s not asking, as far as I’m aware.”
Filed under 2024 presidential election donald trump fraud letitia james new york
3/20/24
Read Next Tyson Foods slapped with 'refuse to buy' branding after hi...
Sort by Best
FL Gal
1 hour ago
If his assets are seized and the ruling gets reversed on appeal, then what? You shouldn't have to
ay this price in order to invoke your rights to appeal free from punitive measures from a
govt.
Marshall Feuer
1 hour ago
The seizures can be reversed on appeal
8th amendment. No confiscatory fines.
Reply 61 Share
8 replies
Susan Simonetti
1 hour ago
When he wins on appeal, think of him suing New York and LJ! Can’t wait.
Reply 131 Share
7 replies
Show 20 more replies
Independant
1 hour ago
IfJames takes the Property and sells it, it will send a LOUD and CLEAR message to all
ompanies doing business in NYC to GET OUT! The fall out from her seizing his assets will be
Risky, but tremendous.
Reply 100 Share
Wanker Dongster
36 minutes ago
They do not care. All they care about is keeping Trump from becoming president. Period.
they KNOW retribution will be justified, and severe, and I can't wait for it.
Reply 20 Share
2 replies
Barry
1 hour ago
The message loud & clear: DON'T CHEAT
Reply 36 Share
6 replies
Show 9 more replies
Michael Isaak
1 hour ago
Not sure why the Supreme Court will not step in and stay the judgement since this is truly a
onstitutional matter - this being the egregious penalty. The penalty prevents procedural due
(right to appeal).
Reply 30 Share
Cara Zee
1 hour ago
They have until Friday or so to do that. The egregiousness is blatant. The attack on a
olitical opponent is as well. This is nothing but vote tampering and regime attacks.
with the WH will no doubt be found and exposed.
Reply 17 Share
2 replies
Barry
59 minutes ago
State Case. Not s Fed Case
Reply 5 Share
3 replies
46 People Reacted
More Stories
Page Six NYPost
Scheana Shay hints that she once had an orgy Dodgers awestruck by first pitch from South
with John Mayer: 'My body was a wonderland' Korean actress in viral moment
Sections & Features Post Sports+ Newsletters & Feeds Help/Support Apps
US News Metro Subscribe Email Newsletters About New York Post iPhone App
World News Sports Articles RSS Feeds Customer Service iPad App
Sports Betting Business Manage NY Post Official Store Apps Help Android Phone
Opinion Entertainment Community Guidelines Android Tablet
Home Delivery
Fashion & Beauty Shopping
Contact Us Advertise
Lifestyle Real Estate Subscribe
Media Tech Manage Subscription Tips Media Kit
Health Travel Newsroom Contact
Astrology Video Delivery Help Letters to the Editor
Photos Visual Stories Licensing & Reprints
Alexa Covers Careers
Horoscopes Sports Odds Vulnerability Disclosure Program
Podcasts Crosswords & Games
Columnists Classifieds
© 2024 NYP Holdings, Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use Membership Terms Privacy Notice Sitemap
Your California Privacy Rights