Are you struggling with writing a literature review for your research project or academic paper?

You're not alone. Crafting a comprehensive literature review can be a daunting task, requiring
extensive research, critical analysis, and effective synthesis of existing literature. One of the crucial
components of a literature review is data extraction, which involves gathering relevant information
from various sources to support your arguments and assertions.

However, navigating through countless scholarly articles, books, and other academic sources to
extract pertinent data can be time-consuming and overwhelming. It requires a keen eye for detail,
excellent organizational skills, and a deep understanding of your research topic. Without proper
guidance and expertise, it's easy to get lost in the sea of information and struggle to extract
meaningful data that adds value to your literature review.

That's where ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ comes in. Our team of experienced writers and researchers
specializes in crafting high-quality literature reviews tailored to your specific requirements. With
years of experience in academia and a passion for scholarly research, we understand the challenges
you face when writing a literature review. Whether you're a graduate student embarking on your
thesis or a seasoned researcher publishing a journal article, we can help streamline the process and
ensure your literature review meets the highest academic standards.

At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we utilize advanced techniques and methodologies to extract relevant data

from a wide range of sources, including peer-reviewed journals, conference proceedings, and
scholarly databases. Our rigorous quality control measures ensure that every piece of data we extract
is accurate, reliable, and directly contributes to the coherence and credibility of your literature review.

By entrusting your literature review data extraction needs to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save
valuable time and energy while ensuring the quality and effectiveness of your research. Let us handle
the intricacies of data extraction, so you can focus on developing compelling arguments and insights
based on the extracted data.

Don't let the complexity of literature review data extraction overwhelm you. Order from ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and take the first step towards crafting a stellar literature review that
showcases your expertise and advances your research agenda.
Simply insert your title and abstract in any of the journal finder tools listed under the publishing your
systematic review tab. Most of the data elements were extracted with F-scores (a mean of sensitivity
and positive predictive value) of over 70 %. Example of these data elements might be overall
evidence, specific interventions, among others (Table 1 ). Automated information extraction of key
trial design elements from clinical trial publications. Review teams can assess the suitability of each
tool and switch between them at any time during this step. Data will be collected regarding the
reasons for exclusion. Literary review templates are surveys of scholarly sources on a specific subject
matter. Lastly, the risk of reporting bias is unclear because of the lack of protocols in the
development, implementation, and evaluation of NLP methods. No two other studies shared the
same gold standard or dataset for evaluation. Despite these potential gains from NLP, the state of the
science of automating data extraction has not been well described. The TIDieR guidelines are a
useful reference for reporting interventions. This finding means that not only are more studies needed
to explore the remaining 70 % data elements, but that there is an urgent need for a unified framework
or system to extract all necessary data elements. Beekhuyzen Griffith Computer Science, Education
2013 TLDR Nvivo8 is proposed as a tool to help any researcher accomplish a rigorous and
transparent literature review in seven steps, using a well-known qualitative research software that
gives the researchers new opportunities to explore and piece together the challenging task of a
literature review. Expand 113 Highly Influenced 5 Excerpts Save (Re)considering the Concept of
Reproducibility of Information Systems Literature Reviews W. Excel Template for Literature
Review Catalog October 2015 Authors: Han Ping Fung HP Inc. SRJ, PG, and MDH did the critical
revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. Web programs like excel or google
spreadsheets may be the best option for smaller or more straightforward projects. They utilized 263
abstracts from the BMJ and achieved F-scores of 76 % for identifying groups, 42 % for outcomes,
80 % for group sizes, and 71 % for outcome numbers. Bandara Paul Mathiesen Computer Science
PACIS 2015 TLDR The study establishes the importance of profiling for managing aspects such as
quality assurance, transparency and the mitigation of selection bias, and discusses how profiling can
provide a valid basis for data analysis based on the attributes of selected literature. Cleven
Philosophy European Conference on Information Systems 2009 TLDR It is argued that the process
of searching the literature must be comprehensibly described and readers assess the exhaustiveness of
the review and other scholars in the field can more confidently (re)use the results in their own
research. Data extraction forms must be customized to the scope and scale of the. Covidence has two
options for data extraction: version 1.0 and version 2.0. The best fit for your project will depend on
factors including the type of review, the type of data, and the type of analysis you plan to do. Web
excel is the most basic tool for the management of the screening and data extraction stages of the
systematic. Discrepancies must be resolved here and a consensus reached. We also sought expert
opinion for additional relevant citations. Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international
conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining; 2010: ACM. Sivasubramanian Education,
Medicine 2016 TLDR The systematic literature review sought to uncover and synthesise any
evidence on, sustainable safe staffing levels in learning disability services, and assess if any of the
emerging evidence affirm or negate the context of care tool as an MDT model of care. Instead of
using this theme as one of the review findings, the reviewers should read and interpret beyond the
given description in an article, compare and contrast themes, findings from one article with findings
and themes from another article to find similarities and differences and to understand and explain
bigger picture for their readers. One study (4 %) reported P5 precision, which indicates the fraction
of positive predictions among the top 5 results returned by the system. Web extraction templates and
approaches should be determined by the needs of the specific review.
Entering study information in the comments can avoid the task of going back to the original report
and can also be used to capture information about deviations from the protocol or research plan,
which need to be reported in the review. Software to help you create coded data extraction forms
from templates include. However, both these studies only highlighted sentences containing the data
elements relevant to interpretation. Expand 1,472 PDF 2 Excerpts Save Reconstructing the giant: On
the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process J. Web gifs the data can be split
into two types: Excel is the most basic tool for the management of the screening and data extraction
stages of the systematic. Cleven Philosophy European Conference on Information Systems 2009
TLDR It is argued that the process of searching the literature must be comprehensibly described and
readers assess the exhaustiveness of the review and other scholars in the field can more confidently
(re)use the results in their own research. Expand 1,428 PDF 1 Excerpt Save A Systems Approach to
Conduct an Effective Literature Review in Support of Information Systems Research Y. Levy T.
Ellis Computer Science Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl. 2006 TLDR This paper
provides the rationale for developing a solid literature review including detailed instructions on how
to conduct each stage of the process proposed and provides arguments for the value of an effective
literature review to IS research. The review authors must include this information in their summary
table. Jonnalagadda View author publications You can also search for this author in. Web data
extraction is central to any systematic review, allowing reviewers to collate data from studies to
enable them to answer a. If some test data is wide of the mark, you have a useful opportunity to
explore the reasons for this and to improve the form. The aim of developing these literature summary
tables is to provide the reader with the information at one glance. Indistinguishable from Magic:
How the Cybersecurity Market Reached a Trillion. We have outlined five tips that could enhance the
quality of the data extraction and synthesis process by developing useful literature summaries.
However, integration may not have occurred at the analysis, interpretation and reporting levels. The
authors tested their method on 50 articles and for disease extraction obtained an F-score of 64 and
85 % for exactly matched and partially matched cases, respectively. In this way, the authors could
generate a dataset of 23,472 sentences. After categorization, the authors used regular expression to
extract the target words for patient population and comparison. On a dataset of 1356 PubMed
abstracts, the authors achieved the highest accuracy using a support vector machines learning model
and achieved an F-measure of 86 %. We also reviewed the citations from included reports. They
utilized the principle of information gain (IG) as well as genetic algorithm (GA) for feature selection.
These data included morbidity, mortality, symptom severity, and health-related quality of life. Lastly,
the risk of reporting bias is unclear because of the lack of protocols in the development,
implementation, and evaluation of NLP methods. If items are unclear, there is a risk that the
reviewers will make mistakes as they use it. Similarly, literature summary tables for articles included
in a meta-synthesis must include information about the participants’ characteristics, research context
and conceptual contribution of each reviewed article so as to help the reader make an informed
decision about the usefulness or lack of usefulness of the individual article in the review and the
whole review. Expand 99 Save The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique and Utilization
J. Expand 3,332 Save What do registered nurses and midwives feel and know about research? R.
Expand 9 Highly Influenced PDF 15 Excerpts Save (Re)considering the Concept of Literature
Review Reproducibility W. No pointless thoughts and statements should be included. (16 Font size).
The risk of performance bias is also likely to be high because the investigators were not blinded.
We sought to minimize this limitation by searching in multiple bibliographic databases, including
PubMed, IEEExplore, and ACM Digital Library. Web extraction templates and approaches should
be determined by the needs of the specific review. Grewal Hanish Kataria Ira Dhawan Education
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 2016 TLDR This article primarily stresses on how to formulate a
research question, the various types and sources for literature search, which will help make your
search specific and time-saving. We excluded a report that met any of the following criteria: 1) the
methods were not applied to the data extraction step of a systematic review; 2) the report was an
editorial, commentary, or other non-original research report; or 3) there was no evaluation
component. I love helping users to get the most out of their Covidence experience. The features were
based on lexical, syntactic, structural, and sequential information in the data. After consensus among
the annotators, agreement rose to 97 and 98 %, respectively. A review of a clearly formulated
question that uses systematic and explicit methods to identify, select, and critically appraise relevant
research, and to collect and analyse data from the studies that are included in the review. Expand 68
PDF 1 Excerpt Save A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems
Research Chitu Okoli Kira Schabram Computer Science 2010 TLDR This article presents a
methodology for conducting a systematic literature review with many examples from IS research
and references to guides with further helpful details, and provides detailed guidelines to writing a
high-quality theory-mining review. It is good practice to specify in advance the process for resolving
conflict among the reviewers and to keep a record of these disagreements. An example of data from
the study is the dose and timing of the. Covidence has two options for data extraction: version 1.0
and version 2.0. The best fit for your project will depend on factors including the type of review, the
type of data, and the type of analysis you plan to do. It is this consensus data that is exported in step
5. The method is related to how you read the paper, you record what you care about after reading.
Data synthesis and analysis Because of the large variation in study methods and measurements, a
meta-analysis of methodological features and contextual factors associated with the frequency of
data extraction methods was not possible. NLP handles written text at level of documents, words,
grammar, meaning, and context. The data extraction step is one of the most time-consuming steps of
a systematic review. Patient-care questions that physicians are unable to answer. Beekhuyzen Griffith
Computer Science, Education 2013 TLDR Nvivo8 is proposed as a tool to help any researcher
accomplish a rigorous and transparent literature review in seven steps, using a well-known qualitative
research software that gives the researchers new opportunities to explore and piece together the
challenging task of a literature review. Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for
systematic reviews. Unfortunately, even that corpus facilitates only classification of sentences into
whether they contain one of the data elements corresponding to the PIBOSO categories. Web
systematic review data extraction form template. Data extraction forms must be customized to the
scope and scale of the. Pare Computer Science Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2018 TLDR The findings indicate
inadequate reporting of the methods, procedures, and techniques used in a majority of reviews, and
recommend that authors of all forms of reviews better document design decisions so to increase
trustworthiness, get meaningful results, and develop a cumulative body of knowledge in this
discipline. Web gifs the data can be split into two types: Excel is the most basic tool for the
management of the screening and data extraction stages of the systematic. Automatic extracting of
patient-related attributes: disease, age, gender and race. Web data extraction is central to any
systematic review, allowing reviewers to collate data from studies to enable them to answer a.
Expand 68 PDF 1 Excerpt Save A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of
Information Systems Research Chitu Okoli Kira Schabram Computer Science 2010 TLDR This
article presents a methodology for conducting a systematic literature review with many examples
from IS research and references to guides with further helpful details, and provides detailed
guidelines to writing a high-quality theory-mining review. Web programs like excel or google
spreadsheets may be the best option for smaller or more straightforward projects. Saurabh Singh The
Evolution of E-learning The Evolution of E-learning Jennifer Lim Pengakuan isi kandungan senarai
jadual senarai rajah kajian utk ar Pengakuan isi kandungan senarai jadual senarai rajah kajian utk ar
Zack Chepa Teori Kecerdasan Pelbagai Teori Kecerdasan Pelbagai Sektor Pengurusan Akademik JPN
Pahang Lit Review Apa Style 1202666316841695 4 Lit Review Apa Style 1202666316841695 4
elm646537 HRM report Main HRM report Main Md.