Crafting the Results Section in a Literature Review: A Daunting Challenge

Embarking on the journey of writing a literature review, especially the results section, can often seem
like navigating through an intricate maze. This pivotal component demands not only a thorough
understanding of the topic at hand but also an ability to critically analyze and synthesize vast
amounts of information from various sources. It's a task that requires precision, analytical skills, and
a deep dive into existing research, making it a formidable challenge for many.

The results section of a literature review is where you distill the essence of your findings from the
literature you've surveyed. It's not merely about listing what previous studies have found but
critically evaluating these findings, identifying patterns, contradictions, and gaps in the research. This
section is crucial as it sets the foundation for discussion and demonstrates your comprehension of the
subject matter and your ability to engage with it critically.

However, the complexity of this task cannot be understated. It involves sifting through potentially
hundreds of studies, discerning relevant data, and presenting it in a coherent and scholarly manner.
This process is time-consuming and often overwhelming, particularly for those balancing multiple
commitments or who may not have extensive experience in academic writing.

Moreover, the challenge is not just in the volume of work but in the intellectual rigor required. You
need to be able to discern the quality of research, understand different methodologies, and critique
findings all while weaving this information into a narrative that is both compelling and academically
sound. It's a balancing act that requires not just hard skills like research and writing but also soft
skills like critical thinking and synthesis.

Given these challenges, it's understandable why many turn to professional writing services for
assistance. One such service that stands out is ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, known for its expertise in
academic writing. Opting for professional help can significantly alleviate the stress associated with
the results section of a literature review. It offers a way to ensure that your review is not only
comprehensive but also meticulously analyzed and well-written.

Choosing to work with ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ means entrusting your literature review to experts who
are familiar with the academic rigors of such a task. Their experience in handling a wide range of
topics means they can provide invaluable insights and guidance, ensuring that the results section of
your literature review is both thorough and academically rigorous.

In conclusion, while the task of writing the results section in a literature review is indeed daunting, it
is not insurmountable. With the right support and resources, such as those offered by ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔, it's possible to navigate this challenge successfully. Whether you're an experienced
academic or a student embarking on your first major research project, seeking professional assistance
can make a significant difference in the quality and coherence of your literature review.
In addition to summarizing the effects of interventions, review authors should also summarize the
results of any subgroup analyses (or meta-regression), sensitivity analyses, and assessments of the
risk of bias due to missing results (if performed) that are relevant to each synthesis. Where meta-
analysis is not used, review authors may find it useful to present the results of studies in a forest plot
without calculating a meta-analytic effect. These are referred to as copy manuscripts A manuscript
prepared according to APA style to be submitted for publication to a professional journal.. Many
features of a copy manuscript—consistent double-spacing, the running head, and the placement of
tables and figures at the end—are intended to make it easier to edit and typeset on its way to
publication. Further guidance is available in the InSynQ (Intervention Synthesis Questions) tool for
planning and reporting synthesis questions ( ). The PRISMA Flow Diagram can be downloaded in
Word files. Often a review is unable to implement all the methods outlined in the protocol. Because
the abstract is usually limited to about 200 words, it can be a challenge to write a good one.
Elements of a Systematic Review Elements of a Systematic Review. Giving a summary of data from
studies is acceptable only when comparisons are being made. It also works well when you are
describing a particular study in detail. Using common lisp, this is equivalent to: When do i use the
imrad format. Examples such as the amount of semesters completed, and gpa of the student.
RevMan allows authors to directly import some types of data (including study results and risk of
bias assessments). They are quite happy for the information that is not available in the printed
manuscript to be provided as supplementary materials in appendices. After that, however, you should
use the first author’s name followed by “et al.” Here are some examples. In a literature review, you
don’t have to refer to each study in the same depth. Cricket essay research format the paper a of
organization imrad stat test example essay, upsc essay paper questions expository essay on cell
phones introduction of no homework policy argumentative essay, nike hr case study economics
grade 12 essays pdf 2018. It is not necessary to state specific hypotheses. III.3.4 Methods The
Methods section in a completed review should be written in the past tense, and should describe what
was done to obtain the results and conclusions of the current review. Review the PRISMA checklist
to see which items you should report in your methods section. It also forces you to write a concise
summary or it won’t fit into the table. Your judgment of the quality of the evidence, including risk of
bias. TL is supported by funding from the National Eye Institute (UG1EY020522), National
Institutes of Health, United States. We thank Sue Brennan, Rachel Churchill, Robin Featherstone,
Ruth Foxlee, Kayleigh Kew, Nuala Livingstone and Denise Mitchell for their feedback on this
chapter. Refer to the Cochrane Library editorial policy on conflicts of interest for full details. Why
conduct a literature review, stages of a literature review, lit reviews: an overview (video), check out
these books. Although much time is invested in developing a search strategy and screening results, a
systematic review is valued by the critical reflection and interpretation of the findings. You will:
Review the reporting standards you will use, such as PRISMA. Differences will allow for debate to
decide why they have occurred, and what that could mean. In this way, the systematic review can be
fully presented without taking up an unacceptably high amount print space for the accepted article.
Authors are strongly encouraged to use this guidance to ensure good practice and consistency with
other summaries in the Cochrane Library.
Writing a shorter article takes more effort than writing a longer manuscript, and it takes longer. How
to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for. Typically it begins with certain preliminary
issues. Therefore, when in doubt, find an appropriate reference to cite or remove the questionable
assertion. In addition to detailed guidance in Chapter 12, a reporting guideline for Synthesis Without
Meta-analysis (SWiM) has been developed and should be considered in addition to MECIR for
reporting these methods( Campbell et al 2020 ). Investing effort in the development of the review
question and planning of methods also stimulates review authors to anticipate methodological
challenges that may arise, and helps minimize potential for non-reporting biases by encouraging
review authors to publish their review and report results for all pre-specified outcomes ( Shamseer et
al 2015 ). It is important to candidly acknowledge any limitations of the systematic review
highlighted by the peer reviewers and to include (where possible) any additional information into the
manuscript. This works well when both the design and the procedure are relatively complicated and
each requires multiple paragraphs. See Chapter 4 for guidance on the study selection process. The
search will necessarily be incomplete, vague and very large all at the same time. Most articles and
book chapters contain a mixture of the two. The following three standard subheadings in the
Background section of a Cochrane Review are intended to facilitate a structured approach to the
context and overall rationale for the review. The information on the included studies allows the peer
reviewers and readers to determine the comprehensiveness of the literature search and also the level
of external validity of the findings from the review. Where appropriate, authors might consider
presenting alternative figures to present the results of included studies. Step 7: Write and publish a
report The purpose of writing a systematic review article is to share the answer to your research
question and explain how you arrived at this answer. Our recommendations are informed by the
reviews and survey conducted before the in-person meeting, theoretical considerations about which
items facilitate replication and help users assess the risk of bias and applicability of systematic
reviews, and co-authors’ experience with authoring and using systematic reviews. External files,
such as template data extraction forms or other data sets, can be added to a disciplinary or general
repository and cited within the review. Any strategies used to deal with missing data should be
reported, including any attempts to obtain the missing data. Conclusion examples in research paper
case study on a cervical cancer patient essay english international language. Source:
coda.newjobs.com While it usually has the same structure and goal there may be certain differences
in its content depending on the type of work you are summarizing. Data collection and management:
Review authors should specify how data were collected for the included studies. Systematic reviews
are characterized by a methodical and replicable methodology and presentation. Authors should use
an additional supplementary material for ROBINS-I risk of bias tables. Literature reviews give an
overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as
gaps in existing research. Or if you are proposing a new theory, then of course you should discuss
findings that are consistent with that theory. Taylor (2004) has described the additional time
commitments reported by students with young families, and the impact these may have on effective
management of study time. For example, the term sexual orientation should be used instead of
sexual preference because people do not generally experience their orientation as a “preference,” nor
is it as easily changeable as this term suggests (Committee on Lesbian and Gay Concerns, APA,
1991). It gives a general summary of information relevant to a certain research problem or question.
This abstract checklist is an update of the 2013 PRISMA for Abstracts statement, 54 reflecting new
and modified content in PRISMA 2020 ( table 2 ). Cite this Scribbr article If you want to cite this
source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to
automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator. Turney, S. (2023, November 20).
Where confidence intervals are compatible with either a positive and negative, or positive and
negligible effect, this is factored into an assessment of the imprecision of the result through
GRADE. However, the following steps are generally accepted in how Systematic Reviews are done:
Identify a gap in the literature and form a well-developed and answerable research question which
will form the basis of your search Select a framework that will help guide the type of study you’re
undertaking Different guidelines are used for documenting and reporting the protocols of your
systematic review before the review is conducted. Reporting bias assessment: Any methods used to
assess the risk of bias due to missing results should be described. This post provides some quick tips
following the imrad structure. Look at how the review is done by covering key information from the
study while. If meta-analysis was possible, synthesized results should always be accompanied by a
measure of statistical uncertainty, such as a 95% confidence interval. Although much time is invested
in developing a search strategy and screening results, a systematic review is valued by the critical
reflection and interpretation of the findings. Guides and software Further help In general, the
writing process for a systematic review is similar to the process of writing any other kind of review.
Cochrane Plain language summaries are frequently translated, and using plain language is also
helpful for translators. The PRISMA checklist and expanded checklist can be downloaded as
supplementary materials to this article. Authors may find it helpful to use a logic model ( Kneale et
al 2015 ) or conceptual framework to illustrate the proposed mechanism of action of the intervention
and its components. Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences 5th Edition Gravetter Solutions.
How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for. This might mean multiple
questionnaires, written vignettes that participants read and respond to, perceptual stimuli, and so on.
It's worth checking the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews independently. Converting a
thesis chapter into a journal article the initial steps: The initial step is to adhere to the instructions to
authors of the journal where the article is to be submitted. Also, the unattributed reproduction of text
from other sources should be avoided. Research has also been done that looks at how the bullies find
their victims. The following publication has been used to supply annotated examples of the abstract,
introduction, discussion and conclusion. Write the review Thompson Writing Studio This link opens
in a new window Need to write a systematic review. You will also need a title and an abstract to
summarize your research. SRs are more comprehensive than a Literature Review, which most
academics will be familiar with, as they follow a methodical process to identify and analyse existing
literature ( Cochrane, 2022 ). It is also important that relevant information pertaining to the design
and conduct of a systematic review is reported in the manuscript in order for the internal validity of
the findings to be accepted. Boyle and Tang read through the articles to decide if any more studies
needed to be excluded based on the selection criteria. For example, in a literature review or research
paper, you may want to briefly summarize this study as part of a wider discussion of various sources.
Writing the literature review: A practical guide Available 3rd floor of Perkins Writing literature
reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences Available online. Contributions of
authors: The contributions of each author to the review should be described. References: Moher D,
Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. By focusing on a single intervention or a few
specific interventions for a particular condition, the investigator can ensure a manageable results set.
See Chapter 6 for more guidance on effect measures.
The heading at the top of this page is the full title of the manuscript, with each important word
capitalized as on the title page. In medicine, clinical trial registries are another important type of gray
literature. Avoiding Deja Vu All Over Again Avoiding Deja Vu All Over Again No Full Text. If
relevant, it is useful to describe how studies including a subset of relevant participants were
addressed (e.g. when children up to the age of 16 years only were eligible but a study included
children up to the age of 18 years). In this way, the systematic review can be fully presented without
taking up an unacceptably high amount print space for the accepted article. Miranda Cumpston, Toby
Lasserson, Ella Flemyng, Matthew J Page Key Points: Clear reporting of a systematic review allows
readers to evaluate the rigour of the methods applied, and to interpret the findings appropriately.
Keywords: evidence; guide; meta-analysis; meta-synthesis; narrative; systematic review; theory. Page
MJ, Altman DG, Shamseer L, McKenzie JE, Ahmadzai N, Wolfe D, Yazdi F, Catala-Lopez F, Tricco
AC, Moher D. However, there are also many good websites on APA style, which do an excellent job
of presenting the basics for beginning researchers. Tables and figures are both used to present results.
For example, a review may be interested in the effects of an intervention in children or adults, or
may wish to investigate the effects of different types of exercise interventions. Cochrane’s
Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR) detail standards for the
conduct of Cochrane Reviews of interventions. Some writers prefer to begin with the research
questions, followed by the context, building to the rationale. Part of being a good writer in general is
adopting a style that is appropriate to the writing task at hand, and for writing about psychological
research, this is APA style. We thank them for their contributions to the earlier chapter. A literature
review is a type of review that uses a less systematic and formal approach than a systematic review.
Quantitative: Use statistical methods to summarize and compare data from different studies.
Conclusion examples in research paper case study on a cervical cancer patient essay english
international language. Bibliographic, word-processing, spreadsheet, and statistical software. For an
edited book, the names of the editors appear with their first and middle initials followed by their last
names (not the other way around)—with the abbreviation “Eds.” (or “Ed.,” if there is only one)
appearing in parentheses immediately after the final editor’s name. This smartshort describes how to
effectively use literature reviews in these sections. Terminology should be reasonably easy to
understand for a general rather than a specialist healthcare audience. You could consider using a
reference management tool, such as EndNote Online, for storing your references and inserting them
into your report (see the 'Referencing' page ) - this will be essential if you are doing a literature-
based project or a systematic review. The imrad format is a way of structuring a scientific article.
Ranjit Singh, IIIT Allahabad Systematic Literature Review Paper Effective Review of Literature
COMMENTS Research Guides: Systematic Reviews: Reporting Results Systematic Reviews
Reporting Results PRISMA provides a list of items to consider when reporting results. If two sources
have the same first author, they are listed alphabetically by the last name of the second author.
Cochrane Plain language summaries are frequently translated, and using plain language is also
helpful for translators. The Abstract also needs to be standalone, representing an independent
summary that can be fully understood without the need for reading the full paper. The results section
of your systematic review is what the rest of your paper depends upon. Hence, the challenge here is
for these articles to provide the relevant information documenting accurately with as little print
space as possible.