Crafting a comprehensive literature review is often a daunting task for many researchers.

It requires
extensive reading, critical analysis, and synthesis of existing literature relevant to the research topic.
The process can be time-consuming and challenging, especially for those who are new to academic
writing or lack experience in conducting literature reviews.

One of the primary difficulties in writing a literature review is locating relevant sources. With the
vast amount of information available online and in libraries, identifying the most pertinent and
credible sources can be overwhelming. Moreover, ensuring that the selected sources contribute
meaningfully to the understanding of the research topic adds another layer of complexity.

Once the sources are identified, extracting key information and synthesizing it in a coherent manner
poses another challenge. Researchers must analyze and interpret the findings from various sources,
identifying common themes, gaps, and contradictions in the existing literature. This process requires
critical thinking and the ability to evaluate the reliability and validity of the information presented in
each source.

Organizing the literature review in a logical and structured manner is also crucial. Researchers must
decide on the most effective way to present the information, whether it be chronologically,
thematically, or theoretically. Ensuring smooth transitions between different sections and maintaining
a clear focus on the research questions or objectives can be challenging but is essential for a
successful literature review.

Given the complexities involved in writing a literature review, many researchers opt to seek
assistance from professional writing services. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert assistance in
crafting high-quality literature reviews tailored to the specific requirements of each research project.
By outsourcing the literature review writing process to experienced professionals, researchers can
save time and ensure that their review is thorough, well-written, and academically rigorous.

In conclusion, writing a literature review is a challenging yet essential aspect of the research process.
From locating relevant sources to synthesizing information and organizing it effectively, researchers
must navigate various obstacles to produce a high-quality review. For those seeking assistance with
this task, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ provides a reliable solution, delivering expertly crafted literature
reviews that meet the highest academic standards.
Advantages of Literature Review There are several advantages to conducting a literature review as
part of a research project, including: Establishing the significance of the research: A literature review
helps to establish the significance of the research by demonstrating the gap or problem in the existing
literature that the study aims to address. Clinical problem. Purpose of this systematic review. One
needs to inform the objective of the review in the initial paragraphs. It uses the information to
support the point like the lawyer uses evidence to prove their cases. As always, remember to state
both what you did and why you did it. In these cases, systematic reviews can use qualitative
synthesis methods such as vote counting, content analysis, classification schemes and tabulations, as
an alternative approach to narratively synthesize the results of the independent studies included in
the review. Inclusion and exclusion criteria must be established to help researchers eliminate studies
that are not aligned with the research questions. Yet Another Writing Tip When Do I Know I Can
Stop Looking and Move On. Or the review might focus on the fundraising impact of the Internet on
a particular political party. This is central to defining a current research gap, and here, we’ll use your
study’s foundational elements, and in particular the research questions, as our guide. Use the key
words in your question, as well as synonyms for those words, as terms in your search. PDF
METHODOLOGY OF THE LITERATURE REVIEW In the field of research, the term method
represents the specific approaches and procedures that the researcher systematically utilizes that are
manifested in the research design, sampling design, data collec-tion, data analysis, data interpretation,
and so forth. Reviews of healthcare interventions follow the PRISMA guidelines for the minimum
set of items to report in the methods section. For each publication, ask yourself: What question or
problem is the author addressing. If the literature review is part of your dissertation or thesis,
reiterate how your research addresses gaps and contributes new knowledge, or discuss how you have
drawn on existing theories and methods to build a framework for your research. When the selection
process is complete, you can summarize what you did using a PRISMA flow diagram. It aims to
identify common themes and patterns across different areas of research. A literature review of your
study helps in explaining your study efficiently. This includes the purpose of the study, who were the
participants, how was the study conducted, and then ultimately, what was found. Plenty of
information mentioned years ago remains relevant, so it’s better not to miss it. So for our current
example, you might choose something like expectancy theory. Systematic Review. NU517 Clinical
Scholarship for Evidence Based Practice Cornelia C. What types of sources should I review (books,
journal articles, websites; scholarly versus popular sources)? 3. Then, synthesize the information from
the sources, identifying patterns and themes in the literature. Finding out in advance will help you to
plan what to include. I have to say that the information that was delivered was congruent, concise,
and quite helpful. This can lead to an incomplete or biased picture of the literature. The authors
conducted a comprehensive search on multiple databases to identify eligible reviews and
subsequently used a validated instrument to conduct an in-depth quality appraisal. Research objective
(s): Rephrase your research question as an objective. It shows how to make a decent attempt to
address the course of your study plan.
When approaching the literature review chapter in your study, it’s very important to keep in mind the
overall purpose of this chapter in your larger study. That is, it represents a synthesis of the evidence
that provides background information on your topic and shows a association between the evidence
and your research question. For instance, Levy and Ellis (2006) proposed a generic framework for
conducting such reviews. A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. This
can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an
entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered. A systematic review
is secondary research because it uses existing research. When we say “literature review” or refer to
“the literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. A proposed
typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. Systematic
reviews with discordant findings can cause great confusion and make it difficult for decision-makers
to interpret the review-level evidence ( Moher, 2013 ). Krishnaswami,o.r,methodology of research in
social science,Mumbai:himalaya. But now you can take this task to the best academic writers. JBI
Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020. Available from.. Lorenzetti DL, Topfer L-A, Dennett L,
Clement F. Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting Professional editors proofread
and edit your paper by focusing on: Academic style Vague sentences Style consistency See an
example A systematic review is a good choice of review if you want to answer a question about the
effectiveness of an intervention, such as a medical treatment. Natural Sciences: In natural sciences,
literature reviews are used to summarize and evaluate the current state of knowledge in a particular
field or subfield. Demonstrates why a topic is significant to a subject area. The body of literature
includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses or research problems. A well-done
integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and
replication. Heterogeneity between the included studies in terms of reported outcomes and measures
precluded the use of meta-analytic methods. It aims to provide a theoretical framework for
understanding a particular research question. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P,
Parker D, Soares CB. Selecting Research Methods: Literature review helps researchers select
appropriate research methods and techniques based on previous research. It incorporate the decisions
made by you in terms of sampling, analysis of the data and the proper inference when the time
comes. In these cases, systematic reviews can use qualitative synthesis methods such as vote
counting, content analysis, classification schemes and tabulations, as an alternative approach to
narratively synthesize the results of the independent studies included in the review. The dystopian
literature is a very popular type of science fiction that sometimes can also be crossed in the horror
genre. Searching the extant literature: The next step consists of searching the literature and making
decisions about the suitability of material to be considered in the review ( Cooper, 1988 ). It reveals
the fact that how significant the results actually were. First, there are the primary studies that
researchers conduct and publish. Narrow the Topic The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to
limit the number of sources you need to read in order to obtain a good survey of relevant resources.
Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Keep careful notes so that you may track
your thought processes during the research process. Related to this, you’ll need to indicate whether
your study adopts a qualitative, quantitative or mixed approach.
In fact, many of our clients initially reach out to us once they reach the literature review stage and
then stay with us for dissertation help throughout the entire process. In addition to keywords, you
can make your search much more focused and systematic by taking a moment to learn about the
search filters available through the search interface. We highly recommend that prospective authors
of narrative reviews consult these useful sources before embarking on their work. In: Chandler J,
Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. In this section, you need to detail and justify the
key methodological choices you’ve made in a logical, intuitive fashion. Provide, in a brief and
concise way, the context of the study. For example, in the case of narrative reviews, there is greater
flexibility in searching and synthesizing articles ( Green et al., 2006 ). Researchers are often
relatively free to use a diversity of approaches to search, identify, and select relevant scientific
articles, describe their operational characteristics, present how the individual studies fit together, and
formulate conclusions. To describe how study data were extracted from the study reports, reviewers
outline the form that was used, any pilot-testing that was done, and the items that were extracted
from the included studies. You can use our free APA Reference Generator for quick, correct,
consistent citations. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred (as
mentioned previously, this may not be appropriate in your discipline — check with a teacher or
mentor if you’re unsure). A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in
dissertations, theses, and research papers. Look for peer-reviewed articles, books, and other
academic sources that are relevant to your research question or topic. Connections should be made
linking those sources to one another. Edit and proofread: Once you have written your literature
review, edit and proofread it carefully to ensure that it is well-organized, clear, and concise. Plenty of
information mentioned years ago remains relevant, so it’s better not to miss it. In the present context,
the notion of rigour refers to the reliability and validity of the review process described in section
9.2. For one thing, reliability is related to the reproducibility of the review process and steps, which
is facilitated by a comprehensive documentation of the literature search process, extraction, coding
and analysis performed in the review. With a few paragraphs divided up with subheadings, the
writing gets higher readability as people can find the needed information in the chosen sections. Lit
reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments in a class or as publications. Historical
literature review: This type of review examines the historical development of research on a particular
topic or research question. A good integrative review or Academic writing literature review must
meet the entire primary research standard with clarity, consistency, and replication. Step 7: Write and
publish a report The purpose of writing a systematic review article is to share the answer to your
research question and explain how you arrived at this answer. Communications of the Association
for Information Systems. 2005; 16:1. Kirkevold M. Integrative nursing research — an important
strategy to further the development of nursing science and nursing practice. Careful planning, clear
writing, and a structured approach are key to a good methods section. Is it manageable? Begin
writing down terms that are related to your question. Does the research use established frameworks
or take an innovative approach. Simply following an example may not be enough, so asking a
writing expert for help is a good option. Access to more recent research than any other consulting
service. Many times per academic article they will say that it is reviewed by peers. Typically, an
expert in a topic will qualitatively summarize and evaluate previous work, without using a formal,
explicit method. You can find a few annotated samples on this page.
Someone from our team will contact you within 1 hour (during business hours), or at your requested
time. Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. This is an important
step because having a plan allows you to work more efficiently and reduces bias. By reviewing the
literature, you can identify the strengths and limitations of different research methods and
techniques, and select the most appropriate ones for your own research. I am currently teaching
research methods, and I have been dealing with your esteemed site for several years, and I found
that despite my long experience with research methods sites, it is one of the smoothest sites for
evaluating the material for students, For this reason, I relied on it a lot in teaching and translated
most of what was written into Arabic and published it on my own page on Facebook. You might
argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to
create a framework for your research. Quality of sources: The quality of the literature reviewed can
vary widely, and not all sources may be reliable or valid. It is often used as an introductory section of
a research paper. Problem-oriented literature review: This review focuses on a specific problem or
issue and examines the literature to identify potential solutions or interventions. Meta-analysis: This
is a quantitative review that uses statistical methods to combine data from multiple studies to derive
a summary effect size. Clearly, the chore of locating 50-80 sources that are directly relevant to your
study is a time-consuming one. Sometimes, students hesitate whether to trust authors or not. Seven
databases were searched from 1985 to March 2010. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and
Systematic Techniques. Often, a lot of information needs to be distilled into just a few paragraphs.
Their model follows the systematic data processing approach comprised of three steps, namely: (a)
literature search and screening; (b) data extraction and analysis; and (c) writing the literature review.
The goal is to deliberately document, critically evaluate, and summarize scientifically all of the
research about a clearly defined research problem. Summarize and Synthesize Remember to
summarize and synthesize your sources within each thematic paragraph as well as throughout the
review. Information extracted from a printed source is recorded on the. Methodological If you draw
your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods, you might
want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. Mixed-methods
literature review: This type of review combines quantitative and qualitative methods to synthesize
and analyze the available literature on a particular topic. To begin organising your literature review’s
argument and structure, you need to understand the connections and relationships between the
sources you’ve read. This step is critical to find additional research and ensure a comprehensive
review of existing studies. You should collect this information using forms. You can find sample
forms in The Registry of Methods and Tools for Evidence-Informed Decision Making and the
Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations Working Group. What
are the strengths and weaknesses of the research. The typology of literature reviews we used herein
will allow eHealth researchers, graduate students and practitioners to gain a better understanding of
the similarities and differences between review types. Preferred reporting items for (SR) and meta-
analyses: the PRISMA statement. Demonstrates why a topic is significant to a subject area. Include
an objective topical sentence that introduces your readers to the purpose of that paragraph. A second
screen of full-text articles, again by two independent members of the research team, ensured that the
studies described phr s.
For example, what might cultural anthropologists say about the continuing conflict in the Middle
East. It aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the research question by combining
different types of evidence. However, when writing a review in the social sciences, a survey of the
history of the literature may be required. Should I evaluate the sources in any way beyond
evaluating how they relate to understanding the research problem? 5. Use the bibliographies and
references of research studies you find to locate others. In this case, you’ll have to apply the
selection criteria on your own; you can mention this as a limitation in your paper’s discussion. While
conducting a review of the literature, maximize the time you devote to writing this part of your
paper by thinking broadly about what you should be looking for and evaluating. This is the reason,
many literature reviews are mistily focused. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a
paper. While the study focuses on one topic, the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics,
it would still be organized chronologically reflecting technological developments in media. If you’re
writing a systematic review as a student for an assignment, you might not have a team. Receive
feedback on language, structure, and formatting Professional editors proofread and edit your paper
by focusing on: Academic style Vague sentences Style consistency See an example A systematic
review is a good choice of review if you want to answer a question about the effectiveness of an
intervention, such as a medical treatment. How to write Literature Review Here are some steps to
follow when writing a literature review: Define your research question or topic: Before starting your
literature review, it is essential to define your research question or topic. Quality of sources: The
quality of the literature reviewed can vary widely, and not all sources may be reliable or valid. The
very last section of the literature review is a chapter summary. It (Literature Review), in fact, sample
survey and survives on scholarly articles and other sources such as dissertations and conference
proceedings. As you write, make sure to follow these tips: Summarise and synthesise: give an
overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole. Always choose
recent publications as reference for your literature work. Literature Search This section outlines the
search strategy and databases used to identify relevant literature. In addition to page length
requirements, the literature review chapter also commonly has requirements in terms of the number
and types of sources included. The methodology chapter is also important in that it allows you to
identify and discuss any methodological issues or problems you encountered (i.e., research
limitations ), and to explain how you mitigated the impacts of these. Reports include market research
reports, government reports etc. What makes a systematic review different from other types of
reviews is that the research methods are designed to reduce bias. NOTE: Most often the literature
review will incorporate some combination of types. Chances are you’ll stumble upon many new
keywords that you hadn’t considered. Krishnaswami,o.r,methodology of research in social science,
Himalaya publishing. Constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence. If your lit review is
a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to
discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you discuss the
literature itself. Summarize and Synthesize Remember to summarize and synthesize your sources
within each thematic paragraph as well as throughout the review. There are two options here: cross-
sectional and longitudinal.
Here is a simple example: Smith (2023) examined the relationship between peer review and final
grades in a first year writing course across multiple universities and colleges and found that xxx.
Also, these summary and synthesis sections are important for noting along the way any important
gaps in the research literature that you have just discussed. Once you are done with these, you can
start presenting your point. Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok Body
image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth
Search for relevant sources Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Systematic mapping
of existing tools to appraise methodological strengths and limitations of qualitative research: first
stage in the development of the CAMELOT tool. Methodological A methodological approach
focuses on the methods utilized by the researcher. It should be a fair representation of the
perspectives and voices of a range of scholars across the field. At this stage of your review, you
won’t read the articles yet. The second type of coverage consists of presenting materials that are
representative of most other works in a given field or area. The content of the literature must include
all studies which are address related or similar theories. There is an increasing interest in the visual
aspects of social media. Subject headings will differ across databases, for example, the PubMed
database uses 'Qualitative Research' whilst the CINHAL database uses 'Qualitative Studies.' (3)
Limiting search results Databases enable sets of results to be limited or filtered by specific fields,
look for options such as Publication Type, Article Type, etc. The most frequent and easy-to-
understand characterization examples are explained in the following segment. Writing a Literature
Review For instance, in the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and
interpretation of source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more
likely to report study designs and results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these
disciplines' purposes and conventions in scholarship. You might argue for the relevance of a specific
theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your
research. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred (as mentioned
previously, this may not be appropriate in your discipline — check with a teacher or mentor if
you’re unsure). Simply save any potentially relevant citations using bibliographic software, such as
Scribbr’s APA or MLA Generator. Evaluate the sources: Once you have found potential sources,
evaluate them critically to determine their relevance, credibility, and quality. It’s needed to give
potential readers an overview of the writing content, helping to decide whether their research
determines it. Here it is: Narrative Essay: Business Literature Review Example Pdf
molotorvac.blogspot.com narrative College Essay: Essay About Literature Example
eketogenit.blogspot.com literary samples Literature Review For Apa Format themcfarlanegroup.com
apa museumlegs essay template findings qualitative summarizing papers vlsi summarize. This type of
research is useful for finding out how many, how much, how often, or to what extent. To describe
how study data were extracted from the study reports, reviewers outline the form that was used, any
pilot-testing that was done, and the items that were extracted from the included studies. Sometimes
individuals must meet them adequately, understand the difficulties and determine their main
priorities, deciding what to examine and how to start writing. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research
Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart,
Chris. Thinking interdisciplinarily about a research problem can be a rewarding exercise in applying
new ideas, theories, or concepts to an old problem. This is called citation tracking and there are a
number of sources that can help you identify who has cited whom, particularly scholars from outside
of your discipline. The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as
mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations).
Then this Historical Literature Review Example voices your familiarity with the topic. That is, it
represents a synthesis of the evidence that provides background information on your topic and shows
a association between the evidence and your research question. Are you an instructor who has
received an exemplary literature review and have permission from the student to post.