Title: Simplifying the Complexity: Your Guide to Crafting a Quantitative Literature Review

Crafting a literature review, especially a quantitative one, can be a daunting task for many students
and researchers alike. It demands meticulous research, critical analysis, and eloquent synthesis of
existing studies to construct a coherent narrative. However, with the right approach and resources,
navigating through this intricate process becomes significantly easier.

The complexity of a quantitative literature review lies in its requirement to analyze numerical data,
statistical methods, and empirical evidence. It necessitates not only a profound understanding of the
chosen topic but also proficiency in data analysis and interpretation. Moreover, synthesizing multiple
studies to draw meaningful conclusions requires a careful balance of objectivity and insight.

To alleviate the challenges associated with crafting a quantitative literature review, it is imperative to
have access to reliable resources and expert guidance. This is where ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ comes into
play. With a team of experienced writers and researchers, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers unparalleled
assistance in composing literature reviews that meet the highest academic standards.

By ordering from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can:

1. Save Time and Effort: Writing a literature review can be time-consuming and mentally
draining. With ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can delegate this task to professionals, freeing up
your time for other academic pursuits.
2. Ensure Quality and Originality: Our writers are proficient in conducting thorough literature
searches, analyzing data, and synthesizing findings. You can rest assured that your literature
review will be meticulously crafted and free from plagiarism.
3. Receive Expert Guidance: Our team consists of experts from various fields who are well-
versed in academic writing conventions. They can provide valuable insights and
recommendations to enhance the quality of your literature review.
4. Meet Tight Deadlines: Whether you're facing a tight deadline or struggling to meet the
requirements of your assignment, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ can provide prompt and efficient
assistance to ensure timely submission.

In conclusion, crafting a quantitative literature review is undoubtedly challenging, but it doesn't have
to be overwhelming. With the support of ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can streamline the process and
achieve academic success with confidence. Place your order today and experience the difference
firsthand.
Probability sampling is of four types namely simple random sampling, stratified random sampling,
cluster sampling, and systematic sampling. PDF version of this title (4.5M) Disable Glossary Links In
this Page Introduction Overview of the Literature Review Process and Steps Types of Review
Articles and Brief Illustrations Concluding Remarks Related information PMC PubMed Central
citations PubMed Links to PubMed Recent Activity Chapter 9?Methods for Literature Reviews -
Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Ev. Insulin dependent diabetics were excluded from the study
and nondiabetic subjects were not taking any medications that were known to affect plasma glucose
levels. How to write a superb literature review The best proposals are timely and clearly explain why
readers should pay attention to the proposed topic. Themes: what questions or concepts recur across
the literature. This is the first video in a whole series about literature reviews. Literature reviews can
be stand-alone research or part of a larger project. You can read more about literature reviews, what
they entail, and how to write one, using the resources below. Inclusion and exclusion criteria must be
established to help researchers eliminate studies that are not aligned with the research questions. Note
Generative AI tools like ChatGPT can be useful at various stages of the writing and research process
and can help you to write your systematic review. In recent years, the number of systematic reviews
in the field of health informatics has increased considerably. A total of 141 respondents took place in
the study. Secondly, the reports only talks of the actual results collected from the study and never
reported on anticipated reports. Contextualization: Enables researchers to understand how their work
fits into the broader academic conversation and contributes to the existing body of knowledge. They
involve a comprehensive search to locate all relevant published and unpublished work on a subject; a
systematic integration of search results; and a critique of the extent, nature, and quality of evidence
in relation to a particular research question. No additional database limiters were set to further
narrow search returns. Therefore, there is a growing need for appraisal and synthesis of prior
systematic reviews to ensure that decision-making is constantly informed by the best available
accumulated evidence. Was the probability level, ?, at which the results of the tests of significance
were evaluated, specified in advance of the data analyses. Last, Bandara, Miskon, and Fielt (2011)
proposed a structured, predefined and tool-supported method to identify primary studies within a
feasible scope, extract relevant content from identified articles, synthesize and analyze the findings,
and effectively write and present the results of the literature review. Victoria (BC): University of
Victoria; 2017 Feb 27. In a critical review, the reviewer not only summarizes the existing literature,
but also evaluates its strengths and weaknesses. A chronological compilation of studies The reason
for conducting a literature review is to: Literature Reviews: An Overview for Graduate Students
While this 9-minute video from NCSU is geared toward graduate students, it is useful for anyone
conducting a literature review. Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative
approach. Work shop of your rough draft Prep Assignment for Next Class Peer Critique. Patsopoulos
N. A., Analatos A. A., Ioannidis J.P. A. Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health
sciences. For example, if you are reviewing literature about women and religion, key themes can
include the role of women in churches and the religious attitude towards women. Identifies critical
gaps and points of disagreement. Discuss alternative methods of argumentation about the received
results. The literature review gives you a chance to: Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and
scholarly context Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research Position
yourself in relation to other researchers and theorists Show how your dissertation addresses a gap or
contributes to a debate You might also have to write a literature review as a stand-alone assignment.
It’s a statistical analysis that combines the results of two or more studies, usually to estimate an
effect size.
It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods,
and gaps in the existing research. The content will look slightly different in each case, but the process
of conducting a literature review follows the same steps. Writing the literature review: A practical
guide Available 3rd floor of Perkins Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and
behavioral sciences Available online. Eczema is a common skin condition that causes red, itchy skin.
However, writing a literary analysis could take more than that. Writing an effective literary analysis
essay requires careful reading, a clear thesis statement, and strong evidence to support one’s analysis.
Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related
terms. You can add to this list if you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.
Archer Librarians can help you structure a search, preparing you for step two. Analysis: Involves
critically evaluating and summarizing key findings, methodologies, and debates found in academic
literature. We highly recommend that prospective authors of narrative reviews consult these useful
sources before embarking on their work. EHealth researchers have at their disposal a number of
approaches and methods for making sense out of existing literature, all with the purpose of casting
current research findings into historical contexts or explaining contradictions that might exist among
a set of primary research studies conducted on a particular topic. I t usually has an organizational
pattern and combines both summary and synthesis. By reviewing relevant literature, we understand
the breadth and depth of the existing body of work and identify gaps to explore. A systematic
review is a type of review that uses repeatable methods to find, select, and synthesize all available
evidence. The article reported a randomized controlled trial examining the effectiveness of a targeted
multiple intervention strategy in reducing the number of patient falls in an acute care hospital. It
needs to provide your concluding interpretations or arguments on the subject matter. A literature
review may be a stand alone work or the introduction to a larger research paper, depending on the
assignment. When searching some databases, and Google, the operator AND may be implied.
However, we strongly advise against trying to pass AI-generated text off as your own work. Darlow
and Wen (2015) provide a good example of a highly structured narrative review in the eHealth field.
There are a variety of online tools that can help you create a concept map or you can simply put pen
to paper. The independent variable is defined but not controlled, and its effect is observed on the
dependent variable. The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as
mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations).
When the selection process is complete, you can summarize what you did using a PRISMA flow
diagram. Your Research Proposal. I. Introduction A. Problem statement B. This author would argue
that this is a weakness of the study, as these are crucial elements of quality measurement in primary
research within healthcare Austin, 2001 p 1; Cooper, 2006, p 439; Nuremberg Code, 1949, online.
You can use a combination of these tools or come up with your own organizational process. It’s a
statistical analysis that combines the results of two or more studies, usually to estimate an effect size.
Firstly, the target group represented a bigger percentage of the population. TemplateLab Example Of
Significance Of The Study In Quantitative Research Quantitative Analysis Literature Reviews
Examples Research development based on quantitative.- Mind Map How to write a literature review
in research paper Quantitative critique sample.
Darlow and Wen (2015) provide a good example of a highly structured narrative review in the
eHealth field. If you’re a student, you should narrow the scope of your systematic review and stick
to a tight schedule. Both authors independently reviewed each of the identified articles to determine
eligibility and extract study information. Previous findings are usually needed and frequently
previous meth- ods are also important. Depending on the length of your literature review, you might
want to divide the body into subsections. Analyzing and synthesizing data: As a final step, members
of the review team must collate, summarize, aggregate, organize, and compare the evidence extracted
from the included studies. By statistically combining data from multiple studies, meta-analyses can
create more precise and reliable estimates of intervention effects than those derived from individual
studies alone, when these are examined independently as discrete sources of information. Your
judgment of the quality of the evidence, including risk of bias. The article reported a randomized
controlled trial examining the effectiveness of a targeted multiple intervention strategy in reducing
the number of patient falls in an acute care hospital. The purpose of this descriptive or mapping
review was to characterize publication trends in the medical informatics literature over a 20-year
period (1987 to 2006). In medicine, clinical trial registries are another important type of gray
literature. As you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this
type of document ). Research apps. Consider using Evernote or Zotero to track your research. You
can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose definitions matter most to
your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as well). A flow diagram shows
the number of studies identified, screened, and included or excluded at each stage of study
selection. These items were such things as waist circumference, waist to hip circumference, fasting
plasma glucose and others. However, you should justify why a quantitative approach wasn’t
possible. If you’re doing a systematic review on your own (e.g., for a research paper or thesis ), you
should take appropriate measures to ensure the validity and reliability of your research.
Organizational Tools for Literature Reviews One of the most daunting aspects of writing a literature
review is organizing your research. As you write, make sure to follow these tips: Summarise and
synthesise: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent
whole. Why? Understanding the subject terminology used in databases can be challenging.
Typically, an expert in a topic will qualitatively summarize and evaluate previous work, without using
a formal, explicit method. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students.
Quantitative: Use statistical methods to summarize and compare data from different studies. Gilard
M 1, Arnaud B 2, Cornily JC 1, Le Gal G 3, Lacut K 3, Le Calvez G 2, Mansourati J 1, Mottier D 2,
Abgrall JF 2, Boschat J 1. Malden, ma: Blackwell Publishing Co; 2006. Rousseau D. M., Manning
J., Denyer D. Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field’s full weight
of scientific knowledge through syntheses. The basic research question — what works? — which is
usually associated with systematic reviews changes to: what is it about this intervention that works,
for whom, in what circumstances, in what respects and why. Analysis: Involves critically evaluating
and summarizing key findings, methodologies, and debates found in academic literature. Finally, the
data collected was in the form of numbers and statistics. The following discussion identifies the
application of quantitative research in the two studies and criticizes the appropriateness of the design
used.
Hoboken, nj: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008. Jesson J., Matheson L., Lacey F.M. Doing your literature
review: traditional and systematic techniques. We outline core standards and principles and describe
commonly encountered problems. (PDF) How to Conduct a Literature Review Paragraphs need to
link to other. For example, you could use EndNote, Microsoft Word, Excel, and SPSS. By organizing
your research into a matrix, like the examples below, can help you visualize the ways in which your
sources connect. Approaching literature review for academic purposes: The Literature Therefore, this
paper discusses the purposes of LRs in dissertations and theses. To increase inter-rater reliability,
ensure that everyone thoroughly understands the selection criteria before you begin. After the
introduction, it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical
framework or methodology. No additional database limiters were set to further narrow search
returns. Instead, researchers often present studies that are representative of most works published in
a particular area and they consider a specific time frame to be mapped. To this end, they provide a
number of recommendations to strengthen knowledge development towards improving the design
and execution of future reviews on home telemonitoring. 9.4. Summary Table 9.1 outlines the main
types of literature reviews that were described in the previous sub-sections and summarizes the main
characteristics that distinguish one review type from another. The independent variable is defined but
not controlled, and its effect is observed on the dependent variable. This research technique is
conducted to give value to the relationships that are naturally occurring, and a minimum of two
different groups are needed to effectively perform this quantitative research method. Retrieved from
Ridley, D. (2008). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students. The synthesis can be
narrative ( qualitative ), quantitative, or both. This includes sampling methods such as probability
and non-probability sampling. Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure
your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. In the meantime, to ensure continued
support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. Did the researcher discuss or
account for any potentially confounding variables that he or she was unable to control for. Although
literature reviews are often less time-consuming and can be insightful or helpful, they have a higher
risk of bias and are less transparent than systematic reviews. The two may be used in a well-blended
mix that is more conclusive to the. Surveys ask a sample of respondents questions using different
types such as online polls, online surveys, paper questionnaires, web intercept surveys, etc. They
originated from criticisms of positivist systematic reviews which centre on their “simplistic”
underlying assumptions ( Oates, 2011 ). There are so many issues in contemporary science that you
could spend a lifetime of attending conferences and reading the literature just pondering what to
review. Is the rationale given for the selection of the instruments or measurements used. The
participants came from Norway and some from the ongoing Thematically Organized Psychosis (TOP)
Study. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred. Subsequently, they
use fixed or random-effects analysis models to combine the results of the included studies, assess
statistical heterogeneity, and calculate a weighted average of the effect estimates from the different
studies, taking into account their sample sizes. Therefore, there is a growing need for appraisal and
synthesis of prior systematic reviews to ensure that decision-making is constantly informed by the
best available accumulated evidence. The study by Tesli, Egeland, Sonderby, Haukvik, Bettella, and
many others investigates the influence of genetic risk variants such as enlarged ventricles and
volumetric reductions on structural brain abnormalities in Bipolar Disorder (BD). The typology of
literature reviews we used herein will allow eHealth researchers, graduate students and practitioners
to gain a better understanding of the similarities and differences between review types.
These authors reviewed the existing literature on personal health record ( phr ) systems including
design, functionality, implementation, applications, outcomes, and benefits. A literature review is a
survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations, theses, and research papers. This
exercise requires a significant investment on the part of researchers, who must ensure enhanced
objectivity and avoid biases or mistakes. However, it is still a credible source of information. AU
library also has AU student authored theses and dissertations available in print, search the library
catalog for these titles. Good Essay About Personality Bipolar Disorder: Causes, Diagnosis And
Treatment. Type more methodology terms in the first search box. Make sure the sources you use are
credible, and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.
Step 1: Formulate a research question Formulating the research question is probably the most
important step of a systematic review. When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,”
we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. You can use this sample for research
and reference purposes to help create your own paper. It can also be helpful to consider the historical
and cultural context in which the work was created and to engage with other critical interpretations
of the work. You should be able to answer it based only on a review of existing publications. Boyle
and Tang read through the articles to decide if any more studies needed to be excluded based on the
selection criteria. After the introduction, it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads
directly to your theoretical framework or methodology. A literature review is a survey of scholarly
sources on a specific topic. The purpose of this descriptive or mapping review was to characterize
publication trends in the medical informatics literature over a 20-year period (1987 to 2006). It can
be undertaken as stand-alone projects in their own right, or as a precursor to a systematic review. In
this way, critical reviews attempt to constructively inform other scholars about the weaknesses of
prior research and strengthen knowledge development by giving focus and direction to studies for
further improvement ( Kirkevold, 1997 ). The 7 steps for conducting a systematic review are
explained with an example. The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the
literature review. Research objective (s): Rephrase your research question as an objective. Depending
on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your
overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically). Another strategy is
to scan the reference lists of relevant studies. Boyle and colleagues also divided the studies into
subgroups, such as studies about babies, children, and adults, and analyzed the effect sizes within
each group. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria; 2017 Feb 27. If you’re a professional seeking to
publish your review, it’s a good idea to bring together an advisory committee. Many nurses have a
baseline understanding of research in general, but it is important for the researcher to understand their
own values and beliefs when determining the type of research they will be performing. The following
are five secondary quantitative research approaches which are popularly used.
The use of any parts of the work without proper citation is forbidden. When you have multiple
sources cited in a paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing them (not always, but often Read
more about synthesis here. Bibliographic, word-processing, spreadsheet, and statistical software. A
literature review is a type of review that uses a less systematic and formal approach than a
systematic review. Step 7: Write and publish a report The purpose of writing a systematic review
article is to share the answer to your research question and explain how you arrived at this answer.
The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice. How to Do a Systematic
Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and This guide describes how to plan, conduct,
organize, and present a systematic review of quantitative (meta-analysis) or qualitative (narrative
review, meta-synthesis) information. As another methodological contribution, vom Brocke et al.
(2009) offered a series of guidelines for conducting literature reviews, with a particular focus on
how to search and extract the relevant body of knowledge. The 7 steps for conducting a systematic
review are explained with an example. The methods are repeatable, and the approach is formal and
systematic: Formulate a research question. They’re thorough: they summarize all available evidence.
Although literature reviews are often less time-consuming and can be insightful or helpful, they
have a higher risk of bias and are less transparent than systematic reviews. By examining the various
literary devices used by the author and analyzing the themes and symbolism within the work, readers
can gain a deeper appreciation for the work and its place within its cultural and historical context.
Presentation Outline: What “Literature Review” is and its importance. However, if you choose this
strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarising sources in order. By accessing the work
you hereby accept the Terms. The nature of this statement would suggest that it is not an
experimental study, but that it is within a quantitative research paradigm. Four inclusion and three
exclusion criteria were utilized during the screening process. This is a group of about six people who
have experience in the topic you’re researching. He holds a PhD in education and has published over
20 articles in scholarly journals. Previous findings are usually needed and frequently previous meth-
ods are also important. They help to define the relationship between your search terms. For example,
using the operator AND will combine the terms expanding the search. Write in well-structured
paragraphs: use transitions and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts. Was
the research funded by a source that could influence the findings. Pivotal publications: are there any
influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field. Local papers, newspapers,
magazines, radio stations, and television stations are a fantastic source of data for secondary
quantitative research. Contact a librarian directly (email), or submit a request form. You should
always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in your field to
be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as for any other
genre. There is however no real discussion of the underpinning principles of quantitative research
Parahoo, 2006. A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. If you want to
know more about statistics, methodology, or research bias, make sure to check out some of our other
articles with explanations and examples.