Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    SELF

    Uploaded by

    Jecka villasis
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating e-portfolios with criteria in four areas: visual appeal, organization, content, and reflections. Each area contains several indicators that are rated on a scale of 1 to 5. The ratings in each area are averaged and multiplied by the area's weight to calculate a subtotal. The subtotals are summed to calculate a final rating out of 5.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    SELF

    Uploaded by

    Jecka villasis
    4 views1 page
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating e-portfolios with criteria in four areas: visual appeal, organization, content, and reflections. Each area contains several indicators that are rated on a scale of 1 to 5. The ratings in each area are averaged and multiplied by the area's weight to calculate a subtotal. The subtotals are summed to calculate a final rating out of 5.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating e-portfolios with criteria in four areas: visual appeal, organization, content, and reflections. Each area contains several indicators that are rated on a scale of 1 to 5. The ratings in each area are averaged and multiplied by the area's weight to calculate a subtotal. The subtotals are summed to calculate a final rating out of 5.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    4 views1 page

    SELF

    Uploaded by

    Jecka villasis
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating e-portfolios with criteria in four areas: visual appeal, organization, content, and reflections. Each area contains several indicators that are rated on a scale of 1 to 5. The ratings in each area are averaged and multiplied by the area's weight to calculate a subtotal. The subtotals are summed to calculate a final rating out of 5.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Republic of the Philippines

    Northwest Samar State University


    Rueda St., Calbayog City 6710
    Website: http//www.nwssu.edu.ph
    Email: main@nwssu,edu.ph
    Telefax: (055) 2093657

    COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

    Rubric for e- Portfolio

    Name of Student: JECKA J. VILLASIS Course & Year: BEED 3


    Evaluation: _/__Self ___Peer ___Professor

    Direction: tick(/) the box below the score that best describes the indicator. The legend
    below gives the description of each score.

    LEGEND
    5 - Outstanding 2 - Fair
    4 - Very outstanding 1 - Need Improvement
    3 - Satisfactory

    Criteria RATINGS
    5 4 3 2 1
    A. Visual Appeal (20%) /
    1. Lay-out /
    2. Tone/mode /
    3. Creativity /
    4. Resourcefulness
    Sub Total Visual Appeal ( Total ratings/4)x.20
    B. Organization (20%)
    1. Completeness of entries /
    2. Hyperlinking of entries /
    3. Ease of navigation of entries /
    4. Correctness of Form (e.g, grammar) /
    Sub Total Organization ( Total ratings/4)x.20
    C. Content (30%)
    1. Self- Introduction /
    2. Learning outputs /
    3. Reflection /
    Sub Total Content ( Total ratings/2)x.30
    D. Reflections (30%)
    1. Depth of understanding /
    2. Application /
    Sub Total Reflection ( Total ratings/2)x.30
    Final Rating: 5.7

    JECKA J. VILLASIS
    Name and Signature of Rater

    You might also like