How Student Learn Ohm Law in The Classroom-Saunarno Dan Yusliana

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

PROSIDING ICTTE FKIP UNS 2015 ISSN: 2502-4124

Vol 1, Nomor 1, Januari 2016


Halaman:

How Student Learn Ohm Law in The Classroom

Sarwanto, Widha Sunarno, Elvin Yusliana


Sebelas Maret University
Jl Ir. Sutami 36 A, Surakarta, Indonesia

Corresponding e-mail: sarwanto@fkip.uns.ac.id

Abstract: Most of Indonesian Physics teachers begin to teach dynamic electricity with explain the meaning of electric
FXUUHQW RKP¶V ODZ D SDUDOOHO VHULHV FLUFXLW FRQWLQXLQJ ZLWK WKH H[DPSOH SUREOHPV SURYLGH SUDFWLFH DQVZHU-
questions, ending with H[DPLQDWLRQ 7KLV VWXG\ DLPV WR DQDO\]H KRZ WR OHDUQ RKP¶V ODZ RQ VWXGHQW OHDUQLQJ
with this traditional approach and problem based learning approach. This research method is descriptive
analytic study, with a sample of first-year students at the college. In traditional approach student can solve the
problem in low order thingking skills but not in high order thingking skills. Student who learn with problem
based learning can demonstrate their skill in thingking and psychomotor. It shows students how to think is
partial, view of the symptoms considered only on the symptoms. The mindset of the students has been
changed into a more holistic when the research data analyzed simultaneously by using linear regression.

Keywords: RKP¶V ODZ, traditional approach, problem based learning

1. ,1752'8&7,21 Furthermore, these intuitive conceptions were


Research related to the study of physics has found to be extremely robust to change and were
been widely published (Carmichael et al, 1990; often held intact by children and adults alike
Pfundt & Duit, 1991; Wandersee, Mintzes & even after completion of years of formal science
Novak, 1994). Results of the research show that instructions. Thus the problem of how to bring
students already have a prior knowledge, ideas about conceptual change in learners becomes a
of science, knowledge of nature and technology major challenge to science educators.
prior to the formal learning process is done. In Indonesian Curriculum 2013 requires
addition, also found some intuitive concept that learning is done with scientific approach. In
is different from a scientific view, giving rise to scientific approach, student activities include
misconceptions (e.g. Helm, 1980), observing, ask, try, reason and communicate.
preconceptions (e.g. Novak, 1977), alternative Student activity like this is easy to do when
conceptions (Driver & Easley, 1978) or learning the experimental method. Student
FKLOGUHQ¶V VFLHQFH *LOEHUW 2VERUQH inquiry is defined as a versatile activity that
Fensham, 1982). involves making observations, posing questions,
Physics Education Program of Teacher examining books and other sources of
Training and Education Faculty have many information to see what is already known;
problems in student performance. One indicator planning investigations; reviewing what is
is in the laboratory we found more than 50% already known in light of the student's
damaged electricity measuring devices. These experimental evidence; using tools to gather,
tools are indispensable to do an experiments on analyze and interpret data; proposing answers,
electricity yet. The experience from study in explanation, and predictions; and
senior high school, most of Indonesian physics communicating the results (Hussain, 2011). By
teachers begin to teach dynamic electricity with experiment in inquiry we refer to that portion of
H[SODLQ WKH PHDQLQJ RI HOHFWULF FXUUHQW RKP¶V research in which variables are manipulated and
law, a parallel series circuit, continuing with the their effects upon other variables are observed
example problems, provide practice answer- (Campbell and Stanley, 1966). A large chasm
questions, ending with examination. existed between the practice of research and the

| 812
PROSIDING ICTTE FKIP UNS 2015 ISSN: 2502-4124
Vol 1, Nomor 1, Januari 2016
Halaman:

practice of teaching (e.g., Piaget & Szeminska, in understanding the text, and text
1952; McLellan & Dewey, 1895; Brownell, comprehension correlated with cognitive ability.
1928). The preferred source of lessons students are
Psychometrics lent support to classical work-books students (Lembar Kerja Siswa-
experimental design²that to experiment means LKS). Analysis of the 10 LKS for physics
to manipulate variables. In classical students found that: LKS book contains a
experimental research, tasks, items, dimensions,
and so forth were objects to be manipulated. It summary of the material, physics formulas, and
was through such manipulation that researchers examples of problems, exercises, and exams.
FRQWUROOHG VWXGHQWV¶ HQYLURQPHQWV DQG KHQFH Although in LKS no indication experiment, but
uncovered the reality of their knowledge. From experiments in LKS is verification of the
a constructivist perspective, however, there is no summary material. Physics interpreted by most
VXFK WKLQJ DV D ³FRQVWDQW´ VWLPXOXV VWXGHQWV students as subjects which contain definitions,
construct for themselves the tasks in which they formulas and calculations. Therefore, the book
actually engage, and it is the constructive
process and the constructed task that are is a book that favored students who directly
interesting scientifically (Powers, 1978). provide definitions, formulas, and practice
0(7+2' counting using the existing formula. This result
This study was conducted on 32 students of is in line with the opinion that in the textbooks,
physical education study subjects who will took the subject matter is often approached from a
as a teacher physics in high school. The student factual and calculus-based angle. Students are
has the 6th semester, this semester they also take presented with facts, definitions, and laws, and
courses microteaching. Students already passed WKH\ DUH WDXJKW HTXDWLRQV H J EDVHG RQ 2KP¶V
the fundamental physics courses, basic math, Law, I = V/R) that can be used to solve standard
electronics and mechanics. Based on the circuit problems (Frederiksen et al., 1999;
description of the subjects that have been taken, Gunstone et al., 2009; Jaakkola et al., 2011;
the students have the ability early enough to McDermott & Shaffer, 1992).
pack into a physics course in high school /LNHZLVH ZKHQ VWXGHQWV OHDUQ WKH RKP¶V
physics teaching. law in dynamic electricity. The concept of
Study of secondary school physics lecture electricity is abstract and hard to grasp.
was held for four months (12 lectures), and by Electricity is invisible yet omnipresent in our
learning through multiple instructional methods. lives. Many models of and analogies for
At first the students were given a demonstration electricity have been used, but none of them
of learning method, followed by an experimental
method, the last lecture was held by the method fully explains all of its aspects (Frederiksen,
of inquiry. Learning resources using Serway White, & Gutwill, 1999; Hart, 2008).
book, and students are asked to pack the McDermott (1991) studied examination
material physics for microteaching activities. responses from groups of university students
/HDUQLQJ RKP¶V ODZ LWVHOI LV GRQH DV PXFK DV who had completed a course on introductory
one-off meeting of the two meetings about SK\VLFV LQFOXGLQJ HOHFWULFDO FLUFXLWV DQG 2KP¶V
dynamic electricity. Data were analyzed Law. The students were presented with an exam
descriptively qualitative.
3. 5(68/7 $1' ',6&866 question about a simple DC circuit. In another
The identification results using physics study, McDermott and Shaffer (1992) observed
textbooks in middle school together showed that many students have persistent conceptual
94% of students do not like textbooks. Textbook difficulties with analyzing simple electrical
contains many lengthy verbal information, circuits, such as an inability to apply formal
detailed information, using a standard language, concepts related to current, voltage, and
make students confused and difficult to resistance. These observations still hold today;
understand the content of textbooks. It shows in more recent literature about electricity
students have difficulty understanding the instruction it is remains the case that students
information that is textual. These results are fail to acquire a deep conceptual understanding
consistent with research Ramelan (2008) which of electricity and the behavior of electrical
states that high school students have a weakness FLUFXLWV %DúHU 'XUPXú %DúHU
| 813
PROSIDING ICTTE FKIP UNS 2015 ISSN: 2502-4124
Vol 1, Nomor 1, Januari 2016
Halaman:

Geban, 2007). Electrical learning difficulties electrical measuring instruments. This


caused by lack of mastery of concepts, lack fascination with the power tool make students
mathematical ability, and the incapacity of enthusiastic in learning about electricity. The
students in converting units. Students find it fact that occurs when the design is implemented,
difficult to achieve the goal of learning: using a the impact ammeters damaged. Papadouris and
voltmeter and ammeter in series; and understand Constantinou (2009) argued that the
the Law of Kirchoff II, for 2 loops (Rusilowati, accumulation of experiences with natural
2006). phenomena through active exploration,
In inquiry learning, students learn through investigation, and interpretation provides a basis
exploration and application of scientific for the development of conceptual
reasoning. It has been found to be among the understanding. The role of active
most effective methods for acquiring conceptual
knowledge (Alfieri, Brooks, Aldrich, & experimentation by students in science learning
Tenenbaum, 2011; Deslauriers & Wieman, was also emphasized by Steinberg (2000). In his
2011). But in Indonesia, most famous learning opinion there are at least two elements that
resources is LKS not textbook. In the LKS, appear to be critical in making science
students can study definitions, laws, and they are instruction successful. First, successful
WDXJKW HTXDWLRQV H J EDVHG RQ 2KP¶V /DZ , instruction is based on understanding how
V/R). Another student activity is doing an students make sense of the subject matter. That
experiment that be designed like figure 1.
is, instruction must take into account the ideas
and conceptions the students already have about
the subject matter. As stated in the introduction,
electricity is an abstract and intangible concept;
however, most people have conceptions, often
pre-scientific and idiosyncratic ones, about what
HOHFWULFLW\ LV DQG KRZ HOHFWULFLW\ ³EHKDYHV´
Steinberg emphasizes the importance for
instruction of hHOSLQJ VWXGHQWV WR ³HOLFLW´ WKHLU
own conceptions and using those conceptions as
a starting point for the instruction. Second,
students must be actively engaged in finding out
what is happening instead of just witnessing
)LJXUH 2KP¶V /DZ H[SHULPHQW GHVLJQ
something being presented.
We did redesign the experiment guide
Based on the design of this experiment, the RKP¶V ODZ :URQJ HOHFWULFDO FLUFXLW FDXVHV
students conducted an experiment to prove the damage ammeter because current flows exceeds
data that has been presented in the table. Design the maximum allowed by the electrical
of experiments like these do not require students measuring devices. So that the current flowing
to experiment, because the existing data students through the ammeter according to their ability in
can analyze the data. However, if this data is the circuit ammeter then mounted potentiometer
analyzed will be found a lot of mistakes. as a flow regulator. By using a variable
potentiometer daam free this trial is an electrical
Graphics are not through the center of current, while the dependent variable is the
coordinates, so that there is a deviation from the electrical voltage. The data obtained will be
chart should be. Implementation of the study, more than in the previous experiment design.
was not carried out an analysis of the chart is Transformation into a flow chart on the abscissa
formed, only the relationship between V and I. and on the ordinate the voltage will make it
Based on this design, the compiler of the book easier to get the physical meaning of the slope of
looks not seriously attempted to obtain data. the graph. Mathematically, the slope of this
graph has meaning barriers and in accordance
The experiments were performed despite with the ohms law.
RKP¶V ODZ IRU YHULILFDWLRn, it was quite 4 CONCLUSIONS
interesting for students. One of which caused a /HDUQLQJ SURFHVV RKP¶V ODZ WKDW LV
lot of students who are still not familiar with incompatible with the nature of science led to
| 814
PROSIDING ICTTE FKIP UNS 2015 ISSN: 2502-4124
Vol 1, Nomor 1, Januari 2016
Halaman:

student learning verbalistic. 2KP¶V law is Hart, C. (2008). Models in physics, models for physics
simply a statement of concepts, mathematical learning, and why the distinction may matter in
the case of electric circuits. Research in Science
formula, which needs to be calculated to get the Education, 38, 529-544.
result. 7KURXJK UHGHVLJQ OHDUQLQJ RKP¶V ODZ
Helm, H. (1980) Misconceptions in Physics amongst South
students learn in a holistic manner, covering the African Students. Physics Education, 15(2), 92-
circuit, the data pattern, data analysis and 97.
conclusions obtained. Students not only
Jaakkola, T., Nurmi, S., & Veermans, K. (2011). A
XQGHUVWDQG WKH RKP¶V ODZ EXW DOVR VKRZHG comparison of students' conceptual
activity in thinking, planning, implementing in understanding of electric circuits in simulation
real events in everyday life. only and simulation-laboratory contexts. Journal
5 REFERENCES of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 71-93.
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. McDermott, L. C. (1991). What we teach and what is
R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction learned: Closing the gap [Millikan Lecture 1990].
enhance learning? Journal of Educational American Journal of Physics, 59, 301-315.
Psychology, 103, 1-18. McDermott, L. C., & Shaffer, P. S. (1992). Research as a
%DúHU 0 'XUPXú 6 7he effectiveness of guide for curriculum development: An example
computer supported versus real laboratory from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation
inquiry learning environments on the of student understanding. American Journal of
understanding of direct current electricity among Physics, 60, 994-1003.
pre-service elementary school teachers. Eurasia McLellan, J. A., & Dewey, J. (1895). The psychology of
Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology number. New York: constantly Appleton.
Education, 6, 47-61. Novak, J. D (1977). A Theory of education. Ithaca, NY:
%DúHU 0 *HEDQ g (IIHFW RI LQVWUXFWLRQ EDVHG Cornell University press.
on conceptual change activities on students' Papadouris, N., & Constantinou, C. P. (2009). A
understanding of static electricity concepts. methodology for integrating computer-based
Research in Science & Technological Education, learning tools in science curricula. Journal of
25, 243-267 Curriculum Studies, 41, 521 - 538.
Brownell, W. A. (1928). The developmenW RI FKLOGUHQ¶V Pfundt, H, & Duit, R. (1991). %LEOLRJUDSK\ 6WXGHQWV¶
number ideas in the primary grades. Chicago: alternative frameworks and science education.
University of Chicago Press. Kiel, Gen. University of Kiel Institute for
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Science Education.
quasi-experimental designs for research. Piaget, J., & Szeminska, A. (1952). 7KH FKLOG¶V FRQFHSWLRQ
Chicago: Rand McNally of number. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Carmichael, P., Watts, M., Driver, R., Holding, B., Philips, Powers, W. (1978). Quantitative analysis of purposive
I. & Twigger, D. (1990). 5HVHDUFKRQ VWXGHQWV¶ systems: Some spadework at the foundations of
conceptions in science: A bibliography. scientific psychology. Psychological Review,
/HHGV (QJODQG &KLOGUHQ¶V /HDUQLQJ LQ 6FLHQFH 85(5), 417±435.
Research Group. (University of Leeds). Ramelan, R. (2008). Bahasa dan kognisi Studi korelasional
Deslauriers, L., & Wieman, C. E. (2011). Learning and tentang pemahaman teks ekspositori dan berpikir
retention of quantum concepts with different deduktif dan induktif pada siswa SMA. Wacana,
teaching methods. Physical Review Special Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia, 10(1),
Topics - Physics Education Research, 7, 010101. 72-89
Driver, R. & Easley, J. (1978) Pupil and paradigms: A Steinberg, R. N. (2000). Computers in teaching science: To
review of the literature related to concept simulate or not to simulate? American Journal of
development in adolescent science students. Physics, 68, S37-S41.
Studies in Science Education, 5, 61- 84. Wandersee, J.H., Mintzes, J.J. and Novak, J.D.(1994)
Frederiksen, J. R., White, B. Y., & Gutwill, J. (1999). Research on alternative conceptions in science.
Dynamic mental models in learning science: The In D.L. Gabel (Eds.), Handbook of research on
importance of constructing derivational linkages science teaching and learning, Macmillan, 177-
among models. Journal of Research in Science 210.
Teaching, 36, 806-836.
*LOEHUW - 2VERUQH 5 )HQVKDP 3 &KLOGUHQ¶V
science and its consequences for teaching.
Science Education, 66, 623-633.
Gunstone, R., Mulhall, P., & McKittrick, B. (2009).
Physics tHDFKHUV¶ SHUFHSWLRQV RI WKH GLIILFXOW\ RI
teaching electricity. Research in Science
Education, 39, 515-538.

| 815

You might also like