Surgicalstrikes Perception 161019073336

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 16

Surgical Strikes – Perception Analysis

Group 2, AD-PR 2016-17, IIMC Delhi


Surgical Strikes - Timeline

Sept 18, 2016: Four terrorists attack Indian Army headquarters in Uri near LOC, kill 19
Indian soldiers
Sept 21: India summons Pak envoy
Sept 22: Nawaz Sharif provokes India at Unga
Sept 23: PM Modi takes war-room briefing
Sept 29: Indian Army carried out surgical strikes in POK, killing 38 terrorists and 2
Pakistani soldiers
Sept 30: Pak troops opened fire at J&K's Akhnoor district
Oct 1: Pak troops again targeted J&K's Akhnoor district
Oct 2: Again Pak troops launched firing in Pallanwala sector of Jammu district.
Oct 3: Pak troops violated ceasefire four times in Pooch district of J&K, leaving 5
civilians injured
Oct 4: Pak troops again violated the border ceasefire five times in Jammu region, one
Jawan suffered minor injury
Oct 5: Pak troops violated the border ceasefire four times in civilian areas of Pooch,
Rajouri and Kapwara district of J&K. Number of ceasefire violations reach 20 as
Pakistani troops continue to retaliate
Highlights of Indian Media Coverage of Surgical Strikes

• Exhaustive coverage reporting & justifying strikes

• All-out support for the Indian Army

• Pro-government attitude

• Strikes reported as an NDA ‘homerun’ against cross-


border terrorism

• Politicization of the event sparsely covered

• Signs of warmongering
Indian Print Media on Surgical Strikes
Notable Reactions in India on Surgical Strikes
Pakistan Print Media on Surgical Strikes
Reaction of Political Parties in India
• Initially, all political parties publicly supported the strikes

• However, doubts surrounding authenticity of strikes invited controversial remarks


from the likes of Kejriwal later
Reaction of Political Parties in Pakistan

• Complete denial of ‘surgical strikes’

• India’s version of surgical strikes called a


‘farce’

• Baloch leaders and other factions ‘welcomed’


the strikes
Reaction of other countries on India’s surgical strikes

United States of America


The Obama administration publicly slammed Pakistan for its continual harboring of
terrorists and many American leaders came out in support of India on its stance on Uri
issue and sending a strong message to Pakistan that it needs to act against UN-
designated terrorist groups. Interestingly on the other hand leading American news
dailies like The Washington Post have taken this issue with a pinch of salt, putting a
question mark on the whole incident.

China

China quoted that it is in touch with India and Pakistan through different channels to
bring down tensions, asking them to properly deal with their differences and work
jointly to maintain peace and security in the region. Thereby, not breaking its
diplomatic stance by not openly condemning Pakistan or lauding India for taking a
stand against cross border terrorism.
Russia

Russia welcomed the surgical strikes by India saying that every country has a right to
defend itself. Russia's Ambassador to New Delhi Alexander M Kadakin also said his country
had always been with India in fighting cross-border terrorism. He also assured India that it
does not need to worry about Russia-Pakistan joint military exercise, saying it did not take
place in "Pakistan-Occupied Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir".

Afghanistan

Afghanistan backed India's surgical strikes on terror launch pads in PoK, terming it as an
act of "self-defense", and in a strong message to Pakistan asserted that time has come to
take "tough" and "risky" decisions to deal with the menace of terrorism.

Bangladesh
India has "all legal and globally accepted right" to respond to any attack on her
sovereignty and territory.
United Nations on Surgical Strikes by India

The UN was seen taking a diplomatic stand like always. Stephane Dujarric,
spokesperson for Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, stated the Secretary-
General was following the developments "with great concern," adding that
the United Nations "calls on the governments of India and Pakistan to
exercise restraint, and encourages them to continue the effort to resolve their
differences peacefully and through dialogue.

In a press conference on October 3, Vitaly Churkin, the Permanent


Representative of Russia to the United Nations and the President of the UN
Security Council for that month, refused to comment on the India-Pakistan
situation, stating the Security Council had not been discussing the matter
Impact of Surgical Strikes on Market

• On 29th September, PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry president Mahesh


Gupta said there will be no impact on India's trade and economy, adding that the
volatility in the financial markets will also be short lived.

• Despite this there was an environment of large uncertainty dooming over the
Indian markets.

• At one point the Sensex was down 500 points. Even the rupee wobbled and looked
like it was sliding down. Normally India’s stock market is in sync with global
markets. But on this day most of the world’s stock markets were rallying, including
the ones in East and South East Asia. Ironically even the Karachi stock market went
up, not down after the surgical strike.

• Eventually by 5th October, although there was a fear of retaliation from the other
side of the border, the markets had stabilized.
Impactful PR strategies surrounding Surgical Strikes

• Public announcement of strikes; pattern followed by Israel


and Russia
• Excellent media handling, pumping information justifying the
strikes
• Strikes coated as ‘justice for Uri Attacks’ and ‘morale buildup’
for forces
• Cornered Pakistan as ‘terrorism hub’ on international stage;
earned global sympathy
• Multiple statements on ‘Free Baloch’ and ‘Free Gilgit’ thereby
denting Pak democratic image
Takeaways from India’s Surgical Strikes

• Government showed courage and conviction in approving and publicizing


surgical strikes on Pakistan

• Public opinion changed in NDA’s favor almost instantly; all other issues were
overshadowed

• Indian Media supported the government; even defended the strikes whole-
heartedly

• Miscommunication regarding publicizing surgical strike evidence was damaging


to some extent

• Support from neighboring countries and global leaders helped mold public
opinion

• Modi’s ’56-inch’ image refurbished

• After Kashmir ‘pellet’ debacle, Indian Army’s credibility was reinstated


THANK YOU!

You might also like