5 4 3 2 1

f x̄ % f x̄ % f x̄ % f x̄ % f x̄ % Tot Legen Rank

al d
mea
n
1. I visit the
canteen during recess 32 1 20 5 1. 31. 4 0. 25. 3 0. 21. 1 0.00 0.63 3.50 OFTE 1
1 28 88 1 77 63 5 44 88 63 N
time frequently.
2. I always go to
library whenever we 3 0. 1. 4 0. 2.5 4 0. 25. 6 0. 42. 4 0.28 27.5 2.09 RARE 2
09 88 1 1 77 63 8 85 5 4 LY
have vacant.
3. I visit the
computer laboratory 2 0. 1. 6 0. 3.7 2 0. 16. 4 0. 28. 8 0.5 50 1.79 NEVE 3
06 25 15 5 6 49 25 6 58 75 0 R
whenever I have free
time.
GENERAL WEIGHTED MEAN = 2.46 (RARELY)

Table 4.Frequency

Table 6.Educational Resources

 5 4 3 2 1

f x̄ % f x̄ % F x̄ % f x̄ % f x̄ % Me Legend Rank
an
1. The quality of 9 0. 5. 3 0. 23. 9 1. 57. 1 0. 11. 2 0.01 1.25 3.23 ACCEPT 8
educational resources
28 63 9 98 38 2 73 5 8 23 25 ABLE
provided in the cafeteria.
2. The quality of 10 0. 6. 7 1. 44. 7 1. 45 7 0. 4.3 0 0 0 3.53 GOOD 4
resources available in the
31 25 1 78 38 2 35 09 8
library for your academic
use.
3. The adequacy of 24 0. 15 9 2. 56. 3 0. 23. 8 0. 5 0 0 0 3.81 GOOD 2
medical services
75 0 25 25 8 71 75 1
provided in the clinic.
4. The quality of 16 0. 10 7 1. 46. 5 1. 35. 9 0. 5.6 4 0.03 2.5 3.56 GOOD 3
educational resources
5 4 85 25 7 07 63 11 3
provided by the school
(i.e. textbooks and
modules).
5. The adequacy of 13 0. 8. 5 1. 35. 8 1. 51. 7 0. 4.3 0 0 0 3.49 GOOD 6
resources in the canteen.
41 13 7 43 63 3 56 88 09 8
6. The availability of up- 9 0. 5. 5 1. 34. 7 1. 48. 1 0. 11. 0 0 0 3.35 ACCEPT 7
to-date software and
28 63 5 38 38 8 46 75 8 23 25 ABLE
hardware.
7. The condition of the 13 0. 8. 6 1. 40 7 1. 46. 9 0. 5.6 0 0 0 3.51 GOOD 5
library resources.
41 13 4 6 4 49 25 11 3
8. The overall adequacy 37 1. 23 6 1. 38. 5 1. 35 5 0. 3.1 0 0 0 3.82 GOOD 1
of facilities provided in
16 .1 2 55 75 6 05 06 3
the clinic for supporting
the health and well-being 3
of students.
9. The quality of internet 7 0. 5. 4 1. 30. 7 1. 44. 2 0. 16. 7 0.04 4.38 3.15 ACCEPT 9
connectivity in the
22 48 9 23 63 1 33 38 6 33 25 ABLE
computer laboratory for
your academic tasks.

GENERAL WEIGHTED MEAN = 3.49 (GOOD)

Table 5.Physical Infrastructure and Accessibility

 5 4 3 2 1

f x̄ % f x̄ % F x̄ % f x̄ % f x̄ % Me Legend Rank
an
1. The school premises 9 0. 5. 3 0. 23. 9 1. 57. 1 0. 11. 2 0.01 1.25 3.23 ACCEPT 8
are consistently clean and
28 63 9 98 38 2 73 5 8 23 25 ABLE
well-maintained.
2. The classrooms are 10 0. 6. 7 1. 44. 7 1. 45 7 0. 4.3 0 0 0 3.53 GOOD 4
well-equipped with
31 25 1 78 38 2 35 09 8
comfortable furniture,
proper lighting, and
ventilation.
3. The school's physical 24 0. 15 9 2. 56. 3 0. 23. 8 0. 5 0 0 0 3.81 GOOD 2
facilities (classrooms,
75 0 25 25 8 71 75 1
libraries, etc.) are easily
accessible for students
and staff.
4. Safety features such as 16 0. 10 7 1. 46. 5 1. 35. 9 0. 5.6 4 0.03 2.5 3.56 GOOD 3
fire extinguishers,
5 4 85 25 7 07 63 11 3
emergency exits, and first
aid kits are easily
accessible and functional.
5. The school's 13 0. 8. 5 1. 35. 8 1. 51. 7 0. 4.3 0 0 0 3.49 GOOD 6
maintenance practices
41 13 7 43 63 3 56 88 09 8
prioritize student safety
and well-being.
6. We have adequate 9 0. 5. 5 1. 34. 7 1. 48. 1 0. 11. 0 0 0 3.35 ACCEPT 7
sports facilities, including
28 63 5 38 38 8 46 75 8 23 25 ABLE
playing fields, courts, and
equipment for various
activities
7. There are enough 13 0. 8. 6 1. 40 7 1. 46. 9 0. 5.6 0 0 0 3.51 GOOD 5
classrooms to meet the
41 13 4 6 4 49 25 11 3
demands of the student
population.
8. The cafeteria and 37 1. 23 6 1. 38. 5 1. 35 5 0. 3.1 0 0 0 3.82 GOOD 1
restroom facilities are
16 .1 2 55 75 6 05 06 3
clean and well-
maintained. 3
9. The science 7 0. 5. 4 1. 30. 7 1. 44. 2 0. 16. 7 0.04 4.38 3.15 ACCEPT 9
laboratories equipped are
22 48 9 23 63 1 33 38 6 33 25 ABLE
with modern and
functional equipment.

GENERAL WEIGHTED MEAN = 2.46 (RARELY)

Table 7.School Security and Services
 5 4 3 2 1

F x̄ % F x̄ % f x̄ % f x̄ % f x̄ % Me Legend Rank
an
1. I feel that the academic 30 0. 18 9 2. 61. 3 0. 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.99 SATISFIE 1
support I receive from
94 .7 8 45 25 2 6 D
my teachers.
5
2. I feel comfortable 28 0. 17 6 1. 43. 5 1. 35 6 0. 3.7 1 0.00 0.63 3.75 SATISFIE 3.5
approaching my teachers
88 .5 9 73 13 6 05 08 5 63 D
for help.
3. I feel that my school 14 0. 8. 6 1. 39. 7 1. 44. 1 0. 6.8 1 0.00 0.63 3.50 SATISFIE 9
provides me with the
44 75 3 58 38 1 33 38 1 14 8 63 D
resources I need in case
of emergency.
4. The support in times of 17 0. 10 6 1. 40. 7 1. 44. 5 0. 3.1 2 0.01 1.25 3.56 SATISFIE 8
need offered at my
53 .6 5 63 63 1 33 38 06 3 D
school are adequate.
3
5. I feel like my school is 19 0. 11 8 2. 55. 4 0. 28. 6 0. 3.7 0 0 0 3.76 SATISFIE 2
a welcoming and
59 .8 9 23 63 6 86 75 08 5 D
supportive environment.
8
6. I feel safe at school. 13 0. 8. 8 2. 53. 5 0. 31. 1 0. 6.2 1 0.01 1.25 3.62 SATISFIE 7
41 13 5 13 13 0 94 25 0 13 5 D
7. I believe that my 26 0. 16 7 1. 45 5 1. 35 6 0. 3.7 0 0 0 3.74 SATISFIE 5
school takes safety
81 .2 2 8 6 05 08 5 D
seriously.
5
8. I am confident that my 23 0. 14 7 1. 43. 6 1. 38. 6 0. 3.7 0 0 0 3.69 SATISFIE 6
school is prepared for
72 .3 0 75 75 1 14 13 08 5 D
emergencies.
8
9. I believe that my 23 0. 14 7 1. 48. 5 1. 34. 4 0. 2.5 0 0 0 3.75 SATISFIE 3.5
school is a place where I
72 .3 8 95 75 5 03 38 05 D
can focus on learning
without worrying about 8
my safety.

GENERAL WEIGHTED MEAN = 3.71 (SATISFIED)

 This table presents the results derived from a survey questionnaire administered to

evaluate the satisfaction of Benigno V. Aldana High School students regarding school facilities,

with a particular focus on security and safety measures not only physically but emotionally. The

data illustrates the diverse responses provided by the respondents.

The initial two questions, phrased in the first person, addressed the students' emotional

satisfaction and the support they receive from teachers. With a response of 3.99 (satisfied) and

3.75 (satisfied), it is evident that the students expressed a satisfaction in these aspects. 3 rd, 4th and

5th question assessed the students' satisfaction with the school's resources for safety and the

support provided in case of emergencies. The students indicated satisfaction with responses

averaging 3.50 (satisfied), 3.56 (satisfied), and 3.76 (satisfied), respectively. Question 6 inquired

about the students' sense of safety while at school, and it garnered a positive response from the

students, resulting in an average satisfaction score of 3.62 (satisfied). Questions 7 and 8

examined the level of preparedness of the school in various emergency scenarios in the

viewpoint of the students. The students expressed notable satisfaction, providing responses of

3.74 (satisfied) and 3.69 (satisfied), respectively. Finally, they were asked about their ability to

concentrate and work effectively in this educational environment. The collective response from

the students reflected a high level of satisfaction, with an affirmative average score of 3.75

(satisfied).

The data outcomes reveal a weighted mean of 3.71 (satisfied) for all responses, indicating

overall satisfaction among students regarding their security and well-being. This implies that

students experience a sense of safety and security within the school premises. Furthermore, the
findings suggest that students feel a strong confidence in the school's preparedness for

emergencies, as evidenced by the availability of necessary resources. The results underscore the

students' trust in the school's capability to provide the security they require. These findings

support the absence of these facilities hampers the assurance of security and trust among both

students and staff towards the school administration (Yusuf and Ahmed, 2016).