Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2024LGF2
2024LGF2
: BAYANDA MAY
: WANDILE ALFRED MLANJENI
: QINISELA DLAMINI
STUDENT NUMBER : 221257144
221539964
221422463
220165963
DEPARTMENT : MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE
QUALIFICATION : DIPLOMA- LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE
SUBJECT : LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE III
SUBJECT CODE : LGF36W0 EXT
QUESTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Local government is the sphere of government that is closest to ordinary South Africans
because it provides the basic services that have a direct impact on their lives. It is
meant to be an inclusive, democratic and accountable system, with communities and
community organisations acting as shareholders who are directly involved in local
government matters through public participation processes. In 2021-22, local
government had an estimated expenditure budget of R539,13 billion to operate and
deliver services.
In South Africa, municipal audit committees play a crucial part in promoting good
governance, accountability, and effective management of public resources. These
committees operate within the context of the Municipal Finance Management Act
(MFMA), which defines standards and rules for financial management procedures in
municipalities. The committees have many major responsibilities:
EXTERNAL AUDIT OVERSIGHT: The Audit Committee communicates with the external
auditors hired to review the municipality's financial statements. It reviews the auditor's
findings, ensures that audit recommendations are carried out, and tracks the
implementation of corrective actions.
COMPLIANCES MONITORING : The Committee oversees the municipality's
commitment to applicable laws, regulations, policies, and contractual agreements. It
evaluates the effectiveness of compliance measures and offers enhancements to
address any non-compliance issues discovered.
QUESTION 2
• Financial auditing
The overall investment in financial reporting, including finance officials’ salaries and
consulting fees, was R941.3 million, up from R832 million the year before. Internal audit
units and audit committees also examined the submitted financial accounts, and the
province cooperative governance agency and treasury sent experts to assist some
finance units. Despite these resources and support, key financial management controls
were insufficient to prevent material misstatements in financial statements, as only two
municipalities (Nkangala and Ehlanzeni district municipalities), which managed 3% of
the province’s local government budget, produced credible financial and performance
reports and followed important legislation. Dr. JS Moroka and Dipaleseng local
municipalities improved from disclaimed to qualified audit opinions after addressing
severe shortcomings in their internal controls, with the joint cooperation of the provincial
cooperative governance department and the treasury.
Municipalities also struggled to collect revenue for essential services, with poor debt
collection resulting in insufficient financial flow, making it difficult to fund operations and
settle supplier accounts. Eskom’s debt has increased from R9.51 billion to R13.45
billion, with municipalities taking an average of 456 days to pay their suppliers,
collecting R835 million in interest and penalties. We have advised municipal managers
of four substantial irregularities in this matter, including three late payments to vendors
and one failure to file value-added tax returns to the South African Revenue Service on
time.
• Compliance auditing
• Performance auditing
The majority of municipalities (70%) lacked efficient methods for gathering and
disseminating performance data, which resulted in inaccurate reporting, weakened
accountability, and subpar service delivery. These shortcomings make it more difficult
for councils and other bodies to perform their oversight duties. The majority of
municipalities also fell short of their goals, and some even went over budget even if they
didn’t accomplish them all. For instance, Thaba Chweu Local Municipality only met 29%
of its targets for infrastructure development and basic services despite using 104% of its
budget for these purposes. Critical performance indicators were also left out of several
municipalities’ performance reports. Msukaligwa Local Municipality, for example, did not
plan any resources to address community needs in this area since it did not include an
indicator on the quality of drinking water.
Municipalities spent the majority of the money they got without delivering the necessary
infrastructure on time and in the acceptable quality due to project flaws such as poor
planning, monitoring, and budget control. This resulted in towns paying for work that
was not completed, projects being delayed, and projects being delivered with flaws.
Some municipalities underspent their grant monies greatly, depriving citizens of services
for which funds had been set aside, such as clean drinking water. Municipalities also
failed to maintain their infrastructure assets, spending just an average of 1% of their
value on repairs and maintenance, which is significantly lower than the industry average
of 8%. And leaks owing to unmaintained and failing infrastructure.
The National Treasury did intervene last year to aid with financial rescue, but the impact
of this intervention is yet to be seen because addressing deep-rooted issues such as
debt recovery takes time. The Standerton wastewater treatment plant deteriorated
structurally and mechanically due to a lack of maintenance, with some portions of the
plant being completely non-functional. This had a detrimental impact on operational
procedures and resulted in sewage overflowing into the Vaal River, which the population
relies on for water. The torrential rains in February 2023 also wreaked havoc in the
Ehlanzeni district, emphasizing the issue of inadequate infrastructure repair.
RECOMMENDATIONS