Research Literature Review Template

Writing a literature review for your research can be a daunting task. It requires extensive reading,
critical analysis, and synthesis of existing literature on your chosen topic. A well-written literature
review provides a solid foundation for your research, demonstrating your understanding of the field
and identifying gaps for further exploration. However, navigating through numerous scholarly
articles, books, and other sources while ensuring coherence and relevance can be challenging.

The Difficulty of Writing a Literature Review

Crafting a literature review involves several challenges:

1. Information Overload:
With the abundance of literature available, it's easy to get overwhelmed by the sheer volume of
information. Sifting through numerous sources to identify relevant ones can be time-consuming and
mentally taxing.

2. Critical Analysis:
Evaluating the quality and reliability of sources requires critical thinking skills. Distinguishing
between credible research and biased opinions is essential to maintain the integrity of your literature
review.

3. Synthesis and Organization:

Integrating information from diverse sources into a coherent narrative is a complex process.
Structuring your literature review in a logical manner while highlighting key themes and debates
demands careful planning and attention to detail.

4. Time Constraints:
Conducting a thorough literature review is a time-intensive task. Balancing your research with other
academic or professional commitments can make it challenging to allocate sufficient time for
comprehensive literature review writing.

Why Choose ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔?

Amidst these challenges, seeking professional assistance can alleviate the burden and ensure the
quality of your literature review. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert academic writing services
tailored to your specific needs. Here's why you should consider us:

1. Experienced Writers:
Our team comprises skilled writers with expertise in various disciplines. They possess the necessary
research acumen to conduct thorough literature reviews that meet academic standards.

2. Customized Approach:
We understand that every research project is unique. Our writers work closely with you to
comprehend your requirements and tailor the literature review accordingly, ensuring relevance and
originality.

3. Quality Assurance:
We uphold high standards of quality in all our deliverables. Each literature review undergoes
rigorous editing and proofreading processes to eliminate errors and enhance clarity.

4. Timely Delivery:
We recognize the importance of deadlines in academic pursuits. With ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can
rest assured that your literature review will be delivered promptly, allowing you ample time for
review and feedback.

5. Customer Satisfaction:
Your satisfaction is our priority. We strive to exceed your expectations by providing personalized
attention and addressing any concerns promptly.

Conclusion
Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review hinder your research progress. Trust ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ to deliver a meticulously crafted literature review that sets the stage for your
academic success. Contact us today to avail of our professional writing services and embark on a
journey towards scholarly excellence.

(Note: This content is for illustrative purposes only and does not endorse any specific writing service.
It's essential to conduct thorough research and exercise discretion when seeking academic assistance.)
Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. The stand-alone literature review The
literature review published as a stand-alone article presents and analyzes as many of the important
publications in an area of study as possible to provide background information and context for a
current area of research or a study. For scholars, the depth and breadth of the literature review
emphasizes the credibility of the writer in his or her field. But these articles refer to some British
biological studies performed on whales in the early 18th century. This makes you wonder about
American whaling methods during the time portrayed in Moby Dick, so you find some academic
articles published in the last five years on how accurately Herman Melville portrayed the whaling
scene in his novel. Consulting with citizens in the design of wellbeing measures and policies: lessons
from a systems science application. Our systematic review revealed some gaps in the literature on
coproduction leadership, such as the lack of attention to the mental complexity of coproduction
leaders, the under-representation of service users and citizens as leaders, and the need for more
empirical studies that use appropriate models and methods to capture the complexity of
coproduction leadership. During the analysis by stakeholders, no themes were changed or refined;
instead, the analysis confirmed the relevance of the initially identified themes, thus emphasizing the
robustness of our findings based on a process that involved reading four key articles and identifying
the perceived key implications for our research aim. Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid
qualitative evidence This paper forms part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane
Rapid Reviews Methods Group and addresses rapid qualitative evidence syntheses (QESs), which
use modified systematic, transparent and reproducible methodsu to accelerate the synthesis of
qualitative evidence when faced with resource constraints. It’s basically a hint for the following
researchers. Meta-analysis: This is a quantitative review that uses statistical methods to combine data
from multiple studies to derive a summary effect size. Frequently this means combining all relevant
studies to explore the respective foci of each systematic review. Critical literature review: This type
of review evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the existing literature on a particular topic or
research question. However, they found it challenging to transition to a more distributed and
collective leadership approach. Some questions to ask: How are they organizing their ideas. QR
Codes Generate QR Codes for your digital content. They can range from selective (a very narrow
area of research or only a single work) to comprehensive (a larger amount or range of works).
October 26, 2022 recording Last Updated: Oct 26, 2022 2:49 PM URL: Learn how to write a
review of literature What is a review of literature. Provide the reader with strong “umbrella”
sentences at beginnings of paragraphs, “signposts” throughout, and brief “so what” summary
sentences at intermediate points in the review to aid in understanding comparisons and analyses. If
your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give
you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you
discuss the literature itself. For further details, please check with your faculty advisor. Read through
titles and abstracts, select and obtain articles (that is, download, copy, or print them out), and save
your searches as needed. For example, you might categorize your sources into those that examine the
impact of social media on self-esteem, those that explore the effects of cyberbullying, and those that
investigate the relationship between social media use and depression. Such logic is appropriate for
fields like medicine and education where findings of randomized controlled trials can be aggregated
to see whether a new treatment or intervention does improve outcomes. Enhancing the credibility of
the research: A literature review helps to enhance the credibility of the research by demonstrating the
researcher’s knowledge of the existing literature and their ability to situate their research within a
broader context. Social Posts Create on-brand social posts and Articles in minutes. While the study
focuses on one topic, harpoon technology, it will still be organized chronologically. Examples of
stylistic variations in literature reviews include: Summarization of prior work vs. Study protocols
were excluded because we wanted to capture lessons drawn from implementation, and conference
papers were excluded because they lacked sufficient detail. It also discusses common pitfalls and
how to get literature reviews published.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Presenting material that is not directly
relevant to your study will distract and frustrate the reader and make them lose sight of the purpose
of your study. Within power relations however, (such as between a target setter and the worker. You
can check out the literature review section of the blog here. Computer-generated reminders delivered
on paper to healthcare professionals: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. They
provide historical context for a field while offering opinions on its future trajectory. Definition: A
literature review is a systematic examination and synthesis of existing scholarly research on a specific
topic or subject. If you have limited time to conduct research, literature reviews can give you an
overview or act as a stepping stone. JN is lead convenor of the Cochrane Qualitative and
Implementation Methods Group. Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the
community: What needs to be done. Consider Whether Your Sources are Current Some disciplines
require that you use information that is as current as possible. A literature review is a document or
section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in
conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). In other words, a chronological review would
have subsections for each vital time period; a thematic review would have subtopics based upon
factors that relate to the theme or issue. Corresponding author Correspondence to Sofia Kjellstrom.
In: The Sage handbook of organizational research methods. edn. Edited by Buchanan D, Bryman A:
Sage Publications Ltd; 2009. The length of a review of the literature depends on its purpose and
target readership and can vary significantly in scope and depth. Two independent reviewers
appraised the quality of included studies using a quality assessment checklist. BMJ disclaims all
liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. TemplateLab 50 Smart
Literature Review Templates (APA). A course assignment is an example of a selective, stand-alone
work. Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text Be assured that you'll submit flawless
writing. All authors revised and approved the final manuscript. Leadership can be shared in
interpersonal relationships; for example, it can be pooled among duos or trios at the top of an
organization, or shared leadership can be exercised within teams working on a project. Grant MJ,
Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Nine
practices associated with leading coproduction We identified nine processes that encompass wide-
ranging activities and interactions between individuals and groups with regard to leading the
coproduction of health and wellbeing. Three models of leadership in coproduction These actors play
different leadership roles, and leadership can be exercised by individuals or groups. The literature
that is reviewed contains: books, articles, academic articles, conference proceedings, association
papers, and dissertations. Conceptual literature review: This review synthesizes and integrates
theories and concepts from multiple sources to provide a new perspective on a particular topic.
Secondly, there is heterogeneity of the studies within the included systematic reviews themselves.
When the review of the literature is complete, attention should be directed to the theoretical part of
the research.
This added value can, for example, be that the research gaps are made explicit, and this may be very
helpful for readers who plan. The usefulness of this review is questionable because it cannot provide
evidence of what is an effective opinion leader, whether teams of opinion leaders or a single opinion
leader are most effective, or the most effective methods used by opinion leaders. Sometimes
individuals must meet them adequately, understand the difficulties and determine their main
priorities, deciding what to examine and how to start writing. You must start with a literature review
outline and a dissertation outline template will be helpful here. Methodological strengths and
limitations A strength of this review lies in its integration of research on the sparse and overlooked
issue of leadership in coproduction. Time-limited: Literature reviews can become quickly outdated as
new research is published, making it difficult to keep up with the latest developments in a field.
However, the degree of emphasis that is given to individual studies may vary (more or less detail
may be warranted depending on how critical or unique a given study was). For more information
about this step, please see the Using Databases and Finding Scholarly References section of this
website. 3. Read through the research that you have found and take notes. Literature reviews are
designed to provide an overview of sources you have used in researching a particular topic and to
demonstrate to your readers how your research fits within existing scholarship about the topic. He
then relates his theories on learning organisations back. You should have a rough idea of your
strategy before you start writing. You can also use this method to consider what is currently of
interest to scholars in this field and what is not. In what ways might geographers view the need for
better distribution of social service agencies in large cities than how social workers might study the
issue. Conduct a comprehensive search: Use databases and search engines to find relevant literature.
Conceptual literature review: This review synthesizes and integrates theories and concepts from
multiple sources to provide a new perspective on a particular topic. Then, organize the literature
according to your chosen structure, and analyze and synthesize the sources. Communicating Results:
Literature review helps researchers to communicate their results effectively by providing a context
for their research. Moreover, outlining allows you to learn specific things about your chosen sources.
What other sections you include in the body is up to you. Social Posts Create on-brand social posts
and Articles in minutes. Effectiveness of technology-enabled knowledge translation strategies in
improving the use of research in public health: systematic review. Conclusion: Summarize the key
findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance Connect it back to your
primary research question How should I organize my lit review. Introduction This paper forms part
of a series from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group providing methodological guidance
for rapid reviews. Looking at a good review outline example and can provide information about how
to organize and layout your own literature survey outline. Subjective interpretation: Literature
reviews can be subjective, and the interpretation of the findings can vary depending on the
researcher’s perspective or bias. At the level of this overview — and in most of the systematic
reviews included — it appears to be the case that MFIs struggle with the question of attribution. A
review is a required part of grant and research proposals and often a chapter in theses and
dissertations. To conclude, our main objective in this chapter was to demystify the various types of
literature reviews that are central to the continuous development of the eHealth field. Sample
description We included 73 papers (Additional file 1 ) dating from 1994 to 2019 (the year in which
the initial search was performed).
Fullscreen Sharing Deliver a distraction-free reading experience with a simple link. If you are looking
for a guide on structuring a standard literature review, this printable PDF outline template would be
useful with its detailed discussion on what to include and how to arrange a proper literature review.
Your literature review should be guided by your central research question. New York: Longman.
Troyka, Lynn Quittman, and Doug Hesse. 2016. Simon and Schuster Handbook for Writers, 11th ed.
A review is a required part of grant and research proposals and often a chapter in theses and
dissertations. More Features Connections Canva Create professional content with Canva, including
presentations, catalogs, and more. Here is where you can find an amazing research literature review
sample. The length of a review of the literature depends on its purpose and target readership and can
vary significantly in scope and depth. You can also use this method to consider what is currently of
interest to scholars in this field and what is not. Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the
literature. Steps in Conducting a Literature Review A literature review may be a stand alone work or
the introduction to a larger research paper, depending on the assignment. It involves identifying,
evaluating, and synthesizing relevant literature, including scholarly articles, books, and other sources,
to provide a summary and critical assessment of what is known about the topic. Finally, double
check that you’ve documented your sources and formatted the review appropriately for your
discipline. The protocol should always be publicly available ( table 2, item R2). 24 25 Formal
registration may require that the team has not commenced data extraction but should be considered
if it does not compromise the rQES timeframe. We may have gone as far as we can in understanding
the implementation of evidence through systematic reviews of single and multi-faceted interventions
and the next step would be to conduct more research exploring the complex and situated nature of
evidence used in clinical practice and by particular professional groups. It is our hope that our
descriptive account will serve as a valuable source for those conducting, evaluating or using reviews
in this important and growing domain. This handout will explain what literature reviews are and
offer insights into the form and construction of literature reviews in the humanities, social sciences,
and sciences. The literature review in a dissertation or thesis is both comprehensive and helps make
up a larger work. Use a citation manager, such as EndNote as the repository for your citations.
Project leaders are responsible for overall project management, including the setting of goals,
objectives, and timelines. These excellent free samples are easy to download and print. Alternatively,
you may be expected to include a literature review as part of a larger research paper (such as part of
an Honors Thesis). Based on your reading and notes, you can look for: Trends and patterns (in
theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time. Proceedings
of the European Conference on Information Systems; 2011. If you are writing a literature review as
a stand-alone assignment, you will have to choose a focus and develop a central question to direct
your search. QR Codes Generate QR Codes for your digital content. Mader LB, Harris T, Klager S,
Wilkinson IB, Hiemstra TF. Publication bias: Literature reviews may be influenced by publication
bias, which occurs when researchers are more likely to publish positive results than negative ones.
The following collection of annotated sample literature reviews written and co-written by colleagues
associated with UW-Madison showcases how these reviews can do different kind of work for
different purposes. A good strategy is to begin by searching the USC Libraries Catalog for recent
books about the topic and review the table of contents for chapters that focuses on specific issues.
At the end of the review follows a conclusion that once again explicitly ties all of the cited works
together to show how this analysis is itself a contribution to the literature. Incorporating systems
thinking and relevant leadership models can offer new perspectives on collective leadership practices.
Parts of Literature Review Parts of a literature review are as follows: Introduction The introduction
of a literature review typically provides background information on the research topic and why it is
important. If the literature review is part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate how your research
addresses gaps and contributes new knowledge, or discuss how you have drawn on existing theories
and methods to build a framework for your research. What other sections you include in the body is
up to you. Thirty-two studies were included in the systematic review. Table 1. provides a detailed
overview of the included systematic reviews comprising reference, strategy type, quality score,
number of included studies, local, target population, effectiveness and scope of impact (see Table 1.
Approaching literature review for academic purposes: The Literature Therefore, this paper discusses
the purposes of LRs in dissertations and theses. In some cases, these processes naturally align with
certain actors—for instance, senior leaders play key roles in the tasks of initiating coproduction and
implementing and sustaining its results—but other processes (championing coproduction,
establishing trusting relationships, and ensuring good communication) are applicable to any and all
participants in the coproduction process. Finally, double check that you’ve documented your sources
and formatted the review appropriately for your discipline. Published examples typically use a
single reviewer for data extraction 8 with use of two independent reviewers being the exception. Our
findings highlight the need for a complex way of making meaning of leadership throughout the
coproduction process, such as the ability to be flexible due to circumstances and employ both strong
leadership and more facilitative approaches when necessary. Schools are a group of organisations
that have always focused on outcomes other. For more details about taking notes, please see the
“Reading Sources and Taking Notes” section of the Finding Scholarly References page of this
website. 4. Organize your notes and thoughts; create an outline. Their need stems from the ever-
increasing output of scientific publications.For example, compared to 1991, in 2008 three, eight, and
forty times more papers were indexed in Web of Science on malaria, obesity, and biodiversity,
respectively.Given such mountains of papers, scientists cannot be expected to examine in detail
every. However, it’s also essential to remember examples of older studies and keep the balance
between them and the newer research. Social capital, management capacity and public service
performance: Evidence from the US states. Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review
Literature reviews are in great demand in most scientific fields. Whether the search is comprehensive
or not, whether it involves a methodical approach for data extraction and synthesis or not, it is
important that the review documents in an explicit and transparent manner the steps and approach
that were used in the process of its development. Write a riveting review of the next work of
literature you pick up using these. If you have the opportunity, discuss your topic with your
professor and your class mates. 2. Decide on the scope of your review How many studies do you
need to look at. Although based on evaluation projects and qualitative data, their results also suggest
that positive changes on patient outcomes can be made following the implementation of specific
evidence-based approaches (or projects). Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of
implementation science and policy implementation research. Orchestration involves recruiting the
appropriate actors as noted above as well as directing and coordinating activities, thereby ensuring
that the whole is more than the sum of its parts. The purpose is to place research in a historical
context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions
for future research. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to
Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Help writing papers for graduate school
pumpkin writing paper marketing expenses in a business plan. There may be future developments
that could make your work less relevant. Theoretical Review The purpose of this form is to examine
the corpus of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. The
Balanced Scorecard (ibid) already in use in some school. The authors then extracted data from the
selected articles and created several tables, one for each outcome category.