Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quanti @
Quanti @
THE PHILIPPINE
POLITICAL SYSTEM
JESSE F. MARQUETTE
University of Florida
Republic
Despite the has
often chaotic profile of its postwar history, the Philippines
viable
developed a A democracy.interest-
ing aspect of postwar Philippine politics has been the continuous and
particularly
steady increase ~in the level of mass electoral participation. This paper
presents a partial explanation for this increase and the concomitant
development of a stable mass democracy in the Philippines in terms of
certain salient socioeconomic factors.
Philippine society has experienced rapid and continuing change; yet, in
the face of this change with all its attendant problems, the vast majority of
the populace has been willing to carry its problems to the ballot box.
Despite some electoral violence, the transfers of power have been legal; a
civilian regime has governed since independence, and the government has
peacefully changed hands upon the decision of the electorate. In this
sense, the Phillippines constitute a stable democracy.
In the following discussion, development is discussed strictly in terms
of democratic development; the increasing participation of the mass of the
populace in the decision-making processes of the political system.
Although there are many definitions of development, mass participation is
usually a component (Pye, 1966), and in this paper concentration is
centered on electoral activity as the least demanding form of participation.
[339]
Downloaded from cps.sagepub.com at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on May 16, 2016
[340]
METHODS
TABLE 1
THE COMPOSITE CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
MATRIX (1953-19f5)
Equation (A) quite clearly demonstrates that the causal path is not
operating in the expected direction. The alternative path of Urbaniza-
tion-Media-Education, yields the prediction equation (B):
This is obviously incorrect. The alternative path, as expected from the first
link, is Media-Education-Development. This prediction equation is:
The relationship in (D) is much more likely to be valid than that in (C).
The causal path for all four variables is shown in Figure 2.
Since the possible correlation of urbanization and development is not
statistically significant it will not be discussed. The multiple correlation
coefficient of urbanization, mass media, and education with development
is r 0.66. Since the zero-order correlation of education with development
=
Figure 2
Since neither the correlation between media and participation, nor the
correlation between urbanization and participation are statistically signifi-
cant, the model follows the path indicated in Figure 3 for 1949.
Figure 3
DISCUSSION
NOTES
Philippines, only 24 have cities with a population over 50,000. Thus, the use of
Lerner’sdefinition would have resulted in missing data for the urbanization variable
in most cases. In addition, Gibbs (1966) has demonstrated that there is a correlation
of approximately 0.92 among accepted indicators of urbanization and one such
indicator is residence in a place of 2,500 population or above. I am quite certain that
the correlation between density and urbanization is similarly high for a country the
size of the Philippines. The smaller the country, and the greater the number of
political subdivisions, the more closely will the size of the subdivisions approach the
size of a city.
3. This technique of averaging correlation coefficients is statistically valid, as long
as all the original coefficients are based on the same size sample (Kelley, 1947). For
unequal sample sizes, a more complex procedure is required.
4. For three excellent histories of the postwar Philippine period, see Scaff
(1955), Smith (1958), and Starner (1961).
REFERENCES