KM - Midterm Module 4

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 41

KNOWLEDGE

MANAGEMENT
MIDTERM MODULE 4

Prepared by: Ms. Sofia Marie Guintu


Learning OBJECTIVES
At the end of this module, students should be able to:

01 02
Familiarize
themselves with
Delineate the
the different
different
scholars who
models of
advocated the
knowledge
different models
management.
of knowledge
management; and
MODULE 4 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT MODELS

In 1597, Francis Bacon wrote, “Knowledge is power”

Knowledge Management Models (KMM) is capturing in an


organized and structured lens the processes of KM used by an
organization, industry, or any firms to investigate its properties
and tailoring it to their specific needs.
Lesson 1. Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) SECI Knowledge Management
Model
Lesson 1. Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) SECI Knowledge Management
Model

Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) have developed the knowledge spiral model
in 1995 to show the interaction between tacit and explicit knowledge in
an organization.

Socialization, Externalization, Combination and Internalization (SECI).

They have given four knowledge conversion techniques as:


i) socialization (tacit to tacit),
ii) externalization (tacit to explicit),
iii) combination (explicit to explicit), and
iv) internalization (explicit to tacit)
Lesson 1. Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) SECI Knowledge Management
Model
Lesson 1. Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) SECI Knowledge Management
Model

There are four different modes of knowledge conversion in


the Nonaka and Takeuchi model of knowledge conversion.
These are:
1. Socialization (tacit to tacit)
2. Externalization (tacit to explicit)
3. Combination (explicit to explicit)
4. Internalization (explicit to tacit)
Lesson 1. Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) SECI Knowledge Management
Model

Socialization (tacit to tacit)


the technique of sharing tacit knowledge through observation,
imitation, practice, and participation in formal and informal
communities and groups.

This process is basically preempted by the creation of a


physical or virtual space where a given community can interact
on a social level.
Lesson 1. Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) SECI Knowledge Management
Model

Socialization (tacit to tacit) Example


The team members gather for a brainstorming session to
generate ideas for the campaign. During this session, they
engage in open discussions, share personal experiences, and
express their opinions about target demographics, market
trends, and creative concepts. As they communicate face-to-
face, they exchange tacit knowledge about consumer behavior,
effective messaging strategies, and design aesthetics.
Lesson 1. Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) SECI Knowledge Management
Model

Externalization (tacit to explicit)


technique of expressing tacit knowledge into explicit
concepts.

this process is the key to knowledge sharing and creation.

The explicit form is also derived from drawings, models, words,


concepts or metaphors that can be used by experts to
articulate tacit knowledge.
Lesson 1. Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) SECI Knowledge Management
Model

Externalization (tacit to explicit) Example


In the brainstorming session, the team uses visual aids such as
whiteboards, sketches, and multimedia presentations to
externalize their ideas. They articulate their tacit knowledge
into explicit forms by documenting key insights, outlining
campaign objectives, and visualizing creative concepts. Through
this process, they transform individual thoughts and
experiences into shared representations that can be easily
understood and further developed.
Lesson 1. Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) SECI Knowledge Management
Model

Combination (explicit to explicit)


Technique of integrating concepts into a knowledge system.
Some examples or cases would be a synthesis in the form of a
review report, a trend analysis, a brief executive summary, or a
new database to organize content. This is the most familiar
process
The combination of existent information can be facilitated by
the selection, adding, grading, and categorization of explicit
knowledge.
Lesson 1. Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) SECI Knowledge Management
Model

Combination (explicit to explicit)


There are three basic phases to this pattern:
i) capturing knowledge from inside and outside the organization and
internalizing it
ii) disseminating the explicit knowledge through networks and
systems, and
iii) processing the explicit knowledge into a more usable format like
documents, plans, and reports
Lesson 1. Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) SECI Knowledge Management
Model

Combination (explicit to explicit) Example


After the brainstorming session, the team members gather the
documented ideas, research findings, and creative concepts into a
comprehensive campaign proposal. They integrate diverse
perspectives, refine the messaging, and align the visual elements to
create a cohesive plan. Through collaborative discussions and
iterative revisions, they combine explicit knowledge from various
sources to develop a unified strategy for the advertising campaign.
Lesson 1. Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) SECI Knowledge Management
Model

Internalization (explicit to tacit)


This technique of embodying explicit knowledge into tacit knowledge.

Conversion of this process is more difficult. In this process learning by


doing, training and exercises allow the individuals to access the
knowledge domain of interest from the group and the organization.

It is very important in building, understanding and developing a learning


culture. Individuals read, blend, and conceptualize their findings to
create new insights, concepts and methods.
Lesson 1. Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) SECI Knowledge Management
Model

Internalization (explicit to tacit) Example


Once the campaign proposal is finalized, each team member internalizes
the collective knowledge gained throughout the process. They absorb
the insights, methodologies, and best practices shared during the
brainstorming sessions and strategy meetings. As they immerse
themselves in executing their respective tasks—whether it's designing
visuals, writing copy, or analyzing campaign performance—they apply
the tacit and explicit knowledge acquired from their interactions with
colleagues.
Lesson 2. Choo Sense-Making Knowledge Management Model
Lesson 2. Choo Sense-Making Knowledge Management Model

The Choo Sense-Making KM Model (1998) Created by


Chun Wei Choo stresses on the following:

Sense Making
Knowledge Creation
Decision making skills
Lesson 2. Choo Sense-Making Knowledge Management Model

The Choo KMM focuses on how information elements are


selected and subsequently fed into organizational
actions.
Organizational action results from the concentration and
absorption of information from the external environment
into each successive cycle.
Lesson 2. Choo Sense-Making Knowledge Management Model
Lesson 2. Choo Sense-Making Knowledge Management Model

Sense Making
The goal is to help organizations thrive in a changing world
by gathering and understanding information about
customers, suppliers, competitors, and the overall
environment.

This involves keeping an eye on trends and changes, so they


can adapt and succeed over time.
Lesson 2. Choo Sense-Making Knowledge Management Model

Knowledge Creation
It is a process that allows a company to create or acquire,
organize and process information in order to generate new
knowledge through organizational learning.

The knowledge gained helps the company to develop new skills,


products, and services, improve existing ones, and redesign
organizational processes.
Lesson 2. Choo Sense-Making Knowledge Management Model

Knowledge Creation

Transformation of personal knowledge between individuals


through dialogue, discourse, sharing, and storytelling.

The creation of new knowledge involves the conversion,


sharing, and combination of tacit, explicit and cultural
knowledge.
Lesson 2. Choo Sense-Making Knowledge Management Model

Decision Making

Used to identify and evaluate alternatives by processing the


information and knowledge collected.

Every organization must choose the best option it has which is


reasonable and beneficial for the organization
Lesson 2. Choo Sense-Making Knowledge Management Model

Decision Making
Many suggestions can be made upon the decision making theory. Choo (1998) provides
a few of them
i) the decision making process is driven by the search for alternatives that are
satisfactory, rather than seeking for the optimal solution

ii) the choice of one single alternative means the leave of the others, and

iii) a completely rational decision would require information beyond the capability of the
organization to collect, and information processing beyond the human capacity to
perform.
Lesson 2. Choo Sense-Making Knowledge Management Model
Example:
A small clothing store noticing a decline in sales for a particular
product line, such as women's dresses
Sense Making
You collected the sales data for the past few months, customer
feedback, and observations from staff.
Knowledge Creation
You brainstorm ideas such as offering promotions on dresses,
updating the inventory with trendier styles, or reorganizing the store
layout to feature dresses more prominently.
Decision Making
You evaluate each potential strategy based on factors such as cost,
feasibility, and potential impact on sales.
Lesson 3. WIIG MODEL
Lesson 3. WIIG MODEL
Karl M. Wiig is one of the pioneers in the field of KM and was among the
first to publish a series of texts that assembled management relevant
concepts.

His KM cycle addresses how knowledge is built and used as individuals or as


organizations.

Addresses the organization as a whole and includes business areas that


are commonly found in most organizations.

used in problem solving and decision making, and manifested cognitively


as well as in culture, technology and procedures
Lesson 3. WIIG MODEL

Karl Wiig KM model (1993) marks the basic principle which says, in order for
knowledge to be useful and valuable, it must be organized and synchronized

1. Completeness
how much relevant knowledge is available from a given source
Sources vary from human minds to knowledge
The knowledge is complete if all the information available on the
subject is there, but if no one knows of its existence, they cannot
make use of this knowledge
Lesson 3. WIIG MODEL

Karl Wiig KM model (1993) marks the basic principle which says, in order for
knowledge to be useful and valuable, it must be organized and synchronized

2. Connectedness
well-understood and well-defined relations between the different
knowledge objects.
knowledge objects are connected to each other the more
connected a knowledge base is then the more consistent the
content and the greater its value
Lesson 3. WIIG MODEL

Karl Wiig KM model (1993) marks the basic principle which says, in order for
knowledge to be useful and valuable, it must be organized and synchronized

3. Congruency
A knowledge base congruent when all the facts, concepts,
perspectives, values, judgments, and relational links and
connections between the objects are consistent
Lesson 3. WIIG MODEL

Karl Wiig KM model (1993) marks the basic principle which says, in order for
knowledge to be useful and valuable, it must be organized and synchronized

4. Perspective and Purpose


It is a technique through which we know something but from a
particular point of view for a specific purpose.
We organize much of our knowledge applying to the dual
dimensions of perspective and purpose
Lesson 3. WIIG MODEL

Karl Wiig Knowledge Management Model (1993)


Lesson 3. WIIG MODEL

Wiig (1993) identifies the major purpose of KM as an effort “To make the
enterprise intelligent-acting by facilitating the creation, commutation,
deployment and use of quality knowledge.”

He proposed an organizational KM cycle of four consecutive stages as:

i) building
ii) holding
iii) pooling
iv) using knowledge
Lesson 3. WIIG MODEL

1. Building knowledge
It consists of obtaining, analyzing, reconstructing, synthesizing,
organizing, codifying and modeling knowledge.

> Obtaining knowledge


a. Individual innovations, experimentation, reason with existing knowledge,
hiring new people,
b. import knowledge from outside sources, and
c. observation of the real world (site/field visits, etc.).
Lesson 3. WIIG MODEL

> Analyze knowledge indicates;

i) extract potential knowledge from obtained material,


ii) abstract extracted materials,
iii) identify patterns extracted,
iv) explain relations between knowledge fragments, and
v) verify that extracted materials kept their original meetings.

Knowledge is organized for specific uses and according to an established


organizational framework such as, standards and categories.
Lesson 3. WIIG MODEL

> Reconstruct and synthesize knowledge

i) generalize analyzed material to obtain broader principles,

ii) generate hypotheses to explain observations,

iii) establish conformance between new and existing knowledge, and

iv) update the total knowledge pool by incorporating the new knowledge
Lesson 3. WIIG MODEL

> Codify and manage knowledge indicates;

i) how we represent knowledge in our minds

ii) how we assemble the knowledge into a coherent model

iii) how we document the knowledge in books and manuals

iv) how we encode it in order to post it to a knowledge repository.

At this point knowledge is acquired and built from various sources


Lesson 3. WIIG MODEL

2. Holding knowledge
remembering, accumulating and embedding knowledge in storehouse as
documents which are gained as research reports, practical tips, case studies

Remembering is the individual has retained the item of knowledge.


Accumulating is the creating a computer-resident knowledge base and
encoding knowledge so it can be stored in organizational memory
Embedding is the ensuring knowledge and is a part of business procedures
Archiving is the systematically retiring outdated, false, irrelevant knowledge
from the active repository.
Lesson 3. WIIG MODEL

3. Pooling knowledge
It consists of coordinating, assembling, and accessing and retrieving knowledge

Coordinating is formed collaborative teams to work with particular content


to create a ‘who knows what’ network.
Assembling is the gather knowledge sources into a background library or
repository to make later access/retrieval easier
Access and retrieval can get knowledge from the repository or through
consultation with knowledgeable people about difficult problems, obtaining a
second opinion from an expert, or discussing a difficult case with a peer.
Lesson 3. WIIG MODEL

4. Using knowledge
using practical knowledge such as, routine tasks, productions and services
mostly in any kind of decision-making within an organization

Routine tasks typically use compiled knowledge that we use almost


unconsciously or automatically.
The services include using knowledge to identifying problems and their
potential consequences
choosing knowledge suitable for solving these problems, searching for
alternative solutions, assessing the advantages and disadvantages of those
solutions, and planning and implementing selected solutions

You might also like