Understanding the Difference Between Literature Review and Literature Study

Navigating the world of academic writing can be challenging, especially when it comes to
differentiating between a literature review and a literature study. Both are crucial components of
scholarly research, but they serve distinct purposes and involve unique methodologies. In this article,
we'll delve into the nuances of these two types of literary analyses and explore why it can be difficult
to craft them effectively.

Literature Review:

A literature review is a critical analysis and synthesis of existing research on a particular topic or
subject. It involves systematically examining scholarly articles, books, and other sources to identify
key themes, debates, and gaps in the literature. The primary goal of a literature review is to provide
an overview of the current state of knowledge on a subject and to establish the context for a new
research study or project.

Writing a literature review requires careful planning and organization. Researchers must sift through
vast amounts of literature, evaluate the quality and relevance of each source, and synthesize the
findings in a coherent and meaningful way. This process can be time-consuming and labor-intensive,
requiring a keen analytical eye and strong critical thinking skills.

Literature Study:

On the other hand, a literature study involves a more focused and in-depth analysis of a specific
work or set of works within a particular literary tradition or genre. Unlike a literature review, which
encompasses a broad range of sources, a literature study delves deeply into the themes, characters,
motifs, and stylistic elements of a single text or a small selection of texts.

Conducting a literature study requires close reading and interpretation of the chosen works, as well
as familiarity with relevant literary theories and methodologies. Researchers must pay attention to
nuances of language and symbolism, and they may need to engage in comparative analysis or explore
historical and cultural contexts to fully understand the significance of the texts under scrutiny.

Why it's Difficult:

Writing both a literature review and a literature study can be challenging for several reasons. Firstly,
researchers must possess a comprehensive understanding of the relevant literature and theoretical
frameworks, which may require extensive background research and expertise in the field.
Additionally, synthesizing complex ideas and arguments from multiple sources or analyzing intricate
literary texts demands advanced critical thinking skills and attention to detail.

Moreover, crafting a well-written and coherent literature review or literature study requires effective
communication and writing skills. Researchers must be able to articulate their ideas clearly and
persuasively, while also adhering to the conventions of academic writing and citation.

Recommendation:

Given the complexities involved in writing literature reviews and literature studies, it's
understandable that many scholars and students may seek assistance with these tasks. For those who
require expert guidance and support, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers professional academic writing
services tailored to your specific needs. With a team of experienced writers and researchers, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ can help you craft high-quality literature reviews, literature studies, and other
scholarly documents that meet the highest standards of academic excellence. Trust ⇒ StudyHub.vip
⇔ to deliver exceptional results and take the stress out of your writing process.
However, only include what is necessary for the reader to locate your study within the larger
scholarship about the research problem. These constructions can be quite valuable in helping readers
understand the data-collection and analysis process. For newer topics that are actively being studied,
“recent” might mean published in the past year or two. A systematic review answers a defined
research question by collecting and summarizing all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified
eligibility criteria. LW and ML collected and analyzed the data, then wrote the manuscript; SJ, YO,
FW, and KL provided professional opinions about JGCT and ultrasound manifestations; JL and YJ
revised the manuscript; HL and QZ designed and supervised the study. In a more recent example,
Sbeglia et al. (2021) illustrated how a conceptual framework influences the methodological choices
and inferences in studies by educational researchers. Focusing on recent research in the last 5 years is
a good first step. The authors attributed the variation to the different types of helping behaviors of
students. Our series comprises also patients younger than 30 years, including, 7 teenager patients had
low grade SPC, except one. There are others from the same area that are not infected. You have
patients that are sick with a new disease. For the example given, it would be fruitful to look at
research focused on learning communities with faculty in STEM fields or in general education fields
that result in instructional change. Research on differences between women and men, for example, is
always indexed under “Human Sex Differences.” Research on notetaking is always indexed under
the term “Learning Strategies.” If you do not know the appropriate index terms, PsycINFO includes
a thesaurus that can help you find them. There are various approaches to organizing the body of a
literature review. In Official Conference Proceedings of the Third Asian Conference on Education in
Osaka, Japan. Researchers can use quantitative data, qualitative data, or both to answer these
research questions through a variety of methodological traditions. Another step yous should have is
to argue your choice. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new
research area, or for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet
been answered. Searching the extant literature: The next step consists of searching the literature and
making decisions about the suitability of material to be considered in the review ( Cooper, 1988 ).
For example, pure research into the structure of the atom has led to structural glass, x-rays, nuclear
power and silicon chips. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key
concepts. There are a variety of literature reviews available, each with its own approach, analysis,
and goal. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing
sources in order. The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as
mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations).
Other studies have presented a research logic model or flowchart of the research design as a
conceptual framework. Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your
sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. Pivotal publications: are there any influential
theories or studies that changed the direction of the field. You don’t want to substitute a thorough
review of core research literature in your discipline for studies conducted in other fields of study. A
systematic review is generally conducted by a team including an information professional for
searches and a statistician for meta-analysis, along with subject experts. By Publication Order your
sources by publication chronology, then, only if the order demonstrates a more important trend.
Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include: Your university’s library catalogue
Google Scholar Project Muse (humanities and social sciences) Medline (life sciences and
biomedicine) EconLit (economics) Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science) You can also
use boolean operators to help narrow down your search. Study Planning It is easy to confuse
systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The area of the squares represents the weight reflected in the
meta-analysis. Historical literature reviews focus on examining research throughout a period of time,
often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature, then
tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. The remainder is mostly metabolized in
the liver by the usual body mechanisms for uracil. NOTE: Most often the literature review will
incorporate some combination of types. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill.
The infrequency of malignant Disease in diaphyseal aclasis and neurofibromatosis. Historical
literature reviews focus on examining research throughout a period of time, often starting with the
first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution
within the scholarship of a discipline. More: different types of literature reviews on how to conduct a
literature review. One finding, for instance, posited that inquiry instruction, as a whole, resulted in
reasoning and achievement gains. Such logic is appropriate for fields like medicine and education
where findings of randomized controlled trials can be aggregated to see whether a new treatment or
intervention does improve outcomes. Listed below are definitions of types of literature reviews:
Argumentative Review This form examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an
argument, deeply imbedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the
literature. Similarities And Differences Of Review Of Related Literature And Review i). JBI EBP
Database (formerly Joanna Briggs Institute EBP Database) This database includes systematic
reviews, evidence summaries, and best practice information sheets. This can be especially helpful for
students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire community of scholars
toward questions that have not yet been answered. These criteria can include study design,
population, intervention or exposure, outcome measures, and language. The anatomical site of the
neoplasms was established by radiological evaluation. They help the investigator understand his topic
for. A literature review is foundational to any research study in education or science. It can tell you
how your study fits into the research literature. Therefore, various guidelines have been suggested for
conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses to help standardize them and improve their quality.
The task for a researcher is to craft an efficient literature review that offers a critical analysis of
published work, articulates the need for the study, guides the methodological approach to the topic
of study, and provides an adequate foundation for the discussion of the findings. You have some
chance to do this in your introduction in an article, but the literature review section gives a more
extended opportunity to establish the conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it.
Constructing Conceptual Frameworks Including a conceptual framework in a research study is
important, but researchers often opt to include either a conceptual or a theoretical framework. In
addition to the focus and transparency of these types of reviews, additional aspects of a quality
systematic literature review includes: Clear and concise review and summary Comprehensive
coverage of the topic Accessibility and equality of the research reviewed Systematic Review vs
Literature Review The difference between literature review and systematic review comes back to the
initial research question. Literature reviews can be useful to inform background sections of papers
and reports and to give the reader an overview of a topic. A literature review, which reviews the
existing research and information on a selected study area, is a crucial element of a research study.
There are thousands of professional journals that publish research in psychology and related fields.
This is a difficult question because it depends on how extensively your topic has been studied and
also on your own goals.
Cancers (Basel). 2021.. Bovee JV, Cleton-Jansen AM, Wuyts W, Caethoven G, Taminiau AH, Bakker
E, Van Hul W, Cornelisse CJ, Hogendoorn PC. If you are doing Case study - look for background
information and if any similar case studies have been done before. They predicted that students in
heterogeneous groups would experience greater improvement in their reasoning abilities and science
achievements with much of the learning guided by the more knowledgeable peers. Merely ask any
radio station that holds a viral phone call-in contest. The. However, it is easy to get confused
between them while writing your manuscript. Chondrosarcoma-from Molecular Pathology to Novel
therapies. Collect data, integrate the findings and perspectives from different studies and add your
own analysis of its feasibility. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global Cancer Statistics
2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185
Countries. This process involves performing a regression analysis of the pooled estimate for
covariance at the study level, and so it is usually not considered when the number of studies is less
than 10. What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review. The relevance
of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice. You begin to backtrack to try to find the
source or common element of the infection. A value lower than “0” means the new treatment method
is less effective than the existing method, and a value greater than “0” means the new treatment is
more effective than the existing method. Rights and permissions Open Access This article is licensed
under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing,
adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate
credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and
indicate if changes were made. MB performed data collection, cleaning, and interpretation.
Manuscripts, theses, and dissertations are usually unpublished materials. Emerging areas of BER
include the affective domain, issues of transfer, and metacognition ( Singer et al., 2012 ). Many
studies in these areas are transdisciplinary and not always specific to biology education (e.g.,
Rodrigo-Peiris et al., 2018; Kolpikova et al., 2019 ). These newer areas may require reading outside
BER; fortunately, summaries of some of these topics can be found in the Current Insights section of
the LSE website. How many sources are enough for your literature review. A type of review article
primarily devoted to presenting a new theory. You can find systematic reviews in these filtered
databases: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Cochrane systematic reviews are considered
the gold standard for systematic reviews. They assist and guide the researcher in comparing his
findings to those of other researchers on similar studies, with the goal of formulating generalizations
or principles that are the study’s contributions to the fund of knowledge. An outline for literature
review has a bit unlike structure comparing with other types of paper works. Researchers may also
find that multiple theoretical frameworks are necessary to frame and explore a problem, as different
frameworks can provide different insights into a problem. A literature review in empirical research
studies provides a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing published research and
scholarly works related to the topic under investigation. Frameworks that connect to individuals, for
instance, could contribute to understanding their actions, learning, or knowledge. In focusing on a
specific problem within a broader research strand, a new researcher will likely need to examine
research outside BER. Literature reviews are designed to provide an overview of sources you have
used in researching a particular topic and to demonstrate to your readers how your research fits
within existing scholarship about the topic. However, it is easy to get confused between them while
writing your manuscript. A systematic review answers a defined research question by collecting and
summarizing all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria. Because experiments
may take some time to produce the desired results, this is especially important for empirical studies.
Example: In a review of psychological studies on memory, sections could be organized around
cognitive, behavioral, and neuroscientific theories. Engage in Dialogue Frame your literature review
as a conversation with other scholars. Now you lot understand the core milestones regarding the
introduction to the literature review. A value of “0” for the MD or SMD indicates that the effects of
the new treatment method and the existing treatment method are the same. As our understanding of
evidence-based medicine increases and its importance is better appreciated, the number of systematic
reviews and meta-analyses will keep increasing. To determine the effect of working in groups, the
authors also measured students’ reasoning abilities and achievement. Think about why this is
important for your research. The main difference between introduction and literature review is their
purpose; the purpose of an introduction is to briefly introduce the text to the readers whereas the
purpose of a literature review is to review and critically evaluate the existing research on a selected
research area. Finally, 750 studies were selected for data extraction and analysis. These emergent
ideas would not be considered a “theory” if they are not yet tested, supported by systematically
collected evidence, and peer reviewed. After the introduction, it grounds your research in a scholarly
field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology. Nyitrayova
O.Juxtaglomerular cell tumor, causing fetal demise. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Some frameworks are well
articulated, and others are still being refined. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert
advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a
lot more. It is a result of our own work as science education and biology education researchers,
whether as graduate students and postdoctoral scholars or newly hired and established faculty
members. Ensuring the coherence of these elements to the discipline’s perspective also involves
situating the work in the broader scholarly literature. Author information Li Wang and Meiying Li
contributed equally to this work. Their study helps fill that gap by describing how scaffolds can
support students in the three dimensions of metacognition: intelligibility, plausibility, and wide
applicability. A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations,
theses, and research papers. In a subgroup analysis, the data are divided into subgroups that are
expected to be homogeneous, and these subgroups are analyzed. Now, they also include any
evidence-based research questions. LITERATURE RELATED. Studies, inquiries, or investigations
already conducted to which the current proposed study is related or has a similarity. Jennes I, Entius
MM, Van Hul E, Parra A, Sangiorgi L, Wuyts W. Why is it useful? It confirms that the theoretical
framework is valid. Your professor will probably not expect you to read everything that's available
about the topic, but you'll make the act of reviewing easier if you first limit scope of the research
problem. It is our hope that our descriptive account will serve as a valuable source for those
conducting, evaluating or using reviews in this important and growing domain. Historical literature
reviews focus on examining research throughout a period of time, often starting with the first time an
issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the
scholarship of a discipline. This Research Methods article is designed to provide an overview of each
of these elements and delineate. To find only systematic reviews, click on Limits and then select
Systematic Reviews in the Publication Types box.