Crafting a literature review can be a daunting task, requiring extensive research, critical analysis, and

effective synthesis of information. It demands not only a deep understanding of the topic but also
the ability to sift through numerous sources to identify relevant evidence. The process involves
evaluating the credibility and reliability of various studies, identifying gaps in existing literature, and
presenting a cohesive narrative that contributes to the understanding of the subject matter.

Many individuals find themselves overwhelmed by the complexities of writing a literature review.
The sheer volume of scholarly articles, books, and other sources can be overwhelming, and
navigating through them to extract pertinent information can be time-consuming and challenging.
Moreover, synthesizing the findings of different studies while maintaining coherence and clarity
requires a high level of skill and precision.

For those who are struggling with the demands of crafting a literature review, seeking professional
assistance can be invaluable. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers a solution to alleviate the burden of
literature review writing. With a team of experienced writers who are well-versed in various
academic fields, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ provides customized literature reviews that meet the highest
standards of quality and rigor. By entrusting your literature review to the experts at ⇒ StudyHub.vip
⇔, you can ensure that your work is comprehensive, well-organized, and academically sound.
Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review hinder your academic progress. Order from ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and experience the difference that professional assistance can make.
Not all therapeutic recommendations are based on evidence of equal quality. Although it depends on
the question in hand, 25-30 titles should be sufficient to find the relevant results. Journal of Dental
Research. 2002 Dec;81(12):866-70. Category II-3: Evidence from multiple times series with or
without intervention or dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments such as the results of the
introduction of penicillin treatment in the 1940s. Both of these journals publish analyzed systematic
reviews or original research articles along with expert commentary at the end and description of
clinical application. Level 1 evidence might include systematic reviews of homogenous randomized
controlled trials, for example, or simply a single high quality RCT. All anecdotal evidence is
fundamentally flawed and most can be explained by regression to the mean. The very fact that a
meta-analysis is being undertaken is because the studies disagree with one another. The information
needed should be converted into a clinical question which should be clearly relevant to the problem
and should facilitate effective research. Our team of language experts will pay special attention to
the logic and flow of contents, adjusting your document to meet your needs. For example, it is not
the same to use a systematic review or an expert opinion as a basis for an argument. It is an statistical
method to combine the result of several independent studies and to present the average result of
them in different graphical forms and also provides the greater statistical power than individual
study. Dr. Abdul- Monim Batiha Assistant Professor Critical Care Nursing Philadelphia university.
Don't Forget to Search for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Lit Review Tip. A panel of
experts analyses this evidence and formulates the guidelines in an objective manner. Preferred
Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) website. A typology of
reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. The problem, of course, is the
conclusions drawn from the evidence. In DiCenso, A., Guyatt, G., Clinska, D. (Eds). Evidence-
Based Nursing: A Guide to Clinical Practice. This can occur when the study and control groups are
chosen so that they differ from each other by one or more factors that may affect the outcome of the
study. Cliliska, D., Ciliska, D., Pinelli, J., DiCenso, A., Cullum, N. (2001). Resources to enhance
evidence-based nursing practice. Schmalenberg and Kramer (2009) stated that physicians felt the
nurse-physician relation to be more collaborative than nurse did. Then, you read the responses and
you decide which observation was a UFO and which was a normal event explained by man-made or
meteorologic phenomena; in this case, you are biased. More importantly, was the treatment modality
applied on the patient was cost-effective and how much time did the whole process take. All rights
are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. Thank
YOU!!!!. Some of these slides were created by Sharon Reeve, Ph.D., BCBA Professor at Caldwell
College Slides taken or adapted will be noted by (Reeve). The practice of evidence-based medicine
means integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from
systematic research. Medical Journal 3(1) there is an agreed hierarchy of 'levels of evidence'.
Evidence-based decision making incorporates the most current and comprehensive scientific
evidence along with the patient’s needs and preferences to make individualized healthcare decisions.
Hence, it should never replace the traditional decision-making procedures, but just acts as an adjunct.
Exposure and outcome are determined simultaneously. The Full Text version is available to those
eligible through HINARI 1. Barrett Johnson CWDA Child Welfare Conference Monterey, CA May
29 th, 2008. Strength of evidence also depends upon the Nature of questions we ask, for example: if
we want to evaluate the prognosis of a disease, Meta-analysis of Cohort study gives the solid result
than RCT. Don’t be surprised if the same statement is made 30 years from now. When commencing
a literature review, a good place to start is by finding out whether any systematic reviews have been
conducted on your topic. The utilization of medical literature in decision making in medical practice
was pioneered at McMaster University, Ontario, Canada, in the 1980s. Critical Care Nurse Clinical
North America. 13, 497-509. References Theroux, R. (2006). How to bring evidence into your
practice. It indicates to what extent the results of the research may be biased and is thus a comment
on the degree to which alternative explanations for the outcome found are possible. This is referred
specifically as Evidence Based Healthcare. In simple words, we can say that a systematic review is a
multistage process where firstly, we identify all available and reliable publications regarding a
specific problem. Reviewing and critically appraising the evidence, (Appraising), and 4. Have you
ever witnessed any disruptive behavior from a nurse at your hospital. These guidelines are based on
information obtained from best available scientific evidence such as high-quality systematic reviews
and meta-analysis. An association may be fortuitous or may be produced by various other
circumstances; the presence of an association does not necessarily imply a causal relationship. The
practice of evidence-based medicine means integrating individual clinical expertise with the best
available external clinical evidence from systematic research. (Sackett et al., 1996, p. 71). Find out
about other changes to Library services. The majority of tools are in medical and nursing areas such
pain measurement, quality of life assessment, and drug efficacy evaluation. Standard 2: The
recreational therapist plans and develops an individualized treatment plan that identifies goals and
evidence-based treatment intervention strategies. Treatment periods are replicated until the clinician
and patient are convinced that the treatments are definitely different or definitely not different.
Knowledge is essential Knowledge changes rapidly Knowledge is illusive. Evidence-Based Nursing
These pages from Penn State University provide different scenarios to practice locating relevant
evidence. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or
additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot
usually be used to identify you. But you can upgrade your membership by going to My Account are
clicking on Change Plan. James Harrington, Cheryl Howard, Lisa Sage, Holley West, Andrea Scott
Ferris State University NURS 350 Spring 2012. The criteria for ranking evidence is based on the
design, methodology, validity and applicability of the different types of studies. Most “Levels of
Evidence” charts organize different types of evidence into some sort of 5 tier system, with the
highest level of evidence, Level 1, being the best. Goals for Today. State the importance of evidence-
based practice Define Evidence-based practice. With the introduction of newer research
methodologies (such as randomized controlled trials) and statistical tools for synthesizing and
analyzing the evidence (systematic reviews and meta-analysis), they became important components
of EBM. The sub-questions in the table help us to decide whether the available evidence is sufficient
to be applied in the practice.
Nursing Reference Center Plus This link opens in a new window Evidence-based Care sheets,
Guidelines and more. more. less. Nursing Reference Center Plus is a evidence-based point-of-care
resource specifically for nurses. The patients and physician are blinded, if possible, ad outcomes are
monitored. It contains citations from more than 5,200 worldwide journals in about 40 languages;
about 60 languages for older journals. For example, a randomized controlled trial or a cohort study.
Drugs, Herbs and Supplements (MedlinePlus) Information about dietary and herbal remedies'
effectiveness, dosage and drug interactions. A widely cited definition is adapted from this definition
of evidence based medicine (EBM). A simple grading system has been suggested to describe the
quality of research which is based solely on the design of the clinical study. Evidence-Based Practice
from a Nursing Perspective Cynthia Padula, PhD, RN Nurse Researcher, The Miriam Hospital
Master’s Program Director, Rhode Island College. Objectives. Describe evidence based practice
from a nursing perspective. Note that Randomized Controlled Trials are the highest level of evidence
in single trials. So, if there are no resources for you available at the top, you may have to start
moving down in order to find the answers you are looking for. Again, a meta-analysis of several high
quality studies containing homogenous results is very likely to be true. EBP Steps Levels of evidence
Tutorials Formulating the question Finding the Evidence Appraising the Evidence EBP resources and
further reading Need Help? Feedback. The external validity of a study refers to the integrity of the
experimental design. The core subject is medicine, but subject coverage also includes bioethics,
biology, chemistry, dentistry, environmental health, genetics, gerontology, health care planning and
administration, history of medicine, hospital administration, microbiology, nutrition, nursing
(International Nursing Index), physiology, pre-clinical sciences, public health, sports medicine,
veterinary medicine and zoology. Created in 1966, it is an excellent index to biomedical literature,
covering the disciplines of medicine, dentistry, nursing, veterinary medicine, health care services, and
the preclinical sciences. This problem can be avoided by combing searches and applying limits. These
RCTs are associated with low study errors (low P-value, confidence interval which excludes 1, or a
”negative” result associated with a power of over 80%). Hence, it should never replace the
traditional decision-making procedures, but just acts as an adjunct. Once the search results have been
obtained, one should have the skill to evaluate the evidence found. Animals are not humans, and we
have learned this time and time again. All anecdotal evidence is fundamentally flawed and most can
be explained by regression to the mean. What remains unknown; recommendations for future
research. The clinical practice guidelines are systematically developed statements to assist clinicians
and patients about appropriate healthcare for specific clinical circumstances 8. Evidence-based
Periodontology is an effective tool to support our decision making in clinical practice. Types of
Literature Reviews Systematic Review: Looks for similar Studies (Critiquing an Article) Meta
Analysis: Statistical technique for averaging an effect of treatment across studies (Cochrane Data
Base) Levels of Evidence Hierarchy of Evidence Hierarchy of Evidence Levels of Evidence
Category I: Evidence from at least one properly randomized controlled trial. In other words, was the
intended outcome of the treatment was achieved in that particular patient in a given clinical situation
or not. But how many meta-analyses of multiple RCTs with homogenous results have you read.
Various professional organizations also provide access to secondary evidence, clinical
recommendations, parameters of care, position papers, or academy statements related to dental
practice include. The original guidelines were published in 1955 and these were updated many times
with the latest recommendation given in the year 2007. Medical Journal 3(1) there is an agreed
hierarchy of 'levels of evidence'.