When it comes to conducting a literature review, especially a systematic one like the one in York, the

task can be quite daunting. The process involves thorough research, critical analysis, and synthesis of
existing literature relevant to a particular topic or research question. It requires not only time and
effort but also a deep understanding of the subject matter and the ability to identify key insights and
gaps in the existing body of knowledge.

Writing a literature review involves several steps, including:

1. Defining the scope and objectives of the review.

2. Conducting comprehensive searches across multiple databases and sources to identify
relevant studies and literature.
3. Screening and selecting studies based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
4. Extracting relevant data and information from selected studies.
5. Analyzing and synthesizing the findings from the literature.
6. Writing a coherent and well-structured review that presents the findings, identifies key
themes and patterns, and discusses implications for future research.

The difficulty lies in managing the vast amount of information available, critically evaluating the
quality and relevance of each study, and organizing the findings in a meaningful way. It requires not
only research skills but also analytical and writing skills to effectively communicate the findings and
insights derived from the literature.

For those who find the task of writing a literature review challenging, seeking assistance from
professional writing services like ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ can be beneficial. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers
expert assistance in conducting systematic literature reviews, providing support at every stage of the
process. Their team of experienced writers and researchers can help streamline the process, ensuring a
high-quality and well-written literature review that meets the academic standards and requirements.

By ordering from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time and effort while ensuring that your
literature review is comprehensive, well-structured, and effectively communicates the key findings
and insights from the literature. With their expertise and support, you can confidently navigate the
complexities of writing a literature review and produce a high-quality output that contributes to the
advancement of knowledge in your field.
An examination of the included studies always precedes statistical synthesis in Cochrane Reviews.
GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) is a
transparent framework for presenting summaries of evidence. (PDF) Five tips for developing useful
literature summary tables for Data were extracted using the summary tables in Excel. Through a
range of tools and practical resources, this international, cross-sector initiative aims to educate
researchers, promote integrity, and build trust in credible research and publications. PDF Preparing
Summary of Findings (SoF) Tables of this document is to provide instructions for authors on
preparing Summary of Findings (SoF) tables in reviews. Are there factors about them (e.g. age, race)
that could be relevant to the question you’re trying to answer. As a result, although narrative reviews
are informative, they often include an element of selection bias. This review requires intensive
information on the topic and it allows to include the searching on all major databases, including
statistical test values. A meta-analysis aspect is often used in systematic reviews, which entails using
statistical techniques to synthesise data from several studies into a single quantitative estimation or
summary effect size. A summary table helps you record the main points of each source and
document how sources relate to each other. How much generalizability does your research solutions
have. Although you may write a stand-alone literature review as a course assignment to enhance
your own knowledge as a student, scholars often write stand-alone literature reviews to benefit the
research community and discipline. A grade of the overall quality of the body of evidence for each
outcome (which may vary by outcome). These terms are often not clearly allocated in the literature.
You need to fill in all of the columns for each study you find to properly review the available
evidence. Few studies or sparse data, or both, may lead to different groupings of interventions,
populations or outcomes. Chapter 5: Collecting Data (Cochrane Handbook) A Practical Guide to
Data Extraction for Intervention Systematic Reviews (Covidence) Click on a type of data extraction
tool below to see some more information about using that type of tool and what UNC has to offer.
Tabulating study characteristics can help to explore and compare PICO elements across studies, and
is particularly important for reviews that are broad in scope, have diversity across one or more PICO
elements, or include large numbers of studies. Here is an example of a table that summarizes the
characteristics of studies in a review, note this table could be improved by adding a column for the
quality score you assigned to each study, or you could add a column with a value representing the
time period in which the study was carried out if this might be useful for the reader to know.
Extraction templates and approaches should be determined by the needs of the specific review. Upon
conducting the literature search, you have now access to a good amount of information. For
example, some scholars have examined the social aspects of a topic while others have explored its
economic aspects. From here, identify the purpose or thesis for your topic. These notes will be used
in creating one or more tables to display key elements of the studies reviewed and in forming
impressions about the strength and the direction of evidence on the topic of your review. It is, for
example, possible that the pooled effect estimate is mainly determined by one large study. Absolute
and relative magnitude of effect (if both are appropriate). The literature review is not just a summary
of the already published works. The template follows the standard format for academic literature
reviews, which means it will be suitable for the vast majority of academic research projects
(especially those within the sciences), whether they are qualitative or quantitative in terms of design.
Example: If you are studying the effects of violent games, you will target gamers, explore
technology, and by doing so will help you identify your research question. Learn more about
distillersr. (Article continues below) What Does A Summary Of Findings Table Include.
The research you are about to perform is based on the data you have extracted earlier. Fig. 7. Codes
and number of articles related to the artifact-mediated communication principle. After preliminary
examination of the outcome data, the review authors changed their planned intervention groups.
However, in most areas, terminology is variable, making it difficult to compare the PICO of each
included study to the PICO for each synthesis, or to compare PICO elements across studies. The
review distinguishes between types of data that have been studied, evaluated, and detailed over a
known period. Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food,
alcohol and tobacco. This process can be done by hand or by using a computer program.? Click an
item below to see how it applies to Step 7: Extract Data from Included Studies. We’ve also included
practical examples and links to more free videos and guides to help you understand exactly what’s
required in each section. Systematic literature review quick guide Decide on your team. So, whether
you are writing a student papers, dissertations, or scholarly report it is necessary to learn a few tips
and tricks to organize your ideas. Outcome(s): what are you trying to measure or achieve. This table
presents a high-level summary of the characteristics that are most important for determining which
comparisons can be made. This description should integrate information about key PICO
characteristics across studies, and identify any potentially important differences in characteristics that
were pre-specified as possible effect modifiers. Systematic review article and Meta-analysis: Main
steps for Successful writin. Put simply, it's a study of studies. ?? What is the final stage of a
systematic literature review. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version
6.4 (updated August 2023). Turn recording back on Connect with NLM National Library of
Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894 Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability
Disclosure Help Accessibility Careers What’s Included: Literature Review Template This template is
structure is based on the tried and trusted best-practice format for formal academic research projects
such as dissertations and theses. Writers can easily summarize material but seem to struggle to
adequately synthesize knowledge about their topic and express that in their writing. Tabulating study
characteristics is generally preferable to lengthy description in the text, since the structure imposed by
a table can make it easier and faster for readers to scan and identify patterns in the information
presented. Table 9.3.b illustrates one such approach. Ideally you should represent the meta-analysis
visually on a see fig. If you are conducting an analytical review with a meta-analysis to compare data
outcomes from several clinical trials you may wish to computerize the data collection and analysis
processes. So, don’t shy away from existing research that takes an opposing view to yours. PDF
Preparing Summary of Findings (SoF) Tables of this document is to provide instructions for authors
on preparing Summary of Findings (SoF) tables in reviews. Embedded historiographies are shorter
and may only need to be two or three paragraphs. Discuss any discrepancies in coding throughout
the process. Data extraction by at least two reviewers is necessary to ensure inter-rater reliability and
prevent data entry errors. Like other literature reviews, historiographies can be embedded or stand-
alone. The authors provided a rationale for the change and noted that it was a post-hoc decision.
9.3.5 Synthesize the characteristics of the studies contributing to each comparison (step 2.5) A final
step, and one that is essential for interpreting combined effects, is to synthesize the characteristics of
studies contributing to each comparison. Good Luck! Read more Free presentation slides If you are a
course instructor willing to educate your class or a student who wants to learn then refer to our free
presentation slides available for Google slides and Microsoft PowerPoint. For getting successful
publications and doing quality research work, the requirement of funding is very much essential.
Sitemap case study cover letter creative writing presentation problem solving rewiew prompts
websites tips. A literature review simply provides a summary of the literature available on a topic.
Keep in mind that the exact requirements for the literature review chapter will vary between
universities and degree programs. These are typically minor, but it’s always a good idea to double-
check your university’s requirements before you finalize your structure. Unleashing the Power of AI
Tools for Enhancing Research, International FDP on. Interpret and present the results. 1. Decide on
your team When carrying out a systematic literature review, you should employ multiple reviewers in
order to minimize bias and strengthen analysis. Systematic literature reviews are often found in
clinical or healthcare settings. Communications of the Association of Information Systems, 37 (43),
879-910. Research groups and researchers contacted (Names and contact details). To write a strong
embedded literature review, you should approach your research systematically. These tables will help
you determine which studies, if any, are eligible for quantitative synthesis. For example, examination
of the interventions studied is often needed to itemize their content so as to determine which studies
can be grouped in a single synthesis. If you have more than two people to research with you, then
SLR is the right option for you as it is an extensive method. Then ask yourself, “has someone written
a systematic literature review on my question already?” If so, yours may not be needed. Do you need
help conducting a structured literature search. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015; 9:
CD011045. Need of systemic review and meta-analysis: There are several reasons for performing a
systematic review and meta-analysis: It may assist in resolving discrepancies in results published by
individual studies that may include bias or errors. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston
M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). What types of systematic literature reviews are there. Step7:
Appraise studies per protocol Ensure to check and balance if the studies you have selected for your
research are based upon the research protocol you have made earlier. Consult your library subject
guide to review databases appropriate for your topic. The PICO for each synthesis (also planned at
the protocol stage) defines the question that the specific synthesis aims to answer, determining how
the synthesis will be structured, specifying planned comparisons (including intervention and
comparator groups, any grouping of outcome and population subgroups). In both stand-alone and
embedded historiographies, you must support your arguments and analyses with examples from the
sources. The key here is to use the table to provide a simple representation of what the research has
found (or not found, as the case may be). It might be possible to hire study authors to collect missing
data for data pooling (e.g., means, standard deviations). Use existing systematic reviews on your
topic to identify what information to collect if you are not sure what to do. The literature review is
not just a summary of the already published works. Writing a systematic review and meta-analysis
will help identify a researcher’s field of interest since they are published in high-impact journals and
receive many citations (3). The synthesis of study characteristics is also needed for GRADE
assessments, informing judgements about whether the evidence applies directly to the review
question (indirectness) and analyses conducted to examine possible explanations for heterogeneity
(inconsistency) (see Chapter 14 ). It would be best if you make the final decision on study inclusion.
This strategy is particularly valuable when matching data from several studies addressing similar
questions, usually, quite specific experimental questions, such as ”Does a rational-emotional therapy
intervention promote well-being in patients who are considered emotionally distressing?”.