When it comes to academic writing, one of the most challenging tasks can be crafting a literature

review. This critical component of research requires a deep understanding of existing scholarly works
related to a specific topic. Many students find themselves struggling with the intricate process of
conducting thorough research, synthesizing information, and presenting it coherently.

Writing a literature review involves more than just summarizing existing studies; it requires a
comprehensive analysis of the literature, identifying key themes, trends, and gaps in research. This
demands meticulous attention to detail and critical thinking skills to evaluate the relevance and
credibility of various sources.

Moreover, distinguishing between a literature review and analysis can add another layer of
complexity. While a literature review provides an overview of existing literature on a topic, analysis
delves deeper into examining and interpreting the findings, drawing connections, and offering
insights.

Navigating through this intricate process can be overwhelming for many students, especially when
balancing multiple academic responsibilities. As a result, seeking professional assistance becomes a
viable solution to ensure the quality and effectiveness of the literature review.

At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we understand the challenges students face in writing literature reviews and
analyses. Our team of experienced writers specializes in conducting thorough research and crafting
high-quality academic papers tailored to your specific requirements. With our expertise and
dedication to excellence, we guarantee a well-written literature review that meets the highest
academic standards.

Don't let the complexities of literature review and analysis hinder your academic success. Trust ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ to provide you with the assistance you need to excel in your academic endeavors.
Order now and experience the difference our professional writing services can make.
Perhaps a long lustrous curl or even a modern sassy cut. Our team consists of the best experts with
tremendous academic writing experience. The model dialogues in the chapters are nearly perfect and
one can seldom find client services officer resume false starts or self-corrections in them. Having
established the protocol, the next step is to search relevant electronic databases, reference lists and
other sources as determined by the search strategy, to seek studies meeting the eligibility criteria.
Hence, wherever a systematic review has been published, it is important to critically appraise it before
using it to inform practice. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and
your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will
need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. For example, the quality of a
randomized controlled trial can be assessed by finding out the answers to the following questions:
Was the assignment to the treatment groups really random. If you look at the diamond at the bottom
of the plot, the middle of the diamond is the point estimate of the effect size and the widest points
of the diamond represent the CIs. Application What is the effect of antiviral treatment in dengue
fever. A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic litera. Each citation in
the bibliography is followed by an annotation a sentence paragraph consisting of a summary,
literature evaluation, and a reflection of that resource. Click on the titles of the grey boxes below to
expand and read the purposes of each generic stage. The fourth column visually displays the study
results. Systematic Literature Review or Literature Review Systematic Literature Review vs Meta
Analysis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(5):765.. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liang X, Bi S, Yang W, Wang L, Cui G, Cui F, et al. If some lines do not overlap at all, these trials
may be said to be heterogeneous. Risk of bias assessment should be done, when possible, using a
predetermined, validated tool (or equivalent for qualitative studies if included) (9). Seroprevalence
of hepatitis B among a 1-69-year-old population in Nanjing city in 2020. Compared to the previous
meta-analysis, it appears the prevalence rates of HBV in both men and women have decreased.
Systematic review service is available to faculty, residents, fellows, and post-docs. Evidence thus
becomes more accessible to not only health care providers but also their users, that is, patients and
their families. With a few paragraphs divided up with subheadings, the writing gets higher readability
as people can find the needed information in the chosen sections. In this context, systematic means
that the methods used to search for and analyse the data are transparent, reproducible and defined
before searching begins. Many first time reviewers, whether they are independent researchers or
undertaking the review as part of a PhD or Professional Doctorate, feel that they benefit from
attending workshops and accessing online training resources offered by some review organizations.
Analysis of seroepidemiological survey of hepatitis B among people aged 0-79 years in Zhengzhou
from 2019 to 2021. Often, novice researchers mistakenly use these terms synonymously. While
analyzing the sources, you should look to find out answers to questions like: What question or
problem has the author been describing and debating. Another strategy is to scan the reference lists
of relevant studies. Systematic reviews on the other hand are far superior in that they adhere to a
strict scientific design based on explicit, prespecified and reproducible methods (Table 1). Systematic
Review and Meta-Analysis Within the paradigm of evidence-based orthopedics, systematic reviews
and meta-analyses top the hierarchy of evidence.
Evid Based Spine Care J. 2013;4(2):68. Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S, Guyatt GH,
Schemitsch E, DeBeer J, Bhandari M. For an overview of project planning, see the guide: Project
Planning for the Beginner: Home. Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other
reporting biases in meta-analyses of health research: A review. Be able to write a single paragraph
summary of the article. This is what differentiates a systematic review from a descriptive review that
might be based on, for example, a subset of the literature that the author is familiar with at the time
of writing. A review team searches for studies to answer the question using a highly sensitive search
strategy. Usually, it’s unnecessary, but if an abstract is mentioned in the requirements, consider
adding it to the working plan. It may also be, however, that the inclusion criteria do cover these but
no relevant studies have yet been conducted. Methods should be adequately documented so that they
can be replicated. Since it's a real paper written by a real student, we haven't corrected the student's
errors, but have instead included comments that point them out. BMC Pub Health. 2023;23(1):256..
He L, Pan X, Yang J, Ma Q, Jiang J, Wang W, et al. Thus, literature review is the starting point of
research since it makes the researcher summarise, evaluate and compare the most significant and
relevant information and sources in the relevant field. Supplementary Information Additional file 1..
Search Term Additional file 2: Table S1. Screening, data extraction and quality assessment Articles
were screened independently by the primary reviewer and at least one secondary reviewer, with all
conflicting decisions agreed up between reviewers. Types of Literature Reviews Meta-analysis:
Technique that statistically combines the results of quantitative studies to provide a more precise
effect of the results: Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching.. Refers to any combination of
methods where one significant component is a literature review (usually systematic). So what is the
difference between systematic review and literature review. Sheth U, Simunovic N, Klein G, Fu F,
Einhorn TA, Schemitsch E, Ayeni OR, Bhandari M. Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers
evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews The Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group
offers new, interim guidance to support the conduct of Rapid Reviews. Constant scrutiny: Concepts
or theories that repeatedly went under examination. Indeed, it can take years to conduct and write a
systematic literature review. LibGuides: Systematic Reviews: Types of Systematic Reviews Meta-
analysis is a statistical method that can be applied during a systematic review to extract and combine
the results from multiple studies. In the subgroup analysis, we found that HBV prevalence was
similar between males and females. Annotated bibliographies focus on sources gathered for a specific
research project. They objectively summarize large amounts of information, identifying gaps in
medical research, and identifying beneficial or harmful interventions which will be useful for
clinicians, researchers, and even for public and policymakers. PRISMA for Scoping Reviews
(PRISMA-ScR) The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was published in 2018. At this stage of
your review, you won’t read the articles yet. Writing a targeted literature review a targeted literature
review is not: It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant
theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research. Although not all systematic reviews conduct
meta-analyses, many do and present their findings in the form of forest plots. If you are befuddled
by the complexity and scope of the task, do not worry. Language Editing Plus With Elsevier’s
Language Editing Plus services, you can relax with our complete language review of your systematic
literature review or literature review, or any other type of manuscript or scientific presentation.
Systematic Reviews: CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care Provides a succinct
outline for carrying out systematic reviews and well as details about constructing a protocol, testing
for bias, and other aspects of the review process. It answers a clearly formulated research question
and explicitly states the methods used to arrive at the answer. Search results may be filtered by
screening titles first, then abstracts of relevant-looking titles and finally the full reports. The purpose
is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and
identify future research's likely directions. Reply Delete Replies Reply Unknown 5 February 2018 at
06:02 Wow, great post. Systematic reviews sit at the top of the evidence hierarchy because it is
widely agreed that studies with rigorous methods are those best able to minimise the risk of bias on
the results of the study. Education Naima Ferdous July 26, 2021 Systematic and literature reviews
are used to give a piece of summary information; both reviews also synthesize evidence. Holding
degrees in more than 50 subjects, they know how to create masterpieces. Consider using transition
phrases like the following, or borrow phrasing that you like from other articles. (It's not plagiarism to
use common phrases.). A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in
identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):27.
The National Library of Medicine. Request a consultation with one of our team members and start
empowering your researchers: By using our site you consent to our use of cookies to measure and
improve our site’s performance. In simple words, what key points will be added to the body part.
Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant
theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Systematic Reviews Meta-analysis
Research Methodology Evidence-Based Orthopedics Evidence-Based Medicine This is a preview of
subscription content, log in via an institution. Additional Information A typology of reviews: an
analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies This classic article is a valuable reference
point for those commissioning, conducting, supporting or interpreting reviews. A good literature
review is a critical appraisal of narrowly focused, selected and truly relevant work that provides the
current status (perspective) of the topic. Most systematic literature reviews originated in the world of
medicine science. The theoretical literature review helps to establish what theories exist, the
relationships between them, the degree the existing approaches have been investigated, and to
develop new hypotheses to be tested. In what ways does it relate to other sources on the same topic.
Further Reading: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. There are many
challenges and skills required for producing a systematic review. To find out the solutions or answers
to a clinical question like this, one has to refer textbooks, ask a colleague, or search electronic
database for reports of clinical trials. Registration is free and open to anyone undertaking systematic
reviews of the effects of interventions and strategies to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor health
conditions, for which there is a health related outcome. Seroepidemiological survey of hepatitis B in
healthy population in Zhejiang, 2018. For subgroup analysis of sexes were separated into males and
females. Assess credibility of papers quickly SciSpace helps you assess the credibility of research
papers by showcasing citation count and H-index Source When doing the literature review, it is
critical to establish the quality of your sources. Your strategy will depend on your field and your
research question, but sources generally fall into these four categories: Databases: Search multiple
databases of peer-reviewed literature, such as PubMed or Scopus. Find out why over 350 of the
world’s leading institutions are seeing a surge in publications since using Covidence. Appropriate
methods of synthesis should be used for different types of evidence. Hepatitis B and C virus
infection and hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a review of epidemiology and control measures.
Summary In summary, systematic reviews (if well-conducted) can be an invaluable resource for
providing an up-to-date and systematic summary of the current evidence for particular interventions.
Read the articles and decide which articles meet the selection criteria. This may potentially restrict
the generalizability of our findings regarding HBV prevalence in the eastern region. There are a
variety of possible approaches that you can take. We caught up with some of the winners to discover
the impact of their work and find out more about their experiences. Theoretical Review This form
aims to examine the corpus of theory accumulated regarding an issue, concept, theory, and
phenomenon. All included search terms used for each searched database were reported in the
Additional file 1. Finally, the review team synthesises the extracted study data (perhaps using meta-
analysis) and presents the results. The second column relates to the intervention groups and the third
column to the control groups. Whichever type of review is employed, the process is similarly linear.
If a systematic review has not been well conducted, there would be concern regarding the validity of
its findings. These are some places where protocols for systematic reviews might be published. The
prevalence rate was higher in males compared to females, higher in rural areas than in urban areas,
and higher in western regions than in central and eastern regions. The square blocks represent the
point estimate of the effect for each study (larger blocks indicate that the study was given more
weight in the analysis, for example, because it had a larger sample size), and the horizontal lines the
CIs. Each term refers to research about research, but there are important differences. The content and
the purpose of an essay depends on the type of the essay. PROSPERO: International prospective
register of systematic reviews PROSPERO is an international database of prospectively registered
systematic reviews in health and social care, welfare, public health, education, crime, justice, and
international development, where there is a health related outcome. For example, in CiB, each unit is
designed with tasks for students to learn how to establish purpose annotated meetings, interrupt and
handle interruptions, the and give clarifications, etc; while in Literature, each unit is designed with
tasks for students to learn the to discuss and exchange ideas, work with the agenda and how to
negotiate in order bibliography reach an agreement. They answered the question “What is the
effectiveness of probiotics in reducing eczema symptoms and improving quality of life in patients
with eczema?” In this context, a probiotic is a health product that contains live microorganisms and
is taken by mouth. For instance, in the unit discussing interruption in meetings in CiB Review
Appendix I there is an the dialogue annotated which learners need to respond difference with the
expressions acquired previously in order review handle interruption. The previous 2017 meta-analysis
divided the age groups into 9 groups but in our meta-analysis, we only had two age groups. Due to
heterogeneity in data collection methods among studies, there remains a need for systematic
surveillance of nationwide HBV prevalence. Finding and reviewing hr literature and information
sources for PhD hr disser. On the contrary, if you are writing a narrative essay, narrating a story and
retaining the attention of your readers will be your main argument. Read more PUB-Effective
Strategies to Monitor Clinical Risks Using Biostatistics March 9, 2021 Effective strategies to monitor
clinical risks using biostatistics Read more. Interpret results: Graph The results of a meta-analysis are
usually presented as a graph called forest plot because the typical forest plots appear as forest of
lines. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ,
Sipe TA, Thacker SB. Publication bias assessment was tested by Egger’s test and funnel plot.
Additionally, you should know that the narrower your research topic is, the swifter it will be for you
to restrict the number of sources to be analyzed. 2. Search relevant literature Dig deeper into search
engines to discover what has already been published around your chosen topic. It is a good practice
to then keep your review up-to-date and consider republishing it every few years depending on the
speed of progress in the field.
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis The JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis is designed to provide
authors with a comprehensive guide to conducting JBI systematic reviews. In this case, you’ll have
to apply the selection criteria on your own; you can mention this as a limitation in your paper’s
discussion. Source: image.slidesharecdn.com Literature review sample literature reviews search this
guide search. Guyatt G, Cairns J, Churchill D, Cook D, Haynes B, Hirsh J, et al. The GRADE
approach provides guidelines for making recommendations based on research evidence, which you
may find help you to consider how to interpret the findings of systematic reviews (see and for
further guidance). The previous 2017 meta-analysis divided the age groups into 9 groups but in our
meta-analysis, we only had two age groups. Analysis on new born hepatitis B immunization
coverage and pregnant women hospital delivery rate in different regions. Databases: EMBASE,
PsycINFO, AMED, LILACS, and ISI Web of Science Handsearch: Conference proceedings and
reference lists of articles Gray literature: The Cochrane Library, the metaRegister of Controlled
Trials, and the Ongoing Skin Trials Register Experts: Authors of unpublished registered trials,
pharmaceutical companies, and manufacturers of probiotics Step 4: Apply the selection criteria
Applying the selection criteria is a three-person job. Countdown to 2030: eliminating hepatitis B
disease, China. We want to keep things simple and provide support if your systems experience any
of these disruptions. Inclusion and exclusion criteria All articles that reported cross-sectional studies
on the general population tested for HBsAg in different regions of China were included.
Bibliographic, word-processing, spreadsheet, and statistical software. From these results the most
relevant will be identified. From proactively monitoring and fixing your system remotely to enabling
you to reset your own system easily, we have you covered. Preferred reporting items for systematic
reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. In a
meta-analysis, studies with narrower CIs are given more weight in the analysis, and those with wider
CIs are given relatively less weight; this is referred to as weighting according to the inverse of the
variance. Across the seven searched databases, a total of 1418 articles published in English and 1883
articles published in Chinese were retrieved. Reply Delete Replies Reply Unknown 5 February 2018
at 06:02 Wow, great post. Reviews that do not contain meta-analysis can still synthesise study data to
produce something that has greater value than the sum of its parts. What makes a systematic review
different from other types of reviews is that the research methods are designed to reduce bias. To
decide the type of studies to be included and excluded in meta-analysis is highly dependent on the
question that is asked. They’re narrow in scope: they only answer the precise research question. Yes,
the literature review should ideally be written in the past tense. Searching for grey literature for
systematic reviews: challenges and benefits. If you’re doing a systematic review on your own (e.g.,
for a research paper or thesis ), you should take appropriate measures to ensure the validity and
reliability of your research. Should I summarize, synthesize or offer a critique of the sources. In this
context, systematic means that the methods used to search for and analyse the data are transparent,
reproducible and defined before searching begins. There are many possible approaches and
techniques for a review so a review organization’s handbook and evidence-based guidance on the
process could save you time. Typical effect sizes in systematic reviews are the odds ratio, the risk
ratio, the weighted mean difference and the standardized mean difference. Scoping Reviews, JBI
Manual for Evidence Synthesis The Joanna Briggs Institute provides extensive guidance for their
authors in producing both systematic and scoping reviews.
Extending the reach of an academic library by taking the library to the students. A literature review
is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those
sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis).the lit review is an important genre in
many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays).
But we can still see that there are certain linguistic features which we can introduce to NNSEs in
order to help them develop communicative competence in the workplace. Our objective is to use
explicit, systematic, and transparent methods to develop an evidence-based and agreement-based
reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions (PRIOR, Preferred
Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews). As a researcher, you should use it to set the context,
build your argument, and establish the need for your study. At this stage of your review, you won’t
read the articles yet. Guyatt G, Cairns J, Churchill D, Cook D, Haynes B, Hirsh J, et al. Quantitative:
Use statistical methods to summarize and compare data from different studies. This step is most
important since the remaining steps will be based on this. Your literature review format depends
heavily on the kind of manuscript you are writing — an entire chapter in case of doctoral theses, a
part of the introductory section in a research article, to a full-fledged review article that examines the
previously published research on a topic. Below are the general guidelines on which this part is
usually based. Delete Replies Reply Reply Unknown 3 December 2017 at 05:18 Wow,great post.
PRISMA for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was
published in 2018. However, a scoping review isn’t a type of systematic review. Once a concrete
evidence base has been identified, the researcher extracts relevant data before reporting the
synthesized results in an extended piece of writing. Common Topics Topics that have clear
conclusions can be reached through the support of data and statistics. Make referring sources super
easy Make referring pages super easy with SciSpace Source To ensure you don't lose track of your
sources, you must start noting down your references when doing the literature review. You may find
it helpful to ask yourself these questions. A lit review goes beyond basic summarizing to focus on
the critical analysis of the reviewed works and their relationship to your research question. Eczema is
a common skin condition that causes red, itchy skin. PRISMA-P is a 17-item checklist for elements
considered essential in protocol for a systematic review or meta-analysis. A meta-analysis is the use
of statistical methods to summarize the results of a systematic review. Wenyu Liao conducted the
data extraction and quality assessment. As for the subgroup of age groups, HBsAg positive cases in
people aged ?18?years old were reported in 14 articles and people We systematically evaluated peer-
reviewed studies published in English or Chinese describing HBV prevalence in China from 2018 to
2022 to provide an updated meta-analysis from a previous meta-analysis. The perspectives of those
involved in the care for people with cardiovascular disease can be different to those of other health
care professionals. To conduct a systematic review, you will need, among other things: A specific
research question, usually in the form of a PICO question. You evaluate the existing literature on a
similar topic as yours to present an understanding of the problem you are trying to solve. For
example, the review could be about the effectiveness of treatment. The images or other third party
material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated
otherwise in a credit line to the material. A literature review requires a lot of research work.