Struggling to write a literature review? You're not alone.

Crafting a comprehensive literature review

can be an arduous task, requiring extensive research, critical analysis, and synthesis of existing
literature. From identifying relevant sources to organizing your findings coherently, every step
demands meticulous attention to detail and a deep understanding of the subject matter.

Many students and researchers find themselves overwhelmed by the sheer volume of information
available and the complexity of academic writing conventions. The pressure to produce a high-
quality literature review that meets academic standards adds another layer of challenge.

Fortunately, there's a solution. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers professional assistance tailored to your

specific needs. Our team of experienced writers specializes in crafting literature reviews that are
comprehensive, well-structured, and impeccably written. Whether you're struggling to find relevant
sources, articulate your arguments clearly, or meet tight deadlines, we're here to help.

By ordering from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can:

1. Save Time and Effort: Focus on other aspects of your research while our experts handle the
literature review for you.
2. Ensure Quality and Originality: Receive a custom-written literature review that adheres to
academic standards and is free from plagiarism.
3. Gain Insights and Expertise: Benefit from the knowledge and expertise of our writers, who
are well-versed in a wide range of subject areas.
4. Meet Deadlines with Confidence: Rest assured that your literature review will be delivered
on time, allowing you to meet your academic or professional deadlines.

Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review hold you back. Trust ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ to
provide the support you need to succeed. Order now and take the first step towards achieving your
academic goals.
They provide detailed descriptions of research methods and results, as well as in-depth analysis and
discussion of the implications of the research. Effects of training on quality of peer review:
Randomised controlled trial. It features a substantial list of references that a reader may wish to
consult when learning about or researching a topic. That paper went on to receive the Nobel Prize in
economics in 2001 for its significant contribution to behavioral economics. There is no doubt that
being acknowledged as an elite reviewer in a prestigious journal can be a significant incentive. The
reviewers are also required to note errors in layout, terminology, and grammar. Articles fall into
several categories: general articles, series, concise article-in-boxes, classroom pieces, nature-watch
pieces, research news, book reviews, and information and announcements useful to students and
teachers. Without javascript some functions will not work, including question submission via the
form. Chronic Schizophrenia and Cognitive Behaviour Therapy: Three Case Studies. (2015)
Common in the social sciences and life sciences, a CASE STUDY provides an intensive analysis of
an individual unit (such as a person, group, community or event) in order to illustrates a problem,
present new variables, and provide possible solutions or questions for further research. Peer review
may be conducted in different ways by different journals, and each of these methods has its own
advantages and disadvantages (Table 1). It is imperative that any gaps in the literature review be
clarified. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription
by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. There is a need for the reviewer to
identify the contributions of the paper and whether it adds to our understanding of the subject. The
journal explores the measures vital in the prevention of hospital-acquired infections. If you continue
without changing your browser settings we will assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on
the SciTeMed Publishing Group website. Lastly, the reviewer recommends whether the paper be
accepted in its submitted form, whether the paper be accepted with major or minor changes, or
whether it should be rejected (Table 3). Allowing researchers to publish negative results would
encourage a spirit of collaboration and would lead to a dramatic shift in scientific discovery. A
request for review and an abstract of the manuscript are then emailed to the appropriate reviewers.
This process continues until the experts deem the article acceptable for publication. Novel
applications of Mathematics in real situations are especially welcome. If reviewers know that they
will be identified, they may exert additional effort during their review. It is common for the reviewer
to be asked to re-assess the paper after the authors have made revisions to ensure that the problems
have been addressed effectively. Check whether the authors have provided the information required.
A comprehensive review emphasizes an article's significance and explains how it contributes to
scientific research. ASCO assumes no responsibility for any injury or damage to persons or property
arising out of or related to any use of the material contained in, posted on, or linked to this site, or
any errors or omissions. It also allows you to gauge how much your coworker or friend knows about
his or her profession. To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely,
please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. It has been proposed that draft papers be made
available online on preprint servers for peer review so that peers can comment on them. The reasons
for the rejection should be clearly explained. Journal of Nursing Care Quality.The journal explores
the steps followed in the prevention of all urinary tract infections.
The main reason for this is that reviewers seek to provide an in-depth review of a manuscript, while
authors are pursuing publication as the goal. The Journal reports the scientific and technological
achievements and frontiers in aeronautic engineering and astronautic engineering, in both theory and
practice, such as theoretical research articles, experiment ones, research notes, comprehensive
reviews, technological briefs and other reports on the latest developments and everything related to
the fields of aeronautics and astronautics, as well as those ground equipment concerned. At this
stage she's looking for first indications not just of the quality of the article and the science
underpinning it, but also of the relevance of the research to the field and to the journal itself. Lastly,
the public has an important interest in the research, as people rely on understandable, thoroughly
explained research to provide the most genuine analyses of research topics. Early childhood cognitive
development and parental cognitive stimulation: Evidence for reciprocal gene-environment
transactions (2012) This scientific RESEARCH STUDY presents original interpretation of data that
was collected and analyzed by the authors. Academic research departments, pharmaceutical
companies, and universities all benefit from publishing research. It uses technical and formal
language with a logical structure that reflects the format of the study. None of the information
posted on ASCOconnection.org is intended as medical, legal, or business advice, or advice about
reimbursement for health care services. A major criticism of the peer review process cocerns what an
author should do when two reviewers disagree on how to improve a paper. Other studies have
encouraged the idea of training reviewers prior to review. Once all reviews are completed, the
editorial team compiles them and presents a summary report to the editor, who then decides whether
the manuscript should be accepted, rejected, or revised. All variables of interest (including
dependent and independent variables) should be well measured and controlled. However, as we
have seen by recent retractions of published works from high-profile journals, this theory is not
always true. Ethical concerns also need to be addressed in this section. By increasing recognition and
incentivizing reviewers, this may lead to more reviewer participation, as well as faster turnaround
times. Articles fall into several categories: general articles, series, concise article-in-boxes, classroom
pieces, nature-watch pieces, research news, book reviews, and information and announcements
useful to students and teachers. It can be a valuable addition to one’s academic career. A few
prestigious journals may even specify exactly what they expect from their reviewers in a very
concise and direct manner. In her novels many men and women living together journeying across life
in their different age groups, classes and gendered roles. She is one of the promninent and leading
Indian women writers in English. The summary usually includes what the paper is about and what
the main findings are. Academic writing acknowledges and formally cites the work of researchers,
authors, artists and other creators of ideas, words, images and data. Single blind is the most common
form of peer review amongst scientific journals. In most journals, there will be a list of choices to
pick from: accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject. There are a number of metrics used to
evaluate the prestige of research journals. It welcomes submissions of manuscripts reporting research
that is up-to-date, scientifically exc. You must be frank about your opinion and comment on whether
you think the manuscript is worth publishing. If the author is not known, the title of the article moves
to the author position. Several aspects are taken into consideration during the second read.
Reviewers may exhibit biases associated with intellectual conservatism, or with a preference for
papers in their field of interest, or with papers which they agree with.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and
fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. When major changes are required, the reviewer needs to
ensure that they are explained with references to previous research that supports the suggestions. As
the author explains, fatigue refers to the reduction of energy or the rate of expenditure of muscle
tissues Kumar, 2006. Reviewers should endeavor to complete their reviews within the timeframe
stipulated by the journal. A competent reviewer keeps an open mind and strives to put biases aside
constantly. At present, peer reviews constitute the primary factor in publication decisions. A key
feature of the first section of the review report is the emphasis on the favourable aspects of the paper;
criticism of it comes later. There is no doubt that being acknowledged as an elite reviewer in a
prestigious journal can be a significant incentive. Safety in the Stacks: Developing Safety Procedures
and Training in the Academ. When done correctly, it is a vital part of building trust and maintaining
high standards of quality for published research. A paper must follow a logical order: study
hypotheses or research issues, research methodology, study design, data collection, and analysis.
Founded with the aim of accelerating the pace of scientific advancement and demonstrating its
value, we believe all rigorous science needs to be published and discoverable, widely disseminated
and freely accessible to all. Due to a lack of transparency by both authors and peer reviewers, data
falsification may go unnoticed. Below are the questions you should keep in mind as you peer review.
See Full PDF Download PDF About Press Blog People Papers Topics Job Board We're Hiring. Yet
the reviewers may not be sufficiently compensated due to the lack of monetary rewards. After that,
reviewers are selected based upon their expertise required to review a particular paper. Most journals
do not offer any type of author appeal system and often declare the peer review and editor’s
decision to be final. To combat this problem, academics have come up with ideas such as the
Reviewer Index (RI), Reviewer Index Directory (RID) and Global Reviewer Index Directory
(GRID), which aim to strengthen scientific research by focusing on both authors and reviewers
simultaneously. This is dependent on the policies of the publishers of the book. Therefore, improved
selection and cycling of editors-in-chief and editorial board members, along with assignment of
received manuscripts to persons with expertise, would produce a higher quality and less biased
assessment. Improving radiologists’ and orthopedists’ QoE in diagnosing lumbar disk herni. The
introduction also includes a review of existing literature on the topic, which helps to put the research
in context and highlight any gaps in previous research that the current study aims to address.
Download Free PDF View PDF See Full PDF Download PDF Loading Preview Sorry, preview is
currently unavailable. One of the most highly debated fixes to the peer review issue concerns
whether or not journal editors should blind the reviewers and authors in the review process, and, if
so, who should be blinded. Study populations should be representative to allow generalization of the
results from a small sample to a larger population. Bowman Joy Bowman, CSCA IMAGE GUIDED
SURGERY IMAGE GUIDED SURGERY Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and SJH Menzies
final hobart 29 feb13 Menzies final hobart 29 feb13 Australian Medical Council Limited More
Related Content What's hot Image-Guided Surgery Image-Guided Surgery Alexander Bardis Breast
Lesion Segmentation in Ultrasound Images Breast Lesion Segmentation in Ultrasound Images
Mohamed Elawady ICIAR 2016 Poster: Automatic Nonlinear Filtering and Segmentation for Breast.
This means that readers of the article will be able to view reviewer reports, editor's decision letters,
and the authors' responses. Some might be under-researched and rely on guessing to fill in the gaps.
Instead, the authors should specify the reasons for not accepting a suggestion, and the reviewer can
then decide whether the explanation is acceptable.
Single blind is the most common form of peer review amongst scientific journals. Any
overinterpretation of the findings should be avoided. They provide detailed descriptions of research
methods and results, as well as in-depth analysis and discussion of the implications of the research.
We evaluate submitted manuscripts on the basis of methodological rigor and high ethical standards,
regardless of perceived nove. At this step, any gaps or inconsistencies in the story need to be
addressed. Authors of peer reviewed articles typically have graduate degrees and often work at a
university. Academic writing acknowledges and formally cites the work of researchers, authors,
artists and other creators of ideas, words, images and data. CrystalGuide flat fee surgical guide and
triple scan - a new and effective pr. Look for information about their review process on their
website. In this case, they may be inclined to emphasize the positive aspects of the research as they
may be concerned with the possible consequences that arise from their review. This journal features
articles on physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics, computer science, and engineering. There have
been a few individuals who have complained about not receiving any monetary compensation. Novel
applications of Mathematics in real situations are especially welcome. Grant funding for basic and
clinical research is extremely competitive. This is one reason why they undergo a process of quality
control before they are published. This practice is not acceptable and is strictly forbidden by journals,
however it may happen quite often. In addition, reviewers should ensure that the study has been
conducted according to established methodologies. Most dental journals will publish ideas only in
papers which also report observations. To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and
more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. If you continue without changing
your browser settings we will assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the SciTeMed
Publishing Group website. Lastly, a problem that authors often confront at the end of the peer review
process is how to defend a rejected submission. The third point that the reviewer should consider is
the validity of the methods used for collecting the data. PERSPECTIVE For years, the peer review
process has been a guiding force for scientific publishing. There are usually guidelines for writing
reviews, and sometimes, specific questions are asked regarding certain aspects of the review. There
will be more about competing interests in a later post. In open peer review, the identity of the authors
and the reviewers are known by both parties. Early childhood cognitive development and parental
cognitive stimulation: Evidence for reciprocal gene-environment transactions (2012) This scientific
RESEARCH STUDY presents original interpretation of data that was collected and analyzed by the
authors. Unleashing the Power of AI Tools for Enhancing Research, International FDP on. This
tutorial was made using Microsoft PowerPoint 2007. That paper went on to receive the Nobel Prize
in economics in 2001 for its significant contribution to behavioral economics.
In some cases, this delay can take up to several months. Grant money would be used more efficiently
because of the increased transparency regarding experimental outcomes that did not bear fruit. The
fete can only be achieved through diligence in the prevention and effective treatment of the
patients.Flanders, K. (2014). Rounding to reduce CAUTI. Scientific findings and discoveries can
have far-reaching implications for individuals and society. Although people all respect colleagues and
professors, some editors-in-chief are simply too far removed from the current generation’s research
interests and practices. Indian Pediatrics has a permanent Editorial Office situated at New Delhi,
India. One issue with training current reviewers is that those with years of experience may be
hesitant to change their style of review. The peer review process itself involves many interested
parties. Journals can still choose whether to carry out a single-blind, double-blind, or open peer
review during the review process. The journal welcomes papers that are related to all aspects of brain
hemorrhage, including cerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, aneurysm rupture, cerebral
arteriovenous malformation, traumatic cerebral hemorrhage, and hematomyelia. If reviewers know
that they will be identified, they may exert additional effort during their review. These can come in
very handy when you need to see the quality of the works of others. However, incentivizing
reviewers by paying them could be an effective tool to encourage others. Such studies often borrow
from and interact with research in other fields, such as monetary theory, industrial organization,
finance, labor economics, political economy, public finance, international economics, and
development economics. We take a look in the second of a series of step-by-step guides for the
novice peer reviewer. Furthermore, research results can be interpreted from a variety of perspectives,
and the study results should only be applied to similar populations and situations. There is a need for
reviewers to remain vigilant in their efforts to avoid unsubstantiated claims. Every comment should
be backed up with facts, references, and concrete recommendations. Artificial-Intelligence-in-
Marketing-Data.pdf Artificial-Intelligence-in-Marketing-Data.pdf From eSIMs to iSIMs: It’s Inside
the Manufacturing From eSIMs to iSIMs: It’s Inside the Manufacturing 5 Things You Shouldn’t Do
at Salesforce World Tour Sydney 2024! 5 Things You Shouldn’t Do at Salesforce World Tour
Sydney 2024. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 25 (1), 43-49. With the widespread
problem of insufficient transparency combined with bias, there is a dire need to reevaluate present
methods for accepting publications. The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication:
Directional selection towards a robust discipline. Reviewers may exhibit biases associated with
intellectual conservatism, or with a preference for papers in their field of interest, or with papers
which they agree with. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non
Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon
this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the
original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See. One of the first steps in the
process of peer review is finding qualified individuals to review the paper. Response Your insightful
comments are greatly appreciated. Authors do not care to spend time writing up results that do not
prove their hypotheses and there is very little journalistic value in publishing negative studies. Peer
review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of
the process. It is my opinion that this paper deserves to be published, but I believe one problem
needs to be addressed before it can be accepted for publication. The article begins with an
introduction that provides background information on the topic and explains the research question
being addressed. When current findings are inconsistent with those that exist in the literature,
possible explanations for these inconsistencies should be proposed.
Nevertheless, most reviewers do not receive any of these fees, which is unfair to them since they
have spent considerable time and effort on the review. With grants focused on answering such
specific questions in science today, it is only human that people will have differing opinions
regarding the grant’s strengths, weaknesses and importance. It also allows you to gauge how much
your coworker or friend knows about his or her profession. Individuals lacking expertise in that
particular area may be unable to provide a learned and unbiased review. Reviewers tend to approve
papers that demonstrate large sample sizes, detailed statistical analysis, and a well-controlled design.
This process continues until the experts deem the article acceptable for publication. These can come
in very handy when you need to see the quality of the works of others. The same is the case with
words and phrases borrowed from foreign languages, the defining names for objects, participants,
groups, variables and other vital elements of the research process, and any nonstandard or newly
coined abbreviations.. INTRODUCTION Breast cancer is a global health threat due to its frequent
nature with a frequency of 30% amongst other types of cancer. False data were found in at least 17
papers he published while working at Bell Laboratories in Murray Hill, New Jersey. Response Your
insightful comments are greatly appreciated. There is a need for reviewers to remain vigilant in their
efforts to avoid unsubstantiated claims. Every comment should be backed up with facts, references,
and concrete recommendations. Otherwise, there is no point, and these reviews will not be credited
by anybody from the same profession. The purpose of the IJDVL is to facilitate scientific dialogue
amongst its members through the medium of publication of case reports, studies or letters as well as
to deliver continuing medical education to its members and postgraduate students through reviews
and other articles. While there is a general consensus among researchers and clinicians that something
must be done to improve upon the method for properly vetting manuscripts, there are conflicting
opinions on how to best implement new policies. Our strict peer-review procedure guarantees the
academic level of publications and enhances the reputation of the journal. An imperative point to
remember is that in cases where the reviewer is confronted with information outside of their
expertise, the details must be made clear in the review. It is typically published in a scholarly journal
and is written for an audience of experts in the field. Anything rural is of interest; however, the
journal has an avowed bias towards matters of policy, institutions, organizations and practices. There
should be a clear and concise definition of the ranges or cut-offs of normal and abnormal values in
the test results. There have been a few individuals who have complained about not receiving any
monetary compensation. PREVIOUS NEXT Everything about Writing Timed Essays How to Write
Satire. In accordance with accepted academic practice, anyone may use, distribute, or reproduce this
material, so long as the original author(s), the copyright holder(s), and the original publication of this
journal are credited, and this publication is cited as the original. Journal of Nursing Care Quality.The
journal explores the steps followed in the prevention of all urinary tract infections. At present, peer
reviews constitute the primary factor in publication decisions. The most common types of peer
review are single-blind peer review, double-blind peer review, open peer review, and transparent peer
review. My aim in this paper is to show how assertion can be one of the ways to seek a solution to
the problems faced by the characters in the novel The present paper will highlight the struggles of
characters, the dilemma they faced and finally their assertion as one of the remedy taken by them to
fight with the injustice and prove their worth. Article processing fees may also include charges for
the peer review process. What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical
journal. What Happens to the Eye after uncomplicated Cataract Surgery. The scales used for the
measurements should be clearly defined.