Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

1

Topic 5 DQ 1

Name

Institution Affiliation

Course

Instructor

March 12, 2023


2

Topic 5 DQ 1

Personal biases are unintentionally acquired taught views, opinions, or attitudes that

frequently perpetuate stereotypes. These personal biases are unconscious, automatic, and

inherent, leading to inaccurate judgments. When a particular outcome or response is chosen or

encouraged above others during testing or sampling in research, bias is created. Bias can appear

at any stage of the research process, including study design, data collection, data analysis, and

publication (Collins, 2020). The problem of research bias in academic writing is quite

significant. These studies' findings must be reliable and respectable because they are frequently

utilized to inspire further research and policy decisions. The researcher may not always be aware

of their bias, but it does happen occasionally. Frequently, a researcher will favor a particular

hypothesis and may try to influence certain phases of their study to steer it towards the outcomes

and results they are hoping for because of this intended outcome. When a research study lacks

objectivity, the entire experiment and its findings lose their importance (Collins, 2020). Bias

cannot be as easily altered when using quantitative measurements. Unless the researcher

purposefully modifies the findings, numbers are numbers, and the information is factual.

Typically, when it comes to qualitative research, the issue of bias surfaces. Bias can be deceptive

and leads to incorrect judgments. It impairs the validity and dependability of the findings of a

quality improvement project, resulting in inaccurate interpretations of the data and incorrect

conclusions (Collins, 2020). Thus, conducting biased research is immoral and unethical.

Homan et al. (2020) explore quantitative methods of analyzing intimate partner violence

in microblogs or social media. The study demonstrates a bias towards female victims and male

abusers, which is also highlighted as a limitation of this particular study. However, the selection

bias is unintentional, given that it is rare to identify female abusers, and male victims do not
3

report or are reluctant to share their stories on social media and microblogs. Most male victims

do not make their narrative public hence the bias in selection leading to more female victims and

male abusers. This study is still valid and reliable because the bias was unintentional and driven

by societal factors.
4

References

Collins, J. (2020, May 25). How to recognize and avoid research bias.

https://www.impactio.com/how-to-recognize-and-avoid-research-bias

Homan, C. M., Schrading, J. N., Ptucha, R. W., Cerulli, C., & Ovesdotter Alm, C. (2020).

Quantitative Methods for Analyzing Intimate Partner Violence in Microblogs:

Observational Study. Journal of medical Internet research, 22(11), e15347.

https://doi.org/10.2196/15347

You might also like