Sample Of Review Of Related Literature In A Research Paper

Writing a literature review for a research paper can be an arduous task. It involves thorough research,
critical analysis, and coherent synthesis of existing scholarly works related to the topic of study.
Crafting a well-written literature review requires a deep understanding of the subject matter and the
ability to present insights in a structured and compelling manner.

One of the biggest challenges in writing a literature review is sifting through vast amounts of
literature to identify relevant sources. This process can be time-consuming and overwhelming,
especially for researchers who are unfamiliar with the topic or lack access to comprehensive
databases. Additionally, synthesizing diverse perspectives and findings from different sources into a
coherent narrative requires careful planning and organization.

Moreover, ensuring the quality and credibility of sources is essential in producing a reliable literature
review. Evaluating the validity and reliability of each source requires critical thinking and expertise
in the subject matter. Researchers must be diligent in assessing the authority, relevance, and currency
of the literature to avoid including biased or outdated information in their review.

Given the complexities involved in writing a literature review, many researchers seek assistance from
professional writing services like ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔. By outsourcing the task to experienced
writers, researchers can save time and ensure the quality of their literature review. ⇒ StudyHub.vip
⇔ offers expert assistance in conducting literature searches, evaluating sources, and synthesizing
information to create well-structured and insightful reviews.

For researchers looking to streamline the process and produce high-quality literature reviews, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ provides a reliable solution. With their team of skilled writers and commitment to
excellence, researchers can trust ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ to deliver exceptional results that meet their
academic needs.
Reference lists of relevant papers were also examined. The CQIMG endorses three types of
synthesis; thematic synthesis, framework synthesis and meta-ethnography ( box 1 ). 43 44 Rapid
QES favour descriptive thematic synthesis 45 or framework synthesis, 46 47 except when theory
generation (meta-ethnography 48 49 or analytical thematic synthesis) is a priority ( table 2, item
R17). Limitations of Literature Review Limitations of Literature Review are as follows: Limited
scope: Literature reviews can only cover the existing literature on a particular topic, which may be
limited in scope or depth. While these approaches often form part of implementation studies in the
form of process evaluations, they are usually relatively small scale in relation to implementation
research as a whole. Facilitating co-production in public services: management implications from a
systematic literature review. The landscape then shows the reader that the writer has assimilated
most of the previous essential works on the subject into the present study. Then the whole annotated
bibliography is approximately 1 page (275 words). Try sorting through some other current
bibliographies or literature reviews in the field to get a sense of what your discipline expects. What
are effective strategies for the implementation of care bundles on ICUs: a systematic review. The
following are some of the most important elements that a literature review provides. Consulting with
citizens in the design of wellbeing measures and policies: lessons from a systems science application.
Take notes and cite your sources As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Is contrary
data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to prove the author's point. A good RRL
DOES: Present a brief typology that orders articles and books into groups to help readers focus on
unresolved debates, inconsistencies, tensions, and new questions about a research topic. This article
suggests criteria to evaluate the quality of dissertation literature reviews and reports a study that
examined dissertations at three universities. USC Libraries Research Guides Organizing Your Social
Sciences Research Paper 5. Computer-generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare
professionals: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. For more information, please
see our handout on plagiarism. In recent years, the number of systematic reviews in the field of
health informatics has increased considerably. For further details, please check with your faculty
advisor. The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice. Developing inclusive
residential care for older lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans (LGBT) people: An evaluation of the Care
Home Challenge action research project. A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a
specific topic. This review provides further evidence that we need to bring qualitative approaches in
from the periphery to play a central role in many implementation studies and subsequent evidence
syntheses. Check with your professor, or a subject expert in the field, if you are missing any key
works in the field. In: The Sage handbook of organizational research methods. edn. Edited by
Buchanan D, Bryman A: Sage Publications Ltd; 2009. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the
Social Science Research Imagination. If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the
link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. In clinical or
biomedical journals less rich findings may be placed within a single table or box. Use the key words
in your question, as well as synonyms for those words, as terms in your search.
Developing inclusive residential care for older lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans (LGBT) people: An
evaluation of the Care Home Challenge action research project. In summary, the review team should
consider privileging rich qualitative studies 2; consider a stepwise approach to inclusion of
qualitative data and explore the possibility of sampling ( table 2, item R5). The format of a review of
literature may vary from discipline to discipline and from assignment to assignment. Outcomes
related to improvements in health care processes or patient well-being. In the last 36 months, he
received royalties from Systematic Approaches To a Successful Literature Review (Sage 3rd
edition), honoraria from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and travel support from
the WHO. Our sample literature review documents contain examples guidelines and brief
information about literature review writing and research. Service users, community members and
community representatives can play a vital role in the task of deliberatively coproducing or even
transforming services, as can third-sector organizations, external experts, politicians, mid-level
facilitators, managers, and senior leaders. It received an a. Sample literature review this is a
literature review i wrote for psychology 109 research methods i. Reigeluth1994 have altered societys
educational needs and in turn are driving schools to redesign their curricula. Manually-generated
reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes. Try sorting
through some other current bibliographies or literature reviews in the field to get a sense of what
your discipline expects. Just ensure you provide us with all the details needed to avoid multiple
revision rounds. Your hypothesis, argument, or guiding concept is the “golden thread” that will
ultimately tie the works together and provide readers with specific insights they didn’t have before
reading your literature review. Evaluate sources. Identify themes, debates and gaps. For example:
Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research Discuss how the topic
has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship Divide the literature into
sociological, historical, and cultural sources Theoretical A literature review is often the foundation
for a theoretical framework. Resources Dive into our extensive resources on the topic that interests
you. It (Literature Review), in fact, sample survey and survives on scholarly articles and other
sources such as dissertations and conference proceedings. You can use their samples to improve your
literature review or order a custom one. Or the review might focus on the economic impact of
whaling on a community. Limitations of Literature Review Limitations of Literature Review are as
follows: Limited scope: Literature reviews can only cover the existing literature on a particular topic,
which may be limited in scope or depth. Literature Reviews Found in Academic Journals The two
types of literature reviews commonly found in journals are those introducing research articles (studies
and surveys) and stand-alone literature analyses. They examined the impact of electronic health
record, computerised provider order-entry, or decision support system. That’s why we’ve decided to
help them free up their schedule, delegating most of the hassles to annotated bibliography writing
service experts. By trend: A better way to organize the above sources chronologically is to examine
the sources under another trend, such as the history of whaling. We also provided a set of reflective
considerations that can help all actors involved in this process make more deliberate choices
regarding the parties involved, leadership models of coproduction, and practices (Table 1 ). These
were the most common intervention approach overall. The Writing Center. University of North
Carolina; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. Some of these systematic reviews focus exclusively on multi-
faceted interventions, whilst others compare different single or combined interventions aimed at
achieving similar outcomes in particular settings. Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid
qualitative evidence This paper forms part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane
Rapid Reviews Methods Group and addresses rapid qualitative evidence syntheses (QESs), which
use modified systematic, transparent and reproducible methodsu to accelerate the synthesis of
qualitative evidence when faced with resource constraints. Your literature review will not only cover
publications on your topics but will include your own ideas and contributions.
Do not use extensive quotes as a substitute for using your own words in reviewing the literature.
View all journals Explore content About the journal Publish with us Sign up for alerts CAREER
FEATURE 04 December 2020 Correction 09 December 2020 How to write a superb literature
review Andy Tay is a freelance writer based in Singapore. Literature Search This section outlines the
search strategy and databases used to identify relevant literature. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:212..
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G,
Fraser C, Bero L, et al. On some occasions, coproduction initiatives are reported to senior leaders,
while on other occasions, the senior leaders were part of the coproduction team. How does the
publication contribute to your understanding of the topic. As you write, make sure to follow these
tips: Summarise and synthesise: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine
them into a coherent whole. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of
Health. As mentioned earlier, when rigorously conducted review articles represent powerful
information sources for eHealth scholars and practitioners looking for state-of-the-art evidence. It is
often assigned as part of the research process for a paper. Keeping the logical sequence is very
important, so having a good writing example will be a serious advantage. For example, a literature
review that focuses on continuing research about the emergence of German economic power after
the fall of the Soviet Union. Building Your Literature Review Bookshelf One way to conceive of a
literature review is to think about writing it as you would build a bookshelf. Literature reviews are
commonly used in fields such as medicine, nursing, and public health. Once the issue is clarified,
sticking to it without giving any unnecessary information is essential. After the introduction, it
grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or
methodology. Information systems researchers, among others, have contributed to advancing
knowledge on how to structure a “traditional” review. Here are several strategies you can utilize to
assess whether you've thoroughly reviewed the literature: Look for repeating patterns in the research
findings. Unlike other review types, critical reviews attempt to take a reflective account of the
research that has been done in a particular area of interest, and assess its credibility by using appraisal
instruments or critical interpretive methods. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria; 2017 Feb 27.
These hacks help you understand how to prepare your literature research correctly, avoiding
numerous common mistakes. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to
distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works
on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any
changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:. Statistics from Altmetric.com Request
permissions. In simple words, what key points will be added to the body part. Is this template for an
undergrad, Masters or PhD-level research paper. Reporting and record management Little is written
on optimal use of technology. 8 A rapid review is not a good time to learn review management
software or qualitative analysis management software. However, most receive no credit at their
institutions for doing reviews, although many claim to derive importance for their own research from
reviewing. Enhancing the credibility of the research: A literature review helps to enhance the
credibility of the research by demonstrating the researcher’s knowledge of the existing literature and
their ability to situate their research within a broader context. Strategies for rehabilitation
professionals to move evidence-based knowledge into practice: a systematic review. For example,
weave references to other sources into what you are writing but maintain your own voice by starting
and ending the paragraph with your own ideas and wording. Paper airplane research on how they fly
how to get funding for a business planHow to write igcse literature essay daily math homework
sheets 5th grade definition essay structure.
This will help you identify relevant literature and determine the scope of your review. How will you
further your research as a result of the review. Alternatively, you may be expected to include a
literature review as part of a larger research paper (such as part of an Honors Thesis). It also helps to
justify the significance of their findings in relation to existing research and literature. Doing a
literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Just place your order now,
specify a time frame (to set up the price is affordable for you), and rest while professional service for
annotated bibliography does a great job instead of you. Are you an instructor who has received an
exemplary literature review and have permission from the student to post. Ten Simple Rules for
Writing a Literature Review Literature reviews are in great demand in most scientific fields. This
depends entirely on your university’s specific requirements, so it’s best to check with them. This
review can inform a framework that offers guiding insights on which commissioners, evaluators,
managers and leaders of coproduction can reflect as well as suggestions and directions for future
research. Steps in Conducting a Literature Review A literature review may be a stand alone work or
the introduction to a larger research paper, depending on the assignment. Providing a historical
background also demonstrates to other researchers and journal editors your competency in discussing
theoretical concepts. Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the
body into subsections. We’ve also included links to free resources to help you understand how to
write each section. Everyone may not wonder why the color of the scrub suit is color green or blue.
The goal is to deliberately document, critically evaluate, and summarize scientifically all of the
research about a clearly defined research problem. The carefully examined examples can be like a
treasure with multiple tips. How does the publication contribute to your understanding of the topic.
By regularly reviewing the literature, you can stay informed about the latest findings and
developments in your field. It provides background and context, and shows how your research will
contribute to the field. This tends to blur the line between managers and employees, creating a more
informal and often egalitarian workplace environment. A thematic review would have subtopics
based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly
contradictory previous studies. Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the
community: What needs to be done. Methodological If you draw your sources from different
disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods, you might want to compare the results
and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. Questions for Further Research: What
questions about the field has the review sparked. Establishing trusting relationships Coproduction is
essentially relational and requires concerted efforts to establish trusting relationships and a sense of
commitment. Facilitating co-production in public services: management implications from a
systematic literature review. Hoboken, nj: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008. Jesson J., Matheson L., Lacey
F.M. Doing your literature review: traditional and systematic techniques. In this way, critical reviews
attempt to constructively inform other scholars about the weaknesses of prior research and strengthen
knowledge development by giving focus and direction to studies for further improvement (
Kirkevold, 1997 ).
In conclusion, to create more equal power relations over time, we must challenge our current
practices and work deliberately to enhance the capacity of individuals and groups to effectively
engage in coproduction leadership. Body: Contains your discussion of sources and is organized
either chronologically, thematically, or methodologically (see below for more information on each).
Discusses further research questions that logically come out of the previous studies. Public services
management and co-production in multi-level governance settings. So it’ll be easy for them to
expand your list of sources with trustworthy ones on the topic. A safe place to reflect on the meaning
of recovery: a recovery community co-productive approach using multimedia interviewing
technology. To this end, the authors resorted to using narrative analysis and synthesis to describe the
effectiveness of handheld computers on accessing information for clinical knowledge, adherence to
safety and clinical quality guidelines, and diagnostic decision-making. Download Word doc
Download Google doc Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic.
Here are a few other sections you might want to consider: Current Situation: Information necessary
to understand the topic or focus of the literature review. What types of sources (books, journal
articles, websites). Information systems researchers, among others, have contributed to advancing
knowledge on how to structure a “traditional” review. As compared with empirical reports, literature
reviews can tackle broader and more abstract questions, can engage in more post hoc theorizing
without the danger of capitalizing on chance, can make a stronger case for a null-hypothesis
conclusion, and can appreciate and use methodological diversity better. Let’s get to it! What should I
do before writing the literature review. You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical
approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research. This
diversity of study settings allows us to consider the important role context (in its many forms) plays
on implementing evidence into practice. They can range from selective (a very narrow area of
research or only a single work) to comprehensive (a larger amount or range of works). Then your
review would have subsections according to eras within this period. There is an increasing interest in
the visual aspects of social media. Shanghai, China Fudan University Postdoctoral Associate- Single-
Cell and Data Science Houston, Texas (US) Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) Postdoctoral
Associate Postdoctoral fellow. Educational interventions promoting evidence-based practice among
emergency nurses: a systematic review. Unlike other reviews, this one has beginning, a middle and
an end. However, it’s also essential to remember examples of older studies and keep the balance
between them and the newer research. It is often written as part of a dissertation, thesis, research
paper, or proposal. In updating the review, we anticipated a larger pool of reviews and an
opportunity to consolidate learning from more recent systematic reviews of interventions. During the
selection process, we included studies that looked explicitly at interventions designed to turn
research evidence into practice. Incorporating systems thinking and relevant leadership models can
offer new perspectives on collective leadership practices. In other words, they provide helpful
background and context. The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the
literature review. Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments in a class or as
publications. Literature reviews can take two major forms. The most prevalent one is the “literature
review” or “background” section within a journal paper or a chapter in a graduate thesis.