Crafting a comprehensive literature review can be an arduous task, demanding meticulous attention

to detail and a thorough understanding of the subject matter. It involves systematically collecting,
evaluating, and synthesizing existing research to provide a comprehensive overview of a particular
topic. However, navigating through the vast sea of scholarly articles, journals, and publications can
be overwhelming, leaving many researchers feeling daunted and unsure of where to begin.

One effective solution to this challenge is to seek assistance from professional writing services that
specialize in literature reviews. At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we understand the complexities involved in
conducting a systematic literature review and are dedicated to providing researchers with high-
quality, custom-written reviews tailored to their specific needs.

Our team of experienced writers possesses the expertise and skills necessary to conduct
comprehensive literature searches, critically evaluate existing research, and synthesize key findings
into a coherent and well-structured review. By entrusting your literature review to us, you can save
valuable time and resources while ensuring that your work meets the highest standards of academic
excellence.

Whether you're a graduate student embarking on a thesis or dissertation, a researcher preparing a

grant proposal, or an academic seeking to publish a scholarly article, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ is here to
support you every step of the way. Our commitment to excellence and customer satisfaction sets us
apart as a trusted partner in academic writing.

Don't let the daunting task of writing a literature review stand in the way of your research goals.
Order your custom literature review from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and take the first step towards
success.
Results: We identi?ed and analyzed 83 relevant publications. It will take time to read, reread,
annotate, and start to see connections beween sources. Once a list of articles is generated from the
keyword and subject heading search, the researcher must then manually browse through each title
and abstract, to determine the suitability of that article before a full-text article is obtained for the
research question. It can take between 6 months and 2 years to conduct a systematic review. Codes
related to the iterative and incremental design and development principle. UCASD. Overall, as listed
in Table 5, four codes from our coding sys-. Systematic reviews sometimes contain so-called meta-
analyses, wherein the collected data is combined using statistical methods. The search terms within
each block are combined with OR, then the blocks are combined with AND. The risk of antenatal
parasitemia is 286 events per every 1,000 people. The relative risk is 0.39, which means that malaria
chemoprevention is associated with a 61% decrease in parasitemia. This approach aims to improve
the accuracy and efficiency of transcript reconstruction, particularly in complex genomic regions. The
unfiltered search results should be saved and retained for possible reanalysis. The name lagged
behind, appearing first in 1996, apparently referring to the tree-line optics typical of most forest
plots. As a previous Ontario Graduate Scholar, he has applied his accolades as a teaching assistant
and has become a research associate in the department of surgery at Hamilton Health Sciences. After
obtaining his Bachelor of Science in Genetics, he earned a Master of Science in Microbiology from
the Michael DeGroote Institute of Infectious Disease Research at McMaster University. Remember,
working on a systematic reviews is a team sport. If you have less time than that available, you may
want to conduct a rapid review instead. If you do so, however, you risk missing material that may
have been added retrospectively to the database. Consequently, the weight of this study is only
6.7%, which is lower than the others. The picture demonstrates how the different operators work. As
you have seen in this brief introduction, literature reviews are a very specific type of research,
analysis, and writing. The 95% confidence interval is very large and crosses 1. In clinical research, it
is common to use the PICO-structure: P opulation, I ntervention, C ontrol and O utcome. Definitions
may be similar across the disciplines, with new types and definitions continuing to emerge.
Prognostic reviews examine the course of a disease and its potential outcomes. Objective: This paper
aims to capture the current state of the art in UCASD approaches and to derive gen-. Systematic
literature review quick guide Decide on your team. In some cases, the research question will drive
the type of literature review that is undertaken. It should be adapted to your specific question. 8.
Analyze the results Establish a standard measure of outcome which can be applied to each study on
the basis of its effect size.
In systematic reviews, specific details are extracted from every study included, such as numbers of
participants, methods, analysis techniques, and key outcomes. This example shows a specific type of
effect size: relative risk. OR multi organisational OR multi- company OR multi-organisation OR
multi-. Figure 3.4: Drugs for preventing malaria in pregnancy: conceptual framework. In such a case,
it might not make sense to attempt to determine one overall meta effect size from a comparison of
the studies. There are several different frameworks available that might be able to help you structure
and delimit your research question. Data abstraction will involve pulling data elements from the
individual studies. A systematic review, on the other hand, is more than just a summary. Conclusion:
Our paper contributes to the software development body of knowledge by (1) providing a. Interpret
and present the results. 1. Decide on your team When carrying out a systematic literature review,
you should employ multiple reviewers in order to minimize bias and strengthen analysis. You should
formulate a “well-built clinical question.” This is the process of generating a good search question.
Again, record any excluded studies here for reference. 9. Interpret and present the results Consider
different factors when interpreting your results. There are many different kinds of reviews, and the
kind that will suit you best will depend on a variety of factors, for instance, how much time you
have, as well as what kind of research question you’re working with. The search terms within each
block are combined with OR, then the blocks are combined with AND. If so, you might consider
proposing a collaboration or modifying your aims. Your second move should be to consult a clinical
librarian or someone with experience conducting a systematic review for tips on setting up your
project. The protocol for your systematic literature review should include: the objectives of your
project the specific methods and processes that you’ll use the eligibility criteria of the individual
studies how you plan to extract data from individual studies which analyses you’re going to carry
out For a full guide on how to systematically develop your protocol, take a look at the PRISMA
checklist. Once reference lists have been finalised the full articles of potentially useful studies.
Rewrite the words within a parenthesis and write AB in front of the parenthesis. The places to
consider in your search are electronic scientific databases (the most popular are PubMed, MEDLINE,
and Embase ), controlled clinical trial registers, non-English literature, raw data from published trials,
references listed in primary sources, and unpublished sources known to experts in the field. ?? Take a
look at our list of the top academic research databases. In order to identify candidate principles, each
code was investi-. Adding a number after adj will determine how many words you want to “allow”
between your two terms. A small number of high quality studies with a low risk of bias is preferable
to lots of poorly reported or conducted studies. An annotated bibliography might suffice for a
literature review. They can be used to assess the effectiveness of an intervention from a person-
centric perspective. Some systematic reviews include a meta-analysis, which is quantitative technique
for combining the results of multiple studies to estimate a pooled effect size that takes variations in
study size and quality into consideration. In the picture below you can see how the different search
strategies compare to one another. They’re often used to complement, or in the absence of,
quantitative data. It is also easier to structure comprehensive and advanced search strategies, and to
edit search strategies. It can take between 6 months and 2 years to conduct a systematic review. You
are looking for key factors, concepts or variables and the presumed relationship between them.
Here we’ll review how you can do so in Web of Science and in SpiderCite, which builds on data
from Lens.org. Andrew has received numerous awards and scholarships including: the Ontario
Graduate Scholarship, the William Henry Yates Travel Scholarship and the Institute of Infectious
Disease Research Undergraduate Research Award. In the fourth stage, the ?nal sample passed a ?rst
categorization. In this guide, we will cover: the definition of a systematic literature review the
purpose of a systematic literature review the different types of systematic reviews how to write a
systematic literature review. In addition to including all the questions needed to answer the review
question and. They come together to make a unified sound (synthesis). Literature reviews can
usually be conducted by a single person rather than a team. What types of systematic literature
reviews are there. Radeva-Petrova et al. ( 2014 ) summarized the problem of malaria during
pregnancy, explained the hypothesized mechanism by which chemoprevention prevents malaria,
framed why this review is important, and listed the objectives of the study. Summarizes previous
studies while also showing how the body of literature could be extended and improved in terms of
content and method by identifying gaps. Fig. 5. Codes and articles related to the process dimension.
You should document details such as: The databases you search and which years they cover The
dates you first run the searches, and when they’re updated Which strategies you use, including search
terms The numbers of results obtained. One inclusion criteria might be that assignment to study arms
had to be random; an exclusion criteria might be all studies without a control arm that used a
placebo. Interpret and present the results Registering your systematic literature review Frequently
Asked Questions about writing a systematic literature review Related Articles What is a systematic
literature review. Using Smartwatches to Assist Students with Intellectual and Developmental Dis.
On March 30, 2016, Andrew Duong taught a seminar to students at the Michael DeGroote School of
Medicine on the 6 Steps of the Systematic Review Process. An annotated bibliography might suffice
for a literature review. All point estimates fall to the left of the line of no effect ( 1 would mean the
risk was higher among the intervention group, thus favoring the control group (with no treatment).
Established stewardship committee, and implementation in MCH, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Depending on the topic, you may want to supplement your search with a multi-disciplinary database
like Web of Science, or subject-specific databases, such as CINAHL, PsycInfo or ERIC. Plan your
research protocol Now you need a detailed strategy for how you’re going to search for and evaluate
the studies relating to your question. You can then export the references from the list to EndNote or
another reference management program. Reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature
on a topic in an integrated way. Parallel tracks Parallel interwoven creation tracks. Parallel tracks
Parallel interwoven creation tracks. You may also need to team up with a librarian to help with the
search, literature screeners, a statistician to analyze the data, and the relevant subject experts. 2.
Formulate your question Define your answerable question. Data abstraction will involve pulling data
elements from the individual studies. Rather than simply summarizing sources (as an annotated
bibliography does), synthesis also does the following. Make an assessment checklist that closely
aligns with your research protocol, including a consistent scoring system, calculations of the quality
of each study, and sensitivity analysis. Select “ OR ” between each row and add more rows if needed.
A focused literature review generally will describe the implications of choosing a particular element
of past research, such as methodology in terms of data collection, analysis and interpretation. On this
page, we will review a few things worth thinking about when you intend to conduct and report a
systematic literature search. In clinical research, it is common to use the PICO-structure: P opulation,
I ntervention, C ontrol and O utcome. They can be used to assess the effectiveness of an
intervention from a person-centric perspective. You may also want to use a program that can help
you screen your references, such as Rayyan. This is something that needs to be paid careful attention
to. The relative risk is 0.39, which means that malaria chemoprevention is associated with a 61%
decrease in parasitemia. These preregistration plans include a specific search strategy using specific
search terms for individual scholarly databases so other researchers can recreate the search. Simply
put, studies with weaker research designs, such as this one, have less weight in the pooled analysis.
You will use these to create search blocks that will then form the basis for the search strings used in
the different databases. Undertaken to clarify the state of existing research, the evidence, and
possible implications that can be drawn from that. Could the conclusions of the study have been
influenced by bias? 7. Codes related to the parallel interwoven creation tracks principle. Visit our
guide to the best research databases for medicine and health to find resources for your systematic
review. They are often collaborative and tag, for instance, inclusion- and exclusion criteria. Your
reader expects you to have done the hard work of gathering, evaluating and synthesizes the
literature. Extract the data Every step of the data extraction must be documented for transparency
and replicability. In addition, the research team formally assesses the quality of each study, including
the potential for bias, and these assessments are considered when the results are synthesized. In this
case, the result is considered not “statistically significant.”. It operates by utilizing clustered contigs
as a guide throughout the assembly process. Radeva-Petrova et al. ( 2014 ) summarized the problem
of malaria during pregnancy, explained the hypothesized mechanism by which chemoprevention
prevents malaria, framed why this review is important, and listed the objectives of the study. For
example, Radeva-Petrova et al. ( 2014 ) include the following passage in their plain language
summary. Your systematic literature review doesn’t have to contain a comparison, but you’ll want to
stipulate at this stage, either way. Integrates findings from a large body of quantitative findings to
enhance understanding, draw conclusions, and detect patterns and relationships. You could also
register your completed work with PROSPERO. You can use these key articles to both construct
your own search strategy and to test it: if your search does not retrieve your key articles, then your
strategy needs to be modified. Research groups and researchers contacted (Names and contact
details). In such a case, it might not make sense to attempt to determine one overall meta effect size
from a comparison of the studies. Watson, 2002), they are less common in software engineer-. Where
will your education and career journey take you?
More speci?cally, we investigate the following research question. A literature review simply provides
a summary of the literature available on a topic. Unlike an annotated bibliography or a research paper
you may have written as an undergraduate, your literature review will outline, evaluate and
synthesize relevant research and relate those sources to your own thesis or research question. Adding
a number after adj will determine how many words you want to “allow” between your two terms.
There are several different frameworks available that might be able to help you structure and delimit
your research question. You may also want to use a program that can help you screen your
references, such as Rayyan. Fig. 7. Codes and number of articles related to the artifact-mediated
communication principle. For example qualitative studies can suggest reasons. Definitions may be
similar across the disciplines, with new types and definitions continuing to emerge. Chair of
Information Systems IV, University of Mannheim, L 15, 1-6, 68131 Mannheim, Germany. Literature
reviews don’t have to follow such rigid methods or make the methods explicit. Codes related to the
iterative and incremental design and development principle. She obtained the add qualification from
American board in infectious disease. The purpose of this section is to provide enough detail to
enable other researchers to replicate the review. Some systematic reviews include a meta-analysis,
which is quantitative technique for combining the results of multiple studies to estimate a pooled
effect size that takes variations in study size and quality into consideration. Codes related to the
iterative and incremental design and development principle. A systematic review, on the other hand,
is more than just a summary. Relevant past research is selected and synthesized into a coherent
discussion. Andrew is an avid runner, and is said to dabble in the culinary arts, when he’s not
spoiling his dog. The review must be documented in sufficient detail for readers to be able to.
Parallel tracks Parallel interwoven creation tracks. However, in a systematic literature search, it is
recommended that you specify the search field manually instead. McGill Library also has a helpful
guide to Rayyan. If you search without quotation marks, the terms are not kept together as a phrase.
UCD and ASD, has been around for some time, many integration. Level 2 Little design up front
Prototyping Close collaboration Data exchange. Starting with a systematic review pays off almost
every time one is available. In contrast to a wide search, a narrow (or precise ) search will result in a
larger share of relevant hits, but you also run the risk of missing relevant studies. You should
document details such as: The databases you search and which years they cover The dates you first
run the searches, and when they’re updated Which strategies you use, including search terms The
numbers of results obtained. In the Conclusion, the authors frame the overall results in terms of their
implications for practice and research.
As a student you should rather do a structured literature review, including only certain aspects of the
methodology described on this page. Frequently Asked Questions about writing a systematic
literature review. This might include handsearching selected journals, or doing a citation analysis.
There are many different kinds of reviews, and the kind that will suit you best will depend on a
variety of factors, for instance, how much time you have, as well as what kind of research question
you’re working with. With the tools to objectively collect and interpret information, investigators can
cater research programs, and expand on the current body of knowledge. However, students could
gain a reasonable idea from citations and journal rankings (albeit rough). As we move forward in the
book, we’ll consider why a study like Villegas et al. ( 2007 ) was judged to have a low risk of bias
across all dimensions, where as a study like Cot et al. ( 1995 ) was classified as having a high risk of
bias and flagged for not providing enough information. The relative risk is 0.39, which means that
malaria chemoprevention is associated with a 61% decrease in parasitemia. The aim is breadth rather
than depth and to get a general feel for the size of the topic area. Sometimes published reviews will
include their search strategy in the appendix. The 95% confidence interval is very large and crosses
1. Remember a comprehensive literature review is, at its most fundamental level, an original work
based on an extensive critical examination and synthesis of the relevant literature on a topic. An
annotated bibliography might suffice for a literature review. Heterogeneity complicates the
interpretation of a meta-analysis; it signals that we might be comparing apples and oranges.
Undertaken to clarify the state of existing research, the evidence, and possible implications that can
be drawn from that. The risk of antenatal parasitemia is 286 events per every 1,000 people. They’re
often used to complement, or in the absence of, quantitative data. If you use truncation, the
automatic mapping won’t work. The review protocol was developed in cooperation with the ?rst.
Codes related to the parallel interwoven creation tracks principle. Journals also often demand that a
search be updated if several months have passed since the article was submitted. Diagnostic test
accuracy reviews produce a summary of diagnostic test performance so that their accuracy can be
determined before use by healthcare professionals. The name lagged behind, appearing first in 1996,
apparently referring to the tree-line optics typical of most forest plots. An advanced-level literature
review shows how prior research is linked to a new project, summarizing and synthesizing what is
known while identifying gaps in the knowledge base, facilitating theory development, closing areas
where enough research already exists, and uncovering areas where more research is needed. The first
stage in carrying out a systematic literature review is to put together your team. Start by focusing on
the red box and examine the comparative risk column that shows the assumed risk among the control
group. Visit our guide to the best research databases for medicine and health to find resources for
your systematic review. It can take between 6 months and 2 years to conduct a systematic review.
Team members screen the search results and sort them according to these criteria, beginning with
titles and abstract reviews and moving to full-text reviews later. Like any other aspect of research,
however, systematic reviews must define and follow a method that can be replicated.
It is especially important to consider other disciplines when you do not find much on your topic in
one discipline. On March 30, 2016, Andrew Duong taught a seminar to students at the Michael
DeGroote School of Medicine on the 6 Steps of the Systematic Review Process. A systematic
review, on the other hand, is more than just a summary. You will use these to create search blocks
that will then form the basis for the search strings used in the different databases. Your systematic
literature review doesn’t have to contain a comparison, but you’ll want to stipulate at this stage,
either way. News Production Workflows in Data- driven, Algorithmic Journalism: A Systema. To
address a particular research query, it attempts to collect all available information on a specific
subject. Put simply, it's a study of studies. ?? What is the final stage of a systematic literature review.
The risk of antenatal parasitemia is 286 events per every 1,000 people. Criteria may include factors
relating to the population, the intervention, the type of study and the outcome. They’re often used to
complement, or in the absence of, quantitative data. For instance, the intervention may work
differently in different contexts, and the included studies were gathered from all over the world. In
contrast to a wide search, a narrow (or precise ) search will result in a larger share of relevant hits,
but you also run the risk of missing relevant studies. As you have seen in this brief introduction,
literature reviews are a very specific type of research, analysis, and writing. Remember, working on a
systematic reviews is a team sport. This process is more ad hoc for literature reviews. Codes related
to the parallel interwoven creation tracks principle. A variety of tools and databases allow you to
search for citation data, including Web of Science, Google Scholar and SpiderCite. Aggregative
methods produce effect sizes or percentages across studies (such as meta-summary). This is
something that needs to be paid careful attention to. Where will your education and career journey
take you? If so, you might consider proposing a collaboration or modifying your aims. Your second
move should be to consult a clinical librarian or someone with experience conducting a systematic
review for tips on setting up your project. If you do so, however, you risk missing material that may
have been added retrospectively to the database. You are looking for key factors, concepts or
variables and the presumed relationship between them. Literature reviews, on the other hand, do not
follow such rigid or explicit methods. Like any other aspect of research, however, systematic reviews
must define and follow a method that can be replicated. By conducting a comprehensive search of
all relevant previous studies, developing a rigorous and reproducible system, this procedure will
funnel the inclusion and quality of the existing literature. Could the conclusions of the study have
been influenced by bias? 7. In order to identify candidate principles, each code was investi-.
Intervention: which main intervention or treatment are you considering for assessment.