Title: Mastering Literature Review Structures: Your Roadmap to Academic Success

Welcome to the ultimate guide on Literature Review Structures! Crafting a literature review can be a
daunting task, often requiring extensive research, critical analysis, and impeccable organization.
Whether you're a student tackling a research paper or a scholar diving into a new field of study,
understanding the nuances of literature review structures is essential for producing high-quality
academic work.

Why is writing a literature review so challenging, you may ask? Well, let's delve into it. A literature
review involves synthesizing a vast array of scholarly articles, books, and other sources related to
your research topic. It requires you to not only summarize existing literature but also to critically
evaluate and analyze it, identifying gaps, contradictions, and trends in the existing body of
knowledge. Additionally, you must present your findings in a clear, coherent manner while adhering
to the conventions of academic writing and citation styles.

Navigating through this complex landscape of information and ideas can be overwhelming,
especially for those new to academic writing or tackling a particularly intricate topic. However, fear
not! With the right guidance and resources, mastering literature review structures is entirely within
your reach.

Here at ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we understand the challenges students and researchers face when it
comes to crafting literature reviews. That's why we're here to offer our expertise and assistance every
step of the way. Our team of experienced writers and researchers specializes in creating custom
literature reviews tailored to your specific requirements and academic standards.

When you order from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can rest assured that you'll receive a meticulously
researched and expertly written literature review that meets the highest standards of quality and
academic integrity. Whether you need assistance with structuring your literature review, identifying
relevant sources, or crafting compelling arguments, our team is here to help you succeed.

So why struggle with the complexities of literature review writing on your own when you can enlist
the help of professionals? Take the stress out of your academic journey and order from ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ today. With our assistance, you'll be well on your way to mastering literature
review structures and achieving your academic goals.
However, it is also where you get to learn about the topic in great detail. An overview of the
contradictions, gaps, strengths, and weaknesses in different sources. What are the strengths and
weaknesses of the research. Right? Wrong! The “literature” of a literature review refers to any
collection of materials on a topic, not necessarily the great literary texts of the world. “Literature”
could be anything from a set of government pamphlets on British colonial methods in Africa to
scholarly articles on the treatment of a torn ACL. Here keep in mind that they are taken from
trustworthy databases and libraries and that they are peer-reviewed. Some might argue that you
should be sending your work to your supervisor sooner than this (indeed your university might
formally require this), but in my experience, supervisors are extremely short on time (and often
patience), so, the more refined your chapter is, the less time they’ll waste on addressing basic issues
(which you know about already) and the more time they’ll spend on valuable feedback that will
increase your mark-earning potential. In other words, your introduction needs to give the reader a
taste of what’s to come, and how you’re going to lay that out. But you’re still a bit away from
actually writing about the literatures. Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can
be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you
research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars,
professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic. The literature review might give a new
interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations. When you’ve finished writing
and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. What is
the most important thing you want to get across in your presentation of resources. One way to define
and structure your question is to break it down into different parts. Provide strong sentences at
beginnings of paragraphs: every paragraph shall deal with a topic or make a point. Literature search -
- finding materials relevant to the subject being explored. 3. Data evaluation -- determining which
literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic. 4. Analysis and
interpretation -- discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent literature. Are there gaps in the
research that your approach addresses. You have some chance to do this in your introduction in an
article, but the literature review section gives a more extended opportunity to establish the
conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it. Given this, while literature reviews
are designed to provide an overview and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are
a number of approaches you could adopt depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your
study. Here are several strategies you can utilize to assess whether you've thoroughly reviewed the
literature: Look for repeating patterns in the research findings. Read them to get a sense of the types
of themes you might want to look for in your own research or to identify ways to organize your final
review. Further investigations should rigorously review the full body of literature pertinent to WPV
in healthcare to identify a more exhaustive list of quality indicators. Writing literature reviews is a
particularly important skill if you want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research.
Inevitably, new papers on the reviewed topic (including independently written literature reviews) will
appear from all quarters after the review has been published, so that there may soon be the need for
an updated review. Simply put, empirical research includes any study that involves actual data
collection and analysis, whether that’s qualitative data, quantitative data, or a mix of both. There are
many different critical appraisal worksheets and checklists. While quality indicators can measure the
impact of an intervention and trends in workplace violence, it is important to collect complimentary
bottom-up data through routine surveys or qualitative interviews to capture a fulsome view of WPV
in healthcare settings. Sheppard and Williams (2016) had not discovered these individual factors in
their original literature review on community and environmental resilience. An overview of the
contradictions, gaps, strengths, and weaknesses in different sources. Therefore, it was important to
identify and exclude literature and indicators that were incompatible with modern care delivery
standards to minimize damaging effects to patient psychosocial safety. BS provided substantial
contributions to the conception of the rapid review, reviewed the rapid review manuscript critically
for important intellectual content, provided final approval of the version to be published and agreed
to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Explore different methods, such as sequential, thematic, funnel and mixed, and how to choose the
best one for your research. Also, without the bird’s eye view that a catalogue provides, you’ll miss
connections between various articles, and have no view of how the research developed over time.
However, the experts of allassignmenthelp.co.uk can be a great help for you in such a situation. Use
a range of keywords to search databases such as PsycINFO and any others that may contain
relevant articles. Make sure you don't just stick to one type of source. You can choose the intellectual
lineage you would like to be part of and whose definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly
humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as well). Receive feedback on language, structure, and
formatting Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on: Academic style Vague
sentences Style consistency See an example To begin organizing your literature review’s argument
and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve
read. Is there a logic to the way you organized the material. If you are writing a literature review as
a stand-alone assignment, you will have to choose a focus and develop a central question to direct
your search. Therefore, this review aims to identify and compile a list of existing quality indicators
that have been utilized to provide insight into WPV within healthcare. Introduction Define the topic
of the literature review, including any terminology. It should be like the blueprint of your dissertation
so that readers could figure out what they are going to dive into. Charlesworth Author Services, a
trusted brand supporting the world’s leading academic publishers, institutions and authors since
1928. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses or
research problems. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in
regard to clarity, rigor, and replication. For guidance on formatting citations, please see the UNC
Libraries citation tutorial. Most lit reviews use a basic introduction-body-conclusion structure; if
your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction and conclusion pieces may be just a few
sentences while you focus most of your attention on the body. It provides an overview of current
knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research
that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic. Guides: Academic Writing: How
to Build a Literature Review Structure of a Literature Review. For the purpose of this review, WPV
is defined as an act or attempt of physical or verbal abuse or the use of threatening behaviour by a
patient, caregiver, chosen family member or visitor towards a worker in their workplace. Now’s the
time to try to improve the linkage from each section to the next, tighten up the writing to be more
concise, trim down word count and sand it down into a more digestible read. Finally, when doing
your literature review, ensure that you can differentiate between credible and non-credible sources of
information. It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography, where you compile full citation
information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. An overview of the
contradictions, gaps, strengths, and weaknesses in different sources. Create a table using our
Literature matrix of the relevant sources, summarising the key points for easy comparison. Validity -
- are the author's arguments and conclusions convincing. One of the very significant benefits of
structuring the literary review chronologically is that we can discuss development in a particular field.
Thematic Organization Group related studies by themes rather than chronology. You should be able
to answer it based only on a review of existing publications. Get the structure of your literature
review chapter wrong and you’ll struggle to achieve these objectives. Narrow them down to studies
that are similar to yours by the issues highlighted, strategies, and so on.
Introduction. Define the topic of the literature review, including any terminology. Like descriptive
reviews, the research questions are generic and usually relate to publication patterns and trends. In
such cases, an abstract should provide an overview of what it is you plan to study, your main
research question, a brief explanation of your methods to answer the research question, and your
expected findings. Structure of the Literature Review Although your literature review will rely
heavily on the sources you read for its information, you should dictate the structure of the review.
Make a list of keywords Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question.
Another good idea is to review related literature and studies about teenage pregnancy. The
classification of quality indicators into the three delineated categories as per the Donabedian model
necessitated thorough discussions among the reviewers. However, particularly in the social sciences,
thinking about research problems from multiple vectors is a key strategy for finding new solutions to
a problem or gaining a new perspective. Selection Methods: the criteria you used to select (and
perhaps exclude) sources in your literature review. For instance, you might explain that your review
includes only peer-reviewed articles and journals. Besides, you can gain even more knowledge on the
topic while going through all the previous studies. Once you have defined your research question,
focus on learning what other scholars have written on the topic. It’s like a report card for your
research: it assesses the quality and originality of your work and determines whether you’re on the
right track. A full review will have the advantage of more freedom to cover in detail the complexities
of a particular scientific development, but may then be left in the pile of the very important papers
“to be read” by readers with little time to spare for major monographs. To be able to perform a
literature review, you need to consider a subject area in which there seems to be a sufficiently large
number of original research studies. Like any other academic text, your literature review should have
an introduction, a main body, and a conclusion. The following information was extracted: article
type, country of study, study design, study population, structural quality indicators, process quality
indicators, and outcome quality indicators. Describe the relationship of each work to the others
under consideration. In reviews written by multiple authors, this may be achieved by assigning the
review of the results of a coauthor to different coauthors. Funding Statement This work was funded
by the French Foundation for Research on Biodiversity (FRB) through its Centre for Synthesis and
Analysis of Biodiversity data (CESAB), as part of the NETSEED research project. A literature
review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations, theses, and research
papers. As explained above, systematic reviews seek to identify causation. This is, after all, one of
the main purposes of the literature review process (i.e. to familiarise yourself with the current state of
research in your field). The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your dissertation.
The analytical features of a literature review might: Give a new interpretation of old material or
combine new with old interpretations, Trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major
debates, Depending on the situation, evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most
pertinent or relevant research, or Usually in the conclusion of a literature review, identify where gaps
exist in how a problem has been researched to date. There are a few guidelines you should follow
during the writing stage as well. It is beneficial when examining how different theories contribute to
the understanding of a phenomenon. Systematic Review This form consists of an overview of
existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and
standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and
analyze data from the studies that are included in the review. Chronological The simplest approach is
to trace the development of the topic over time. The only proofreading tool specialized in correcting
academic writing - try for free.
For example, a review of the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics could focus on the
development of online political satire. Summarize and Synthesize Remember to summarize and
synthesize your sources within each thematic paragraph as well as throughout the review. Despite its
detailed coverage, it is important to note that in the emerging field of healthcare WPV QI, this
reviews list of indicators is non-exhaustive and not broadly applicable to every healthcare
environment. Rule 1: Define a Topic and Audience How to choose which topic to review. The initial
sourcing of articles was limited to three Ovid databases with search strings and inclusion criteria that
may not capture the full breadth of existing literature. It is not possible to discuss all of the sources
you have discovered. Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok Body image,
self-perception, self-esteem, mental health Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth Search for
relevant sources Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. A majority of the articles (93%)
contained at least 1 quality indicator that possessed the potential to be operationalized at an
organizational level. Regardless of which structure you opt for, each of the three components will
make an appearance in some shape or form. A thematic literature review groups the literature based
on the key themes or key concepts that emerge from the literature. A literature review is a survey of
scholarly sources on a specific topic. After the introduction, it grounds your research in a scholarly
field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology. Privacy Overview Have a
language expert improve your writing Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically
generate references for free. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of
Health. There are many different ways of searching databases. Now’s the time to try to improve the
linkage from each section to the next, tighten up the writing to be more concise, trim down word
count and sand it down into a more digestible read. Prepare yourself for having to modify and redo
your search query several times, before deciding on your final search strategy. The introduction of
novel quality indicators may require organizations to invest in solutions to manage the resulting
higher volumes of data. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several
of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is
discussed chronologically). Within those one to three paragraphs, it is important to briefly answer the
following questions: What is the central research problem. Instead, you need to read first and distil
the information, then plan and execute the writing. This use of specific indicators allows for deeper
understanding and resource allocation efficient compared to general indicators that may have less
utility, broader resource focus, and lack fulsome understanding. Integrative Review Considered a
form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an
integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. For example,
an indicator measuring the incidence of WPV related to care of psychiatric patients may suggest
interventions that target patients with mental health issues regardless of their actual risk. How will
you further your research as a result of the review? IV. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the
Social Science Research Imagination. Don’t be afraid to do more research if you discover a new
thread as you’re writing. And a chronological organization looks at the literature by when it was
written. This demonstrates to your reader that you know what you are going to do and how you are
going to do it. They provide historical context for a field while offering opinions on its future
trajectory.
A literature review is a piece of academic writing demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the
academic literature on a specific topic placed in context. You should find out whether there is a
possibility of further research on the same subject. There are many benefits to writing a literature
review, from improving your research skills to gaining a better understanding of the field you are
studying. Stancanelli, P. Weisberg, and X. Xu for insights and discussions, and to P. Bourne, T.
Matoni, and D. Smith for helpful comments on a previous draft. Helpfulpapers delivers professional
writing and editing services. Peer Review reports Introduction Workplace Violence (WPV) is a risk
disproportionately affecting the healthcare sector that has been linked to poorer quality of patient
care provision and affects the well-being of employees. It is suitable when your topic has a clear
historical development or when you want to showcase the evolution of ideas over time. Are the
arguments and conclusions the author presents adequately convincing. Related items that provide
additional information, but that are not key to understanding the research problem, can be included
in a list of further readings. Try for free Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging. Weave
the points together rather than list summaries of each source. Synthesize Information Connect the
dots between different studies. The research team started with an exploratory review of background
documents and research studies to identify ways in which patient portals may contribute to health
service delivery and patient outcomes. Moreover, if you still find it daunting to write a good
literature review then literature review writing help is always in the service. For example, if you were
reviewing the literature on obesity in children you might say something like: There are a large
number of studies of obesity trends in the general population. Yet Another Writing Tip When Do I
Know I Can Stop Looking and Move On. As in most narrative reviews, the scope of the research
questions being investigated is broad: (a) how development of these systems are carried out; (b)
which methods are used to investigate these systems; and (c) what conclusions can be drawn as a
result of the development of these systems. To provide clear answers to these questions, a literature
search was conducted on six electronic databases and Google Scholar. Questions for Further
Research: What questions about the field has the review sparked. You also need to define the most
important key concepts of your research question. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit
line to the material. APA7 Style resources APA Style Blog - for those harder to find answers 1. Then
your review would have subsections according to eras within this period. There are so many issues in
contemporary science that you could spend a lifetime of attending conferences and reading the
literature just pondering what to review. A literature review surveys academic knowledge on a topic.
Not everyone can be a good writer and boast about their academic papers. Missed appointments are
a major cause of inefficiency in healthcare delivery with substantial monetary costs to health systems.
These authors sought to assess whether mobile phone-based appointment reminders delivered
through Short Message Service ( sms ) or Multimedia Messaging Service ( mms ) are effective in
improving rates of patient attendance and reducing overall costs. Were the results effectively
interpreted and reported. The introduction section should provide an overview of what you will
discuss in your literature review. You should provide a critical evaluation of each source, highlighting
its strengths and weaknesses. Each literature review should be broken up into different subtopics.
This is the most common form of review in the social sciences. If you are writing the literature
review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your
research problem and questions. Writing a literature review can also be beneficial in terms of gaining
a better understanding of the field you are studying. A current literature study I’m working on, for
example, investigates impediments to higher education for undocumented students. By Publication
Order your sources by publication chronology, then, only if the order demonstrates a more important
trend. Thank you Great work, very insightful. Thank you. Thanks for this wonderful presentation.
The literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (eventually your research objective, the
problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). Literature Reviews (n.d.)
Accessed Nov. 10, 2021 This guide was designed to: Identify the sections and purpose of a literature
review in academic writing Review practical strategies and organizational methods for preparing a
literature review. Consider Whether Your Sources are Current Some disciplines require that you use
information that is as current as possible. The body of your literature review should do just as the
description of this chapter suggests. Find models Look for other literature reviews in your area of
interest or in the discipline and read them to get a sense of the types of themes you might want to
look for in your own research or ways to organize your final review. To conclude, a review of related
literature is a significant genre of scholarly works that can be applied in various disciplines and for
multiple goals. However, if you are at a stuck point with structure it can help to simply brainstorm
how you would organise your material in some or all of these ways. Instead, it focuses on the
“methods” of the researcher or writer. You decide on the headings that are important and useful to
your process, and how you create the table (Excel, Word, etc). Identifying quality indicators to
measure workplace violence in Systematic literature review findings regarding WPV against
healthcare professionals overwhelmingly rely on subjective measures, such as questionnaires and
narrative evidence. Research Guides: Literature Reviews: Concept Mapping A concept map or mind
map is a visual representation of knowledge that illustrates relationships between concepts or ideas.
As with any scholarly research paper, you must cite the sources you used in composing your research
proposal. Were the results effectively interpreted and reported. A literature review discusses
published information in a particular subject area. The right structure will vary from study to study,
depending on various factors. In other words, your discussion in those sections needs to start laying
the foundation for the research gap. You need to show that you understand what research has already
been done in your field and how your own research fits into it. The bibliography or reference section
of sources you've already read, such as required readings in the course syllabus, are also excellent
entry points into your own research. Again, you can use this to make an argument about gaps in the
research. The introduction should: define your topic and provide an appropriate context for
reviewing the literature; establish your reasons - i.e. point of view - for. Here’s a quick recap of what
you need to keep in mind when deciding on your literature review structure. However, with the
chronological approach, the emphasis is very firmly on how the discussion has evolved over time, as
opposed to how all the literature links together (which we’ll discuss next ). Narrow the Topic The
narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources you need to read in order to
obtain a good survey of relevant resources. Methodology -- were the techniques used to identify,
gather, and analyze the data appropriate to addressing the research problem.