Understanding the Complexity of Writing a Literature Review

A literature review serves as a critical component of academic and scholarly research, providing a
comprehensive overview of existing literature on a particular topic. However, delving into the world
of literature reviews reveals both its challenges and merits. Here, we explore the intricacies of
crafting a literature review and highlight the benefits of seeking assistance from professional writing
services.

The Challenge of Crafting a Literature Review

Writing a literature review demands more than just summarizing existing literature. It requires:

1. Thorough Research: Conducting extensive research to identify relevant studies, articles,

and scholarly works.
2. Critical Analysis:Evaluating the quality, reliability, and significance of the literature to form
coherent arguments.
3. Synthesis of Ideas: Synthesizing diverse perspectives and findings to present a unified and
insightful narrative.
4. Organizational Skills:Structuring the review in a logical manner to guide readers through
the evolving discourse.
5. Citation and Referencing: Adhering to academic standards for citing sources accurately
and consistently.

Navigating through these challenges demands time, effort, and expertise, making the process
daunting for many researchers and students.

The Importance of a Well-Crafted Literature Review

Despite its complexities, a well-crafted literature review offers numerous benefits, including:

1. Contextual Understanding: Providing context and background information to frame the

research question and justify its significance.
2. Identifying Gaps: Identifying gaps and inconsistencies in existing literature, paving the way
for further research.
3. Building Credibility: Demonstrating the researcher's knowledge and understanding of the
field, enhancing the credibility of the study.
4. Informing Methodology: Guiding the selection of appropriate research methodologies based
on previous studies and theoretical frameworks.
5. Contributing to Knowledge: Contributing new insights or perspectives to the academic
discourse, advancing the collective understanding of the subject matter.

Simplifying the Process with Professional Assistance

Recognizing the challenges involved in writing a literature review, many individuals turn to
professional writing services for assistance. Among the myriad of options available, ⇒ StudyHub.vip
⇔ stands out as a reliable and reputable platform offering tailored solutions for literature review
writing.

Why Choose ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔?

1. Expert Writers: Access to experienced writers with expertise in various academic disciplines
and research methodologies.
 2. Customized Solutions: Tailored assistance to meet individual requirements, ensuring the
delivery of high-quality and original content.
3. Timely Delivery: Commitment to meeting deadlines and accommodating urgent requests
without compromising on quality.
4. Plagiarism-Free Guarantee: Guarantee of originality and authenticity, with stringent
measures in place to prevent plagiarism.
5. 24/7 Support: Responsive customer support available round-the-clock to address queries and
provide assistance at every stage of the process.

In conclusion, while writing a literature review may present numerous challenges, the benefits it
offers in terms of contributing to knowledge and enhancing academic credibility are undeniable. For
those seeking to streamline the process and ensure the delivery of a well-crafted review, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ emerges as a trusted partner, offering reliable assistance and expert guidance every
step of the way.
Sometimes, the literature review is the most challenging part of writing a dissertation or thesis. You
may analyze a book, an academic article, or any other manuscript that has some value. Most
participants contribute to Cochrane, whose mission includes a commitment to the updating of its
systematic review portfolio. Not only can they help you come up with an interesting and fresh topic,
but also demonstrate the effective use of the best Literature Review writing practices and content
structuring techniques. Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest. To see which
publications that have cited these articles, click on Citation Report, which you’ll find on the right
side of the search box. Before you start your work on a literature reviewyou need to understand the
essential features of this assignment. This may include quotes from research articles, statistics, or
other forms of data that help to illustrate the main points being made. Alcohol has been used by
many people for several years and its abuse has become a major societal health problem. In clinical
research, it is common to use the PICO-structure: P opulation, I ntervention, C ontrol and O utcome.
The beliefs, values, norms, and morals that are accepted and shared by the deaf community make up
the deaf culture. TL is an editor (unpaid) for the Cochrane Airways Group. A literature review is
organized by subtopic, not by individual. The meeting began with a review of the literature about
abstract structure and content, followed by a review of the checklist items as proposed by the survey
respondents. As for students, they can detect a writer’s trustworthiness inside of a specified subject
by reading through their literature review format. Software innovation and new management systems
are being developed and in early use to help streamline review updates in the coming years. It’s often
a good idea to start with a test search where you use the subject headings and synonyms you’re
already familiar with. Below is a five-step process for conducting a simple review of the literature
for your project. We discovered that, with information on how sufficiently a tool described a quality
item, tool users might broaden their horizons on quality concerns of non-randomised studies to be
considered. When a comprehensive literature search is conducted in a transparent and unbiased way,
it can be considered a “systematic review” ( Neely et al. 2009 ). Such systematic reviews may also
be meta-analyses when one of the aims is combining or re-analyzing data from previous studies to
answer new questions, improve accuracy, or identify sources of variation. One hundred and forty-
seven participants, who were authors of research on abstracts, established authors of systematic
reviews, methodologists or statisticians related to systematic reviews, and journal editors, were
invited by email to complete the three rounds of the web-based survey. Results for main outcomes
(benefits and harms), preferably indicating the number of studies and participants for each. Editors,
referees, or experts in the topic area or methodologists can provide an informed view of whether a
review can be substantially improved by application of current methodological expectations and new
methods (fig 1 ? ). The decision needs to take into account whether the review addresses a current
question, uses valid methods, and is well conducted; and whether there are new relevant methods,
new studies, or new information on existing included studies. If material is not included in the
article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or
exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
This research will begin with the statement that ethics is basically moral philosophy. The first round
of screening can consume 1 hour per screener for every 100-200 records. New information can also
include fresh follow-up data on existing included studies, or information on how the studies were
carried out. For example, a tool addressing concerns on RoB may focus less on Study objective,
which is relatively more difficult to be directly linked to a well-defined type of bias. It could possibly
be so simple as a summary of resources or might be as long as several webpages.
The abstract should record the name of the database with which the review is registered, and the
registration number. The beliefs, values, norms, and morals that are accepted and shared by the deaf
community make up the deaf culture. Introduce the literature review by pointing out the major
research topic that will be discussed. If the review does not answer a current question, the
intervention has been superseded, then a decision can be made not to update and no further
intelligence gathering is required (fig 1 ? ). You may also want to use a program that can help you
screen your references, such as Rayyan. Those updating systematic reviews to author clinical practice
guidelines might consider the influence of new study results in potentially overturning the
conclusions of an existing review. If that’s your result, then you’ve retrieved all your key articles. A
literary review template is usually a variety of created function that discusses posted details a couple
of precise material. In the context of current knowledge explain how the review may add to the
knowledge base of readers from a variety of backgrounds or disciplines. You may analyze a book,
literature review topic examples academic article, or any other manuscript that has some value. The
search strategy for an update need not replicate the original search strategy, but could be refined, for
example, based on an analysis of the yield of the original search. A systematic literature review is a
method which sets out a series of steps to methodically organize the review. Scandinavian Journal of
Management, 31(3), 387-408. A practical guide to understanding systematic reviews and meta-
analyses. The panel for updating guidance for systematic reviews (PUGs) group met to draw
together experiences and identify a common approach. Researching Society and Culture 3 rd
February 2014 Hannah Jones. In most cases, reviews without clearly and exactly specified
populations, interventions, exposures, and outcomes will produce results sets that quickly outstrip the
resources of a small team and offer no consistent way to assess and synthesize findings from the
studies that are identified. When you are citing a specific author's findings, use the past tense:
(found. A report from a meeting of Experts jointly organized by UNICEF and WHO. New York:
Child and Adolescent Health and Development, 18 July 2001. ? Smaill FM, Grivell RM. Abstracts
should not replace full articles in informing decision making, but for time-pressed readers and those
with limited access to full text reports, the abstract must stand alone in presenting a clear and truthful
account of the research. The PUGs panel recommended that a protocol refresh will require the
authors to use the latest accepted methods of synthesis, even if this means repeating data extraction
for all studies. Grey literature In the third approach, we searched for grey literature on the websites
of European HTA agencies. Noon University of Washington, Department of Civil and Environmental
Engineering Associated Data Supporting Information S1: This supporting information provides a
sample STARR-LCA worksheet for use in study planning, manuscript preparation, and peer review.
Updating systematic reviews; AHRQ technical reviews; report no 07-0087. Rewrite the words
within a parenthesis and write AB in front of the parenthesis. Updating Cochrane Reviews: results of
the first pilot of a focused update. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed
management knowledge by means of systematic review. Approaches range from qualitative work
such as grouping and summarizing of expert opinions, to quantitative synthesis, in which the
published data are adjusted to a common value or other statistical methods are utilized as part of a
meta-analysis. A wide search means that not all search results will be relevant.
Any references cited in the literature review must be included. Most children tend to imitate
negative things they see on television, as they do. PubMed, for instance, uses the controlled
vocabulary list MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). No matter what class you need to do a literature
review for, you do not want to get behind, and if you do then you could find yourself in a lot of
trouble. The certain point at which determined the efforts are no longer worth the extension of
chronological life due to the lack of quality in life being saved. Briefly state specific findings listed
in an article. Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review Ranking studies based on a
checklist is a common practice for quality assessment. Meta-analysis: A melding of data from
multiple studies, usually involving additional mathematical analyses, with the goal of utilizing this
synergy of information and data size to answer questions that cannot be answered by existing
individual studies or to improve the certainty or impact of known findings by increasing the sample
size. Once you are done with creating the topic, you may start researching materials, literature review
topic examples. Nobody will assess your paper with the highest grade if you discuss the concepts
that were already investigated by other scholars. Publication bias against negative results from
clinical trials: three of the seven deadly sins. OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Shojania K,
Sampson M, Ansari M, et al. The search strategy should be documented in full for each database,
and can be published in an appendix to the published review article. According to Luft (2000),
management is the method that is used to achieve organisational aims; that is. This includes phrases
such as “ this paper argues that ” and “ this paper is in the view that. ”. An authorship team
publishing an update in a scientific or medical journal is likely to manage the new edition of a review
in the same way as with any other publication, and follow the ICMJE authorship criteria. 56 If the
previous author or author team steps down, then they should be acknowledged in the new version. A
systematic review is best deployed to test a specific hypothesis about a healthcare or public health
intervention or exposure. However, since Fowler’s work is based largely within a Western Christian
setting, some attention to differences in faith among class members would have been a useful
addition to the study. It can be undertaken as stand-alone projects in their own right, or as a
precursor to a systematic review. Read more A List to 50 Good Literature Review Topics 1 of 5
Download Now Download to read offline Recommended Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences Lit
Reviews for the Health Sciences Robin Featherstone Writing a literature review Writing a literature
review Nancy Little 14. In the first approach, we conducted a systematic review to identify articles
on appraisal tools, through a database search using Medline. A checklist is not sufficient to ensure
good abstract writing. Keep in mind that it may not always be possible to alter your strategy to such
an extent that all your key articles are found without your results becoming too comprehensive. This
question format can be further defined by adding relevant parameters such as geographic region,
technology type, or years of interest. While there are a variety of reviews that have been published in
LCA, there is great variability in methodology and reporting, which makes use of the information
difficult. Readers in countries where English is not the primary language may have access to an
abstract translated to their own language, but not to a translated full text. In our research, the tools
described by Tseng et al 38 and Blagojevic et al 51 and ANDQ 16 were originally designed for a
surgical intervention, knee osteoarthritis and for the field of diabetes, respectively. We acknowledge
that meta-analyses can occur outside the scope of a systematic review of the literature. The
phenomena being studied is the mental health care experiences of women who are immigrants and
refugees talks about how experience of immigrant and refugee women with mental illnesses with
regards to support and coping mechanisms. The problem is unambiguously stated, and this problem is
that as a result of the migration process, women suffer from a variety of mental illnesses. Levinson
and Sutton (2001) argue that it is easy to say what a policy is than to say what it does.
The search terms within each block are combined with OR, then the blocks are combined with AND.
This might include handsearching selected journals, or doing a citation analysis. With keen editors
and friendly support, we guarantee quality, ORIGINAL papers and essays that score high. Life cycle
assessment (LCA): Also known as life cycle analysis, LCA is a standardized framework, (ISO 2006a,
2006b) that can improve our understanding of the impacts of a system or product through the stages
of its manufacturing, utilization, and disposal. It is an important tool for researchers to understand the
current state of knowledge on a particular topic and to identify gaps in the research that may be
worth exploring. As such, you should: Introduce the name of the text State the author’s name. A
survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. The most distinct characteristic that makes
PBL different. PDF Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses evidence. If you do
not change your settings, we will consider that you will not mind us sending all cookies to you.
Identify the report as a systematic review, meta-analysis, or both. Ranjit Singh, IIIT Allahabad
Systematic Literature Review Paper COMMENTS PRISMA Checklist The PRISMA 2020 statement
comprises a 27-item checklist addressing the introduction, methods, results and discussion sections
of a systematic review report. Management can best be defined as the system that is used for any
organisation to succeed in meeting its. Present and Future Requisites for Prosperity in the Caribbean
Present and Future Requisites for Prosperity in the Caribbean AWS RDS Data API and CloudTrail.
This includes phrases such as “ this paper argues that ” and “ this paper is in the view that. ”. For an
effective source, Read more Literature Audience Education Time Internet Information Website
Public Relations Literature Review Researcher Sociology Data 3 Pages Medicine: Paramedics And
Obstetrics Essay Introduction. Determination of a need to replicate a prior study in. A standardized
technique for assessing and reporting reviews of LCA data (STARR-LCA) A summary of STARR-
LCA checklist items is provided here: Review title, keywords and abstract Rationale for the review
Review question and objectives. PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal
and The PRISMA for Abstracts checklist gives authors a framework for condensing their systematic
review into the essentials for an abstract that will meet the needs of many readers.. Identify the report
as a systematic review, meta-analysis, or both.. Hartley J (2000) Clarifying the abstracts of
systematic literature reviews. Agree with manuscript results and conclusions: EMB PPG DGA SH
HB IC PCG TL DT. A change in the date of the search only (where no new studies were identified)
would not require peer review (except, arguably, peer review of the search), but the addition of
studies that lead to a change in conclusions or significant changes to the methods would require peer
review. This assignment is often given in social sciences and other experiment-driven subjects, but
these can also pop up in liberal studies such as English. The transient and progressive flooding stages
of damaged ro-ro vessels: A systematic review of entailed factors. A tool was excluded if it was
designed for non-randomised studies of exposures which were not controlled by investigators (eg,
diets). This guidance helps authors of systematic reviews, commissioners, and editors decide when to
update a systematic review, and then how to go about updating the review. Those updating
systematic reviews to author clinical practice guidelines might consider the influence of new study
results in potentially overturning the conclusions of an existing review. Then transition from the
attention getter to the point of the essay. ROBIS group. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in
systematic reviews was developed. Paper 1: Literature Review and Critique worth 100 points Paper
1 is a literature review and critique. Healthcare professionals have embraced medical technologies
and other interventions to address this issue; an aspect that has reduce neonatal and childhood
mortality rate and increased survival of premature infants.