This document provides a rubric for evaluating a final report with criteria in five areas: report writing, work content, innovation and understanding, outcomes, and total marks. Reports are assessed on a scale of excellent, good, average, or poor for criteria such as structure, use of principles, results, and achievement of objectives. The committee uses this rubric to score the report and provide feedback to the student.
This document provides a rubric for evaluating a final report with criteria in five areas: report writing, work content, innovation and understanding, outcomes, and total marks. Reports are assessed on a scale of excellent, good, average, or poor for criteria such as structure, use of principles, results, and achievement of objectives. The committee uses this rubric to score the report and provide feedback to the student.
This document provides a rubric for evaluating a final report with criteria in five areas: report writing, work content, innovation and understanding, outcomes, and total marks. Reports are assessed on a scale of excellent, good, average, or poor for criteria such as structure, use of principles, results, and achievement of objectives. The committee uses this rubric to score the report and provide feedback to the student.
Final Report (20 marks) – to be filled by committee
Excellent Good Average Poor Marks achieved 5 3-4 2 1 X Quality of the report Ideas have been Sequencing of ideas Sentence structure Sentence structure, writing: layout, structure, logically expressed; within paragraphs and and/or word choice word choice, lack of written and graphical sequencing of ideas transitions between sometimes interfere transitions and/or material, referencing within paragraphs and paragraphs generally with clarity. Needs to sequencing of ideas transitions between make the report easy considerably improve make reading and paragraphs make the to follow, except non- sequencing of ideas understanding difficult. report easy to follow. clarity in few places. within paragraphs and transitions between paragraphs. Report format is Report format is Many departures from Work fails to follow consistent throughout generally consistent. the desired report desired report format. including heading format. styles, fonts, margins, white space, equations, captioning for Figures and Tables, referencing etc. Work content: quality Reported critical Reported effective Report shows serious Report shows no or work, student effort selection and application of deficiencies in proper erroneous application application of engineering principles selection and use of of engineering engineering principles resulting in reasonable engineering principles. principles yielding ensuring reasonable solution – decent to unreasonable solution. results – significant use moderate use of engineering knowledge engineering knowledge and concepts/codes/ and concepts/codes/ standards/design standards/design manuals/literature etc. manuals/literature etc.
Name of student:_______________________Roll number:_______________ Branch:_________
Page |2
Excellent Good Average Poor Marks
achieved 5 3-4 2 1 X Reported extensive Reported computer– Reported minimal Report shows serious computer–aided aided tools/ application and use of deficiencies in tools/mathematical mathematical models appropriate tools. understanding the models to effectively to used with moderate correct selection develop and analyze effectiveness to and/or use of tools. designs. develop designs. Innovation and Exceptionally well- Well-presented and Content is sound and Content is not sound. understanding: level of presented and argued; argued; Innovative solid; innovative difficulty, innovation and Innovative ideas/solutions are ideas/solutions are understanding of work ideas/solutions are detailed, developed present but not completed detailed, well- and supported with particularly developed developed, supported evidence and details, or supported; some with specific evidence mostly specific. evidence, but usually and facts, as well as of a generalized examples and specific nature. details. Significant capacity to Generally acceptable Limited capacity to No or trivial capacity to integrate knowledge, capacity to integrate integrate knowledge, handle innovation handle complexity and knowledge, handle handle complexity and requirements. formulate judgements complexity and formulate judgements with incomplete or formulate judgements with incomplete or limited information. with incomplete or limited information. limited information. Outcomes: results, All figures/results are Most figures/results Many figures/results Figures/results are not conclusions and learning effectively interpreted are properly are not interpreted. used effectively. Little outcomes achieved and discussed in the interpreted and Important features are understanding of report. Conclusions are important features not communicated or important features or relevant and true. noted. Conclusions are understood. issues. Conclusions are generally valid. Conclusions require
Name of student:_______________________Roll number:_______________ Branch:_________
Page |3
Name of student:_______________________Roll number:_______________ Branch:_________
Page |4
Excellent Good Average Poor Marks
achieved 5 3-4 2 1 X significantly more vague and clarity. unacceptable. All the project Project objectives and Considerable Gross deviations or objectives and learning learning outcomes deviations from project failure to meet project outcomes have been have been generally objectives and learning objectives and learning achieved. met with occasional outcomes. outcomes. deviations. Total marks achieved ∑X
Name and the signature of the Panel member:_______________________________________
Name and the signature of the Panel member:_______________________________________
Name and the signature of the Chairperson of the Panel:_______________________________
Date of Presentation:________________________________
Name of student:_______________________Roll number:_______________ Branch:_________