Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

2.

5
Hungarian uprising 1956 an outcome of khruscher speech
THE SECRET SPEECH REACTIONS IN THE COMMUNIST
WORLD AND SUCCESSFULATTEMPTS TO BRING CHANGE

Stalin died 1953 1956 Ussr loosened government control


encouraged
by westenersbut not outside Immunis
1953 Laurenti teria mainlyMao khouscher attack on stalin as personal
1956 Khruscher damaged relations sino soviet
Soviets oppressedeconomies in East Europe socialist I preserve
Bulgaria East germany romania continueStalinism
East germany s nothing west germany rebuilt
1953 change in East gemany after revolt
hallen death Feb 1956 secretspeech personality cultand its consequences

Itis
in a host county to de stalinization speech only Stalin Potatievents
with half a million mafactuseerkhrisiteÉtevisionism northKorea didaswell
confirmed communist Intrsgutspiatect
1955 reconciliation with tito

Juan
aim occupation ruinejetitsttfustry.EE rmEonamic
state realinane

FLEY rebell polish communistparty on nationalistroad to


requested

and
sociali t
soviet troops dispatched but thy convined thy would follow
marshall socialism they remained as a buffer against western expansion
get Rokossovsky IMPACT HUNGARIAN UPRISING
Hungarians followed poland threatened sovietsecurity us policy of
containment s not direct support A Suez crisis furthered tension
also 23 october1956 revolution civil rights freedom departure of troops

Imre nagy Soviet tanksgarment buildings were seized inBudapest

pygmy Soviets seemed accepting of nationalist communism withdrew tanks

sovereignstate determineits ownpoliticalfuture


had been expelled but Y
withdraw from warsaw 11ejectforeign forces
ater rehabilitated eisenhower unlikely to sendtroops
secretary of state dukes pledged assistance to
any couth that broke ties

DEATH OF STALIN SECRET


SPEECH DETACHMENT FROM
SOVIETS
FE independent
but apparently
recency hangars

connected to fue
Jungang
supported democracy
dy funded
Ree sgave them the illusion of support
resurgent
Political
Hungarian revolutionaries appeared to win
30 october nagy hungarian neutrality
parties
UN no power to enforce
press freedom 4 now 1956 revolution crushed communist partyonly
political dissidents nagy 1 200 ooo
executed fled to austria
were me SIGNIFICANCE
revolution zo ooohungarians 1,500 Soviets
d
thruscher trusted threats to soviet security and defection of Socialist
ideology
Polish gomulka Khruscheuforeign policy conflicted not toleratedeiation
w y u from socialist line check his expansion
active in international
more affairs
Shine of socialism only revolutions in Soviet sphere
and they were weak communismimposed not desired
US inactivity not saying anything embaited soviets

Duteshassistana to take action


Us action policy of containment
commitmentto the Eisenhower rollback challenged his motivation

onanist states less likely to see us as an idealistic supporter


approached the Us warily
furthered confined by us response to suez crisis

HUNGARY REVOLUTION

FOLLOWING POLISH
THE SUEZ CRISIS
nationalize suez canal infuriated French

I
Egyptian
and british losing empire already decolonization
Israeli Fin USAand Soviet union not initially inclined
decline of colonial power
changed that
CAUSES
Nasser prieved as a corrupt elitist
enlisted
general unharmed d Not he he rose through the yay
arab nationalism arbicious social policies modernise egypt
naguib overthrow strong anti Israeli stance t anti idonialism
Nasser stronger army challenge british bring control
highfarouk as
to improve lives of the majority replace power shutterstandard
outested in Iggy religion removed from public life and influence secularism
Improve education 11prior 1952 Gt owned Gst of land
1962 government controlled sot of baisresses
rebuild as 1955usa and british offered funding sa got byAnthea
Dulles hoped economic aid ties nasser saw as valuable
control mile river
May 1956 recognised peoples republic met with foreign
funding 1956
Soviet
minist
and
Jules out
r
arms agreement 1955
backed but sovietsoffered assistance
of funding
instead Nasser pursued the Suez canal 1936 treaty british
supposed to leave 1946snationalized the canal
INITIATION OF HOSTILITIES AND NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL
French british wanted canal return
26 Oct 956 Israeli army invaded sinnai peninsula

nigga's
british french later came to secure canal
and words oil larger concern forthe U.s than
provide petroleum Hungarian crisis us against taking action
Soviets saw his response as covert support

UPRISE FOR A BETTER

EGYPT SUEZ CRISIS


US had no foreknowledge of the invasion
us had support Khruscher focused on hungarian
viet nudeal bluff cont support to egypt
Israeli and
rejected Nasser
ya ya strong opposition to candism
when the Ussr
home Taming
against Soviet nuclear war
he threatened unilateral economic sanctions against
supported him France Israel and butian if they didnt withdraw ant
block international monetary fund from providing
emergency loans 1957 all forces withdrew
UN immediate withdraw
1956 blue helmets
SIGNIFICANCE OF SUEZ CRISIS
UN role blue helmets could intervene
uplift
brazil canada iclambia Denmark finland india
M M indonesia norway poland sweden yugoslavia ble helmets

Taintain and more significant potential more focus


British french influence weakened
watch aye only military action with us support
1966
military autonomous
Khraschev saw responsibility for anglo french israeli withdraw
ussr interning pushed them out
then Israeli loyal american ally
Eisenhower doctrine provide aid to middle east to
prevent spread of communism
not reliant on superpowers use as an advantage
nasser
anti communism covers things in the eyes of
the his

ULTIMATE OUTCOME OF THE

SUEZ CRISIS

You might also like