Research Vs Literature Review

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Navigating the intricate landscape of academic research often requires a keen understanding of the

nuances between conducting original research and synthesizing existing literature. One such aspect
that demands careful attention is the literature review, a critical component of scholarly work that
necessitates thorough examination and analysis of previously published material.

Embarking on the journey of crafting a literature review can be a daunting task for many researchers.
It requires not only a comprehensive grasp of the subject matter but also the ability to critically
evaluate a multitude of sources, ranging from peer-reviewed articles to books and other scholarly
works. Furthermore, synthesizing these diverse sources into a cohesive narrative that contributes
meaningfully to the existing body of knowledge requires both skill and finesse.

The complexity of writing a literature review often stems from the need to strike a delicate balance
between providing a comprehensive overview of existing research and offering insightful analysis
and interpretation. It entails meticulously organizing vast amounts of information, identifying key
themes and trends, and elucidating their relevance to the research question at hand. Moreover,
ensuring the coherence and logical flow of the narrative is essential to effectively communicate the
significance of the reviewed literature.

For many individuals, the sheer magnitude of these tasks can be overwhelming, leading to feelings
of frustration and uncertainty. In such instances, seeking professional assistance can prove to be
invaluable. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers a solution tailored to alleviate the burden of crafting a
literature review, providing expert guidance and support every step of the way.

By entrusting your literature review to the experienced professionals at ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can
rest assured that your work will be meticulously crafted to meet the highest academic standards. Our
team of skilled writers possesses the expertise and knowledge necessary to conduct thorough
research, critically evaluate relevant literature, and synthesize findings into a coherent and
compelling narrative. With a commitment to excellence and a dedication to client satisfaction, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ is your trusted partner in academic success.

Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review hinder your academic progress. Trust ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ to deliver exceptional results that will elevate your research and set you on the path
to success. Contact us today to learn more about our services and discover how we can assist you in
achieving your academic goals.
The sources support what Falk and Mills are saying. By trend: A better way to organize the above
sources chronologically is to examine the sources under another trend, such as the history of whaling.
In the sciences, for instance, treatments for medical problems are constantly changing according to
the latest studies. Here it is: Narrative Essay: Business Literature Review Example Pdf
molotorvac.blogspot.com narrative College Essay: Essay About Literature Example
eketogenit.blogspot.com literary samples Literature Review For Apa Format themcfarlanegroup.com
apa museumlegs essay template findings qualitative summarizing papers vlsi summarize. What
theories have been used to explain, predict, or understand their research problem. Here, the
Conclusion and Recommendations add new dimensions to the existing research base. Making it the
most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. The theoretical literature review helps to
establish what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree the existing
theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested. A literature review is a
comprehensive summary of previous research on a topic. This will help the reader get a sense of what
the project is about. University of North Carolina Writing Center. (2018). Literature Reviews. It
helps in identifying problem statements and also to prevent duplication of research work. Rely
heavily on the guidelines your instructor has given you. For the sperm whale project, one
methodological approach would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of whales in
American, British, and French art work. The introduction should: define your topic and provide an
appropriate context for reviewing the literature; establish your reasons - i.e. point of view - for. You
need not have a theoretical framework only when you are testing a theory, you can have them for all
sorts of studies including qualitative, quantitative etc. The tempo of background music influenced
the pace at. The authors here recapitulate important features of Hamilton’s study, but then synthesize
it by rephrasing the study’s significance and relating it to their own work. Its purpose is to identify
and gather the top insights, gaps, and answers to research questions. The pool of writers on this
platform encompasses experts in every literature review type. The researcher in specific must be able
to show an adequate amount of Review Paper publications to avail a PhD degree. The margins of the
paper should be 1 inch and the scholar must consider A4 sized paper. Literature reviews can take two
major forms. The most prevalent one is the “literature review” or “background” section within a
journal paper or a chapter in a graduate thesis. Sure, it’s impossible to find a topic that hasn’t been
discussed or cited. Literature reviews help researchers to evaluate the existing literature, to identify a
gap in the research area, to place their study in the existing research and identify future research. This
can be especially useful if you are new to a field, or if you are interested in keeping up with current
thinking on a particular topic. Quality control service experts additionally assure that your writing
requirements are followed. Systematic reviews that involve the rigorous application of scientific
strategies aimed at limiting subjectivity and bias (i.e., systematic and random errors) can respond to
this challenge. In a literature review it is best to build a case with selected sources by grouping them
thematically so that you can analyze, compare and contrast the theories, and that policies and
practices in the field you are studying or conveyed in an organized way. Parts of a Literature Review
Introduction Purpose: To explain the focus and establish the importance of the subject In general,
your introduction should provide the framework, selection criteria, or parameters of your literature
review provide background or history outline what kind of work has been done on the topic 5.
Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting Professional editors proofread and edit
your paper by focusing on: Academic style Vague sentences Style consistency See an example To
begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you understand the
connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Comprehend the relationship
between various contributions to your topic. While this can be time consuming, it is the proper way
to undertake a literature review. The review ends with a conclusion section which summarizes the
findings regarding the state of the research of the specific study, the gaps identify and if applicable,
explains how the author's research will address gaps identify in the review and expand the
knowledge on the topic reviewed. A literature review in this sense is just like any other academic
research paper. Sometimes you may need to quote certain terminology that was coined by the author,
is not common knowledge, or taken directly from the study. Or the review might focus on the
economic impact of whaling on a community. Structure requirements Alphabetical sorting Clear
separation of entries Easy navigation Advanced representation of sources in the text Sources can
appear several times Components List formatted in the formal citation styles (MLA, APA, Chicago,
etc.). Introduction, main body, and conclusion. Types of Literature Review You can reach the
purpose we have discussed above in several ways, which means there are several types of literature
review. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the direction of
the field. Are you an instructor who has received an exemplary literature review and have permission
from the student to post. Through your literature review, you’ll show what gaps exist in the current
body of knowledge, and then your study will then attempt to fill (or contribute towards filling) one
of those gaps. What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review. Does it
confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge. The structure of a literature review is similar to
that of an essay or an article. Take notes and cite your sources As you read, you should also begin
the writing process. Armed with a BA degree in English and a knack for digital marketing, she
explores her passions for literature, history, culture, and food through her engaging and informative
writing. Integrative Review Considered a form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes
representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives
on the topic are generated. Users on the Froedtert network must sign in via OpenAthens when
attempting to access electronic library resources (including UpToDate, VisualDx, etc.). MCW
Libraries is aware of this change and is working to provide a permanent access solution. For
example, when discussing empirical research, you might mention that most studies have focused on a
certain context, yet very few (or none) have focused on another context, and there’s reason to believe
that findings may differ. In other words, a chronological review would have subsections for each
vital time period. Thus, while ambient sexism accounted for some of the masculine bias, sexist
language amplified the effect. (Source: Erika Falk and Jordan Mills, “Why Sexist Language Affects
Persuasion: The Role of Homophily, Intended Audience, and Offense,” Women and Language19:2).
Methodological A methodological approach focuses on the methods utilized by the researcher. Then
your review would have subsections according to eras within this period. Most of the universities in
the Middle East consider honorary Research Papers. This approach helps highlight ethical issues
which you should be aware of and consider as you go through your own study. The middle or main
body should: organise the literature according to common themes; provide insight into the relation
between your chosen topic and the wider subject area e.g. between obesity in children and obesity in
general; move from a general, wider view of the literature being reviewed to the specific focus of
your research. The content of the literature must include all studies which are address related or
similar theories. Moreover, our literature review writers identify the current research gap and help
you relate your findings to previous research.
A literature review, which reviews the existing research and information on a selected study area, is a
crucial element of a research study. By statistically combining data from multiple studies, meta-
analyses can create more precise and reliable estimates of intervention effects than those derived
from individual studies alone, when these are examined independently as discrete sources of
information. If you use an assignment from StudyCorgi website, it should be referenced accordingly.
A literature review may be a stand alone work or the introduction to a larger research paper,
depending on the assignment. Writing teachers often say synthesis is like hosting a dinner party:
imagine all your sources are together in a room, discussing your topic. It is assumed that by
mentioning a previous work in the field of study, that the author has read, evaluated, and assimilated
that work into the work at hand. Instead, researchers often present studies that are representative of
most works published in a particular area and they consider a specific time frame to be mapped.
Historical Review Few things rest in isolation from historical precedent. What are the key concepts
and how are they defined. Two members of the research team selected the articles using a pre-
established list of inclusion and exclusion criteria and following a two-step procedure. Give your
interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred. This is important because it allows
you to focus your own research on filling these gaps. If you are in doubt about how to approach a
literature review, always follow up with your rubric, syllabus, professor or teaching assistant.
Galvan, J. L. (2009). Writing Literature Reviews: A Guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral
Sciences. Pick one of these themes to focus the organization of your review. Development of the
Literature Review Four Basic Stages of Writing 1. Literature reviews also provide a solid
background for a research paper’s investigation. Introductions can be found in nonfiction books,
essays, research articles, thesis, etc. They originated from criticisms of positivist systematic reviews
which centre on their “simplistic” underlying assumptions ( Oates, 2011 ). This means that you
should focus on critical writing, rather than simply providing a summary of what others have written.
A basic literature review includes the introduction with the research topic definition, its arguments,
and problems. Then, it has a synthesis of the picked pieces of literature. If your review type is absent
from the service list on the order page, choose the “Other” option. Social media, Facebook,
Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth Search for relevant sources Use your keywords to begin
searching for sources. Literature reviews are written occasionally in the humanities, but mostly in the
sciences and social sciences; in experiment and lab reports, they constitute a section of the paper.
You should have a rough idea of your strategy before you start writing. As in most narrative reviews,
the scope of the research questions being investigated is broad: (a) how development of these
systems are carried out; (b) which methods are used to investigate these systems; and (c) what
conclusions can be drawn as a result of the development of these systems. To provide clear answers
to these questions, a literature search was conducted on six electronic databases and Google Scholar.
It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries. History: The
chronological progression of the field, the literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the
literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology. The purpose is to
get the lay of the land in a given research area. What are the most important topics, subtopics, etc.,
that your review needs to include. Take notes and cite your sources As you read, you should also
begin the writing process.
Under this method, you would combine the recent studies on American whaling in the 19th century
with Moby Dick itself in the 1800-1899 category, even though the authors wrote a century apart.
Notice that Falk and Mills do quote certain terms that were coined by the author, not common
knowledge, or taken directly from the study. A good starting point could be to look at some
examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write. Questions for Further
Research: What questions about the field has the review sparked. Typically you’ll cover a few things
within the theoretical framework: Firstly, you’ll need to clearly define the key constructs and
variables that will feature within your study. Conclusion: Summarize the key findings you have taken
from the literature and emphasize their significance Connect it back to your primary research
question How should I organize my lit review. The studies focus on its management process and
coping mechanism. Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest. How well do they present
the material and do they portray it according to an appropriate theory. Here are several strategies you
can utilize to assess whether you've thoroughly reviewed the literature: Look for repeating patterns in
the research findings. Systematic reviews are used mainly because the review of existing studies is
often more convenient than conducting a new study. Every writer holds a degree and knows
authoritative literature in their subject. Writing Your Literature Review Once you've settled on how
to organize your literature review, you're ready to write each section. There are five key steps to
writing a literature review: Search for relevant literature Evaluate sources Identify themes, debates,
and gaps Outline the structure Write your literature review A good literature review doesn’t just
summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes, and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the
state of knowledge on the subject. Assume that the person or people who will read your research
proposal know nothing or very little about the research problem. The review should enumerate,
describe, summarize, objectively evaluate and clarify this previous research. Literature reviews give
an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well
as gaps in existing research. History: The chronological progression of the field, the research
literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature
review is not already a chronology. You cannot convince your reviewer without a good literature
review work. Maybe you’re on the verge of getting a doctorate and want a literature review to be
just ideal. In the sciences, for instance, treatments for medical problems are constantly changing
according to the latest studies. Why is it useful? It confirms that the theoretical framework is valid. It
may describe the possible gaps and contradictions in existing research. On the other end of the
spectrum, there might be a wealth of research regarding a certain topic within one country (say the
US), but very little research on that same topic in a different social context (say, China). Create an
organizational method to focus this section even further. Communications of the Association for
Information Systems. 2005; 16:1. Kirkevold M. Integrative nursing research — an important strategy
to further the development of nursing science and nursing practice. Introduction OK. You’ve got to
write a literature review. To conclude, our main objective in this chapter was to demystify the various
types of literature reviews that are central to the continuous development of the eHealth field.
Although it may sound like a term used to describe the act of penning down your thoughts and
analysis after reading a striking book or a poem, it is not what it is about. This means that you will
not just simply list your sources and go into detail about each one of them, one at a time. No. As you
read widely but selectively in your topic area, consider instead what themes or issues connect your
sources together.
Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than just summarizing it. As you begin writing
your research proposal it is helpful to think of the introduction as a narrative of what it is you want
to do, written in one to three paragraphs. Here, the Conclusion and Recommendations add new
dimensions to the existing research base. Recapitulate important features of a research study, but then
synthesize it by rephrasing the study's significance and relating it to your own work and the work of
others. Literature Review Outline We’ve already discussed the importance of a literature review
outline. At first, you gather several related research papers. Google Scholar is an interesting
searching tool which helps in searching different journals and magazines. With Visa and Mastercard
checkout options, your payments for service are out of danger. A description of the research design
or general approach used to guide the reading and analysis of the literature (this may be organized
chronologically, by subjects, by theoretical framework, etc.). A summary of the main themes or
arguments emerging from your critical review of the literature. Subsequently, they use fixed or
random-effects analysis models to combine the results of the included studies, assess statistical
heterogeneity, and calculate a weighted average of the effect estimates from the different studies,
taking into account their sample sizes. The margins of the paper should be 1 inch and the scholar
must consider A4 sized paper. Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your
sources. For professionals, they are useful reports that keep them up to date with what is current in
the field. Its primary goal is to provide an overall picture of the study object. As explained above,
systematic reviews seek to identify causation. Analyze its literature review, the samples and variables
used, the results, and the conclusions. If the review is a stand-alone assignment for a course, the
conclusion should suggest any practical applications of the research as well as the implications and
possibilities for future research. In the course, we walk you through the full process of developing a
literature review, step by step. However, particularly in the social sciences, thinking about research
problems from multiple vectors is a key strategy for finding new solutions to a problem or gaining a
new perspective. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper.
2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. The narrower your topic, the easier it will be
to limit the number of sources you need to read in order to get a good survey of the material. There is
no preconceived plan to systematically review all of the literature although this can be done. We’ve
written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below. Regardless of the situation, you should not
just list several literature items. On the contrary, build a decent logical connection and analysis. At the
beginning of the literature review, you can mention the type of literature review you have used and
why you chose it for your research. Given that you are presenting what the literature says about a
field of study, not what you think or believe, you must cite those authors that actually make and
provide the research evidence, theories, frameworks for practice etc. This step will help you work out
the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute
to existing knowledge. Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative
approach. How will you further your research as a result of the review. It is not just a descriptive list
of the material available, or a set of summaries.
Cook, Kathleen E. and Elise Murowchick. “Do Literature Review Skills Transfer from One Course
to Another?” Psychology Learning and Teaching 13 (March 2014): 3-11; Fink, Arlene. To achieve
this ambitious objective, the authors performed a bibliometric analysis of medical informatics
citations indexed in medline using publication trends, journal frequencies, impact factors, Medical
Subject Headings (MeSH) term frequencies, and characteristics of citations. Look at sources the
authors cite to in their work. Were the results effectively interpreted and reported. Our service is
legal because, all institutions permit their students to read previous project, books, articles or papers
while developing their own works. You cannot convince your reviewer without a good literature
review work. For example, a review of the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics could
focus on the development of online political satire. Background and significance The purpose of this
section is to explain the context of your proposal and to describe, in detail, why it is important to
undertake this research. The similarity score of your literature overview will be low if you use our
writing service. Popular Publications Qualitative Methods Quantitative Methods Insiderness Using
Non-Textual Elements Limitations of the Study Common Grammar Mistakes Writing Concisely
Avoiding Plagiarism Footnotes or Endnotes. Sometimes individuals must meet them adequately,
understand the difficulties and determine their main priorities, deciding what to examine and how to
start writing. In other words, a complete understanding the research problem requires you to
deliberately examine how knowledge and perspectives have changed over time. Let’s get to it! What
should I do before writing the literature review. It can be anything from qualitative to quantitative in
acknowledging problems in a particular theory. As such, as new information becomes available,
literature reviews grow in length or become focused on one specific aspect of the topic. What were
the noteworthy limitations of these studies. Analyzing and synthesizing data: As a final step,
members of the review team must collate, summarize, aggregate, organize, and compare the evidence
extracted from the included studies. Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint If you want to
know more about the research process, methodology, research bias, or statistics, make sure to check
out some of our other articles with explanations and examples. Those who will read this example of
literature review will understand in which way they should move to continue investigating the topic.
The authors here recapitulate important features of Hamilton’s study, but then synthesize it by
rephrasing the study’s significance and relating it to their own work. Then you look up a book
written in 1968 with information on how sperm whales have been portrayed in other forms of art,
such as in Alaskan poetry, in French painting, or on whale bone, as the whale hunters in the late 19th
century used to do. Sheppard and Williams (2016) had not discovered these individual factors in
their original literature review on community and environmental resilience. For example, a review
that examines literature supporting or refuting an argument, assumption, or philosophical problem
related to the research problem will also need to include writing supported by sources that establish
the history of these arguments in the literature. An outline for literature review has a bit different
structure comparing with other types of paper works. When we say “literature review” or refer to
“the literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. In this part, you
should outline the following characteristics: Selected topic Research question Related research
question trends and prospects Research methods Expected research results Body. Sometimes, though,
you might need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the
organizational strategy of the body. A good literature review doesn't just summarise sources - it
analyses, synthesises, and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the
subject. That’s why you have no more reason for fear of cyber attacks. Make sure that you only get
articles and books in those areas, even if you come across fascinating books in other areas.

You might also like