Peer Review #1:

1. These paragraphs give good background but it would be helpful to cite sources
in order to build ethos.
2. I think that these paragraphs show the thesis that there needs to be regulations
so that CRISPR technology does not become harmful.

Peer Review #2:

1. Parts of your essay are Somewhat repetative

2. Strong argument at the end of this paragraph. I like how you started with more
of a back and forth between both sides and then stated your claim. This gives
more background knowledge for readers.
3. Maybe condense these smaller paragraphs into 2 larger ones. This will make
your closing feel more collective and connected, instead of 4 separate points.
4. Overall I thought this was a very strong essay with an interesting and relevant
topic. Your wonderous introduction set a foundation for the rest of this essay to
shine. The one thing I would critique is to try and connect your points to one
another more. They are all strong on their own, so finding a way for them to lead
into one another to support your single claim will make the essay even stronger.
Finally, make sure you put your annotated bib before final submission. Nicely
done!