Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bankruptcy Tutorial 1
Bankruptcy Tutorial 1
Bankruptcy Tutorial 1
b. Discuss the material differences between a Receiving Order and Adjudication Order. (10marks)
Today we only have one order under s4 – the court may on a bankruptcy petition make
bankruptcy order.
In practice, the RO and AO makes simultaneously.
The RO is for the purposes of giving the debtor some breathing space, DGI comes in to re-
arrange the debts and see whether it can settle the debt. The ownership of the properties is not
shift from the debtor. DGI merely takes control (not ownership) of the properties.
The function of AO is similar to BO:
S8(1)(a): no creditor may bring an action against the debtor without the leave of court.
S8(1)(b): all property shall become divisible among his creditors and shall vest in the DGI
– effect of bankruptcy order which is previously known as AO.
S36: where a debtor is an adjudged bankrupt, he shall be disqualified
S38: where a bankrupt has not obtained his discharge, the bankrupt shall be
incompetent to maintain any action
Supplementary 1998 (February)
Question 8
Flaws in BN:
Question 8
I. Whether Allen can challenge the excessive amount in the bankruptcy notice at this stage; (4m)
s3(2) – Excessive demand in BN does not render the notice bad per se unless the debtor
has given notice within 7 days (Re Rengasamy Pillai)
Find out what stage you are now: [Creditor’s petition is fixed for hearing next month.]
act of bankruptcy has been committed. = Creditor’s petition stage. Cannot challenge at
this stage because of s3(2).
III. Whether Allen has nay grounds to oppose the creditor’s petition; (4m)
1. Statutory requirement under s5 not fulfilled.
Debt owing < RM50k (or 10k at the time) – RM9,750
S6(2): at the date of hearing, the court may require proof of the debt of
petitioning creditor
S6(3): if the court is not satisfied with the proof of the debt, the court may
dismiss the petition.
2. Affidavit of truth of petition
Ho Weng Keong
Koh Kim Kuang
Affirm one day before doesn’t render the petition void
S131 IA
3. Once act of bankruptcy is committed on 9.11.97, the petition must be issued within
6 months.
o On 11.5.98, Albert only filed a creditor’s petition > exceeds 6 months.
IV. Whether Allen’s procedure to oppose the creditor’s petition is correct. (4m)
No, not a correct procedure. He must file Form 45 with the Registrar under Rule 116 IR.
(filing only affidavit is fatal opposing the petition) – namely, below statutory threshold,
act of bankruptcy that is relied on beyond 6 months.
Failure to file is fatal (D&C Bank v Datuk Ong Kian Seng)
It is not curable under S.131IA/Rule 282IR 2017
b. Assuming that Allen has no grounds to oppose. Could Albert still proceed with the creditor’s petition if
Allen has already been declared a bankrupt and no search was conducted by Albert?
Rule 93(2)
Rule 96
July 1999
Question 8
1. Pokai seeks your advice whether he has grounds to set aside the bankruptcy notice and, if so, the
procedure.
No final judgment or order as Pokai applied to set aside the default judgment
Kaya issued a BN against Pokai for balance of the amount outstanding.
o s3(1)(i) – it must in accordance with the terms of the judgment
o Here, it is for the balance – not in accordance. Dato Mohshari
Statutory requirement > 50k. Here only 40k
o Amount has not been quantified
S3(1)(i) – interest quantified until the date of issuance of bankruptcy notice
Here, it is 8% per annum – haven’t quantified
Period for payment not stated
Procedure
Rule 17- apply by way of summons in chamber supported by affidavit. In affidavit, state the
grounds for opposing the notice.
Apply for extension of time, no act of bankruptcy is committed until the prayer is done.
2. Advise Pokai. Briefly discuss the stages of winding-up procedure commencing from service of
statutory notice of demand under section 218(2) of the Companies Act 1965.
I. That Kaya Bank Bhd’s solicitor had no authority to sign the statutory notice;
S466(1): a company shall be deemed to be unable to pay its debts if a. the company is
indebted in a sum exceeding the amount…. by his agents
Case of Sri Hartamas – the court held that the demand in writing need not be in any
special form. The court held that the demand was not bad or invalid,
Since solicitor is an agent, there is no requirement that it must be Kaya Bank himself. As
long as Kaya authorised his solicitor to sign the notice, the solicitor has authority to sign
the notice.
II. That Pokai Sdn, Bhd. was not insolvent as it has assets, if realise, will be enough to pay off its
debt.
The test of inability to pay debts is commercial insolvency.
Re Hong Huat Realty
Sri Hartamas case