Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ged109 MRR3

    Uploaded by

    bautistamapa1
    2 views2 pages
    The document discusses the respondent's thoughts and understanding before and after reading an article on human rights and gender issues. [1] Before, the respondent thought there were no laws regarding gender roles, but learned that women have long fought for their rights and laws have gradually improved over time. [2] The respondent also realized some past laws, like those regarding same-sex couples, would not be accepted now. [3] Additionally, the respondent understood that human rights laws aim to protect people from discrimination and allow freedom of expression. However, parts of the reading regarding optional protocols, gender identity statements, and new technologies remained unclear. The respondent also had questions about why gender differences matter, if less diversity would reduce discrimination, and what

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    GED109_MRR3

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses the respondent's thoughts and understanding before and after reading an article on human rights and gender issues. [1] Before, the respondent thought there were no laws regarding gender roles, but learned that women have long fought for their rights and laws have gradually improved over time. [2] The respondent also realized some past laws, like those regarding same-sex couples, would not be accepted now. [3] Additionally, the respondent understood that human rights laws aim to protect people from discrimination and allow freedom of expression. However, parts of the reading regarding optional protocols, gender identity statements, and new technologies remained unclear. The respondent also had questions about why gender differences matter, if less diversity would reduce discrimination, and what

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    2 views2 pages

    Ged109 MRR3

    Uploaded by

    bautistamapa1
    The document discusses the respondent's thoughts and understanding before and after reading an article on human rights and gender issues. [1] Before, the respondent thought there were no laws regarding gender roles, but learned that women have long fought for their rights and laws have gradually improved over time. [2] The respondent also realized some past laws, like those regarding same-sex couples, would not be accepted now. [3] Additionally, the respondent understood that human rights laws aim to protect people from discrimination and allow freedom of expression. However, parts of the reading regarding optional protocols, gender identity statements, and new technologies remained unclear. The respondent also had questions about why gender differences matter, if less diversity would reduce discrimination, and what

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    MRR 3

    1. What are the three (3) things that you significantly learned from the reading? Please

    start by saying ' Before reading the article, I used to think that (insert thought). After

    reading the article, I now think that (insert thought)'.

    Before reading the article, I used to think that there is no treaty regarding the sexual

    role of a person. After reading the article, I now think that in the recent year’s woman was

    fighting for their rights and with that constant flow of improvements one by one woman

    right was finally come. Before reading the article, I used to think that it was just recent

    issue regarding the discrimination of genders and that it was from a few years issue when

    it comes trending. After reading the article, I now think that there are laws before that we

    the present can’t handle now specially the law about the same sex couple that they said

    violate a certain article. Before reading the article, I used to think that humans right are

    just a law that let people do what they want but it should be not illegal or something will

    happen. After reading the article, I now think that human rights law simply not protect

    people from discrimination specially that it let people to have their own freedom to talk.

    2. What three (3) things about the reading are unclear to you?

    The first thing that is still unclear tome about the reading is about the “Optional

    Protocol to the Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights”. I have some difficulty

    understand it. The second thing that is still unclear to me about the reading is about the

    “Statement on human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity in the UN General

    Assembly.” It is a bit confusing on what they actually pointing out or something similar like

    that. The last thing that is still unclear to me regarding the reading is about the “New
    Information and Communication Technologies” which is just still unclear and have yet to

    understand right now.

    3. What three (3) questions that you want to ask about the reading?

    The first question that I have wanted to ask about the reading is why does it matter

    having a different gender to the rest of the people? The second question that I have

    wanted to ask about the reading is if there is a small chance that the world or our world

    would have never had other genders does the world won’t have discrimination? The last

    question that I have wanted to ask about the reading is if one genders a problem, that it

    will cause some people to discriminate you. What will happen if the world change and the

    normal genders or straight turn to be the being discriminated?

    You might also like