Title: Navigating the Challenges of Crafting a Literature Review on Pubmed

Crafting a literature review is an essential task for any academic or research endeavor. It involves a
comprehensive analysis and synthesis of existing research relevant to a specific topic. One of the
primary platforms for accessing scholarly articles is Pubmed, a widely used database in the scientific
community. However, the process of writing a literature review on Pubmed can be a daunting task,
requiring a significant investment of time, effort, and expertise.

Pubmed, being a vast repository of scientific literature, presents a myriad of challenges for
researchers aiming to conduct a thorough literature review. The sheer volume of articles available on
Pubmed can be overwhelming, making it difficult for individuals to identify and select the most
pertinent and high-quality sources. Moreover, ensuring that the chosen articles align with the research
focus and contribute to the overall coherence of the literature review adds an additional layer of
complexity.

The process of extracting relevant information from the multitude of articles on Pubmed demands a
keen understanding of the research topic, as well as the ability to critically evaluate the
methodology, findings, and conclusions of each study. Researchers must also navigate through
various disciplines, methodologies, and conflicting perspectives, striving to create a unified and
cohesive narrative that reflects the current state of knowledge on the chosen subject.

Given the challenges associated with writing a literature review on Pubmed, many individuals find it
beneficial to seek professional assistance. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ emerges as a reliable platform for
those looking to alleviate the burdens of this intricate task. The platform offers a team of
experienced writers well-versed in navigating Pubmed and other academic databases. By entrusting
your literature review to the experts at ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can ensure a comprehensive and
well-structured review that meets the highest academic standards.

In conclusion, crafting a literature review on Pubmed is undoubtedly a challenging endeavor. The

complexities of sifting through a vast array of scholarly articles and synthesizing information require
a considerable investment of time and expertise. For those seeking assistance in this intricate
process, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ stands as a reliable resource, offering the expertise needed to produce
a literature review that is not only thorough but also aligned with the highest academic standards.
London: SAGE Publications; 2006. Pawson R., Greenhalgh T., Harvey G., Walshe K. Realist
review—a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Well done
and thank you. Great job. You just summarised everything in the easiest and most comprehensible
way possible. Key Differences Between Light Cream And Heavy Cream Posted in Education Search
for. Systematic reviews are most commonly used in medical and public health research, but they can
also be found in other disciplines. Sometimes, you may want to include a fifth component, the type
of study design. Cook, Kathleen E. and Elise Murowchick. “Do Literature Review Skills Transfer
from One Course to Another?” Psychology Learning and Teaching 13 (March 2014): 3-11; Fink,
Arlene. The difficulty facing a writer is to control the sensitivity they naturally have when their hard
work is criticised. Although literature reviews are often less time-consuming and can be insightful or
helpful, they have a higher risk of bias and are less transparent than systematic reviews. A systematic
review is a type of review that uses repeatable methods to find, select, and synthesize all available
evidence. Introduction Plan your search Where to search Refine and update your search Finding grey
literature Writing the review Referencing Research methods overview Finding literature on research
methodologies, sage research methods online. For example, you could use EndNote, Microsoft
Word, Excel, and SPSS. While the study focuses on one topic, the Internet’s impact on American
presidential politics, it would still be organized chronologically reflecting technological
developments in media. To this end, the authors resorted to using narrative analysis and synthesis to
describe the effectiveness of handheld computers on accessing information for clinical knowledge,
adherence to safety and clinical quality guidelines, and diagnostic decision-making. In: Chandler J,
Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. Target pain receptors with essential oils Target pain
receptors with essential oils Appeptite stimulants and suppresents.pdf Appeptite stimulants and
suppresents.pdf ANTI-HYPERTENSIVE DRUG - RAUWOLFIA ROOT. JBI Manual for Evidence
Synthesis. JBI; 2020. Available from.. Lorenzetti DL, Topfer L-A, Dennett L, Clement F. Literature
Review Sample 1 Literature Review Sample 2 Literature Review Sample 3 Have you written a
stellar literature review you care to share for teaching purposes. The impact of patient, intervention,
comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic
review. JMLA. 2018;106(4):420. Ferrari R. Writing narrative style literature reviews. A meta-analysis
is a statistical analysis, not a type of review. To conduct a systematic review, you’ll need the
following: A precise question, usually about the effectiveness of an intervention. There are no
shortcuts to doing the reading and, with a shortlist of perhaps 30 or 40 publications not unusual, this
is time-consuming. If you fall behind, revise the plan to take this into account and set more
achievable deadlines. In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to
the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research
methodology. It provides a more precise estimate of the overall effect than any individual study.
Begin reading and taking notes on each source, paying attention to key findings, methodologies
used, and any gaps in the research. Analysis: Explain what information you’ll collect from the
studies and how you’ll synthesize the data. Quality of sources: The quality of the literature reviewed
can vary widely, and not all sources may be reliable or valid. Identify extent and quality of work
already carried out in the subject area Identify key contacts Avoid duplication. Being focused is
essential for a successful review; however, this must be balanced against the relevance of the review
to a broad audience. When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about
the research ( scholarship ) in a given field.
Two people should do this step independently, and the third person will resolve any disagreements.
The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses or research
problems. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in regard to
clarity, rigor, and replication. Literature Review Sample 1 Literature Review Sample 2 Literature
Review Sample 3 Have you written a stellar literature review you care to share for teaching purposes.
What other sections you include in the body is up to you. Information systems researchers, among
others, have contributed to advancing knowledge on how to structure a “traditional” review. Thank
you so much. Thanks it was helpful Great information. Make sure the sources you use are credible,
and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research. To this
end, the authors resorted to using narrative analysis and synthesis to describe the effectiveness of
handheld computers on accessing information for clinical knowledge, adherence to safety and
clinical quality guidelines, and diagnostic decision-making. As such, reviewers may selectively
ignore or limit the attention paid to certain studies in order to make a point. Should I summarize,
synthesize, or critique sources by discussing a common theme or issue? 4. Scoping review: This is a
preliminary review that aims to map the existing literature on a broad topic area to identify research
gaps and areas for further investigation. Thematic reviews are organized around a topic or issue,
rather than the progression of time, although the progression of time may still be incorporated into a
thematic review. The purpose of this descriptive or mapping review was to characterize publication
trends in the medical informatics literature over a 20-year period (1987 to 2006). Lack of original
data: Literature reviews do not generate new data, but rather rely on the analysis of existing studies.
Nancy Clark, Director of Medical Informatics Susan Epstein, Public Services Librarian FSU College
of Medicine. Conducting research literature reviews:From the Internet to Paper (Fink, 2019).
References appearing in Results or Discussion may be more relevant to your topic. Edit and
proofread: Once you have written your literature review, edit and proofread it carefully to ensure that
it is well-organized, clear, and concise. A literature review is a big task and it’s no surprise that
things sometimes go astray or fall under the radar. Step 5: Extract the data Extracting the data means
collecting information from the selected studies in a systematic way. Theoretical Review The
purpose of this form is to examine the corpus of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue,
concept, theory, phenomena. The library was pro-active in adopting a new service model as it took
cognisance of the fact that there would be a greater emphasis on supporting academics and their
research; and ensuring that library staff were appropriately skilled to support these services into the
future (Kealy, 2009: 573). However, a scoping review isn’t a type of systematic review. Recapitulate
important features of a research study, but then synthesize it by rephrasing the study's significance
and relating it to your own work and the work of others. Free text searching is the use of natural
language words to conduct your search. It takes into account the context and complexities of real-
world situations. Review the literature Some questions to help you analyze the research: What was
the research question of the study you are reviewing. It aims to provide practical recommendations
for addressing a particular problem or issue. This is the most common form of review in the social
sciences. Systematic reviews are most commonly used in medical and public health research, but they
can also be found in other disciplines.
Meta-analysis: This is a quantitative review that uses statistical methods to combine data from
multiple studies to derive a summary effect size. What types of sources should I review (books,
journal articles, websites; scholarly versus popular sources)? 3. The methods are repeatable, and the
approach is formal and systematic: Formulate a research question. You can also review the indexes of
books to find references to specific issues that can serve as the focus of your research. Where to find
databases: use the tabs on this guide Find other databases in the Nursing Information Resources web
page More on the Medical Library web page. Experts: Contact experts in the field to ask if they have
unpublished studies that should be included in your review. These review techniques have evolved
over time and can sometimes influence each other a little bit. Often, the Thesis Statement is a
statement of a proposed theory. Overview: The Methodology Chapter The purpose of the
methodology chapter Why you need to craft this chapter (really) well How to write and structure the
chapter Methodology chapter example Essential takeaways What (exactly) is the methodology
chapter. This will let you plot out concepts related to your topic, and see quickly how the literature
fits into it. Next, Boyle and colleagues found the full texts for each of the remaining studies. Is it
manageable? Begin writing down terms that are related to your question. In this section, you should
remind your readers what the focus of your study is, especially the research aims. Find out why over
350 of the world’s leading institutions are seeing a surge in publications since using Covidence.
Interpretation of studies or articles using a qualitative approach and subjective guidelines. Therefore,
as with every other methodological choice, it’s essential to justify why you chose the research
strategy you did. A flawed research design or methodology would mean flawed results. Reviews of
healthcare interventions follow the PRISMA guidelines for the minimum set of items to report in the
methods section. This allows them to develop new research questions and hypotheses to fill those
gaps. Often, a lot of information needs to be distilled into just a few paragraphs. Let’s take a look at
two of these, experimental and ethnographic, to see how they contrast. You should be able to answer
it based only on a review of existing publications. When you write this section up, remember to
clearly justify your choices, as they form the foundation of your study. Eczema is a common skin
condition that causes red, itchy skin. But, the literature review does not just state what an article or
book states; the review assesses and evaluates it. Find Models Use the exercise of reviewing the
literature to examine how authors in your discipline or area of interest have composed their literature
review sections. Research objective (s): Rephrase your research question as an objective. The
summary effect size is a value that reflects the average magnitude of the intervention effect for a
particular outcome of interest or, more generally, the strength of a relationship between two variables
across all studies included in the systematic review. If you begin to see the same researchers cited
again and again, then this is often an indication that no new ideas have been generated to address the
research problem. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.
Types of Literature Reviews It is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of
three layers. How to get through study quality assessment Systematic Review Find out 5 tops tips to
conducting quality assessment and why it’s an important step in the systematic review process.
Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text Be assured that you'll submit flawless writing.
Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Specifically, whether you
trying to develop findings that are generalisable to a population or not. Introduction Plan your search
Where to search Refine and update your search Finding grey literature Writing the review
Referencing Research methods overview Finding literature on research methodologies, sage research
methods online. The scope of your review will depend on your topic and discipline: in the sciences
you usually only review recent literature, but in the humanities you might take a long historical
perspective (for example, to trace how a concept has changed in meaning over time). I must say the
information presented was succinct, coherent and invaluable. Developing a robust search strategy
will help reduce irrelevant results. Reviewing research methodologies Research methodology is the
specific strategies, processes, or techniques utilised in the collection of information that is created
and analysed. Don’t worry about getting the outline perfect before writing. Publications Account
settings Browse Titles NCBI Bookshelf. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for: Trends
and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over
time. In this section, it’s important to be critical of the shortcomings of your study. Are you an
instructor who has received an exemplary literature review and have permission from the student to
post. Have you written a stellar literature review you care to share for teaching purposes. Problem
formulation -- which topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues? 2.
Qualitative versus quantitative research Empirical versus theoretical scholarship Divide the research
by sociological, historical, or cultural sources Theoretical: In many humanities articles, the literature
review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. Selecting Research Methods: Literature
review helps researchers select appropriate research methods and techniques based on previous
research. Cite this Scribbr article If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation
or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation
Generator. Turney, S. (2023, November 20). To circumvent these limitations, Pawson, Greenhalgh,
Harvey, and Walshe (2005) have proposed a new approach for synthesizing knowledge that seeks to
unpack the mechanism of how “complex interventions” work in particular contexts. Step 6:
Synthesize the data Synthesizing the data means bringing together the information you collected into
a single, cohesive story. If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organise your
literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic. It assists in enabling
researchers to gain a better understanding of complex concepts, social interactions or cultural
phenomena. Most articles have to be paid for, either individually by credit card or via the
subscription fees of an institutional account holder such as an NHS trust or university library. In this
post, we’ll unpack the topic, step by step. Download references Author information Authors and
affiliations. Two people should do this step independently, and the third person will resolve any
disagreements. Only true experts could provide such helpful, fantastic, and inspiring knowledge
about Methodology. Nancy Clark, Director of Medical Informatics Susan Epstein, Public Services
Librarian FSU College of Medicine.
Discusses further research questions that logically come out of the previous studies. For this reason, it
is useful to make detailed notes before, during, and after the review is completed. Doing a Literature
Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. Even when paraphrasing an author’s
work, you still must provide a citation to that work. V. Common Mistakes to Avoid These are the
most common mistakes made in reviewing social science research literature. A methodological scope
will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are
discussed. We also unpack our free methodology chapter template so that you can see how best to
structure your chapter. Descriptive Vs. Inferential Statistics: The Main Differences. If they don’t, and
you’re clear why your view is the right one, ignore them. Given this, while literature reviews are
designed to provide an overview and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are a
number of approaches you could adopt depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your
study. To identify key concepts and theories: A literature review helps to identify key concepts and
theories that are relevant to your research question and provide a theoretical framework for your
study. This was in response to the library becoming more technologically advanced by offering
information technology services and multimedia services within the context of new undergraduate
degrees being offered at the university (Kealy, 2009: 573). It lists the citation (by author, with a
numbered reference), the client group, study design, which outcomes were measured and what the
main findings were. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts to determine inclusion
status. To this end, they provide a number of recommendations to strengthen knowledge
development towards improving the design and execution of future reviews on home telemonitoring.
9.4. Summary Table 9.1 outlines the main types of literature reviews that were described in the
previous sub-sections and summarizes the main characteristics that distinguish one review type from
another. In the video below, we explain each of these in plain language. A summary can easily be
made in this way and transformed into a well-flowing, logical literature review. Here, it can be a
good idea to use a figure to summarise the key decisions, especially if your university recommends
using a specific model (for example, Saunders’ Research Onion ). Cook, Kathleen E. and Elise
Murowchick. “Do Literature Review Skills Transfer from One Course to Another?” Psychology
Learning and Teaching 13 (March 2014): 3-11; Fink, Arlene. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of
bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. Br Med J. 2016;355 Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton
SC, et al. While outlines are not strictly required, being in the habit of completing an outline before
beginning any project also promotes good writing habits, and improves technical skill. When you
access PubMed, you will retrieve different numbers of articles because the database is constantly
being updated. Unlike a systematic review, the literature review does not use any pre-specified
protocol or plan. Detailed information about writing a literature review. As such, reviewers may
selectively ignore or limit the attention paid to certain studies in order to make a point. The
methodology chapter plays two important roles in your dissertation or thesis: Firstly, it demonstrates
your understanding of research theory, which is what earns you marks. Were the results effectively
interpreted and reported. Research methodology is the specific strategies, processes, or techniques
utilised in the collection of information that is created and analysed. As we’ve discussed many times
on the blog, your methodology needs to align with your research aims, objectives and research
questions. Request a consultation with one of our team members and start empowering your
researchers: By using our site you consent to our use of cookies to measure and improve our site’s
performance. If there’s no previous research, there’s nothing to review.
As always, a lot depends on the type of review but it will certainly contain information relating to
the following areas: Selection criteria. This is clearly a limiting factor but, due to the constraints of
time and funding, it’s often unavoidable. Keep it brief The methods section should be succinct but
include all the noteworthy information. It helps to ensure the accuracy of published research and
assesses the findings in the context of current knowledge. One of the most highly cited scoping
reviews in the eHealth domain was published by Archer, Fevrier-Thomas, Lokker, McKibbon, and
Straus (2011). Have a language expert improve your writing Run a free plagiarism check in 10
minutes, generate accurate citations for free. Every research project has its limitations, so it’s
important to acknowledge these openly and highlight your study’s value despite its limitations.
Search strategy: Discuss your plan for finding studies. Make sure the sources you use are credible,
and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research. Please
construct one methodology on the topic: The effects influencing students dropout among schools for
my thesis This helped me complete my methods section of my dissertation with ease. Naturally, this
means that this research strategy would be far less suitable if your research aims involve identifying
causation, but it would be very valuable if you’re looking to explore and examine a group culture,
for example. Given this, the purpose of a literature review is to: Place each work in the context of its
contribution to understanding the research problem being studied. In: Encyclopedia of Evidence in
Pharmaceutical Public Health and Health Services Research in Pharmacy. This section describes:
how studies were selected for inclusion in the review how study data were extracted from the study
reports how study data were combined for analysis and synthesis To describe how studies were
selected for inclusion, review teams outline the screening process. Searching for eligible studies using
multiple databases and information sources, including grey literature sources, without any language
restrictions. A set of predetermined rules provides a basis for including or excluding certain studies.
For example, in the case of narrative reviews, there is greater flexibility in searching and synthesizing
articles ( Green et al., 2006 ). Researchers are often relatively free to use a diversity of approaches to
search, identify, and select relevant scientific articles, describe their operational characteristics,
present how the individual studies fit together, and formulate conclusions. Peters MD, Godfrey CM,
Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. To synthesize information: A literature review helps to
synthesize the information from multiple sources and present a coherent and comprehensive picture
of the current state of knowledge on the topic. Recognising the need for structural changes can be
disheartening, but better to do it now than to have the journal reject your submission because a
referee criticises it. Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. If the
same authors, books or articles keep appearing in your reading, make sure to seek them out. A review
organized in this manner would shift between time periods within each section according to the
point being made. Literature Review Sample 1 Literature Review Sample 2 Literature Review
Sample 3 Have you written a stellar literature review you care to share for teaching purposes. It’s like
drawing a line in time that shows how far we’ve come and explains how we’ve got there. The more
specific you can be, the more efficient your literature search and evaluation will be. Describe what
happened While the research plan sets out what you intend to do, the methods section is a write-up
of what actually happened. Boyle and colleagues also divided the studies into subgroups, such as
studies about babies, children, and adults, and analyzed the effect sizes within each group. The
methodology section of a research paper, or thesis, enables the reader to critically evaluate the study's
validity and reliability by addressing how the data was collected or generated, and how. This means
drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a topic
over time.