When it comes to academic writing, one of the most challenging tasks is crafting a literature review.

This critical component of scholarly research involves surveying, summarizing, and synthesizing
existing literature on a particular topic. A well-executed literature review provides a comprehensive
understanding of the current state of knowledge in a field, identifies gaps in research, and sets the
stage for further investigation.

Writing a literature review requires more than just summarizing sources. It demands critical thinking,
analytical skills, and the ability to organize vast amounts of information effectively. Researchers must
carefully select relevant literature, critically evaluate the quality and credibility of sources, and
articulate connections between different studies and ideas.

Moreover, crafting a literature review involves navigating through a vast sea of academic papers,
journals, books, and other sources. It can be a time-consuming and daunting task, especially for those
who are new to academic writing or are grappling with complex subject matter.

In contrast, a systematic review follows a rigorous methodology to systematically identify, appraise,

and synthesize relevant studies on a specific research question. While literature reviews provide an
overview of existing literature, systematic reviews aim to answer specific research questions by
employing transparent and reproducible methods.

Given the complexity and time-consuming nature of writing literature reviews, many students and
researchers seek assistance to ensure the quality and effectiveness of their work. ⇒ StudyHub.vip
⇔ offers professional writing services tailored to meet the unique needs of individuals grappling
with literature review assignments.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time, alleviate stress, and
ensure that your work meets the highest standards of academic excellence. Our team of experienced
writers possesses expertise across various disciplines and can deliver meticulously crafted literature
reviews that demonstrate depth of understanding, critical analysis, and scholarly rigor.

Whether you're a student working on a thesis, a researcher preparing a grant proposal, or an

academic seeking to publish a review article, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ is your trusted partner for all your
literature review needs. Contact us today to learn more about our services and how we can help you
succeed in your academic endeavors.
An explanation for the high variability in prevalence among studies could be different in population
types. Peer Review reports Introduction JGCT is a rare and benign renal tumor that originate from
the juxtaglomerular cells of the capillary adventitia in the juxtaglomerular complex. Once a concrete
evidence base has been identified, the researcher extracts relevant data before reporting the
synthesized results in an extended piece of writing. Schunemann HJ, Higgins JP, Vist GE, Glasziou
P, Akl EA, Skoetz N, et al. Descriptive Vs. Inferential Statistics: The Main Differences. Tells the
reader what the report is about Informative, short, catchy Example - Sea level rise in Singapore:
Causes, Impact and Solution The title page must also include group name, group members and their
matriculation numbers. Systematic reviews are currently considered as one of the highest forms of
research evidence and it can be tempting to view a systematic review as providing “the definitive
answer” to a clinical question. While conducting a review of the literature, maximize the time you
devote to writing this part of your paper by thinking broadly about what you should be looking for
and evaluating. Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review
protocols The purpose of this article is to clearly describe how to develop a robust and detailed
scoping review protocol, which is the first stage of the scoping review process. Pettigrew, M. 2015.
Time to rethink the systematic review catechism. A literature review is a discussion on the already
existing material in the subject area. The most interesting literature reviews are often written as
arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t
work for all situations). The age at diagnosis of SPC ranges from 13 to 63, with median age at
diagnosis of 34 years. Hopefully, this systematic review vs literature review was able to help you
understand where they are applicable. If the studies contain data on the same topic that can be
combined, a meta-analysis can even be performed using data from only two studies. This is
problematic because the reporting of published overviews varies considerably and is often
substandard. Diagnosis should be suspected in case of secondary hypertension, particularly in young
women, if no renal vascular cause is found. December 6, 2004. Importance of Conference
Proceedings as Grey Literature. The second most frequent site was lower limbs (femur or fibula or
tibia), identified in 35 patients (33%), 23 males (65.7%) and 12 females (34.3%), in particular,
proximal femur was involved in 17 cases. Publication bias assessment was tested by Egger’s test and
funnel plot. Selection criteria: State how you’ll decide which studies to include or exclude from your
review. There are many different research methods you can use to collect data on your subject. If the
same thing is being said, just by different people, then this likely demonstrates that the research
problem has hit a conceptual dead end. Workshop Overview. Explain elements of the systematic
review process. Supports such as the KS team here at CHI are available for this very purpose. In this
article, we will look at the definition of a systematic review, and understand how it is different from
a meta-analysis. Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in
systematic reviews. Systematic reviews combine study data in a number of ways to reach an overall
understanding of the evidence. This can be done either through conducting the review via an
organization such as the Cochrane Collaboration, or Campbell Collaboration, by registering the
protocol in a dedicated database such as PROSPERO (see link above), or through publishing with a
journal. If the answer was Yes, the item got 1 point, and if the answer was No or Unclear, the item
got 0 points.
However, sometimes it can be part of your essay or thesis introduction. Device-assisted tensioning is
associated with lower rates of graft failure when compared to manual tensioning in ACL
reconstruction. This small study effect can be controlled for by using a sensitivity analysis, which is
performed to examine the contribution of each of the included studies to the final meta-analysis
result. If there are differences in the size and format of the outcome variables that cause difficulties
combining the data, such as the use of different evaluation instruments or different evaluation
timepoints, the analysis may be limited to a systematic review. The absence of nationwide studies in
our meta-analysis may limit the generalizability of our findings to the entire country. Pamela Smith
Research.pdf Research.pdf ssuser109b9e New microsoft word document (2) New microsoft word
document (2) rajarajeswari suresh Quality issues in mixed methods research (with an emphasis on
teaching) - Ala. Hereditary multiple exostoses and enchondromatosis. The square blocks represent
the point estimate of the effect for each study (larger blocks indicate that the study was given more
weight in the analysis, for example, because it had a larger sample size), and the horizontal lines the
CIs. Clinical differences between central and peripheral chondrosarcomas. Databases: EMBASE,
PsycINFO, AMED, LILACS, and ISI Web of Science Handsearch: Conference proceedings and
reference lists of articles Gray literature: The Cochrane Library, the metaRegister of Controlled
Trials, and the Ongoing Skin Trials Register Experts: Authors of unpublished registered trials,
pharmaceutical companies, and manufacturers of probiotics Step 4: Apply the selection criteria
Applying the selection criteria is a three-person job. By defining your way towards the approach to
meta-analysis prior, one can minimize the occurrence of bias introduction. If the outcome variable is
a dichotomous variable, it can be presented as the number needed to treat (NNT), which is the
minimum number of patients who need to be treated in the intervention group, compared to the
control group, for a given event to occur in at least one patient. Bibliographic, word-processing,
spreadsheet, and statistical software. Standards: Description of the way in which you present your
information. Typical effect sizes in systematic reviews are the odds ratio, the risk ratio, the weighted
mean difference and the standardized mean difference. Systematic review is a type of literature
review that uses systematic methods to collect secondary data, critically appraise research studies,
and synthesise findings. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(6). Zhang SX, Dang RB, Zhang WD, Liang XF,
Cui FQ. If you’re doing a systematic review on your own (e.g., for a research paper or thesis ), you
should take appropriate measures to ensure the validity and reliability of your research. You should
apply the selection criteria in two phases: Based on the titles and abstracts: Decide whether each
article potentially meets the selection criteria based on the information provided in the abstracts.
Asking the right question: specifying your study question. The statistical result for the intervention
effect, which is generally considered the most important result in meta-analyses, is the z-test P value.
Thematic: If you have found some recurring central themes that you will continue working with
throughout your piece, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different
aspects of the topic. Sometimes you may need to quote certain terminology that was coined by the
author, is not common knowledge, or taken directly from the study. Further researchers can focus on
reducing vaccination for hard-to-reach populations through improving medical service coverage and
reducing health inequalities. Literature reviews, on the other hand, do not follow such rigid or
explicit methods. The diamond shape indicates the pooled estimate and uncertainty for the combined
effect. Writing Your Literature Review Once you've settled on how to organize your literature
review, you're ready to write each section. Some systematic reviews include a meta-analysis, which
is quantitative technique for combining the results of multiple studies to estimate a pooled effect size
that takes variations in study size and quality into consideration. LibGuides: Systematic Reviews:
Types of Systematic Reviews Meta-analysis is a statistical method that can be applied during a
systematic review to extract and combine the results from multiple studies. Ganeshkumar Healthcare
decisions for individual patients and for public health policies should be informed by the best
available research evidence.
Clear margin meant that the tumor had a clear demarcation with the surrounding tissues. The
systematic review process is accelerated by streamlining specific methods and approaches to rapidly
produce evidence in a resource-efficient way. Have a language expert improve your writing Run a
free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free. Were the groups similar at
baseline in terms of prognostic factors. A protocol will be required to set out the types of research
studies to be included in the review, and anything that does not meet these criteria will be excluded,
based on the prespecified research question and a sound rationale. First, there are the primary studies
that researchers conduct and publish. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
to identify new studies published since 2018 and to describe trends in HBV prevalence in China. The
most feared complication is the secondary peripheral chondrosarcoma, a malignant cartilaginous
neoplasm that arises from the chondroid cap of pre-existent osteochondromas. Device-assisted
tensioning is associated with lower rates of graft failure when compared to manual tensioning in
ACL reconstruction. There are several types of effect size and the most suitable type is chosen by the
review team based on the type of outcomes and interventions under investigation. The Institutional
Review Board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital has reviewed the protocol of this
manuscript and determined that this study is a retrospective study and the need for informed consent
is waived. Here again, if the same authors are being cited again and again, this may indicate no new
literature has been written on the topic. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a paper.
The protocol of this systematic review was registered in the International prospective register of
systematic reviews (PROSPERO), National Institute for Health research (Number:
CRD42023396671). Protocols and registration In systematic reviews, prior registration of a detailed
research plan is very important. The best estimate of treatment effect can be derived from the
weighted summary statistics of all studies which will be based on weighting to sample size, standard
errors, and other summary statistics. Eczema is a common skin condition that causes red, itchy skin.
Evaluating the independent influence of sexual transmission on HBV infection in China: a modeling
study. If an article isn’t available online or through your library, you may need to contact the authors
to ask for a copy. It is a good practice to publish systematic review protocols to enhance the
transparency of the process and avoid duplication. Keywords: COVID-19; early treatment;
hospitalization; monoclonal antibodies; mortality. In addition, almost 60 cases underwent surgical
treatment before 1990’s, so clinical, imaging and follow-data were collected with different criteria,
nevertheless all available pathological samples have been revised by expert pathologists. Types of
Literature Reviews Meta-analysis: Technique that statistically combines the results of quantitative
studies to provide a more precise effect of the results: Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive
searching.. Refers to any combination of methods where one significant component is a literature
review (usually systematic). When this happens, you'll need to search the primary or unfiltered
literature. Filtered Resources Filtered resources appraise the quality of studies and often make
recommendations for practice. Your professor will probably not expect you to read everything that's
available about the topic, but you'll make the act of reviewing easier if you first limit scope of the
research problem. This is the median control group risk across 8 trials of 3,663 women. Systematic
reviews and meta-analyses usually proceed according to the flowchart presented in Fig. 2. We
explain each of the stages below. A further consideration is the type of studies on which the results
have been based. A systematic review is a piece of work that asks a research question and then
answers it by summarising the evidence that meets a set of pre-specified criteria.