Theoretical Literature Review Definition

A theoretical literature review is a critical assessment and synthesis of existing literature that explores
and examines theories, concepts, and frameworks relevant to a particular topic or research area. It
involves identifying, analyzing, and evaluating scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive
understanding of the theoretical foundations underlying a research problem or question.

Writing a theoretical literature review can be a daunting task, requiring meticulous attention to detail,
thorough research, and analytical skills. It demands the ability to sift through vast amounts of
literature, identify key themes, concepts, and debates, and synthesize diverse perspectives into a
coherent narrative.

One of the major challenges in writing a theoretical literature review is navigating the complex
landscape of scholarly literature. It requires expertise in academic research methods and familiarity
with various theoretical frameworks and methodologies. Additionally, synthesizing disparate sources
and integrating them into a cohesive argument requires careful planning and organization.

Moreover, ensuring the relevance and currency of the literature reviewed is essential to maintaining
the rigor and validity of the theoretical framework. This involves staying up-to-date with the latest
research developments, critically evaluating the quality and credibility of sources, and identifying
gaps or contradictions in the existing literature.

Given the complexity and challenges involved, many researchers and students opt to seek assistance
with writing their theoretical literature reviews. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers professional writing
services tailored to the specific needs of researchers and scholars. Our team of experienced writers
specializes in crafting high-quality literature reviews that adhere to the highest standards of academic
excellence.

By ordering from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time and effort while ensuring that your
theoretical literature review meets the rigorous requirements of scholarly research. Our writers are
adept at synthesizing complex ideas, conducting thorough literature searches, and presenting
findings in a clear and concise manner.

Don't let the daunting task of writing a theoretical literature review overwhelm you. Trust ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ to deliver exceptional results that will enhance the quality and impact of your
research. Place your order today and experience the difference our professional writing services can
make.
The basic research question — what works? — which is usually associated with systematic reviews
changes to: what is it about this intervention that works, for whom, in what circumstances, in what
respects and why. Create an organizational method to focus this section even further. Instead, go
over the key findings discussed in the chapter, and end the summary by reiterating the research gap
and the purpose of your study, and with a brief transition to next chapter. This will give you a better
understanding of the author's argument and what to focus on in your own review. 2. Literature
review as a research methodology: An. This standard format will help you finish the literature review
for any research paper, regardless of its type. Read more. Systematic reviews that involve the
rigorous application of scientific strategies aimed at limiting subjectivity and bias (i.e., systematic
and random errors) can respond to this challenge. Most, if not all, peer-reviewed journals in the fields
of medical informatics publish review articles of some type. However, if you choose this strategy, be
careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order. Analyze its literature review, the
samples and variables used, the results, and the conclusions. Points out Errors: It points out glaring
errors and overlooked questions in your research. The format of a literature review varies and
depends upon the length of the research. Several search terms relating to phr s were used during this
process. After the introduction, it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to
your theoretical framework or methodology. You’ve already developed this, obviously, in the course
of identifying your topic and key foundational elements. Within those one to three paragraphs, it is
important to briefly answer the following questions: What is the central research problem. For more
information, please see our handout on plagiarism. Web CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 21
Introduction This chapter presents some background information of the available literature related to
the development of accident rates accident models and accident statistic databases. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. In other words, a chronological review would have
subsections for each vital time period; a thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors
that relate to the theme or issue. You can also review the indexes of books to find references to
specific issues that can serve as the focus of your research. Describe the major issues or problems to
be addressed by your research. It is often the largest piece of writing master’s or doctoral candidates
have completed at this stage of their academic careers, and it can seem overwhelming at first glance.
For example, weave references to other sources into what you are writing but maintain your own
voice by starting and ending the paragraph with your own ideas and wording. A review organized in
this manner would shift between time periods within each section according to the point made. Take
notes and cite your sources As you read, you should also begin the writing process. In this blog post,
we’ll give you a basic overview of how to write a literature review, from brainstorming to editing.
Make clear points of inference and explain the relationships between the studied literature. A
literature review in this sense is just like any other academic research paper. As a researcher, you
should use it to set the context, build your argument, and establish the need for your study. As the
aim of this summary is to recap key findings in your chapter as they underscore the aims of your
own study, you’ll definitely want to avoid introducing new research findings in the summary.
Don't forget nearly these five C'due south to make things easier in writing a literature review: Cite.
Sometimes you may need to quote certain terminology that was coined by the author, is not common
knowledge, or taken directly from the study. The above highlighted reforms in Baltimore City and
Newark Public Schools align with EFA 5 Pillars of Practice. Yet nationally, the teaching force is
predominantly white (around 80% according to recent statistics), and New England reflects this
national trend. The goals and objectives of the research question determine what goes inside these
three sections. The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources you need
to read in order to get a good survey of the material. As mentioned previously, there are a number of
existing guidelines for literature reviews. We highly recommend that prospective authors of narrative
reviews consult these useful sources before embarking on their work. The middle or main body
should: organise the literature according to common themes; provide insight into the relation
between your chosen topic and the wider subject area e.g. between obesity in children and obesity in
general; move from a general, wider view of the literature being reviewed to the specific focus of
your research. This approach helps highlight ethical issues which you should be aware of and
consider as you go through your own study. According tothe Framework, districts should create a
theory of change that articulates a belief about how to improve the instructional core. Federal
government websites often end in.gov or.mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re
on a federal government site. To cite a literature review in APA style, you need to provide the
author's name, the title of the article, and the year of publication. Sort through other current
bibliographies or literature reviews in the field to get a sense of what your discipline expects.
Integrative literature review drives scientific novelty. You might argue for the relevance of a specific
theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your
research. What sorts of research methodologies have been used and how could these help me
develop my own methodology. It’s important to keep track of your sources with references to avoid
plagiarism. If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you
will search for literature related to your research objectives and questions. Ensure you understand the
research topic inside out, or else seek clarifications. What is the difference between a Systematic
Review and a Literature Review. For example, if you are writing for academics or researchers who
are familiar with the existing body of work on your topic, you may only need to provide a traditional
literature review that sums up what has been previously published. Zero-tolerance policies
disproportionately criminalize historically marginalized students based on the belief that severe
disciplinary consequences are required to correct student behavior, regardless of the individual
circumstances, (Kirkland et. al, 2019). For example, Black students comprised roughly 16% of the
student body in K-12 public schools nationwide, but accounted for 32% of in-school suspensions,
42% of multi-day out-of-school suspensions, and 34% of school expulsions (OCR, 2014). Are the
findings across the studies similar or is there a lot of variation. It is also important to recognize that
EFA, like many urban district reforms, is situated within a broader district context, and thus
implementation will be influenced by this context. Writing a literature review can be a daunting task,
but with a little guidance, it doesn’t have to be. Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as
assignments in a class or as publications. Before sharing your materials with us, we will send you our
Non-Disclosure Agreement, which guarantees that your work materials, and even your identity as a
client, will never be shared with a third party. Usually you will need to synthesize research rather
than just summarizing it. Here are some examples: Chronological: The simplest approach is to trace
the development of the topic over time, which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for
instance if you are introducing something that is not commonly known in your field).
The goal is to deliberately document, critically evaluate, and summarize scientifically all of the
research about a clearly defined research problem. It should also include: The research topic and your
motivation behind selecting it A one-sentence thesis statement An explanation of the kinds of
literature featured in the review Summary of what you've learned Conclusions you drew from the
literature you reviewed Potential implications and future scope for research Here's an example of the
abstract of a literature review Is a literature review written in the past tense. The researcher will
conduct a literature review to identify other research that relates to the research question. Hart, Chris.
Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. The literature review
usually comes near the beginning of your dissertation. The purpose is to develop a body of literature
that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. Should I summarize, synthesize, or critique sources by
discussing a common theme or issue? 4. Similarly, economically disadvantaged students have
benefited from school reform efforts focused on being culturally responsive and sustaining to their
ways of being, such as their norms and values, learning styles, and backgrounds (Ladson-Billings,
2009, 2010). The chief pace here is stating a focused inquiry question. The analytical features of a
literature review might: Give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old
interpretations, Trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates, Depending on
the situation, evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant research, or
Usually in the conclusion of a literature review, identify where gaps exist in how a problem has been
researched to date. Historical literature reviews focus on examining research throughout a period of
time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the
literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. Zero in on the research that
relates to your project. For instance, Levy and Ellis (2006) proposed a generic framework for
conducting such reviews. Most lit reviews use a basic introduction-body-conclusion structure; if
your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction and conclusion pieces may be just a few
sentences while you focus most of your attention on the body. This variation in interpretation can, of
course, wreak havoc on how your study is understood. Often, the literature review is where you can
establish your research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. Selection
Methods: Criteria you used to select (and perhaps exclude) sources in your literature review. Many
student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the
scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you: It often helps to remember that the point
of these kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you understand your research, to help them
read the rest of your paper. The Literature Review Definition A literature review surveys prior
research published in books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue,
area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation
of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated. This is understandable for it
determines how the project must move forward. You can use our free APA Reference Generator for
quick, correct, consistent citations. Irrelevant References: Including references that are no longer
relevant and outdated. It is our hope that our descriptive account will serve as a valuable source for
those conducting, evaluating or using reviews in this important and growing domain. Critically
evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources. You can use it to discuss various
theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. Bryk and colleagues (2010) found that schools
strong on at least three of the five essentials were 10 times more likely to show substantial gains in
student learning over time than schools weak on three or more of the five essentials. Then, as it’s not
specific to higher education, you would find appropriate research to situate this theory to this
specific group of employees. Writing itself is less important than an in-depth assay of electric current
literature. However, a general introduction of the context and, toward the end, a recapitulation of the
main points covered and take-home messages make sense also in the case of reviews. Scoping
Review The Scoping Review is often used at the beginning of an article, dissertation, or research
proposal.