ZN Am 20 92 Lushnikov

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Scientific Journals Zeszyty Naukowe

Maritime University of Szczecin Akademia Morska w Szczecinie

2010, 20(92) pp. 75–81 2010, 20(92) s. 75–81

The method of high accuracy at dynamically tuned gyroscope

Metoda wysokiej dokładności w żyroskopach z regulacją


dynamiczną

Evgeniy M. Lushnikov
Maritime University of Szczecin, Faculty of Navigation, Institut of Marine Navigation
Akademia Morska w Szczecinie, Wydział Nawigacyjny, Instytut Nawigacji Morskiej
70-500 Szczecin, ul. Wały Chrobrego 1–2

Key words: accuracy, gyroscope‟s parameters, characteristics of the resonance


Abstract
The method of high accuracy for dynamically tuned gyroscope is presented. The mathematical description
and calculation of the gyroscope‟s parameters which have coefficient of integrating 6.9 are described.
The characteristics of the resonance depending of generalized parameter and influence of balance variation
on accuracy were analyzed. The result of experiment is according to theory at condition of experiment
in vacuum chamber.
Słowa kluczowe: dokładność, parametry żyroskopu, charakterystyka rezonansu
Abstrakt
W artykule zaprezentowano metodę osiągania wysokiej dokładności w żyroskopach z regulacją dynamiczną.
Podano opis matematyczny i obliczono parametry żyroskopu o zwiększonej dokładności do 6,9 raza. Prze-
analizawano charakterystyki rezonansu w zależności od przyjętego parametru i wpływ wariacji balansu na
dokładność. Wyniki badań eksperymentalnych w komorze próżniowej są zgodne z teoretycznymi.

Introduction Torsionally flexible


coupling
The modern space navigating devices have a big
overloads on start of rocket (tens g). The require-
ment of accuracy to gyroscopes of these systems is
exclusively high. Classical heavy gyroscopes in
these conditions have exhausted the opportunities.
The most effective type of gyroscope in these
conditions is a dynamically tuned gyroscope. The
first gyroscopes of such type have appeared in
Rotor Gimbal
Massachusetts Institute of Technology of USA.
This is often called a Hook‟s joint or a Cardan
joint and allows torsion flexibility. At the other end
of the drive shaft is a synchronous motor. Spin motor shaft
(aligned with case)
These gyroscopes are used widely in marine
Fig. 1. Dynamically tuned gyroskope rotor and drive shaft
gyrocompasses, systems of inertial navigation, in assembly [1]
rocket and space complexes. The conceptual sche- Rys. 1. Rotor i wał napędowy żyroskopu z regulacją dyna-
me [1] of such gyroscope is presented at figure 1. miczną [1]

Zeszyty Naukowe 20(92) 75


Evgeniy M. Lushnikov

The rotor is connected to the drive shaft by elements 10 and 13. The power is transferred by
a pair of flexure hinges to an inner gimbals ring. stator 3 and rotor 5.
This inner gimbals‟ ring is also connected to the The system is supplied high stability of rotor‟s
drive shaft by a pair of flexure hinges, the two axes revolving (0.1%). The angle‟s sensor 14 uses a dif-
of freedom being orthogonal. This is an inertial ferential method of measuring. His sensibility is
type of gimbals and is far more compact than the any angles second.
external gimbals. At the other end of the drive shaft The gyroscope of gyrocompass “Yacht” has
is a synchronous motor. diameter 54 mm, length 46 mm and weight 350 gr.
Rotation of the gimbals causes a reaction at the The angle speed of gyroscope is 1.256·103 s–1.
rotor that is equivalent to negative torsion spring The middle time of reliability is 30 000 hours,
stiffness. This effect occurs when the angular mo- speed of keeping up system 200/s.
mentum of the shaft does not coincide with that of The gyrocompasses of such class are Russian
the rotor, the angular momentum of the gimbals gyrocompasses “Giujs”, “Yacht”, “GKU-5”,
jumping between that of the shaft and the rotor, at Russian – South-Koreas gyrocompass “Gyking”,
twice the speed of the rotor. Thus careful selection a gyrocompass “SKR-82” of Norwegian firm
of the torsion stiffness of the gimbals components “Robertson”, a gyrocompass “Meridian” of British–
and rotation speed of the rotor, allows the rotor Russian manufacture.
suspension to have a net zero spring stiffness at All these gyrocompasses have high reliability
a particular rotor speed, known as the tuned speed (30 000–50 000 hours of non-failure operation).
[1]. Under these conditions, the rotor is decoupled It is on the order above, than classical gyrocom-
from tie motion of the rest of the sensor and hence passes such as “Curs”, “Standard” etc. The maxi-
is „free‟. In practice, this condition is usually ad- mal input rate of system (75 † 200/s) [3].
justed or trimmed by the use of screws set into the Modern gyroscopes of space systems have high-
inner gimbals ring that allow minor change in the er requirements on accuracy and as on overloads
mass properties of the gimbals. during start of rockets; therefore the problem
These gyroscopes are characterized by very sta- of perfection of gyroscopes is constantly actual.
ble position of the centre of gravity, high reliability The classical heavy gyroscope has a factor of
in conditions of the big overloads. transmission of entrance influence equal to one
The last modern gyroscope of such type has unit. It means that a deviation of the main axis
a three mass and full symmetry of elastic suspen- of a gyroscope from the basis axis is equal to angle
sion. The same gyroscope is applied today in gyro- of turn of platform in inertial space. Floating single
compasses [2] with electromagnetic steering. degree of freedom rate integrating gyroscope has
The suspension of DTG provides stability of allowed carrying out the factor of transmission in
gravity center, excludes dry friction and high relia- some unit. It was a big success. The same gyros-
bility of construction. cope in laboratory after Charles Draper had taken
accuracy 0.01/hour [4].
The accuracy of 10–4 /hour [4] is already
achieved today in contemporary gyroscopes.
The further progress in this part goes with the big
problem and by the big expenses. The main
obstacles of further increase of accuracy in these
gyroscopes were dry friction at axes of suspension
and instability of gravity centre of gyroscope.
All these problems are not peculiar for dynami-
cally tuned gyroscope (DTG) with elastic types
of suspension. Contemporary type of DTG has
a factor of transmission one unit. The possibility
of factor transmission increase in DTG is reserve
of increase accuracy.
Fig. 2. Construction of dynamical tuned gyroscope (DTG)
Rys. 2. Konstrukcja żyroskopu z regulacją dynamiczną (ŻRD)
The method of increase of transmission
At figure 2 it is presented [2] the scheme of factor for DTG
DTG of gyrocompass [3] “Yacht”. The shaft 1 is
situated at bearing 4 and 15. The rotor 8 is fixed at It is known that in two-mass oscillatory systems
the shaft by means of inner gimbals 10 and elastic can be carry out a mode of dynamic clearing of

76 Scientific Journals 20(92)


The method of high accuracy at dynamically tuned gyroscope

oscillations by a choice of parameters. It is lawful where:


to raise the question return property, namely about A1, B1, C1 – axial and the equatorial moments
realization of effect of dynamic amplification of of inertia of an internal rotor at axis XYZ;
oscillations by two rotors DTG. Realization of such A2, B2, C2 – axial and the equatorial moments
task will allow lowering a threshold of sensitivity of inertia of an external rotor at axis XYZ;
of a gyroscope and by that to lift his accuracy. Ω – angular frequency of rotation of gyro-
The dynamic model of DTG with two tutors and scope‟s rotor;
coaxial elastic element is submitted in figure 3.
The gyroscope settles down on a shaft 1. The inter-
c11 – the module of elasticity moment of the
first torsion (from side of shaft);
nal rotor 3 is fastened on a shaft by flexure hinge
element 2. The external rotor 5 is fastened on an c22 – the module of elasticity moment of the
internal rotor 3 by coaxial flexure hinge element 4. second torsion (from side of shaft);
k1 – the module of the moment of internal
Z friction in the first torsion (from side of
X shaft);
k2 – the module of the moment of internal
friction in the second torsion (from side of
1
shaft);
k'1 – the module of the moment of external
3 friction in the first torsion;
2 Y
Y k'2 – the module of the moment of external
friction in the second torsin;
2 ωy, ωz – portable angular speeds of the basis
4
4 foundation;
M1, M2 – masses of the first and second rotors
accordingly;
X 5 dx1, dz1 – unbalance of the first rotor on
Z corresponding axes;
dx2, dz2 – unbalance of the second rotor on
Fig. 3. Generalized dynamic model of two rotors DTG with corresponding axes;
coaxial flexure hinge element
Rys. 3. Generalizowany model dynamiczny żyroskopu ze jx, jy, jz – acceleration of the basis platform
współosiowymi sprężystymi elementami along axes X0, Y0, Z0;
θ1, θ2 – the angles coordinates of first and
Such model of the gyroscope has oscillation‟s
second rotors.
signal in output.
The differential equations of the gyroscope in For the aim of simplicity a solving of equations
rotating system of coordinates, received on the (1) was find at assumptions k1 = k'1 = k2 = k'2 = 0
basis of La Grangeau equations have a kind: (system without friction) and at zero entry
conditions:
B11   A1  C1   21  c111  c22 1   2  
1 1 1 2 
 k  k     k     M d j  
1 2  1 x1 x 1
1 t  
1  2q1R sin t


 M 1d z1 j y sin t  j z cos t 1    
2 
2 B1B2 q1 q2  q1  q12   2
2


   A1  B1  C1   y sin t   z cos t   2q1S cos t 2q1S cos q1t 2R sin q1t 
 M 1d z1 j x  M 1d x1 j y sin t  j z cos t 

q12   2
 2
q1   2
 2
q1   2 

(1)
B22   A2  C 2   2 2  c22 1   2   (2)
1  2q2 R sin t
2 2 2 
 k   k     M d j  
1 2  2 x2 x 2

 2 

2 B1B2 q2 q2  q1  q22   2
2


 M 2 d z 2 j y sin t  j z cos t  2  

  A2  B2  C 2   y sin t   z cos t   
2q2 S cos t 2q2 S cos q2t 2R sin q2t 
  

 M 2 d z 2 j x  M 2 d x2 j y sin t  j z cos t 
q22   2 q22   2 q22   2 

Zeszyty Naukowe 20(92) 77


Evgeniy M. Lushnikov

1  2q1Q 1  2q1R
 2 t   sin t  1 t   sin t 

2  2
2 B1B2 q1 q2  q1  q1   2
2
 
2  2

2 B1B2 q1   q1  q1   2
2

2q T cos t 2q1T cos q1t 2Q sin q1t  2q1S 2q S 2R 


 12  2  2   cos t  2 1 2 cos q1t  2 sin q1t  
q1   2 q1   2 q1   2  q12 2
q1   q1   2

(2)
1  2q2Q sin t S t R t
 sin t  cos t


2 
2 B1B2 q2 q2  q1  q22   2
2
  2

2 B1B2 q1   2

2 B1B2 q12   2  
1  2q1Q
2q T cos t 2q2T cos q2t 2Q sin q2t   2 t   sin t 
 22
q2   2

q22   2
 
q22   2  
2  2

2 B1B2 q1   q1  q1   2
2

2q1T 2q T 2Q 
where:  cos t  2 1 2 cos q1t  2 sin q1t  
  q12 2 2
R  f1 b2  B2 2  f 2c22  q1   q1   

S   d1 b2  B2 2  d 2c22  
T t
sin t 
Q t
cos t

Q  f 2 b1  B1 2  f1c22 
2

2 B1B2 q1   2

2 B1B2 q12   2  
(4)

T   d 2 b1  B1 2  d1c22 
The most interesting resonant component of the
b1   A1  C1    c11  c22
2
equations solving (4) has the kind:
b2   A2  C2   2  c22
d1   A1  B1  C1   z  M 1 j z d x1 1 
1
  f 2  f1 cos t 
d 2   A2  B2  C 2   z  M 2 j z d x 2 
2 B1  B2 2 
f1   A1  B1  C1   y  M 1 j y d x1  d 2  d1 sin t  t
(5)
f 2   A2  B2  C 2   y  M 2 j y d x 2 
2 

2 B1  B2 2  f   f cost 
2 1

 d 2  d1 sin t  t
2
c0  c  f
q1, 2     0   0
2a0  2a0  a0
In expressions (5) designations are entered:
a0  B1 B2
c0  B1b2 1
  m  1  n   m  1  n 2  4mn
f0  2
b1b2  c22 2  
c
From solving of equations (2) it is visible, that m  11 (6)
c22
the gyroscope represents oscillatory system of the
fourth order. It is characterized by two own 1
n
frequencies q1 and q2. The condition of dynamical 2
tuned q1 = Ω or q2 = Ω allow reaching [3] effect of
resonance: The expression (5) in view of the accepted
designations and the condition of the resonance (3)
 с с с 
 2   11  22  22   can be transformed to the kind:
 21 21 2 2 
2
(3)
1 
 A1  B1  C1    A2  B2  C2   
 с с с  с с
  11  22  22   11 22 B 
  2  1  B2 
 21 21 2 2  1 2
 
where:
1   A1  B1  C1 

  y t  cos t   z t  sin t 
 2   A2  B2  C2  2 
 A1  B1  C1    A2  B2  C2   
B 
2  1  B2 
At condition of resonance (q2 = Ω) the equation  
(2) is indefinite. The definition of this equation can
be exequted by the roole of Lopital:

  y t  cos t   z t  sin t 
78 Scientific Journals 20(92)
The method of high accuracy at dynamically tuned gyroscope

From these expressions it is visible, that the Calculations have shown, that the factor of
factors of transmission η for coordinates θ1 and θ2 integration at such gyroscope makes 6.9. It means
are described by expression: that his accuracy is higher of a usual gyroscope
practically in seven times.
1 
1

 A1  B1  C1    A2  B2  C2  
 B  Z
X
2  1  B2  1
  3
(7)
2 
 A1  B1  C1    A2  B2  C2  
2
B  2 5
2  1  B2 
  4 4

From formulas (7) it is visible, that factors of Y Y


transmission of the first and second rotors differ in
ζ time. From expression (6) it is visible, that the
size of ζ is characterized by two values. This fact
view, that increases of transmission factor can be
reached in a various ways. Factor ζ (m,n) is
a function of parameters m and n. The parameter n X 1
is determined by dependence: Z
k Fig. 4. The scheme of DTG of high sensitiveness

A1  B1  C1
m
i 1
2
i1 xi1 Rys. 4. Schemat ŻRD o wysokiej czujności
n  (8)
A2  B2  C 2 m Experimental check of such gyroscope in
j 1
m j 2 x 2j 2 conditions of a pressure chamber at pressure 80 hp
has allowed to receive factor of integration 5.4. It is
where: established, that in process of pumping out of air
mi1, mj2 – the masses of points of the first and from the chamber the factor of transmission grows
second rotors accordingly; to settlement value. In figure 5 dependence of
xi1, xj2 – a coordinates of points along axis XX factor of trasmission η on the generalized parameter
of the first and second rotors ζ is shown.
accordingly.
2
From expression (8) it is visible, that change of
thickness of a rotor in view of an increment of
masses results in increase of number n under the
cubic law. The opportunity of essential change of
value m a choice of rigidity is obvious. As the
parameter ζ is function of easily varied parameters
m and n also it will be easily varied.

It is the most expedient to make it by varying
of masses characteristics of rotors at set elastic
elements or varying flexibility of torsions at the set
rotors. It is necessary to remember, that all this
satisfies must be exequted at condition of a reso-
nance (2). At the foundation of theoretical analysis
Fig. 5. Dependence of transmission factor η on the generalized
it was designed a gyroscope having parameters: parameter ζ
Rys. 5. Zależność współczynnika η od przyjętego parametru ζ
A1  1,0  104 g  cm 2 A2  1,715 101 g  cm 2
B1  5,21 103 g  cm 2 В2  1,882  101 g  cm 2 The schedule 3 is designed at the constant
moments of inertia A1, B1, C1, A2, B2, C2. Change of
С1  5,21 103 g  cm 2 С2  6,1 g  cm 2 the factor ζ, determined in value m and n, within the
с11  528 n  cm с22  11 n  cm limits of technological admissions changes very
little. The requirement of a maximum of transmis-
The scheme of such gyroscope is presented sion factor is carried out easily enough from this
at the figure 4. Numbers are so as at figure 3. reason.

Zeszyty Naukowe 20(92) 79


Evgeniy M. Lushnikov

Dependance of resonance curve from condition of resonance) is invariant parameter


parameters of gyroscope regarding resonant characteristics.
The magnitude characteristic in dependance of
Influence of static unbalance on accuracy
rotations of the gyroscope are presented in figure 6.
of DTG
2 If the angular speeds ωy and ωz are equal to zero,
from expressions (1) we shall receive target reac-
tion of the gyroscope to acceleration as:
1 M 2 d x 2  M 1d x1
(s–1) 1 

 
j y cos t  j z sin t  t 
 B1 
2   B2 
 
(9)
M 2 d x 2  M 1d x1
2  
j y cos t  j z sin t  t 
 B1 
2   B2 
(s–1)  
From expressions (9) it is visible, that the sensi-
tivity of the device to influence of unbalance also
grows. However by virtue of solidity of design
DTG this circumstance does not conduct to nega-
tive consequences. To reduction the influence of
unbalance conducts as a trivial measure – increase
(s–1) of revolving a gyroscope Ω.

Fig. 6. Resonanse curve at diferent parameter of DTG Limiting sensitivity of the gyroscope
Rys. 6. Krzywe resonansu przy różnych parametrach ŻRD
Limiting sensitivity of the gyroscope is deter-
It can see from resonant characteristics, that mined by the minimal amplitude of oscillations on
a primary factor determining width of the resonant frequency  which are felt by servo system of the
zone is a geometry of rotors. gyroscope. The amplitude of the compelled
Parameters of DTG for variants a, b, c (Fig. 6) is oscillations for a case of resonant adjustment is
presented in table 1. found by the account of friction as:
Table 1. The table of comparison DTG
Tabela 1. Tabela porównawcza wariantów DTG 1 
 A1  B1  C1    A2  B2  C2   
k1  k1  k 2   k2  k2   2 ( y,z)

Ω Rotors parameter c11, c22 (10)


Variant
[s–1] [gcm2] [ncm]
2 
 A1  B1  C1    A2  B2  C2  
( y , z )
Ω1 = 325
A1 = 1·104, A2 = 17,5
c11 = 530 k1  k1  k 2   k 2  k 2   2
A B1 = 5,21·103, B2 = 19,2
Ω2 = 384 c22 = 10,5
C1 = 5,21·103, C2 = 6,22 DTG in an integrating mode works with servo
A1 = 1·104, A2 = 17,5 system. The servo system always has the angle of
Ω1 = 670 c11 = 2120
B B1 = 5,21·103, B2 = 19,2
Ω2 = 768
C1 = 5,21·103, C2 = 6,22
c22 = 42 tolerance determined by an angle s. The gyroscope
A1 = 1·104, A2 = 18 will be tolerant to angular speed of a platform at
Ω1 = 670 c11 = 530
C B1 = 5,05·103, B2 = 18 amplitude of the compelled oscillations less than s.
Ω2 = 768 c22 = 10,5
C1 = 5,21·103, C2 = 2 The angular speed of drift from this reason can be
find from condition  2 = s. It value is characteri-
Calculations and experimental data had shown,
zed by expression:
that a variation geometry of rotors is more
effectively, than a variation of torsion‟s elastic. In
k2  k2    k1  k1  k2  1
these cases it is possible to receive wider resonant 
dr   c (11)
zone that enables to lower requirements to accuracy  A2  B2  C2     A1  B1  C1 
of stabilization of revolutions of a gyroscope.
Thin rotors are according to widely the resonant From this expression it is visible, that the role
zone and it is better quality of the gyroscope. The of internal friction of the second torsions grows,
flexibility of torsions (at performance of the and the first torsions weakens. The drift of the

80 Scientific Journals 20(92)


The method of high accuracy at dynamically tuned gyroscope

gyroskope is proportional to an angle of insensitivi- For space conditions it does not represent the big
ty s of servo system. For reduction of drift the complexities.
sensitivity of servo system should be maximal, and The requirements regarding stabilization of re-
torsions must be produced from high quality steel. volving of the gyroscope do not fall outside the
limits requirements at usual classical gyroscopes.
Conclusion
References
The method of increase of integration factor for
DTG offered and checked up experimentally is 1. TITTERTON D., WESTON J.: Strapdown Inertial Navigation
Technology. 2-nd Edition. The Institution of Electronical
effective and allows increasing accuracy of the Engineers, Reston USA 2004.
device on the order. 2. LUSHNIKOV E.M.: Safety of navigation. BGA, Kaliningrad
Solidity of a design and as consequence high 2007.
stability of mass centre provides reliability and high 3. SMIRNOV E.L. et al.: Sea navigating technics. Elmor, Sankt
Petersburg 2002.
accuracy of the gyroscope. 4. DZHASHITOV V.E., PANKRATOV V.M.: Gauges, devices and
For reduction requirements to servo system it is systems of aerospace and sea instrument making. Electro-
necessary to produce a vacuum. for the gyroscope pribor, Sankt Petersburg 2005.

Zeszyty Naukowe 20(92) 81

You might also like