Group 1 was assigned the case of Renato V. Peralta v. Philippine Postal Corporation regarding a petition filed against Philpost.
Group 2 will report on Atty. Romeo M. Esmero v. President Rodrigo Roa Duterte, a case filed by a petitioner against the President.
Group 3's case is National Power Corporation v. Philippine Electric Plant Owners Association, a case involving the petitioner National Power Corporation and respondent Philippine Electric Plant Owners Association.
Group 4 was given the case of Union School International v. Charley Jane Dagdag involving a petition filed by Union School International against Charley Jane Dagdag.
Group 5 will report on the 1993 case
Group 1 was assigned the case of Renato V. Peralta v. Philippine Postal Corporation regarding a petition filed against Philpost.
Group 2 will report on Atty. Romeo M. Esmero v. President Rodrigo Roa Duterte, a case filed by a petitioner against the President.
Group 3's case is National Power Corporation v. Philippine Electric Plant Owners Association, a case involving the petitioner National Power Corporation and respondent Philippine Electric Plant Owners Association.
Group 4 was given the case of Union School International v. Charley Jane Dagdag involving a petition filed by Union School International against Charley Jane Dagdag.
Group 5 will report on the 1993 case
Group 1 was assigned the case of Renato V. Peralta v. Philippine Postal Corporation regarding a petition filed against Philpost.
Group 2 will report on Atty. Romeo M. Esmero v. President Rodrigo Roa Duterte, a case filed by a petitioner against the President.
Group 3's case is National Power Corporation v. Philippine Electric Plant Owners Association, a case involving the petitioner National Power Corporation and respondent Philippine Electric Plant Owners Association.
Group 4 was given the case of Union School International v. Charley Jane Dagdag involving a petition filed by Union School International against Charley Jane Dagdag.
Group 5 will report on the 1993 case
POL110: Introduction to Philippine Politics & Governance
GROUP NUMBER G.R NO. OF THE CASE/DATES TITLE OF THE CASE
1 G.R. No. 223395 (December RENATO V. PERALTA, (WEEK 3-4) 04,2018) PETITIONER VS. PHILIPPINE POSTAL CORPORATION (PHILPOST), REPRESENTED BY MA. JOSEFINA M DELA CRUZ IN HER CAPACITY AS POSTMASTER GENERAL AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PHILPOST, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CESAR N. SARINO, RESPONDENTS. 2 G.R No. 256288 (June 29, 2021) ATTY. ROMEO M.ESMERO, PETITIONER, VS. HIS EXCELLENCY, HONORABLE PRESIDENT, RODRIGO ROA DUTERTE, RESPONDENT 3 G.R No. 159457 (April 7, 2006) NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION, PETITIONER VS. PHILIPPINE ELECTRIC PLANT OWNERS ASSOCIATION (PEPOA), INC., RESPONDENT 4 G.R. No. 234186 (November 21, UNION SCHOOL 2018) INTERNATIONAL, REPRESENTED BY PASTOR ABRAHAM CHO (SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT), AND JENNIFER MANDAPAT (SCHOOL HEAD), PETITIONERS, VS. CHARLEY JANE DAGDAG, RESPONDENT JUAN ANTONIO, ANNA ROSARIO and JOSE ALFONSO, all surnamed OPOSA, minors, and represented by their parents ANTONIO and RIZALINA OPOSA, ROBERTA NICOLE SADIUA, 5 G.R. No. 101083 (July 30, 1993) PETITIONERS, VS. THE HONORABLE FULGENCIO S. FACTORAN, JR., in his capacity as the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, and THE HONORABLE ERIBERTO U. ROSARIO, Presiding Judge of the RTC, Makati, Branch 66, RESPONDENTS. G.R. No. 212734 (December 05, MABUHAY HOLDINGS 6 2018) CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. SEMBCORP LOGISTICS LIMITED, RESPONDENT.