EDITED IPCRF

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Proficient Teachers
Name of Employee: ANGELINA S. SANTOS Name of Rater: BELSIE D. PABILLON
Position: Teacher III Position: Head Teacher I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Lubao West/ Division of Pampanga Date of Review: July 19,2023
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated 4 5 4.500 0.315
Services Knowledge knowledge Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
and Pedagogy of content Objective 1 as Objective 1 as Objective 1 as Objective 1 as Objective 1 as
within and shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
across rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets /
curriculum inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer
teaching areas. agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms
(PPST 1.1.2) or
7.0%
No acceptable
evidence was
Efficiency Objective was Objective was No acceptable
met within the met but evidence was
allotted time. instruction shown
exceeded the
allotted time
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated 5 5 5.000 0.350
Services of teaching Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
strategies that Objective 2 as Objective 2 as Objective 2 as Objective 2 as Objective 2 as
enhance shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
learner rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets /
achievement in inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer
literacy and agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms
numeracy or
skills. 7.0% No acceptable
(PPST 1.4.2)
evidence was
shown
Efficiency Objective was Objective was No acceptable
met within the met but evidence was
allotted time. instruction shown
exceeded the
allotted time
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated 5 4.5 4.750 0.333
Services Knowledge range of Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
and Pedagogy teaching Objective 1 as Objective 1 as Objective 1 as Objective 1 as Objective 1 as
strategies to shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
develop rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets /
critical and inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer
creative agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms
thinking, as or
well as
No acceptable
other
evidence was
higher-order 7.0%
shown
thinking
skills.
(PPST 1.5.2)

Efficiency Objective was Objective was No acceptable

met within the met but evidence was
allotted time instruction shown
exceeded the
allotted time
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated 5 4.5 4.750 0.333
Services Environment classroom Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
structure to Objective 4 as Objective 4 as Objective 4 as Objective 4 as Objective 4 as
engage learners, shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
individually or in rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets /
groups, in inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer
meaningful agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms
exploration, or
discovery and 7.0% No acceptable
hands-on
evidence was
activities within
shown
a range of
physical Efficiency Objective was Objective was No acceptable
learning met within the met but evidence was
environments. allotted time instruction shown
(PPST 2.3.2) exceeded the
allotted time
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. . Managed Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated 5 5 5.000 0.350
Services Environment learner behavior Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
constructively Objective 5 as Objective 5 as Objective 5 as Objective 5 as Objective 5 as
by applying shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
positive and rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets /
non-violent inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer
discipline to agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms
ensure or
learningfocused
No acceptable
environments.
evidence was
(PPST 2.6.2) 7.0%
shown

Efficiency Objective was Objective was No acceptable

met within the met but evidence was
allotted time instruction shown
exceeded the
allotted time
Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Used Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated 5 5 5.000 0.350
Services differentiated, Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
developmentally Objective 6 as Objective 6 as Objective 6 as Objective 6 as Objective 6 as
appropriate shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
learning rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets /
experiences to inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer
address agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms
learners’ gender, or
needs, 7.0% No acceptable
strengths,
evidence was
interests and
shown
experiences.
(PPST 3.1.2) Efficiency Objective was Objective was No acceptable
met within the met but evidence was
allotted time instruction shown
exceeded the
allotted time
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated 5 5 5.000 0.350
Services and Planning managed and Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
implemented Objective 7 as Objective 7 as Objective 7 as Objective 7 as Objective 7 as
developmentally shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
sequenced rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets /
teaching and inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer
learning agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms
processes to or
meet curriculum 7.0% No acceptable
requirements
evidence was
and varied
shown
teaching
contexts. Efficiency Objective was Objective was No acceptable
(PPST 4.1.2) met within the met but evidence was
allotted time instruction shown
exceeded the
allotted time
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated Quality Planned for Reflected on Shared practices, Attended LAC No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.350
Services and Planning in collegial enriched teaching practices during teacher and sessions / FGDs / evidence was
discussions practice based on LAC sessions / learner feedback meetings / other shown
that use LAC sessions / FGDs / meetings / during LAC collegial
teacher and FGDs / meetings / other collegial sessions / FGDs / discussions that
learner other collegial discussions to meetings / other discuss
feedback to discussions plan, facilitate, and collegial teacher/learner
enrich teaching attended, as enrich teaching discussions to feedback to enrich
practice. shown in MOV 3 practice, as plan, facilitate, and instruction, as
(PPST 4.4.2) shown in MOV 3 enrich teaching shown in MOV 1
7.0%
practice, as
shown in MOV 2
Efficiency
Participated in Participated in Participated in Participated in a No acceptable
collegial collegial collegial collegial evidence was
discussions that discussions that discussions that discussion that shown
discuss teacher discuss teacher discuss teacher discusses teacher
and learner and learner and learner and learner
feedback across feedback across feedback across feedback in only
Timeliness 4 quarters 3 quarters 2 quarters 1 quarter
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 9. Selected, Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated 5 5 5.000 0.350
Services and Planning developed, Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
organized and Objective 9 as Objective 9 as Objective 9 as Objective 9 as Objective 9 as
used appropriate shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
teaching and rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets /
learning inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer
resources, agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms
including ICT, to or
address learning 7.0% No acceptable
goals.
evidence was
(PPST 4.5.2)
shown
Efficiency Objective was Objective was No acceptable
met within the met but evidence was
allotted time instruction shown
exceeded the
allotted time
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assesment 10. Designed, Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated 5 4.5 4.500 0.315
Services and Reporting selected, Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
organized and Objective 10 as Objective 10 as Objective 10 as Objective 10 as Objective 10 as
used diagnostic, shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
formative and rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets /
summative inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer
assessment agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms
strategies or
consistent with
No acceptable
curriculum
evidence was
requirements. 7.0% Efficiency Objective was Objective was No acceptable
(PPST 5.1.2) met within the met but evidence was
allotted time instruction shown
exceeded the
allotted time
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Monitored Quality Involved learner/s Monitored and Monitored and Monitored and No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.350
Services and Reporting and evaluated in monitoring and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner evidence was
learner evaluation of their progress and progress and progress and shown
progress and own progress and achievement achievement achievement
achievement achievement based on based on the based on an
using learner attainment data class attainment existing grade
attainment from an data level / department
data. 7.0% individual learner / learning area
(PPST 5.2.2) report
Efficiency
Timeliness Submitted MOV/s Submitted MOV/s Submitted MOV/s Submitted MOV/s No acceptable
show/s monitoring show/s monitoring show/s monitoring show/s monitoring evidence was
and evaluation and evaluation and evaluation and evaluation shown
done across 4 done across 3 done across 2 done in only 1
quarters quarters quarters quarter
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12. Quality Sustained Communicated Communicated Communicated No acceptable 5 5 5 5.000 0.350
Services and Reporting Communicated engagement promptly and promptly and learners’ needs, evidence was
promptly and through regular clearly using clearly using progress and shown
clearly the communication of various tools only one (1) achievement to
learners’ learners’ needs, and strategies strategy learners’ key stakeholders,
needs, progress progress and learners’ needs, needs, progress including
and achievement achievement to progress and and achievement parents/guardians
to key stakeholders, achievement to to key , but not
key stakeholders, including key stakeholders, stakeholders, regularly as
including parents/guardians including including shown in the MOV
parents/guardian , as shown in the parents/guardians parents/guardians submitted
7.0%
s. MOV submitted , as shown in the , as shown in the
(PPST 5.4.2) MOV submitted MOV submitted
contexts Efficiency
Timeliness Showed prompt Showed prompt Showed prompt Showed prompt No acceptable
communication of communication of communication of communication of evidence was
learners’ needs, learners’ needs, learners’ needs, learners’ needs, shown
progress and progress and progress and progress and
achievement achievement achievement achievement in
across 4 across 3 across 2 only 1 quarter
quarters quarters quarters
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 5. Personal 13. Applied a Quality Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.350
Services Growth and personal that details the that reflects that shows the that indicates a evidence was
Professional philosophy of consistent involvement of application of a personal shown
Development teaching that is involvement of learners in the personal philosophy of
learner-centered. learners in the teaching-learning philosophy of teaching that is
(PPST 7.1.2) teaching-learning process resulting teaching that is not
process resulting from the learner-centered learnercentered
from the application of a
application of a personal
personal philosophy of
7.0%
philosophy of teaching that is
teaching that is learner-centered
learner-centered
Efficiency
Timeliness Applied a Applied a Applied a Applied a No acceptable
personal personal personal personal evidence was
philosophy of philosophy of philosophy of philosophy of shown
teaching that is teaching that is teaching that is teaching that is
learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters in only 1 quarter
Basic Education 5. Personal 14. Set Quality Updated Discussed Set Accomplished No acceptable 5 5 5.000 0.350
Services Growth and professional professional progress on professional the e-SAT at the evidence was
Professional development development professional development beginning of the shown
Development goals based on goals during development goals based on school year as
the Philippine Phase II of the goals with the e-SAT results as evidenced by
Professional RPMS Cycle as rater during the evidenced by MOV 1
Standards for evidenced by mid-year review MOV 2
Teachers. MOV 4 as evidenced by
(PPST 7.5.2) MOV 3

7.0%
Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
acceptable MOVs acceptable MOVs acceptable acceptable MOV evidence was
MOVs shown
Timeliness All four (4) Three (3) of the Two (2) of the Only one (1) of
submitted MOVs submitted MOVs submitted MOVs the submitted
were were were MOVs was
accomplished accomplished accomplished accomplished
within the within the within the within the
prescribed prescribed prescribed prescribed
RPMS Phase RPMS Phase RPMS Phase RPMS Phase
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education Plus factor 15. Performed Quality Performed at least Performed at least Performed at least Performed at least No acceptable 5 5 5 5.000 0.1
Services various related one (1) related one (1) related one (1) related one (1) related evidence was
works / work / activity that work / activity that work / activity that work / activity that shown
activities that contributed to the contributed to the contributed to the contributed to the
contribute to teaching-learning teaching-learning teaching-learning teaching-learning
the process beyond process within the process within the process within the
teachinglearning the school / school / Community learning class as evidenced
process. Community Learning Center area/department as by the submitted
Learning Center (CLC) as evidenced by the MOV.
(CLC) as evidenced by the submitted MOV.
evidenced by the submitted MOV.
submitted MOV.
Efficiency Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that Submitted MOV that No acceptable
details the details the shows reasonable shows evidence was
2.0%
achieved positive perceived positive interlap with the considerable shown
contribution to the contribution to the actual overlap with,
teaching-learning teaching-learning teachinglearning hence
process, as process, as process, significantly
evidenced by the evidenced by the as evidenced by affecting the
annotation annotation the performance of the
provided. provided annotation actual
provided. teachinglearning
process.

Timeliness Submitted MOVs Submitted MOVs Submitted MOVs Submitted MOV/s No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was/were evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters completed in only shown
1 quarter
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
4.895
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory ANGELINA S. SANTOS BELSIE D. PABILLON
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority