Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Position Paper
Position Paper
Position Paper
Second Semester
S.Y. 2023-2024
CONTEMPORARY WORLD
PRELIMINARY TASK PERFORMANCE
The Stand
Introduction
The dispute involving Starbucks and the shanty towns in the Global South, as analyzed
by Lisandro E. Claudio, delves into the intricate relationship between multinational
corporations and marginalized communities. Claudio's examination likely delves into
how Starbucks' presence in these regions symbolizes economic inequality, cultural
appropriation, and the power dynamics inherent in globalization.
As a well-known global brand, Starbucks often represents Western consumer culture
and capitalism. When contrasted with the poverty and informal settlements of the
Global South, it initiates discussions about the consequences of corporate expansion on
local economies and customs. The existence of Starbucks in these areas raises issues
regarding gentrification, exploitation of resources, and the perpetuation of unequal
power structures.
Through his scrutiny of this controversy, Claudio sheds light on broader topics like
development, sustainability, and social justice. The interactions between Starbucks and
the shanty towns serve as a miniature representation of the larger issues present in our
interconnected world, encouraging contemplation on how businesses, governments, and
individuals can cooperate towards a fairer and more inclusive global society.
Positive Stand
Taking a positive stance on "the Starbucks and the Shanty locating the Global South" by
Lisandro E. Claudio entails acknowledging the potential benefits and opportunities that
could emerge from the interaction between multinational corporations like Starbucks
and marginalized communities in the Global South. Here are several reasons to adopt an
optimistic viewpoint on this intricate issue:
Negative Stand
Taking a negative stance on "the Starbucks and the Shanty locating the Global South" by
Lisandro E. Claudio involves acknowledging the potential drawbacks and issues that
could arise from the interaction between multinational corporations like Starbucks and
marginalized communities in the Global South. Here are several reasons to consider a
critical viewpoint on this complex issue:
Cultural Erosion: Starbucks' standardized products and global brand image may
contribute to cultural erosion by overshadowing local traditions and businesses.
This could result in the loss of cultural identity and diversity within the
community.
Social Disparities: Starbucks' entry into shanty towns might widen social
inequalities by catering primarily to wealthier consumers while neglecting the
needs of the most disadvantaged community members. This could deepen
divisions and escalate social tensions.
To sum up, adopting a critical stance on the interaction between Starbucks and shanty
towns in the Global South involves recognizing the potential negative consequences
related to labor exploitation, cultural erosion, resource depletion, gentrification, health
impacts, social disparities, environmental harm, and loss of community autonomy. This
critical perspective encourages a deeper examination of the complexities surrounding
the relationship between multinational corporations and marginalized communities in
the Global South.
Final Stand/Conclusion
In my final stance on "the Starbucks and the Shanty locating the Global South" by
Lisandro E. Claudio, I acknowledge the complex interactions between multinational
corporations like Starbucks and marginalized communities in the Global South. While
there are potential advantages such as economic opportunities and cultural exchange, it
is vital to address the significant concerns and potential negative impacts linked with
such engagements.
The presence of Starbucks in shanty towns can create job prospects and promote skill
development for local residents, contributing to economic advancement and
empowerment. However, the risks of labor exploitation, cultural standardization, and
environmental harm must not be disregarded. Prioritizing ethical business practices,
social responsibility, and sustainable development is essential to mitigate these risks
and ensure favorable outcomes for all parties involved. Preserving culture and engaging
with the community should be at the core of any corporate involvement in marginalized
regions. Multinational corporations like Starbucks should honor local customs, endorse
community initiatives, and actively enhance the welfare of residents. By fostering
partnerships grounded in mutual respect and cooperation, corporations can establish
meaningful and enduring positive impacts in these communities. Moreover, tackling
issues such as gentrification, health disparities, social inequities, and the erosion of
community autonomy demands a comprehensive and inclusive approach. Governments,
civil society organizations, and businesses need to collaborate to establish policies and
practices that foster social justice, environmental sustainability, and community
welfare.
In conclusion, while acknowledging the potential benefits of multinational
corporations operating in the Global South, it is crucial to approach these interactions
cautiously and critically. By prioritizing the needs and perspectives of marginalized
communities, advocating for responsible business conduct, and championing
sustainable development, we can strive towards a fairer and more inclusive society
where everyone has the chance to prosper. Through thoughtful deliberation,
cooperation, and a dedication to social equity, we can navigate the complexities of
corporate involvement in marginalized communities and progress towards a more
sustainable future for all.
References
Sregger, M., Battersby, P., & Siracusa J. M. (2014). The SAGE handbook of
globalization (2nd vol.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.