Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Modernity of Occultism Reflections o
The Modernity of Occultism Reflections o
Wouter J. Hanegraaff
ISBN 9789056295721
E-ISBN 9789048510597
NUR 730
All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part
of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or
transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, re-
cording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and
the author of the book.
When I moved to Amsterdam in 2004 for my new position at the Center for
History of Hermetic Philosophy and Related Currents, one of the tasks I had
to face was the organization of the master course focusing on the late modern
period, entitled “Occult Trajectories.” I was, of course, free to adapt it to my own
research interests, but the course was generally meant to offer some solid, ad-
vanced knowledge on the developments of esotericism in the period that goes
from the 18th century to our days. Soon enough, the idea occurred to me that I
could use this opportunity to make a survey of the ways in which esotericism
had interacted during that period with the environing society and culture. Every
year I would focus on a different aspect. At the end of this cycle not only would
I have a better grasp of the historical development of late-modern esotericism
– which would help me contextualize my research on particular subjects – but
I would also have enough material to write a general introduction to the his-
tory of Western esotericism in the late-modern period. In my first five years in
Amsterdam, I have devoted my courses to the following subjects: Orientalism,1
magic, feminism and gender, politics, literature, and visual arts. In the coming
years, I plan to continue this project by focusing further on a certain number
of aspects, after which the cycle will be closed and I will draw my conclusions,
hopefully producing the book I have had in mind since the beginning. More than
halfway through the cycle, some conclusions can be drawn about the ways in
which esotericism has interacted with modern Western society and culture. In
what follows, I will focus on some of them by discussing, in particular, the role
played by occultist organizations.2
| 59
... the very concept of occultism carries with it the idea that knowledge must
be a secret thing, limited to a small circle of initiates. But the same idea
is integral to Fascism. Those who dread the prospect of universal suffrage,
popular education, freedom of thought, emancipation of women, will start
off with a predilection towards secret cults.10
If one accepts the idea that knowledge and power are strictly related – and it
should be noted here that esotericists are generally inclined to share that view –
this argument seems to be more convincing, because evidence of elitist notions
of knowledge in Western esotericism is certainly not hard to find.
The third aspect seems to be added by Orwell almost as an afterthought,
and is not really explored further: “There is another link between Fascism and
magic in the profound hostility of both to the Christian ethical code.”11 This time
again the argument, if it can perhaps be applied convincingly to Yeats’ specific
case (and even of this I am not sure), appears on the whole relatively weak. In
the first place, Orwell does not explain in what sense fascism would necessarily
lead to hostility towards Christianity. In fact, several historical forms of fascism
have been far from developing hostility towards Christian churches and their
“ethical code.”12 Secondly, as we shall see, the relationship between occultism
and Christianity is much more complex than a mere straightforward attitude of
rejection.
an unexpected reaction against the very method [of the Age of Reason]
which had brought success, a wild return to archaic forms of belief, and
among the intelligentsia a sinister concentration on superstitions which had
been thought buried.17
In The Occult Underground, Webb shows how this reaction could lead, in the fol-
lowing century, to a dangerous liaison with fascism and anti-Semitism.
Since the 1970s, when Webb’s books were first published, many things have
changed. As the present volume attests, the historical study of Western esoteri-
cism has increasingly found its place in academic institutions. In recent years,
new research has shown that, if Adorno’s and Orwell’s visions of occultism may
not have been completely “wrong,” they were at the very least one-sided and
partial. An important book published in 1994 by the Anglo-American scholar
Joscelyn Godwin, The Theosophical Enlightenment, showed (as the title already sug-
gests) the extent to which 19th-century esotericism had assimilated ideas be-
longing to the cultural legacy of the Enlightenment. This made it clear that the
history of esotericism in the late-modern period could not be understood only
in the simplistic terms of a “reaction” to the rationalism of the Enlightenment.
A similar point was made, a couple of years later, by Wouter Hanegraaff in his
New Age Religion and Western Culture, which showed how late-modern esotericism
had tried to “come to terms” with the scientific, rational, and secular culture of
its age, and how this relationship could not always be understood as conflictual
or hostile.18 Since then, a significant number of studies has been published that
have led to a new understanding of the complex interaction between esotericism
and modern culture, in different periods and linguistic areas. In general, they
have focused on spiritualism, psychical research, and occultism.19 There have
Occultist Sociability
We can now proceed to examine in what ways occultism, through the creation
of particular groups and societies, may have developed its complex relation-
ship with modernity. The turn of the 20th century saw a remarkable development
of occult and esoteric organizations. One of the most famous of these was, of
course, the Theosophical Society, founded in 1875 in New York by a Russian émi-
grée, Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, together with some other persons who shared
her passion for the occult. In 1888, another important group, the Hermetic Order
of the Golden Dawn, was created in England. Unlike the Theosophical Society,
this group was focused more on magical practices and on the idea of a Western
esoteric tradition as distinct from, and not inferior to, an Eastern one. These two
groups were only the most famous and successful among many others, and the
rise of occult organizations in the second half of the 19th century is of particular
interest not only to the historian of esotericism, but also to any cultural histo-
rian focusing on that period.
Obviously, I will not dwell here on the history or the structure of these
groups, on which an abundant amount of literature is now available.21 Of more
immediate interest for us is the fact that, at the turn of the 20th century, these
occult organizations offered a social space where new conceptions of culture
and society could be formulated and experimented with. This would be in itself
a good reason – if there were no other – to argue that occultism, as part of the
larger historical body of esotericism, has contributed significantly to the shaping
of modernity, verging, in this case, rather towards the progressive, liberal pole
of the cultural and political spectrum. Interestingly enough, W.B. Yeats – who
is presented by Orwell, not without good reason, as an obvious example of the
intimate connection between fascism and occultism – was deeply and actively
involved both in the Theosophical Society and in the Order of the Golden Dawn.
This would seem to confirm my suggestion that the connection between occult-
ism and fascism was not so much a matter of structural necessity, but rather of
a contingent, idiosyncratic process of reorientation that took place – for reasons
yet to be investigated – in the period around the First World War.
I see at least five respects in which the sociability of occultism offered a
space for cultural and social experimentation: gender, body and sexuality, the
self, colonialism, religion. I would like now to focus briefly on each of them.
4. Colonialism
The end of the 19th century was also the apex of European colonialism. At that
time, not only did England rule a considerable part of the globe, but, more spe-
cifically, it also ruled two lands that were traditionally considered to be the cradle
of esoteric wisdom, Egypt and India. In this period, Orientalism served to create
a framework in which the knowledge derived from the study of these countries,
their exotic cultures, their histories, and their religious doctrines, could be as-
similated and understood by Westerners.37 This framework reinforced the idea of
a deep, fundamental distinction between the “West” and the “East”, which were
understood as having clearly separate identities.38 In the context of groups such
as the Theosophical Society and the Golden Dawn, occultists assimilated this
distinction between East and West, and then made separate choices about the
superiority of the one over the other. If the Golden Dawn was part of what has
been called the “Hermetic reaction,”39 and showed therefore an “Occidentalist”
bias in the construction of its esoteric system, the Theosophical Society, on the
other hand, manifested an opposite attitude.40 It is important to remember that
Theosophists generally opted for the primacy of an Eastern esoteric tradition
over a Western one. This had interesting implications, because it led them also
5. Religion
In England, the rise and the early development of these occult groups coincides
with the final period of the Victorian age, which has often been associated with
a crisis of religious beliefs.41 Evangelicalism, which had dominated the religious
landscape during the early part of the Victorian age, was now seriously chal-
lenged, and entered into a deep crisis. The historian Robert Ensor has observed
that there were at least three factors to consider in this crisis: the development
of the movement of Anglo-Catholicism within the Anglican church, the new dis-
coveries of science (the most famous example being, of course, the publication
of Darwin’s The Origin of Species, 1859), and hedonism, that is, the rejection of
the social model of austerity and seriousness associated with Puritanism and
evangelicalism.42 To these three we may add occultism. One of the most im-
portant aspects of the challenge that occultism offered to evangelicalism, even
when it did not wish to depart radically from Christianity (as is the case with
authors such as Aleister Crowley), was its non-literal, anti-dogmatic reading of
the sacred texts. Actually, this put it at odds not only with evangelicalism, but
also with most other traditional forms of Christianity. This hermeneutical ap-
proach had of course already a long tradition in esotericism, and, in the context
of English occultism, we find it clearly expressed by such authors as Anna Kings-
ford. As Joscelyn Godwin remarks: “The Christianity of Kingsford’s illuminations
was not historically based, did not regard Jesus as the only Son of God or as a
personal savior, and did not pretend that the Christian revelation was unique
or superior to all other religions.”43 By this attitude towards Christianity, occult-
ism was effectively contributing to the relativization of the Christian revelation,
which no longer had a unique status among other religious traditions. Far from
representing a conservative or reactionary religious attitude, in this case oc-
cultism should rather be seen as serving – consciously or not – the cause of the
incipient secularization.
Concluding Remarks
This short survey of Anglo-American occultism based on these five areas should
at the very least give an idea of how complex the relationship between esoteri-
cism and modernity was at the turn of the 20th century. I have focused on a very
specific context, that of Anglo-American occultist organizations at the end of the
19th century, but it is important to keep in mind that much of what I have argued
about them would also be true for other contexts and movements, particularly
spiritualism during the second half of the same century. What is clear in the
specific cases I have discussed here is that occultist organizations such as the
Theosophical Society and the Golden Dawn offered, among other things, a virtu-
Notes
1 While fully belonging to the cycle, this course was exceptionally offered as
a Bachelor course.
2 In using the term occultism I refer to a specific current within Western eso-
tericism that began to develop around the middle of the 19th century and
continues, with various transformations, to our days. I have presented an
overview of this current in my entry for the Brill Dictionary of Religion: Pasi,
“Occultism.”
3 In this case, I use the two terms – esotericism and occultism – interchange-
ably, because this reflects the fuzziness with which they are often used in
non-specialist literature. The problem is obviously not purely terminologi-
cal, but also conceptual.
4 Adorno, “Theses against Occultism.” For a critical analysis of this impor-
tant text see Versluis, The New Inquisitions, 95-104. See also the discussion in
Wasserstrom, “Adorno’s Kabbalah,” 66-69.
5 Orwell, “W.B. Yeats.” Either implicitly or explicitly, some authors had made
this association between occultism and right-wing totalitarianism even be-
fore the war (a case in point is the notorious book by Hermann Rauschning,
Hitler Speaks, first published in 1939), but it is not my aim here to retrace
this historical lineage in detail.
6 Already in the 1920s, Yeats developed an admiration for Mussolini and Ital-
ian fascism, in which it is also possible to perceive the influence of his
younger friend Ezra Pound. Yeats also flirted, albeit for a relatively short
Bibliography
Adorno, Theodor W., “Theses against Occultism,” in: Idem, The Stars down to Earth
and Other Essays on the Irrational in Culture, London and New York: Routledge,
1994, 128-134.
Auden, Wystan Hugh, “The Public v. the Late Mr William Butler Yeats,” in: Idem,
The Complete Works of W.H. Auden: Prose, vol. II (1939-1948), Princeton, NJ: Princ-
eton University Press, 2002, 3-7.