Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 1 - A Road Map To Effective Compensation
Chapter 1 - A Road Map To Effective Compensation
Introduction:
● For Employers, compensation systems are used to – help orgs achieve its strategies and
objectives – help attract, retain and motivate employees – have philosophical and moral
implications.
● For Employees, the compensation system – influences standard of living.
● For shareholders, the financial value of the pay system to the organization’s bottom line is
important.
● The wider society tends to view compensation – from an equity perspective – questions justice
and fairness.
● There is no “one best” compensation system that fits all firms
● Understanding why the same compensation system that is successful in one firm fails at another
firm is an essential precondition to successful compensation design.
● C anadian firms typically spend 40–70 percent of their operating budgets to compensate their
employees.
● For many firms, compensation is the single largest operating expenditure.
● According to Statistics Canada, employers in Canada are now spending nearly a trillion dollars on
wages, salaries, and benefits.
● A compensation system is one of the most powerful tools available to an employer for shaping
employee behaviour and influencing company performance, yet many fail to recognize that.
● Some compensation systems actually promote unproductive or counterproductive behaviour –
low employee motivation, poor job performance, high turnover, irresponsible behaviour, and even
employee dishonesty often have their roots in the compensation system.
● Problems as varied as organizational rigidity, inability to adapt to change, lack of innovation,
conflict between organizational units, and poor customer service may also stem, at least in part,
from the reward system.
● A compensation system that has worked well in the past can become a serious liability when
circumstances change.
● Failure to adapt reward systems to changing circumstances can cause new strategies to falter,
new organizational structures to collapse, new technologies to malfunction, and entire companies
to flounder.
● Many fail to identify the reward system as a major contributor to these problems.
● T he purpose of a compensation system is to help create a willingness among qualified persons to
join the organization and to perform the tasks the organization needs
● What this means is that employees must perceive that accepting a job with a given employer will
help them satisfy some of their own important needs.
● These include economic needs for the basic necessities of life but may also include needs for
security, social interaction, status, achievement, recognition, and growth and development.
● C
hallenges of the compensation system are more evident in organizations whose products,
services, and technologies are becoming increasingly complicated, whose environments are
more dynamic and competitive, who operate in democratic and relatively affluent societies, and
who require complicated behaviours and high performance levels from their members.
● R eward– Anything provided by the job or the organization that satisfies one or more of an
employee’s needs.
● Extrinsic rewardssatisfy basic needs for survival and security, as well as social needs and
needs for recognition – They derive from factors surrounding the job —the job context—such as
pay, supervisory behaviour, coworkers, and general working conditions.
● Intrinsic rewardssatisfy higher level needs for self-esteem, achievement, growth, and
development – They derive from factors inherent in the work itself—the job content—such as the
amount of challenge or interest the job provides, the degree of variety in the job, and the extent to
which it provides feedback and allows autonomy, as well as the meaning or significance of the
work.
Rewards vs Incentives:
● Even though rewards and incentives are often used interchangeably, but they are not
synonymous.
● Rewardsare the positive consequences of performingbehaviours desired by the organization,
and employees normally receive these rewards eithersubsequent to performing the behaviour(in
the case of extrinsic rewards) orduring performanceof the behaviour(in the case of intrinsic
rewards).
● Anincentiveis a promise that a specified rewardwill be provided if the employee performs a
specified behaviour.
● Incentives are offered to induce employees to perform behaviours that they might not otherwise
perform, or to perform these behaviours at a higher level than they otherwise would.
● Incentives are intended to induce valued behaviour, while rewards serve to recognize these
valued behaviour.
● H
owever, at a given organization, the two concepts can merge over time; as rewards when used
consistently to recognize a desired behaviour, often come to be seen as an implied promise for
performing that behaviour in the future—in other words, as an incentive.
● R eward system –The mix of intrinsic and extrinsicrewards that an organization provides to its
members.
● Compensation system –deal with the economic or monetarypart of the reward system.
● Because behaviour is affected by the total spectrum of rewards provided by the organization and
not just by compensation,the compensation systemcan never be regarded in isolation from
the overall reward system.
● This practice of looking at thetotal spectrum ofrewards—which includecareer advancement
opportunities, intrinsic characteristics of the job, work/life balance, employee recognition
programs, and a positive workplace culture, as wellascompensation— is known as the total
rewards approach to compensation
● Total rewards –A compensation philosophy that considersthe entire spectrum of rewards that
an organization may offer to employees.
● Reward strategy –Theplanfor the mix of rewards– both intrinsic and extrinsic – to be provided
to members, – along with themeansthrough which theywill be provided in order to elicit the
behaviours necessary for the org’s success.
● The reward strategy is the blueprint for creating the reward system.
● The compensation system has three main components:(1) base pay, (2) performance pay, and
(3) indirect pay
● Base pay –The foundation pay component for most employees,usually based on some unit of
time worked – an hour, a week, a month, or a year.
● Performance pay –Relates employee monetary rewardsto some measure of individual, group,
or organizational performance.
● Indirect pay –Noncash items or services that satisfya variety of specific employee needs,
sometimes known as “employee benefits.’’ – such as health protection (e.g., extended medical
and dental plans) or retirement security (e.g., pension plans).
● Compensation strategy –The plan for the mix and totalamount of base pay, performance pay,
and indirect pay to be paid to various categories of employees.
● There are two key aspects of a compensation strategy.
➢ One aspect is the mix of the three compensation components, and whether
and how this mix will vary for different employee groups.
➢ The other is the total amount of compensation to be provided to individuals
and groups.
➢ In short,“How should compensation be paid?”and“How much compensation
should be paid?” are the two key questions for compensation strategy.
● The optimal choices for these two aspects of compensation strategy ultimately depend on the
organizational context, but the most immediate determinant is the reward strategy.
● At one extreme, the reward strategy may include none of the three compensation components; at
the other extreme, compensation may be the only appreciable reward provided by an
organization.
Formulating a compensation strategy:
● T he first step in formulating a compensation strategy is to determine the role that compensation
will play in the reward system.
● Assuming organizations wish to minimize compensation costs whenever possible, we must first
identify what other rewards are being provided by the organization and determine whether these
alone are sufficient to elicit the necessary behaviour from organization members.
● For eg., volunteer work receive hours of labour for no pay as the intrinsic rewards are sufficient.
● The key point is that the amount of pay needed to attract and retain the appropriate workforce
varies with the other rewards that the organization can offer.
● For eg., banks had to change their compensation structures in recent years, as they no longer
offer job security.
● Some organizations provide jobs that have high intrinsic rewards that may attract employees
more easily than those that do not
● Firms that enjoy a high level of prestige and public esteem often find it less necessary to offer as
much pay as firms that do not enjoy such prestige. Firms that offer opportunities for learning and
development may be able to offer less pay than those that do not.
● Firms that offer many non-compensation rewards may also choose to provide relatively high
levels of compensation to attract high calibre employees and elicit high commitment and
performance.
● Another approach might be to enrich the jobs by making them more interesting, thereby
increasing intrinsic rewards.
● However, other factors come into play in this decision-making process – For example job
enrichment may not only reduce turnover but may also increase work quality. This may tip the
scales toward job enrichment or a combination approach, rather than simply increased pay
● O ptimal reward system –The reward system that addsthe most value to the organization, after
considering all its costs.
● This may not be the cheapest reward system; in some cases a high-wage compensation strategy
may be optimal.
● The eight main criteria to achieve an optimal reward and compensation system – i.e.,the goals of
the reward and compensation system:
➔ First and foremost, a reward system musthelp theorganization achieve its
goals.
➔ Second, it must fit with the organization’s strategy for achieving its goals and
support its structure for implementing that strategy –fit with and support the
organization's strategy and structure.
➔ Third, it mustattract and retain individualswhopossess the attributes necessary
to perform the required task behaviours.
➔ Fourth, it shouldpromote the entire spectrum of desiredtask behaviourfor
every organization member.
➔
Fifth, it should beseen as equitableby all organization members.
➔ Sixth, it mustcomply with all relevant lawswithinthe jurisdictions in which the firm
operates.
➔ Seventh, it must achieve all this at a cost that iswithin the financial means of the
organization.
➔ Eighth, it shouldachieve these objectives in the most cost-effective manner
possible.
● Inequitable reward system undesirable consequences for an employer, such as increased
employee turnover and reduced work motivation.
● In Canada, the circumstances under which an organization can afford an inequitable reward
system are disappearing and for most organizations, an equitable reward system is a competitive
advantage, if not a business necessity.
● The field of compensation is attracting more and more interest in the business and popular media.
● Firms with comprehensive and attractive reward and compensation systems may even find
themselves included among “Canada’s 100 Top Employers” – a significant advantage when it
comes to employee recruitment.
● TEP 1: UNDERSTAND YOUR ORGANIZATION AND YOUR PEOPLE
S
● STEP 2: FORMULATE YOUR REWARD AND COMPENSATION STRATEGY
● STEP 3: DETERMINE YOUR COMPENSATION VALUES
● STEP 4: DESIGN YOUR PERFORMANCE PAY AND INDIRECT PAY PLANS
● STEP 5: IMPLEMENT, MANAGE, EVALUATE, AND ADAPT THE COMPENSATION SYSTEM
● In small orgs, the responsibility for compensation strategy usually resides with the owner or CEO
and the compensation administration is often contracted out to firms that specialize in payroll
management.
● In larger orgs, the compensation function normally resides with the HRD, with the head of that
department bearing ultimate responsibility for the successful operation of the compensation
system.
● Typically,compensation strategy is formulated by the head of HR, based on the
recommendations of the manager of compensation, but because it is such a crucial issue for
most organizations, theapproval of top management (and often the board of directors)is
always required for major changes to compensation strategy.
● Within a large firm, there are many specialized roles for compensation specialists. For example,
job analystsdevelop job descriptions and conduct job evaluations,benefits specialistsoversee
benefits plans,compensation analystsevaluate market data, andcompensation managers
oversee the administration of the compensation system and recommend, design, and implement
compensation policies.
● Responsibility for specialized aspects of compensation (e.g., evaluating the market or managing
benefits plans) is often contracted to compensation consulting firms.
● C ompensation consulting firmshave grown in number as a result of the increasing complexity
of compensation systems and have become an important source of employment for
compensation professionals.
● In recognition of its importance in the Human Resources field, compensation has been
designated as one of the main categories of professional capabilities required for the Certified
Human Resources Professional (CHRP) designation in Canada.
C
● ompensation Analyst
● Manager of Compensation
● Vice President of Human Resources