Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CLARKE AnalysingElectroacousticMusic 2012
CLARKE AnalysingElectroacousticMusic 2012
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Wiley is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Music Analysis
MICHAEL CLARKE
Traditionally, most Western music analysis has started from a written tra
by the composer - the score - and the analytical process has focused largel
a set of discrete data relating primarily to pitch and rhythm in the form of
For the analyst of electroacoustic music, however, such an approach is not
possible or meaningful. The music may have been generated directly onto
computer by the composer, with no need for a score, and may use source
(for example, a recording of a thunderstorm) that do not easily map
traditional Western notation. So where might the analysis begin of a work
perhaps has no score, no notes and no instruments?
In recent years there has been an increase in the number of publica
concerning the analysis of electroacoustic music. These include, for ex
Françoise Barrière and Gerald Bennett (1997), Lelio Camilleri and Denis
Smalley (1998), Thomas Licata (2002), Stéphane Roy (2003) and Mary Simoni
(2006). A variety of analytical strategies have been employed in such analyses,
and in many cases interesting results have been obtained. However, all have faced
the same two problems, which have never been fully resolved: how to analyse
music which exists primarily in sound, not on the page, and how to communicate
the results of such an analysis.
In investigating the problem and proposing a possible solution, this article
begins with a discussion of the nature of electroacoustic music and the issues
involved in transcribing such works. The second part of the article introduces a
new approach, interactive aural analysis (Clarke 2005), which I first devised for
an analysis of Jonathan Harvey's Mortuos Piango , Vivos Voco (Harvey 1980 and
Clarke 2006) and which I have recently developed and expanded in analyses of
Smalley's Wind Chimes (Smalley 1987 and Clarke 2010) and Pierre Boulez's
Anthèmes 2 (Boulez 1997 and Clarke forthcoming).1
Spectromorphology
Graphic Scores
Despite the difficulty of notating electroacoustic music, most who have engaged
in analysis of this repertoire have resorted to some form of visual transcription.
Given the unsuitability of traditional notation in many cases, one solution is to
use graphic symbols to represent different sounds and to place these symbols on
a timeline, an approach which can be useful for presenting the overall shape of
a work and showing recurring gestures or textures. A good example is Roy's
(1996) annotated listening score of Francis Dhomont's Points de fuite, in which
he annotates a graphic score to indicate the hierarchical levels of his implicative
analysis of the work (Ex. 2). Another example is Leigh Landy's (1991) analysis
of Jean-Claude Risset's Sud . Here Landy uses two different charts, one to show
large-scale structure, the other to provide more detailed information. He
includes elements of traditional notation and in some cases also annotates the
symbols in order to give more precise pitch information.
However, the use of graphic symbols often presents severe limitations. First,
they are not standardised (nor could they be) and therefore cannot be read from
the page as a traditional score can. They are most useful in conjunction with
listening to the recording, but then the problem of quickly locating specific
Sonograms
A popular alternative to graphic scores, especially more recently, has been the use
of sonograms printed as examples on the page. A sonogram is a visual represen-
tation of data generated by computer analysis of a sound. The computer divides
the sound into temporal windows that are then analysed. The sonogram displays
frequency (y-axis) and amplitude (colour/grey-scale) data on a time grid (x-axis).
In theory it shows everything about a sound: every frequency component at every
time, along with its amplitude. The apparent scientific exactitude and complete-
ness of the sonogram have made this seem a very attractive option.5 Indeed, in
a number of situations sonograms can be extremely helpful, but they do have
significant limitations, especially in printed form. To begin with, they cannot be
read in detail by the human eye - it is difficult to see harmonic relationships from
the page and impossible to get more than a general sense of the colour/grey-scale
gradations relating to amplitude. When it comes to the very spectromorphologi-
cal details that are so important for electroacoustic music, such as subtle changes
in the timbrai envelope of a sound, a printed sonogram is often of little use.
Perhaps even more important, although the sonogram shows 'everything' it does
Language
Terminology forms a major part of most analyses, but this too raises particular
problems in relation to electroacoustic music. First, whereas analysis of tonal
music involves a common vocabulary with a broad range of familiar terms,
within electroacoustic music the vocabulary and techniques are much newer and
less standardised. Sometimes a particular technique is devised by a composer in
relation to a specific work and may not be employed elsewhere in the repertoire.
An analysis of electroacoustic music therefore may have not only to define its
terminology but also to introduce the techniques themselves. In introducing such
techniques it will also be important to link the technical process with the aural
significance of what is being discussed. Once again, the printed page may not be
sufficient on its own: it may be impossible to convey the musical significance of
a new technique using the written word alone.
Aural Referencing
?
<L)
I
fi
S
■8
I
1
2
cd
a
a
Vm
O
4-1
0
•S
s
g
co
1
í
S
ti
a
I
in
■M
ö
<L>
1
Ö
5
u
i
i
2
cd
a
1cd
Im
O
4-»
O
•S
g
a
0
co
•I
6
^3
.S
g
1
13
S
C/D
pj
?
V
g,
&
4-J
CÎ
•5
0
cd
1
-3
§
O
■M
O
•s
S
§
co
<N
S
s
•s
R
•O
9
S
'<U
■s
s
N
V
3
pq
ë
<u
£
00
¿j
D
C0
• H
a
«
<u
1
1
2
<u
4-1
•S
«4-1
O
*-»
0
co
a
d
§
co
1
í
s
I
f
cd
sc
ON
CO
<U
Cfl
• H
B
S
U
1a
j
D
i
.s
d
•s
<4-1
O
G
o
Im
0
1
S
8
co
'S
«
N
a>
3
o
PQ
o
&
Ö
ä
S
<u
•s
Cm
O
4-»
U
cd
a
Cm
O
M
0
■S
s
a
u
co
s
.s
•n
S
1?
g
1
e
csi
x'
W
Interactive Sonograms
The three works studied each presented different challenges to the analyst and
helped develop different aspects of interactive aural analysis. Analysing Mortuos
Piango involved investigating and presenting the detailed manipulation of precise
spectral components and new techniques for metamorphosing between timbres
and for structuring harmonic movement. Much of what was structurally signifi-
cant here lay at a level below that of what has traditionally been considered the
fundamental building block of music: the note. In Wind Chimes , the internal
nature of sounds features in a different way, and spectromorphology is used as an
important means of shaping the work, together with the subtle use of harmonic
fields. Anthèmes 2 combines traditionally notated acoustic music with live trans-
formation of these sounds by computer, and one of the challenges was to
a
o
ìww
•g
o
00
<L>
•fi
6
<ê
■M
O
•S
s
<L>
ö
00
en
iH
¿I'
NOTES
1 . This research was funded in part by a grant from the Arts and
Research Council of Great Britain in 2009.
9 . See http://logiciels.pierrecouprie.fr.
12. Occasionally this does not turn out to be the case. Ther
mercially released recordings of Smalley's Wind Chimes
2004), all with slightly different timings. The two late
performed at a fractionally slower speed than the first.
14. A much shorter version of this analysis can be found in Goldman (201 1).
This volume also contains an English version of Goldman's account of the
relationship between Anthèmes 1 anà Anthèmes 2 which previously appeared
in French in Nattiez, Boulez, Bonnefoy, Bernier, Conquer and Goldman
(2009).
15. I number sections for both versions of the work following the numbering
given in the score of Anthèmes 2. Goldman, in writing on Anthèmes (in
which sections are not numbered in the score) probably before the later
version of the work appeared, uses a different numbering.
16. There are, however, a number of errors in the musical notation of the
processes, and the MIDI data usually supplied alongside the notation are a
more reliable guide.
17. A limited version of the software Smalley used in studio 123 at GRM
does exist for Mac, but it is not exactly the same. Although the software
used in the Harvey (Music V) has also long since been superseded,
the techniques used in that work are standard and clearly documented, and
so they are easily reconstructed using contemporary software such as
Max/MSP.
18. The Sound Explorer is in part developed from ideas used by Charles
(2008) in a rather different context with help from Sam Freeman at
Huddersfield.
19. Software for creating and working with sonograms exists, as already
described, in packages such as IRCAM's AudioSculpt or GRM's Acous-
mographe. The Sound Explorer does not duplicate all aspects of such
programs but incorporates features relevant to the analytical context. There
were several reasons for developing new software for use in interactive aural
analysis. Most of all, it was important to be able to facilitate integration of
20. As one step towards broadening the scope, the author has worked with
Amanda Bayley in using somewhat similar software techniques for present-
ing her ethnographic study of Michael Finnissy's Second String Quartet
(Bayley and Clarke 2009).
REFERENCES
(Paris: L'Harmattan).
Simoni, Mary (ed.), 2006: Analytical Methods of Electroacoustic Music (London:
Taylor and Francis).
Smalley, Denis, 1986: 'Spectro-Morphology and Structuring Processes', in
Simon Emmerson (ed.), The Language of Electroacoustic Music (London:
Macmillan), pp. 61-93.
MUSICAL WORKS
NOTE ON CONTRIBUTOR
Michael Clarke is Professor of Music and Director of Research for the School
of Music, Humanities and Media at the University of Huddersfield. He has won
ABSTRACT