Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LivelihoodchallengesfacedbywomeninruralIndiaexplorationofsolutionsusingparticipatoryactionresearch PDF
LivelihoodchallengesfacedbywomeninruralIndiaexplorationofsolutionsusingparticipatoryactionresearch PDF
net/publication/376357217
CITATIONS READS
0 264
6 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Martin Kanyagui on 11 December 2023.
To cite this article: Martin Kofi Kanyagui, K. J. Sajithkumar, Yogesh Velankar, Renjith Mohan,
P. K. Viswanathan & Natalia Magnani (08 Dec 2023): Livelihood challenges faced by women
in rural India: exploration of solutions using participatory action research, Development in
Practice, DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2023.2285251
1. Introduction
In many developing countries, women in rural communities play a role in meeting the needs of their
families when they engage in income-generation activities (Nuryati, Djono, and Chotimah 2022;
Zunaidi and Maghfiroh 2021). Gogoi (2020) observed that rural Indian women contribute less to
the growth of their local communities than their urban counterparts. It was observed that programs
targeting women, such as the Assam Rural Livelihoods Mission, provided rural women with access to
income-generating activities and a platform where they could learn new skills and improve their
existing skills through appropriate training. However, despite efforts to increase women’s partici-
pation in the development process, their participation rate in the labour force was very low.
Figure 1 compares the labour-force participation rates of rural women and men within the national
context and in the State of Uttar Pradesh, where the study village is located.
As shown in Figure 1, women’s participation rates are significantly lower than men’s and have
been declining since 2017. Even though women’s participation rates are lower nationally than
men’s, the rates reported for Uttar Pradesh are lower than the national average. It is estimated
that women in India contribute to 18 per cent of the GDP, one of the lowest rates in the world,
which reflects that women make up only 25 per cent of India’s labour force. Kapsos, Silbermann,
and Bourmpoula (2014) have suggested that measurement, methodology, and occupational
CONTACT Martin Kofi Kanyagui martinkanyagui@gmail.com; jesuslovemartin@yahoo.com Amrita School for Sustainable
Futures, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, No. 36 Edamannel, Clappana P O, Amritapuri, Kollam 690525, Kerala, India
© 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
2 M. K. KANYAGUI ET AL.
Figure 1. India rural/urban LFPR based on gender. Source: Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation (MoSPI) (2022).
segregation changes have contributed to the decline in the participation rate of women in India.
They have also highlighted the need for policies that can help to reduce segregation and
promote skills development to increase the general participation levels. According to McKinsey
and Company (2018), an increase of 10 per cent in women’s labour-force participation can
account for over 70 per cent of the country’s GDP growth.
Within this study, we refer to women’s empowerment as empowering rural women who have
been denied the ability to make livelihood choices. Disempowerment thus represents the denial
of women’s ability to make these choices (Kabeer 2005). Empowerment can be explored through
three dimensions: agency, resources, and achievements, where agency represents how rural
women make decision to achieve their livelihoods; resources refer to the medium, that is the
means by which the livelihood choices are achieved; and finally, achievements are outcomes of
the choices that women make based on the means available to them within a specific context
(Kabeer 2005).
Women’s empowerment interventions are aimed at improving women’s statuses through provid-
ing educational opportunities, raising awareness of available opportunities, skills development, and
creating an environment for rural women to participate fully in society (Purnamawati and Utama
2019). Sobha and Ijmtst (2021) suggest that age, caste, educational level, and location are all impor-
tant factors influencing women’s empowerment in India.
Generally, women’s empowerment initiatives can be classified under three broad categories:
economic, social, and political empowerment. Economic empowerment involves providing
women with access to jobs, capital, and other factors that contribute to sustainable livelihoods
(Varsha et al. 2019).
The Indian government has launched several schemes, including the STEP Scheme, Rajiv
Gandhi National Creche Scheme, Mahila E-Haat, and Mahila Shakti Kendra, to promote
women’s rights and participation in decision-making (Singh and Singh 2020; Varsha et al. 2019;
Wheare 1951). The private sector in Uttar Pradesh has introduced initiatives like ITC Limited’s
Capacity Building of Women, and Inter Globe Aviation Limited’s Project 6E Shakti, all of which
are aimed at empowering women. About 81.6 per cent of 61 non-governmental organisations
DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE 3
are also actively involved in women’s empowerment initiatives (Karje and Kulkarni 2020; Singh
and Singh 2020).
Participatory Action Research (PAR) is a method that applies experiential knowledge to
address issues arising from unequal and harmful social systems, thereby fostering alternative sol-
utions (Cornish et al. 2023). It often focuses on knowledge production by treating communities
as knowledge producers. It involves local action to address social problems and promotes sus-
tainability by building local capacity and empowering local people (Anderson 2015; Barbon
et al. 2021). By working together to decide what is researched, how it is researched, and how
it benefits all stakeholders, PAR facilitates the rebalancing of power (Loewenson et al. 2014;
MacDonald 2012).
Although PAR has been used to facilitate community participation in the development process in
a variety of fields (Gogoi 2020; Kumar et al. 2021), little research seems to have been done on using
this approach to identify the fundamental issues affecting women in India, who are disproportio-
nately marginalised in rural communities, and to use those issues to generate alternative solutions
within the research context. This practice note seeks to contribute to this gap by drawing on the
practical experiences of conducting PAR to identify livelihood challenges faced by women in
Nagla Chandi, the study village, as a basis for designing sustainable solutions to empower them.
This practice note is useful for policymakers and civil society organisations interested in applying
PAR approaches to women’s empowerment initiatives in rural communities and for academic insti-
tutions keen on using an experiential learning approach to address sustainable development
research and education. It documents an innovative approach to PAR analysis within a rural
context where data are limited.
Participants sought to answer specific questions at each phase, as indicated in Figure 2. Some
tools commonly applied in PAR include journey maps, focus group discussions, role play, storytelling,
and participant interviews (Varma et al. 2021). The application of these tools has been discussed in
the section that follows.
Horticulture is another major farming activity engaged in as a source of livelihood. Most of the
women work as farmhands and are paid an average daily wage of INR 300. Furthermore, because
the social norms require them to primarily perform household chores, they are only able to
engage in other income-earning activities in the village. During non-farming seasons, men
engage in other income-earning activities such as construction and commerce.
The village members belong to the Rajput caste, an upper-caste Hindu group. Rajput is a men-
dominated caste, consisting of patrilineal clans historically linked to warriorhood. Gender roles are
traditionally defined. In traditional gender roles, men are typically responsible for providing for
the household, while women are responsible for managing the home. This dynamic is also
present in the village of Rani Mājri, located in the North Indian state of Haryana, which is mainly
populated by two castes: Lohar and Rajput. The Rajput who are traditional land owners, engage
in farming, while the Lohar are mainly blacksmiths, even though a few engage in agriculture. Partici-
pation in the waged labour force is highly gender specific, with girls and boys receiving an education
until they are 16 years old. Women’s educational merits are used as leverage in marriage nego-
tiations but women are expected to maintain traditional roles as caretakers and householders.
They cook, clean, milk, herd, forage, harvest, and refine produce. Women with small incomes have
little say in decisions involving the household economy, village development strategies, or political
or economic issues. This attitude is attributed to gendered norms, making it difficult for women to
engage in waged labour after marriage (Kvanneid 2021).
Figure 4. Focus group discussion with WSHG. Source: Field research 2023.
Figure 5. Related work on buffaloes and benefits. Source: Field research 2023.
being sold, which would maximise profit. Furthermore, income is seasonal, as milk from buffaloes
and cows is available only after the heifer is lactating, and income from field work is available
only during the farming season when planting or harvesting takes place, as shown in Table 3.
Thus, men have become the family’s primary breadwinners, as they contribute the most to house-
hold income from farming and other activities such as construction work and retailing.
Figure 8 shows the ideas generated from the discussion, related mainly to fashion and design.
Participants had several questions and needed clarification about achieving the business ideas.
Their concerns related primarily to access to capital, transport, and marketing of products; the
skills required to carry out some of the concepts needed to be improved. Rural entrepreneurs in
India face challenges such as the lack of basic amenities, education, technological awareness,
DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE 9
work–life balance, motivating factors, social norms, and insufficient technical and conceptual ability
(Audichya 2014; Rathee and Bhuntel 2017).
The participant stated that she invested INR 1,000 after the training but made no profit. The
factory that had promised to buy the product did not show up. She shut down the business
because it was not profitable. However, it has provided her with new skills to apply if she finds a
market for her products. One of the most important takeaways from her story was the importance
of developing marketing channels for products produced by rural communities to improve their live-
lihoods. The lack of essential services and resources to support start-ups has prevented WSHGs from
exploring and pursuing business ventures (Suresh Babu and Sridevi 2019).
that creating additional livelihood opportunities, caring for buffaloes and cows, and undertaking
farm work would further empower them to support their families adequately. Biswas and Banu
(2023) observed that due to limited livelihood opportunities, women in India are often dependent
on their fathers, brothers, or husbands for financial support.
Figure 12. Synthesis of challenges faced by women in Nagla Chandi and suggested solutions. Source: Field Research 2021.
Radhakrishnan (2010) advocate using multimedia and haptic technology to expand vocational edu-
cation because these technologies can effectively communicate complex concepts and skill sets to
illiterate and semi-literate people in rural communities.
3. Concluding remarks
This practice note highlights several underlying issues affecting women in the community and the
possible solutions based on the outcome of the various engagements with the participants.
The PAR process helped develop WSHG members’ skills by helping them identify their problems
and find sustainable solutions. This study has introduced WSHG members to important concepts and
DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE 13
how they can be applied to address challenges in improving livelihoods in the short term. Develop-
ment practitioners and researchers may use a similar approach to investigate other pressing con-
cerns in the domains of livelihoods, women’s empowerment, and other related areas.
Acknowledgements
This paper forms part of the E4LIFE International Doctoral Research Program being undertaken by the first author and
supported by the School of Sustainable Futures, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, India. We extend our gratitude to the
Amrita Live-in-Labs® academic program for providing support. The usual disclaimers apply.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes on contributors
Martin Kofi Kanyagui is a PhD candidate at Amrita University School of Sustainable Futures in India. He has a master’s
degree in Project Management from the University of Greenwich, United Kingdom and a BSc in Development Planning
from Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana. He has over 22 years of experience in Project/
Program/Business Management, as well as extensive knowledge of Organizational Management, International Devel-
opment and Mobilization, Planning, Research, Financial Management, and Procurement. He has coordinated and
managed project teams as an in-house manager in a variety of private and public sector jobs in the UK and Ghana.
His primary research focus relates to Water and Sanitation, Waste Management, Energy Transitions, Natural Resource
Management, Urban and Rural Development, and Sustainability. For correspondence, his email address is
martinkanyagui@gmail.com.
Dr. K. J. Sajithkumar holds the position of Senior Research Scientist at Amrita School for Sustainable Futures, Amrita
Vishwa Vidyapeetham. He earned his Ph.D. in Environmental Science from Mahatma Gandhi University, India, with
his educational background encompassing graduation, post-graduation, and a Master of Philosophy in the Environ-
mental Science discipline. His primary research focuses on wastewater treatment and energy generation utilizing
anaerobic digesters and microbial fuel cells. He is interested in sustainable waste management, bioenergy, environ-
mental pollution studies, biopolymers, and studies related to microplastic pollution. For correspondence, his email
address is sajithkumarkj@am.amrita.edu.
Dr. Yogesh Velankar holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, M.S. in Electrical Engineering, and M.Ed. in Mathematics
Education. He has worked in academia and industry across disciplinary boundaries focussing on capacity building, Insti-
tutional reforms and transformation, leadership development and related areas. His interest areas include Quality Edu-
cation and it’s interrelationship with other Sustainable Development Goals. For correspondence, his email address is
yogeshvelankar@am.amrita.edu.
Renjith Mohan is the program coordinator of Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham’s Live-in-Labs® program. He was instrumen-
tal in executing more than 150 projects across 21 Indian states. He has mentored over 1,000 Amrita University students
and 500 international exchange students. He has collaborated with faculty and researchers from more than 30 inter-
national universities. For correspondence, his email address is renjithmohan@am.amrita.edu.
P. K. Viswanathan serves as Professor (Economics & Sustainability) at the Amrita School of Business, Amritapuri, India.
He has specialized interests in the Economics of Natural Resources Management and Sustainability. He secured a PhD in
Economics from the Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore (Mysore University). His research and teaching
interests relate to Economics of Natural Resources Management; Agrarian Transformation and Rural livelihoods; Aspects
of Technology, Institutions, Policies and Governance; Climate Change impacts on natural resources, environment and
agriculture; Conservation of Biodiversity and Ecosystems; Sustainable energy policy; Globalization and its impacts on
Agriculture and Trade; Welfare Impacts of Trade Certifications in India’s Plantation Sector, etc. He has extensively pub-
lished his research in national and international peer-reviewed Journals. For correspondence, his email address is
viswanathanpk@am.amrita.edu.
Dr Natalia Magnani is Associate Professor in Environmental Sociology in the Department of Sociology and Social
Research of the University of Trento. Her research interests include the socio-ecological transition in the energy and
food systems, sustainable development, urban and rural development, and environmental conflicts. On these issues
she has published articles in various international journals such as the Journal of Rural Studies, Sustainable Production
and Consumption and Energy Research & Social Science, as well as two monographs and chapters in national and inter-
national volumes. For correspondence, her email address is natalia.magnani@unitn.it.
14 M. K. KANYAGUI ET AL.
References
Anderson, F. 2015. “The Development of Rural Sustainability Using Participatory Action Research: A Case Study from
Guatemala.” Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies 3 (1): 28–33. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2015.
31004
Audichya, S. 2014. “Rural Entrepreneurship in India: Problems and Challenges.” International Journal of Retailing & Rural
Business Perspectives 3 (4): 1315–1319.
Barbon, W. J., C. Myae, R. Vidallo, P. S. Thant, E. Monville-Oro, and J. Gonsalves. 2021. “Applying Participatory Action
Research Methods in Community-Based Adaptation with Smallholders in Myanmar.” Frontiers in Climate 3
(734053): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.734053
Bhavani, B., S. Sheshadri, and R. Unnikrishnan. 2010. “Vocational Education Technology: Rural India.” In Proceedings of
the 1st Amrita ACM-W Celebration on Women in Computing in India (pp. 1-7).
Bishop-Sambrook, C. 2016. “How to Do Reducing Rural Women’s Domestic Workload Through Labour-Saving
Technologies and Practices-Gender, Targeting and Social Inclusion.” IFAD, Rome, Italy.
Biswas, B., and N. Banu. 2023. “Economic Empowerment of Rural and Urban Women in India: A Comparative Analysis.”
Spatial Information Research 31 (1): 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-022-00472-3
Connell, E., N. MartinRogers, and A. Petersen. 2020. Mapping the Journey of Families who Have Children with Autism
Through Social and Human Services, Medical, and Education Systems. Saint Paul, MN: Wilder Research.
Cornish, F., N. Breton, U. Moreno-Tabarez, J. Delgado, M. Rua, A. de-Graft Aikins, and D. Hodgetts. 2023. “Participatory
Action Research.” Nature Reviews Methods Primers 3 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1
Gogoi, Kasturi. 2020. “Inclusion of Rural Women in the Development Process: A Study of Rural Women and Their
Livelihoods with Reference to Madhya Khangia Gaon Panchayat, Jorhat Development Block.” Journal of Critical
Reviews 7 (04): 2207–2213.
James, E., Tracesea Slater, and Alan Bucknam. 2014. “Introducing the Three Steps of Action Research: A Tool for Complex
Times and Situations.” Action Research for Business, Nonprofit, & Public Administration: A Tool for Complex Times, 1–30.
Kabeer, Naila. 2005. “Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment: A Critical Analysis of the Third Millennium
Development Goal 1” Gender & Development 13 (1): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552070512331332273
Kanagaraj, S., and V. Priya. 2020. “Skill and Capacity of Women Through Social Mobilization: Analysis of Urban Women
Self Help Groups in Coimbatore City.” Medico-Legal Update 20 (3): 1532–1537.
Kanyagui, Martin Kofi, and P. K. Viswanathan. 2022. “Water and Sanitation Services in India and Ghana: An Assessment of
Implications for Rural Health and Related SDGs.” Water Policy: wp2022079. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2022.079
Kapsos, S., A. Silbermann, and E. Bourmpoula. 2014. Why Is Female Labour Force Participation Declining So Sharply in
India? (pp. 1-51) Geneva: ILO.
Karje, Naveen, and Anjali Kulkarni. 2020. “Role of Civil Society Organisations in Women Empowerment: A Study of
SKDRDP, India”, 241–262.
Kumar, N., K. Raghunathan, A. Arrieta, A. Jilani, and S. Pandey. 2021. “The Power of the Collective Empowers Women:
Evidence From Self-Help Groups in India.” World Development 146: 105579, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
worlddev.2021.105579
Kvanneid, Aase J. 2021. “Climate Change, Gender and Rural Development: Making Sense of Coping Strategies in the
Shivalik Hills.” Contributions to Indian Sociology 55 (3): 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/00699667211059723.
Loewenson, R., A. C. Laurell, C. Hogstedt, L. D’Ambruoso, and Z. Shroff. 2014. “Participatory Action Research in Health
Systems: A Methods Reader.”
MacDonald, C. 2012. “Understanding Participatory Action Research: A Qualitative Research Methodology Option.” The
Canadian Journal of Action Research 13 (2): 34–50. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v13i2.37
McKinsey Global Institute. 2018. “The Power of Parity: Advancing Women’s Equality in Asia Pacific.” McKinsey Global
Institute (November): 22. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/growth/the_power_of_parity_advancing_womens_
equality_in_india.
Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation. 2022. “Employment Indicators in India (Source : Periodic Labour
Force Survey Reports, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation).”
Nuryati, M. N., A. Djono, and N. Chotimah. 2022. “The Role of Women in Empowering Family Economy Through
Agriculture in Koro Village.” Interdisciplinary Social Studies 1 (6): 726–732. https://doi.org/10.55324/iss.v1i6.151
Purnamawati, I. Gusti Ayu, and Made Suyana Utama. 2019. “Women’s Empowerment Strategies to Improve Their Role in
Families and Society.” International Journal of Business, Economics and Law 18 (5): 119–127.
Rathee, R., and R. Bhuntel. 2017, June. “Indian Rural Women Entrepreneurs: Challenges and Benefits.” Global Academic
Research Journal V (V): 32–38. ISBN 2347-3592. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Indian
+Rural+Women+Entrepreneurs%3A+Challenges+and+Benefits.&btnG=#d=gs_cit&t=1695453475005&u=%2Fscholar%
3Fq%3Dinfo%3A2lhwxsmy_98J%3Ascholar.google.com%2F%26output%3Dcite%26scirp%3D0%26hl%3Den:~:text=
Rathee%2C%20D.%20R.%2C%20%26%20Renu%2C%20M.%20INDIAN%20RURAL%20WOMEN%20ENTREPRENEURS%
3A%20CHALLENGES%20AND%20BENEFITS.%20Global%20Academic%20Research%20Journal%2C%205.
Singh, S., and A. Singh. 2020. “Women Empowerment in India: A Critical Analysis.” Tathapi 19 (44): 227–253.
DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE 15
Sobha, K., and Editor Ijmtst. 2021. “A Study on Women Empowerment in India.” International Journal for Modern Trends
in Science and Technology 7: 120–124.
Suresh Babu, G., and K. Sridevi. 2019. “A Study on Issues and Challenges of Startups in India.” International Journal of
Financial Management and Economics 2 (1): 44–48. https://doi.org/10.33545/26179210.2019.v2.i1a.16.
Valanidou, Floria, et al. 2021. “Children’s Life Quality: Participation, Recreation and Play ‘A Rights Based Approach to
Children’s Quality of Life’ Curriculum & Open Resource Toolbox.” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
349971413_.
Varma, D. S., K. Nandanan, P. C. Vishakh Raja, B. Soundharajan, M. L. Pérez, K. A. Sidharth, and M. V. Ramesh. 2021.
“Participatory Design Approach to Address Water Crisis in the Village of Karkatta, Jharkhand, India.” Technological
Forecasting and Social Change 172: 121002–121013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121002
Varsha, P. S., et al. 2019. “A Synthesis on Women Empowerment Initiatives in India : Role of Business & Management
Institutes.” International Journal of Business from Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s M P Birla Institute of Management,
Bengaluru 1: 11–19. http://www.mpbim.com/manage/images/pioneersuploads/eLWyOf_A%20Synthesis%20on%
20Women%20Empowerment%20Initiatives%20in%20India%20Role%20of%20Business%20&%20Management%
20Institutes%20by%20Varsha%20P.S.,%20Uday%20Tate,%20Gayathri%20Reddy%20.
Wheare, K. C. 1951. “The Constitution of India.” International Affairs 27 (4): 527–527. https://doi.org/10.2307/2608678.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Wheare%2C+K.+C.+1951.+%E2%80%9CThe
+Constitution+of+India.%E2%80%9D+International+Affairs+27%284%29&btnG=#d=gs_cit&t=1695454868113&u=
%2Fscholar%3Fq%3Dinfo%3Aca34w30SKOwJ%3Ascholar.google.com%2F%26output%3Dcite%26scirp%3D0%26hl
%3Den:~:text=Wheare%2C%20K.%20C.%20(1951).%20The%20Constitution%20of%20India.
Zunaidi, A., and F. L. Maghfiroh. 2021. “The Role of Women in Improving the Family Economy.” Dinar: Jurnal Ekonomi
dan Keuangan Islam 8 (1): 61–79. https://doi.org/10.21107/dinar.v8i1.10581