This document discusses the advantages of aggressive poker over passive poker. It notes that while some view aggressive players as reckless, there are actually controlled and uncontrolled types of aggression. Controlled aggression, like that of TAGs and LAGs, is winning poker because it allows players to win pots both with the best hand and with bluffs. Passive poker is losing because it only allows players to win at showdown and is easily exploitable by aggressive players who can steal pots by raising or betting into passive players. An example hand is given that illustrates an aggressive player raising a pair of nines pre-flop and taking down the pot when passive players fold.
This document discusses the advantages of aggressive poker over passive poker. It notes that while some view aggressive players as reckless, there are actually controlled and uncontrolled types of aggression. Controlled aggression, like that of TAGs and LAGs, is winning poker because it allows players to win pots both with the best hand and with bluffs. Passive poker is losing because it only allows players to win at showdown and is easily exploitable by aggressive players who can steal pots by raising or betting into passive players. An example hand is given that illustrates an aggressive player raising a pair of nines pre-flop and taking down the pot when passive players fold.
This document discusses the advantages of aggressive poker over passive poker. It notes that while some view aggressive players as reckless, there are actually controlled and uncontrolled types of aggression. Controlled aggression, like that of TAGs and LAGs, is winning poker because it allows players to win pots both with the best hand and with bluffs. Passive poker is losing because it only allows players to win at showdown and is easily exploitable by aggressive players who can steal pots by raising or betting into passive players. An example hand is given that illustrates an aggressive player raising a pair of nines pre-flop and taking down the pot when passive players fold.
This document discusses the advantages of aggressive poker over passive poker. It notes that while some view aggressive players as reckless, there are actually controlled and uncontrolled types of aggression. Controlled aggression, like that of TAGs and LAGs, is winning poker because it allows players to win pots both with the best hand and with bluffs. Passive poker is losing because it only allows players to win at showdown and is easily exploitable by aggressive players who can steal pots by raising or betting into passive players. An example hand is given that illustrates an aggressive player raising a pair of nines pre-flop and taking down the pot when passive players fold.
• Commit this concept to memory: aggressive poker is winning poker.
• There are two fundamental kinds of poker players in the world – passive players and aggressive ones. • Passive poker is losing poker, whereas aggressive poker is winning poker. • Let me refine this statement a bit further: Misconceptions of Aggressive Poker • People often think that an aggressive poker player is one that’s constantly betting, raising, and pushing people around at the poker table. • They are grouping good, aggressive poker players with maniacs, giving the term aggressive poker a negative connotation. • There’s a difference between controlled, well-timed aggression and uncontrolled, reckless aggression at the poker table. • In reality, there are two types of aggressive poker: – Controlled aggressive poker (TAGs and LAGs) – Uncontrolled aggressive poker (Bad Aggressive Maniacs) Why is Aggressive Poker Winning Poker?
• When we play passive poker, we can only win a hand at
showdown by making the best hand. • When we play aggressive poker, we give ourselves a chance to win with either the best or worst hand. – With the best hand, we simply bet for value and hope to extract as much money as possible from our opponents. – With the worst hand, we can bluff or semi-bluff and make our opponents fold better hands. • We’ll elaborate on the reasons to bet in the next lecture. The Downside to Passive Poker • Passive poker players are generally • The problem passive players have is risk-averse. that aggressive poker players will exploit their weaknesses: • Their goal is to play a hand as – When they limp, a good player can cheaply as possible. simply raise them out of the pot. • Rather than raise pre-flop, they – When they check, a good player can prefer to limp. bet and often make them fold. – When said player does become • Post-flop, they typically play the aggressive, a good poker player will same. realize they have a strong hand and adjust accordingly. • They play scared monsters under • All of this makes passive poker the bed poker, fearing the worst and players very easy to play against. only betting strong value hands. Example Hand: Exploiting Passive Poker
Hand Details Discussion Points
A weak-passive player from UTG open- This illustrates a typical scenario you’ll limps for 1bb, MP folds, and another regularly see at the micro stakes. relatively passive player limps in from Several passive poker players limp pre- the CO. flop, an aggressive poker player puts in The action folds around to us in the BB. a significant raise and all of the limpers We look down at 9♣ 9♥ and raise to fold. 7bb. Both UTG and CO fold and we win the hand pre-flop.