Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 - Transport Properties of The Pseudo-Binary
2 - Transport Properties of The Pseudo-Binary
2 - Transport Properties of The Pseudo-Binary
Table 1. Data on eflective massesfor bismuth telluride. It has been found that the conductivity mobility
m,, m2 and m3 are the principal efective masses for current flow in the cleavage planes at room
within a valley, azd m* is the density of states temperature is about 1200 cm‘J/V-set for electrons
effective mass and about 500 for holes for specimens studied in
ZP ___-.
I I this work.
n-type
I I p-type
A further point of interest in the work on p-type
ma unknown O.O505m, material was that the ratio of the resistivities for
mllma 1.21 4.13 current flow perpendicular and parallel to the
ma/m* 0.093 764 cleavage planes and the ratio of the two Hall co-
co? 8 0.055 0.305
efficients were both practically independent of
m+ unknown 0.51 m,
temperature over the range liquid nitrogen to room
______~_
temperature, indicating that any changes in the
The relations between the conductivity mobility form of the valence band are negligibly small over
and the Hall mobility are correspondingly affected. this range.
J. Phys. Chem. Solids Pergamon Press 1959. Vol. 8. pp. 430-433. Printed in Great Britain
(60 c/s) methods, in a vacuum cryostat operating specific electrical conductivity of ten specimens of
between 77 and approximately 600°K.* The total different compositions. Seven of these specimens of
thermal conductivitieswere measured by the method composition y = 0 (Bi,Te,), y = 1.5, 1.8, 2.1, 2.4,
described by J0~~ti.f’) 2.7, and 3.0 (B&Se,) are clearly highly degenerate
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS semiconductors over the whole temperature range
Fig. 1 shows the temperature dependence of the studied. The natural temperature coefficient of
resistivity is positive, and with the exception of
2cCQ Bi,Te,, is constant throughout the temperature
range investigated. Moreover, both the temperature
1000 coefficient of resistivity and the magnitude of the
800 conductivity decrease regularly with increasing
600
tellurium starting from B&Se, up to y = 1.5.
Specimens of these compositions are thus behaving
like semimetals rather than semiconductors.
;
2 200 This behavior may be contrasted with the semi-
2 conductor behavior represented by the composi-
b 100 tions y = 0.72 (except below 200”K), y = 0.9,
80
60
y = 1.2 (above 450°K). The energy gap deduced
from the temperature dependence of electrical con-
ductivity is of the order of 0.13 eV. This is smaller
by a factor of the order of two from the optical band
gap.t5) This factor is not difficult to explain if the
10
maximum energy in the valence band and the
6 minimum energy in the conduction band occur in
100 2w 300 400 500 600
TPK 1 different regions of K-space. It should be noted that
the compositions having the largest optical band
FIG. 1. Electrical conductivity of Bi,Tes_$ey VS.
temperature. gap in this series of alloys are those which exhibit
near intrinsic behavior around 300°K.
* Seebeck coefficients are measured relative to copper. In Fig. 2 is shown the temperature variation of
Of course this constitutes a negligible departure from
the measurement of an absolute value except near the Seebeck coefficient for the same series of alloys.
regions where the Seebeck coefficient of the alloy is in The general features of these curves are in agree-
the process of reversing sign and has a low value. ment with the conclusions drawn from the
180
100
- I ‘j
-160
100 200 300 400 500 600
-150
I
0 0.75 1.5 225 3
Y
analysis suggested by PRICE to the present series of This bonding scheme indicates that B, sites are
alloys. To do so would involve the assumption that energetically more favorable than are B, sites. Thus
the effective masses and mobilities are unchanged a Group VI element which is more electronegative
in the Bi,Te,_,Sey system as y ranges from 0 to 3. than tellurium should prefereutially occupy B, sites.
A final isotherm is shown in Fig. 6, where the At the nominal composition Bi,Te,Se all the B,
sites should be occupied by selenium and the
0 0.5 I I.5 2 2.5 39Y
remaining B, sites by tellurium. (Entropy con-
siderations may well shift the best ordered composi-
tion to y = 0.9.) The naturally occurring mineral
tetradymite (Bi,Te,S) has this structure (lo) with
sulfur occupying B, sites. Although these structures
are ordered, no superstructure lines should appear
since the B, sites are crystallographically non-
equivalent to the B, sites.
FIG. 6. The total thermal conductivity of the This model accounts for the variation in band
Bi,Te,$ey system at T = 300°K.
gap but gives no clue to the reason why the alloy
should be intrinsic at this composition when pre-
total thermal conductivity is plotted against y for pared from stoichiometric materials. It would be
values at 300°K. The expected pronounced mini- convenient if one could point to some feature in
mum is found in both the total and lattice (not the liquidus-solidus curve of the pseudo-binary
plotted) thermal conductivity. This, however, system which could be used to explain the reason
occurs in the neighborhood of y = 0.9. The for this behavior. Unfortunately the experimentally
secondary minimum behavior at y = 2 to 2.5 is determined liquidus-solidus curve shows no ano-
as yet unexplained but is in agreement with the maly at this composition.(3) For the present, it
results of ROSI, ABELES and JENSEN.(~) seems rather fortuitous that the critical point in the
The anomalous behavior of the transport pro- Seebeck coefficient of this pseudo-binary system
perties in the neighborhood y = 0.9 is also accom- should coincide with the energy gap maximum.
panied by an optical band gap anomaly observed by
AUSTIN and SHEARIX(~)The graph of band gap Acknowledgment~The authors are indebted to Mr.
versus percentage of B&Se, added to B&Tea L. C. BENNETT for his assistance, to Messrs. J. R. WIE~E
exhibits a linear variation from y = 0 to y = 0.9. and R. PYLE for alloy preparation and to the sponsors of
At y = 0.9 a cusp-like maximum appears and the the thermoelectric effects research program for their
financial support.
band gap decreases sharply at first and then more
gradually to the value for B&Se,.
The full explanation of these phenomena has not REFERENCES
yet been determined and awaits the detailed con-
1. SIANI S. S. and GORDYAKOVA G. N. 2%. tekh. fiz.
sideration of recent X-ray and Hall mobility data.
26, 2398 (1956).
However, some preliminary observations indicate 2. AIRAPETYANTS S. V., EFIMOVA B. A., STAVITSKAYA
that their explanation may lie largely in the structure T. S., STILBANS L. S. and SYSOEVA L. M.
and bonding scheme for alloys of this series. Z-h. t&h. jk 27, 2167 (1957).
Structurally this series of alloys belongs to the 3. MCHUGH J. P. and TILLER W. A. Westinghouse
Scientific Paper No. 431FD271-Pl (1958).
crystal class 9m and is isomorphous with the natur-
4. DRABBLEJ. R. and GOODMAN C. H. L, r. Phys.
ally occurring mineral tetradymite (Bi,Te,S).“O Chem. Solids. 5, 142 (1958).
The atomic arrangement is a layered structure in 5. AUSTINI. G. and SHEARD,A. r. Electronics 3, 236
which the layers repeat the unit (1957).
6. ROSI F. D., ABELESB. and JENSENR. V. Private
B,-A-B,-A-B,.B,-A-B,-A-B,, communication.
where B represents a Group VI element and A a 7. JOFF~,A. F. Canad. J. Phys. 34, 1342 (1956).
8. KOLOMOETS N. V., STAVITSKAYA T. S. and STILBANS
Group V element. DRABBLEand GOODMANhave
L. S. Zh. tekh.jk. 27, 73 (1957).
proposed a bonding scheme which explains the 9. PRICE P. J. Phys. Rev. 104, 1223 (1956).
band gap anomaly in the Bi,Te,,Se, system. 10. HARKERD. Z. KristaZZogr. 89, 175 (1934).
FF