Historical criticism involves critically examining historical sources like artifacts, documents, and oral traditions to understand events in the past. It aims to interpret events by explaining how and why they happened. There are different types of historical sources, including primary sources created during the period being studied and secondary sources that interpret primary sources. Historical critics use various methods like source criticism, form criticism, and redaction criticism to analyze sources and reconstruct the original historical context. The overall goal is to establish the most accurate understanding possible of what happened in the past.
Historical criticism involves critically examining historical sources like artifacts, documents, and oral traditions to understand events in the past. It aims to interpret events by explaining how and why they happened. There are different types of historical sources, including primary sources created during the period being studied and secondary sources that interpret primary sources. Historical critics use various methods like source criticism, form criticism, and redaction criticism to analyze sources and reconstruct the original historical context. The overall goal is to establish the most accurate understanding possible of what happened in the past.
Historical criticism involves critically examining historical sources like artifacts, documents, and oral traditions to understand events in the past. It aims to interpret events by explaining how and why they happened. There are different types of historical sources, including primary sources created during the period being studied and secondary sources that interpret primary sources. Historical critics use various methods like source criticism, form criticism, and redaction criticism to analyze sources and reconstruct the original historical context. The overall goal is to establish the most accurate understanding possible of what happened in the past.
Historical criticism involves critically examining historical sources like artifacts, documents, and oral traditions to understand events in the past. It aims to interpret events by explaining how and why they happened. There are different types of historical sources, including primary sources created during the period being studied and secondary sources that interpret primary sources. Historical critics use various methods like source criticism, form criticism, and redaction criticism to analyze sources and reconstruct the original historical context. The overall goal is to establish the most accurate understanding possible of what happened in the past.
RPH: Historical Criticism NEUST BSBIO 1-A (2023-2024)
History ● Practice of historical writing
● Comes from the Greek word Historia ● An imaginative reconstruction of the past (learning by inquiry) from the data derived from historical method ● According to Aristotle ● History of history ○ History is a systematic account of a set of natural phenomena, whether Limitations of Historical Knowledge or not chronological ordering was a ● Incompleteness of records has limited factor in the account man’s knowledge of history ● Scientific investigation of past events ● History-as-actuality ○ Whole history of the past Historians ● History-as-records ● Writers of past events ○ Surviving records and are only a tiny part of the whole phenomenon Sources / Sciences ● Archeology Verisimilitude ○ Artifacts ● Aim of the historians (truth, authenticity, and ○ Determination of life, culture, plausibility) about the past customs, etc. ● Geology History ○ Location and landscapes ● Subjective process as documents and relics ● Linguist are scattered and do not comprise the total ○ Trace of language object that the historian is studying ● Scientist ○ Biologists and biochemists Historical Method ● Process of critically examining and Types of History analyzing the records and survival of the ● Factual History past ○ History based on facts or what is presented Historical Analysis ○ Answers the questions: what, when, ● Select the subject to investigate where, and who ● Collect probable sources of information ○ Gives plain and basic information about the subject about the event ● Examine the genuineness, in part of in ○ Presents the reader the plain and whole basic information vis-a-vis or in ● Extract credible particulars from the source relation to events that took place, as well as settings and the people Historical Data involved ● Sourced from artifacts that have been left by ● Speculative History the past ○ Answers the questions: how and ● Relics or remains why ○ Artifacts that offers researchers a ○ Goes beyond the facts clue about the past ○ Concerned about the concept of ● Testimonies of witnesses causality and the manner in which ○ Oral or written the event happened ○ May have been created to serve as records or some other purposes Historiography RPH: Historical Criticism NEUST BSBIO 1-A (2023-2024)
Historians deal with the: ● First-hand information of an event or period
● Dynamic or genetic that are usually written or made during or ○ The becoming close to the event or period ● Static ● Original and factual ○ The being Secondary sources Historians aim at the: ● Materials made by people long after the ● Interpretative event has been described ○ Explaining why and how things ● Analyzes and interprets primary source happened and were interrelated ● Descriptive Historical Criticism ○ Telling what happened, when, ● Examines the origins of the earliest text to where, and who took part appreciate the underlying circumstances upon which the text came to be Written Sources of History ● Sensus literalis historicus ● Narrative or Literature ○ To discover the original meaning of ○ Chronicles or tracts presented in the text in its primitive or historical narrative form context and its literal sense ○ Written to impart a message ● Diplomatic Sources To establish a reconstruction of the historical ○ Those which document record an situation of the author and recipients of the text existing legal situation or create a ● Source criticism new one ○ Analyzes and studies the sources ○ Purest and best source used by biblical authors ○ Government documents ● Form criticism ● Social Documents ○ Seeks to determine a unit’s original ○ Information pertaining to economic, form and historical context of the social, political, or judicial literary tradition significance ● Redaction criticism ○ Record kept by bureaucracies ○ Regards the author of the text as ○ Government reports and research editor of the source material findings ● Tradition criticism ○ Attempts to trace the development Non-written sources of History stages of the oral tradition from its ● Material evidence historical emergence to its literary ○ Archeological evidence is one of the presentation most important unwritten evidence ● Canonical criticism ○ Artistic creations: pottery and jewelry ○ Focuses its interpretation of the bible ● Oral evidence on the text of biblical canon ○ Tales and sagas of people ○ Folk songs or popular rituals from the premodern period of the Philippine history