Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project 5 Curing Agent
Project 5 Curing Agent
OBJECTIVE :
1) To evaluate A51, ZDBC and ZDEC performance using a ratio of 5:2 and 6:2.
METHODOLOGY
1) The L6 and L8 current compounding latex formulations remain but with different
curing agent which are ZDBC and ZDEC.
2) Thus, there are three sets to be compared; one is the control set ( A51 ), Set 2
(ZDBC:ZDEC=5:2) and Set 3 (ZDBC:ZDEC=6:2) by using same formulation except
the ratio used.
3) The hand dip was conducted at F22 Line 6 on 22nd June 2022.
4) Several analysis were conducted such as visual observation, stripping performance,
Stability test, FAB test and ASTM test.
DEPARTMENT: PRODUCTION
LINE 5
COMPOUND 21/6/2022 2:00 PM
HANDIP 22/6/2022 2:00 PM
SET A51 ZDBC:ZDEC=5:2 ZDBC:ZDEC=6:2
(CONTROL SET) (SET 2) (SET 3)
LATEX phr
80K 20N 100
CHEMICAL
KOH 2.00
OCTOSOL 0.50
AMMONIA 0.50
SULPHUR 60% 1.00
A51 1.00
ZDBC 0.71 0.75
ZDEC 0.29 0.25
XIAMETER 0.05
TIO2 1.60
VULTAMOL 0.60
Active ZnO 2.50
Table 1.1 : Formulation for compounding latex for Control Set, Set 2 and Set 3. All
sets are double dipped
Line parameters:
Remarks: 4 main ovens and FDO were operating during the handip with 24K line
speed.
2) MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
I. FAB TEST
Remarks:
a) All sets failed Before Aging (BA) and After Aging (AA) for FAB test.
b) After Aging values for A51 and Set 2 are more than Before Aging
c) Set 3 After Aging value less than Before Aging
Remarks:
a) All sets passed for Tensile Strength for BA and failed for Set 3 After Aging (AA).
b) Only control set passed for Elogation BA and AA.
c) Control Set has the better elogation performance compare to Set 2 and Set 3.
3) GLOVE STRIPPING PERFORMANCE
4) STABILITY TEST
SAMPLE AVERAGE
HEAT STABILITY (g) CHEMICAL STABILITY (g)
STANDARD ≤3 ≤1
REQUIREMENT
A51 0.113 0.061
(CONTROLLER)
ZDBC:ZDEC=5:2 0.088 0.054
(SET 2)
ZDBC:ZDEC=6:2 0.051 0.050
(SET 3)
Remarks:
a) All sets able to pass for heat and chemical stability tests.
b) However, Set 3 with ratio 6:2 shows lowest stability reading (most stable)
compare to Control Set and Set 2
5) GLOVE VISUAL OBSERVATION
SAMPLE OBSERVATION REMARKS
A51 No visual defects
(CONTROL)
Remarks: Control Set does not have any visual defects, but Set 2 and Set 3 have
minor pinholes.
6) SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
7) CONCLUSION
a) All sets failed Before Aging (BA) and After Aging (AA) for FAB test.
d) Control set does not have any visual defects compare to Set 2 and Set 3
e) Control set passed for Before Aging (BA) and After Aging (AA) but
Set 2 failed both.
f) Set 3 failed Before Aging (BA) but passed for After Aging (AA)
ASTM test.
g) Set 2 has 14% FAB improvement for After Aging compare to control
set.
8) FUTURE PLAN
a) To carry out trial run for single dispersion ZDBC and ZDEC with
different ratio which are 1:2, and 1:3.
9) APPENDIX
Collect AA Gloves
FAB Test
ASTM Test