2023-24SY Health Assessment CER – Resiliency and Trafficking Awareness

Student Name: _____________________________________ Teacher: ___________________________ Period: __________ Grade: ____________

GUIDING QUESTION: Are vulnerable youth at higher risk for exploitation and potential trafficking of teens?
Claim, Evidence and Reasoning Assignment Directions: State your claim based on the guiding question (reword to state your claim). Then find evidence to support
your claim. Use at least 3 varied sources from reliable, valid and scientific resources. Build your reasoning based on the evidence you have collected, by stating
how some portion of the evidence collected has proven your claim (or in some cases how it proved the contrary). Be prepared to show the resources used to
teacher. Use this form to organize and prepare your CER and submit for a grade. Review Rubric to assist with expectations of how CER will be evaluated.

Claim: (10 points)

Evidence: (40 points) Reasoning: (40 points)

Document the evidence (direct text, quotes, graphs, charts, etc.) to support How does this evidence you provided support your claim? Be specific, explain in
your claim. detail how the evidence you found supports or provides substantial reasoning to
your claim.

Sources: include direct links/sites and page numbers (10 points)

https://safesupportivelearning.ed.gov/human-trafficking-americas-schools/risk-factors#:~:text=Although%20there%20is%20no%20standard,susceptible%20(see%20Figure
%201).&text=Researchers%20have%20found%20that%20sex,esteem%2C%20and%20minimal%20social%20support.
Health Assessment CER – SCORING RUBRIC- 100 points
Evaluation Areas: 0 points 5 points
CLAIM Nothing Student response is not a claim
provided that answers the question by
choosing a side within the
statement, but a solid attempt
was made
SOURCES Nothing Student has included sources,
provided but they are not the most valid
or reliable choices or are
inaccurate sites not based on
researched scientific facts.
Must include full site for
accessibility of teacher to verify
0 points 10 points
EVIDENCE Nothing Student documentation may be
provided varied, but if the
documentation is inaccurate
and cannot be
verified/checked, evaluator
cannot determine if sources
are valid and reliable student
cannot receive more than 10
points and 5 on sources.
REASONING Nothing Student attempted a response
provided that is missing specific details
of how their evidence supports
their claim. They may also
possibly begin proving their
claim is not accurate once
investigated further. Student
who cannot find evidence-
supporting claim may adjust
claim and include in
explanation.
10 points
Students claim is clearly
depicting the statement,
determining which path
the student will be
investigating evidence
to support or prove
their claim
Student has detailed
sources form valid,
reliable and scientific
sites, with links, and
page found referenced.
Also includes 3 sources
for their evidence.
20 points 30 points 40 points
Student includes Student includes Student includes a variety of
documentation of documentation of documentation of evidence
evidence supporting evidence supporting their supporting their claim (direct
their claim, but it is not claim, but only one type, text, quotes, links, resources,
from valid or reliable although 3 sources are graphs, charts, etc.) This
sources or is not listed. Evidence does not documentation adds to the
specifically connected to support the scope and depth and scope of evidence
their evidence and acts depth of the claim. represented and provides a
more like a reference. challenge if their claim is
inaccurate and may further
provide evidence for the
counterclaim.
Students reasoning is Student includes Student includes explanation,
not dependent on the explanation including both why and how the
evidence and represents either why or how their evidence supports the claim
more of a continued evidence supports their or has supported the
statement of their claim, claim, but only one type. opposite. If their evidence is
not an evidenced-based Their reasoning is not not soundly supporting their
explanation. complete without claim, their reasoning may
evidence that is utilized not be thorough causing
in their explanation as to them to reconsider their
how they developed claim (must include
their reasoning. explanation as well).