This document contains a survey questionnaire about the Lupon Tagapamayapa, a community dispute resolution body in the Philippines. The survey asks respondents to rate their level of agreement with statements about the Lupon Tagapamayapa's decision making quality and effectiveness. Respondents are asked to indicate their frequency of observation of certain conciliation efforts, issuance of certificates, enforcement of rules, and application of legal procedures by the Lupon Tagapamayapa. The survey contains multiple indicators and statements within each category for respondents to provide ratings.
This document contains a survey questionnaire about the Lupon Tagapamayapa, a community dispute resolution body in the Philippines. The survey asks respondents to rate their level of agreement with statements about the Lupon Tagapamayapa's decision making quality and effectiveness. Respondents are asked to indicate their frequency of observation of certain conciliation efforts, issuance of certificates, enforcement of rules, and application of legal procedures by the Lupon Tagapamayapa. The survey contains multiple indicators and statements within each category for respondents to provide ratings.
This document contains a survey questionnaire about the Lupon Tagapamayapa, a community dispute resolution body in the Philippines. The survey asks respondents to rate their level of agreement with statements about the Lupon Tagapamayapa's decision making quality and effectiveness. Respondents are asked to indicate their frequency of observation of certain conciliation efforts, issuance of certificates, enforcement of rules, and application of legal procedures by the Lupon Tagapamayapa. The survey contains multiple indicators and statements within each category for respondents to provide ratings.
Personal Information: Instruction: Please provide the answers needed in each
item by filling out the spaces provided for.
Survey Questionnaire: Name (Optional): ___________________ Instruction: Listed below is a series of statements that represent feelings that individuals might have about the Lupon Tagapamayapa. With respect to your personal observations, please indicate the degree of your agreement or disagreement with each statement by checking a number from 1 to 6 using the scale below.
4– Strongly agree 3– Agree 2 – Disagree 1 – Never
Decision Making Quality Scale
Indicators No Statements 4 3 2 1 .
1. Have a Systematic, structured approach to aid decision making
(consistent, predictable and timely). 2. Assign clear roles and responsibilities (decision makers,advisors, Structure and information providers). Approach 3. The organization of lupong tagapamayapa can met the importance to the society. 4. Regular decision strategy based on facts. 5. Protect the public interest. 1. Assign values and relative importance to decision criteria. 2. Evaluate both internal and external influence/biases. Evaluation 3. Examine alternative solutions. 4. Consider uncertainty. 5. Re-evaluate as new information becomes available.
Impact 1. Perform impact analysis of the decision.
2. Decision making may influence to arise various impact.
3. Experience can emerge the positive and negative effects.
4. Acting fairly and justly in accordance with law. 5. High levels of work performance and service.
Transparency 1. Ensure transparency and provide a record trail.
and Communication 2. Actual objective can resolve dispute. 3. Fairness may lead to a real settlement. 4. Inapproapriate procedure may result disputes. 5. Make a good decision in both parties. Instruction: Listed below is a series of statements that represent feelings that individuals might have about the Lupon Tagapamayapa. With respect to your personal observations, please indicate the frequency of use with each statement by checking a number from 1 to 6 using the scale below.
4- Always 3- Often time 2- Sometime 1- Never
Effectiveness of Lupong Tagapamayapa Scale
Indicators No. Statements 4 3 2 1
The Lupong Members know their duties and 1. Conciliation efforts to responsibilities. reconcile parties The Lupong Members attend regular meetings and 2. hearings. Lupong Members explained the extent of power and 3. process. 4. I was entertain with my complaint and/or counterclaim. I was interview and interrogated for the fact of the 5. case. Issuance of Certificate 1. The office of the Lupong Tagapamayapa is accessible. to File Action 2. Issue certificate to file action when conciliation is not successful. 3. Issue summon between two disputing people or groups. 4. The negotiator between the two parties must provide the time and place. 5. the conciliator and parties must receive authenticated settlement agreement Enforcement 1. The Lupong members strictly implement the conditions of Rules laid for reconciliation. 2. The Lupong members are fair and just. 3. Need to follow the rules to achieve effective conciliation. 4. Review cases to resolve conflicts harmoniously.
5. Procedural policy in exercise of its powers and duties.
Proper Application of 1. Law and rules of conciliation process are compulsory
the Legal Procedures for both parties. 2. I am advise on the proper procedures. 3. Lupong Members drafted a written complaint and/or counter claim for filing 4. I receive a summon and/or notice of hearing. 5. The Lupong member gave recommendations and necessary conditions.